| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
For me it's a pity to end such an inspiring conversation. Anyway, obviously is up to you :-).
|
12-07-07 04:27am
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Thanks for explanation; that's the way I've already answered :-).
|
12-06-07 05:17am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> But chasing gold has never made for a better human being.
Sometimes gold comes out as a nice side effect of efforts to change this world. As you're RagingBuddhist, changing the world is probably contrary to your principles too, but sometimes it changes the world to the better :-). Moreover, someone chasing gold can change the world to the better even without aiming it. I think Bill Gates is one such example; despite my negative (to put it mildly) opinion on him (his business practices back 10 years ago were really atrocious), I should admit that he has made substantial contribution towards Internet culture and associated freedom of communication and knowledge.
|
12-06-07 05:15am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
giants, did you mean "to watch" or "to do"? These are different things for me :-).
|
12-05-07 02:53am
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
+1
|
12-05-07 02:50am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What THEY say is that it is not a wallet, but something that the guy has achieved in life (with money being one of achievements - if they're not inherited but earned). The bad thing is that they don't know themselves how much of it is about achievements and how much is about hard cash :-).
|
12-05-07 02:46am
|
Reply
257
|
Public Invasion
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
> Hopefully that happens one day, because that would be
incredibly hot. We can all hope.
Fat chance :-((. The closest thing to "real reality" I've ever seen is on UltimateSurrender and DareRing (on both sites they're hired models but action seems to be unscripted, though in different way), or on NudeInPublic / NudeInPublic.tv (girls are hired models in real environment with onlookers). If you know of any other site which doesn't have scripts, please let me know :-).
|
12-04-07 11:07am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Uhhhhh, size of what? My wallet?
In certain cases size of wallet can be a good substitute :-).
|
12-04-07 04:07am
|
Reply
259
|
I Am Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
nige1960's Comment
And what billing company it was? We need to know not only Bad Guys, but Good Guys too :-).
|
12-03-07 09:46am
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> trying to convince women that this |-----------------------------------| is seven inches.
No problem to convince them about it - you just need a font (or monitor) big enough :-).
|
12-03-07 09:44am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't think it will happen this way. IMHO it is driven mostly by customer's opinion and models won't be able to change anything :-(. For each one going condom-only there will be ten willing to do condomless.
|
11-30-07 01:44am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
I've put 'Epoch' because of BlacksOnBlondes form with 2 pre-checked "free 1 day trial auto-renewable at $20/month" checkboxes (see my comment on BlacksOnBlondes for details). No other negative experiences with processors (it's funny, but my experiences with non-adult CC processors are MUCH worse than with adult ones).
|
11-29-07 02:36am
|
Reply
263
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Reply
> Well, LOL, you are obviously correct.
:-)
> At least I occasionally like the illusion of reality.
Me either, but I prefer "real reality" sites like UltimateSurrender, where it is known that they're models (well, no way around it), but the action is unscripted, or like NudeInPublic, where action is scripted but not completely (at least onlookers aren't scripted). Unfortunately, there are very few decent sites like this (not much besides UltimateSurrender) :-(.
|
11-28-07 06:04am
|
Reply
264
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Comment
Real women? In porn? Are you serious? Professional models in more or less real situations, that's the most we can expect IMHO, and all the b/s from BangBus and other "reality" sites along the lines of "we've met this girl on street and made her fuck us in 15 minutes" is just as it is - s**t that comes from a bull.
|
11-28-07 01:46am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'd still say that it is necessary to start doing something. Unfortunately, I have no idea what exactly can be done :-((.
|
11-28-07 01:40am
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> I guess it starts with you, me and others out there to suggest that porn movies should be all condom.
The problem is to bring this message to the public and producers :-(.
|
11-27-07 02:38am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Anyway one down, one to go.
:-). Thanks a lot, it will help.
Question to admins: given this discussion, don't you think it is a good idea to have separate (from sites) rating/comments of credit card processors? Might be difficult to implement, but should be very useful for this community. Or at least to make another type of "rating" poll (with ratings) and make the first such poll about credit card processors?
|
11-27-07 02:04am
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
> But think it would be great if you submited yours too, you might have a better angle on it with "the WORST" processor.
Submitted, let's see if it comes out.
|
11-26-07 12:09pm
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
> That would be an interesting topic for next poll.
You're right; will you submit it yourself or want me to do it? (to fit it into current poll system, I'll probably make it something like "Which CC processor do you think is the WORST?")
> Myself, I allways see it as a big plus if a site is ccbill caus i never had any problems with them
Ditto.
|
11-26-07 04:12am
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Please shout LOUDLY if you recognize them (maybe in site comments?). It's really important to know who's who in this business.
|
11-26-07 04:08am
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> This technique has nabbed two "unscrupulous" sites that rebilled after I cancelled a subscription (it was not ccBill, by the way)
Wow, and can you tell which processors were involved (it is processor which is of interest here)?
|
11-26-07 02:39am
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Completely agree. Plus condom-only porn would play an important role in educating people (especially young ones) to use condoms in their private lives. The only minor thing left is to make it happen :-(.
|
11-26-07 02:25am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> I think you'd agree that none of us eat it straight from the source
It's not exactly "straight from the source" either; IMHO, getting it from other guy's poorly washed hands via handshake differs only in quantity, and I have no idea if this difference in quantity makes difference from medical point of view.
> The industry probably doesn't want this kind of information made public.
Come on, this is not the industry where I'd expect conspiracy (they're not tobacco companies after all :-)). More likely doctors just cannot imagine that somebody in sane mind will do it (unlike A2P, which they warn about).
|
11-26-07 02:20am
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
And about condoms and STDs - here I agree that it is definitely a risk, but... that's the way people like to see it and until it changes, I don't think industry will go for condomless porn.
|
11-24-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> To them I say you eat shit and then tell me you feel OK
Strictly speaking, some very small amounts of shit get into people mouths all the time (it's not sterile world after all), and the only difference between this and eating shit is that of amounts, with A2M somewhere in between (don't forget that models wash themselves very thoroughly before doing it). So without any medical opinion (doctors don't rush to advise on it, unlike A2P) I still have no idea if it's really dangerous.
|
11-24-07 07:17pm
|
