Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
149.99? Wow! If not a secret, what's the name of the site? (should have been something REALLY great to warrant such big spending, shouldn't it?)
|
12-31-07 10:48am
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> if all porn was condom only, then any teen/young person who saw that
> would probably think that it's a good idea for him to wear a condom or
> her to ask that her partner does as well.
Exactly my point. On the other hand, I'm not that optimistic that it is possible to make ALL porn condom-only, and think that there are much better chances to make SOME porn condom-only, but restrict TEENS exclusively to this SOME condom-only porn (and even if this last restriction will be only 80-90% successful, it would still be a positive thing).
|
12-26-07 05:33am
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> We know everything at that age, and our parents are the ignorant ones
Right! Exactly my point.
> You and I both know that since the hardcore porn exist most will bypass the mild stuff, and go for the hardcore one.
Sure, but my point is that even hardcore can easily be educational and promote desired behavior, so it is not about it being softcore. My point is that if there will be hardcore but with condoms all the way and with models/actors showing care for each other, it should be enough for a teen to stop looking for something more hard, and on the other hand will get used to the view that a guy ALWAYS puts a condom before starting sex. As I remember myself as a teen, I would definitely NOT try looking for anal or BDSM or anything else if I'd be able to see just simple plain hardcore, with condoms or not; and the younger the teen - the less chances for him to try going further, that's a good thing too. Compare it to what we have now: when teen starts looking for porn (and he starts for sure), most likely he'll find some stuff where women are treated like s**t, and/or all kinds of things which are really harmful at that age, from A2M to WS and beastiality; don't you think that if he would run into hardcore, but condom-only and "caring" porn, it would be much better for him?
|
12-21-07 03:03am
|
Reply
229
|
Dirty Babysitter
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
I tend to agree (if you're interested in details, please see my review).
|
12-20-07 11:41am
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
First of all, thanks a lot for taking it seriously (which I'm sure it deserves).
> I'm really tired of reading about teenagers having babies and how
> cute it all is.
Cute? Not until parents are making conscious decision to have a child, and I don't see how it can happen until about 20 (on the other hand, I think that waiting until 35 isn't really good either).
In general, I agree with you on most of the points, except one: I'm sure that influence of "educational porn" will be more significant than parent's talk (and in ANY case it will have positive effects in promoting responsible behavior, so it will help rather than hurt). The reasons are two-fold: first, teens in range of 13-17 tend to live in their own world, with one of the main rules "ignore what parents say", so while as a parent I spend significant time in such talks and there is enough trust between me and my children when we're talking to each other, I'm still afraid that when they're with the other teens, they can EASILY forget all our talks (probably they will be sorry later, but it might be too late).
Second, it will hopefully distract kids from extreme porn (which they will watch regardless of controls; keeping dedicated and smart 16-year-old from bypassing all the controls is IMHO hopeless, and to make things worse, the more extreme stuff is, the less companies that run such sites tend to abide by rules like site labeling).
|
12-20-07 03:53am
|
Reply
231
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
:-). No, personally I don't like big black dicks (or any dicks whatsoever), but seeing them within the hot girls - that's completely different story :-).
|
12-19-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
232
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
I see; everybody has his own fetishes :-), and I was trying to highlight who is this site was made for; personally I'm not that big fan of dicks but should admit big black dicks and group sex add variety, and variety is the king for me personally.
|
12-19-07 11:54am
|
Reply
233
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Good hint, thanks :-).
|
12-19-07 12:39am
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> Children should never watch that stuff.
With most of them are fucking like RABBITS at 17, do you think that ANY porn will really harm them? This is not rhetorical question as it might seem; I can't agree more that there should be a difference depending on type of stuff, and that anywhere extreme or condomless should be avoided, and that currently you won't be able to find anything besides that, but if somebody would produce love/educational stuff with right connotations (love, care about partner, using condoms and so on), don't you think it would be more useful for , say, 17-year "children" to watch it than not watch it?
|
12-19-07 12:03am
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I used to think this is your quote I've answered: "the first three answer options in this poll are not options at all", isn't it?
|
12-18-07 11:57pm
|
Reply
236
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
What's the big deal if dicks are really big and black (well, they're not that big as one on FreaksOfCock, but still not an average dick, and not even an average porn dick)?
|
12-18-07 11:53pm
|
Reply
237
|
Dollar Act
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
To make a change in a pattern of our recent disagreements :-), I should agree with you here - it does look suspicious. There is also just one thing that puzzles me - how one of these guys managed to get "trust" rating by Marianna? Maybe she should check if her password was stolen/guessed?
|
12-18-07 12:54pm
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
> rather allowing them to go out to a bar where many provide fake ids and go seriously overboard.
And I should add it's a lot safer to start drinking (illegally) in small amounts at 16, rather than to get absolutely drunk on perfectly legal grounds all at once when child turns 18 and happily brings his ID to the bar.
On the other hand, aren't these laws there meant to protect children? If so, why we should sit and silently agree with laws which in fact HARM our children (if alternative options are safer, it means that the law at least isn't as good as it should be)?
|
12-18-07 12:31pm
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> the first three answer options in this poll are not options at all
They can easily be options if interpreting the question the way as I've read it ("what would you do if you were making laws") or another way "what would you do if it would be legal"?
And as I understand US law (which I can easily misunderstand as I'm not a lawyer), this question and answers to it cannot possibly be illegal (in modern US; I'm not speaking of Iran or Orwell's Oceania, where most likely even thought about it would be punished) as they're covered by the First Amendment. Right to DISCUSS things freely is a fundamental right in modern liberal society, so let's not fear to DISCUSS even the most controversial (and even potentially illegal) issues.
|
12-18-07 10:48am
|
Reply
240
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
cerebral's Reply
Thanks :-)
|
12-17-07 02:00pm
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
When I've seen this question, I've interpreted it as "if you were making laws, at what age would you make it legal to watch porn?"
And if I would make such laws, I would definitely put very big difference between 'mild' and even 'educational' porn (come on, average age of having first sex is about 15 years old (!)) - which should be legal at least from the age 15, and probably even earlier, especially if it promotes condoms and responsible behavior, and 'extreme' porn (which should be banned at least until 25). I'm 200% sure that porn that promotes condoms (by using them all the time) will do much more to ensure youngsters having safe sex then any blatant kind of propaganda (which teens tend to hate a LOT, and I cannot blame them).
|
12-17-07 01:58pm
|
Reply
242
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Come on, there is no need to go that personal; I'm sure there are LOTS of people like me out there. See for instance review of m64bob. BTW, if being exact, it is not only cock which is covered, pussies are also covered, aren't they?
|
12-14-07 05:15am
|
Reply
243
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Just put it in caps so it will be obvious on the first glance at the review :-).
|
12-14-07 05:08am
|
Reply
244
|
Just Jannah
(0)
|
Reply of
bootiger's Comment
It's amazing how far some people can go with "protecting" content. It's even more amazing how they cannot understand that it not only doesn't make any sense technically (bypassing it is not a rocket science for sure), but how much money they lose because of these tricks. Kudos to all the sites who avoid DRM (and cheap tricks like disabling right mouse clicks), and shame to those who use it.
|
12-14-07 05:06am
|
Reply
245
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> If you do not like authentic Japanese porn, don't join.
While it's still possible to argue about the term "authentic", there is no point in it. What about the following: you will write in caps in your reviews of such sites: "THOSE WHO DON'T LIKE MOSAICS DON'T BOTHER", and I (and people alike) will never join such a site. Deal? :-)
|
12-14-07 03:52am
|
Reply
246
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Quite a difficult question. For example, if I review site with lesbianism and I like it, but I don't like the way it's shot, should I lower the rating? Probably yes. Moreover, even if EVERYBODY does it "wrong" (from my point of view), but there is one site that does it "right" - should I make the ratings different? Probably yes too. But this is exactly the case which we're discussing - there are tons of sites with "mosaics", but there are a few without; should I put higher rating for those without if I hate mosaics? I think so.
PS Not that I personally will ever knowingly join the site which has mosaics - that's what PU is for :-); the main thing is to make it clear in review, and the rest is not THAT important.
|
12-13-07 06:31am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Voted and was really surprised with current results: 4 out of 4 said "twenties" :-).
|
12-13-07 03:53am
|
Reply
248
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I guess for the genitally obsessed, this would not be a good site.
For me it's not about genital obsession, it is about distraction and feeling that something is "f****ng censored". If there won't be any genitals from the very beginning (for example, using only angles with no genitals in sight) it wouldn't be a problem for me, but this mosaic drives me nuts (I hate censorship in any form; for me it's even worth than DRM :-) ).
> Material such as you mention, if produced in Japan, is a crime.
As far as I've heard, it is a crime NOT to produce, but to PUBLISH it in Japan (otherwise nobody would be able to shoot any porn or even erotic there as genitals aren't covered with mosaic when the actual thing happens :-) ).
If it is really the case, then it is perfectly legal to sell some uncensored footage to US company (maybe with a restriction "not to show/sell to Japanese users") which will be able to sell uncensored thing to the rest of the world. I've personally bought several uncensored Japanese DVDs in US (or was it in UK? I don't remember) shops (not Internet shops, but "real" adult shops), and I don't think real adult shops will deal with anything illegal when there are tons of perfectly legal things out there.
|
12-13-07 03:51am
|
Reply
249
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
On the other hand, there is pretty decent amount of Japanese-style anime out there without mosaic; to do it they just need to sell non-mosaic originals to non-Japanese company which isn't bound by Japanese publishing laws (another option is to produce Japanese-style anime outside of Japan). So from my point of view it is a definite and BIG minus (why I should be hit by Japanese laws? especially if there are perfectly legal ways to avoid it).
|
12-12-07 04:52am
|
Reply
250
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Not going into discussion on personal tastes (personally I don't care much about A2M), I want to comment on "clang of iron". There were times when producing (and even watching) of ANY porn would have caused to hear the clang of iron; for some reason I don't really miss that times :-). So my personal motto is: "I don't care as long as all the activity is consensual activity between consenting adults". If somebody wants to see eating shit and somebody wants to produce this kind of stuff - I don't care though I think it's REALLY disgusting; it is outlawed in certain places, but I think laws prohibiting it should be thrown away (which already happened in many - but not all - places to other laws outlawing such things as anal sex or being gay). Why somebody (especially government) should care about things that happen between consenting adults?
|
12-11-07 06:20am
|
|
