| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> he fact is that wearing one would be beneficial to the male performer's health only, since he'd be proctected but the female would still be doing atm.
Most of A2M on the market is "ass to the same girl mouth", so it would indeed help with STDs, and I don't know if A2M itself poses any risk (A2P does, but no idea about A2M).
> Far too many performers catch a variety of STD's
Do you have any statistics on it? I've heard about one quite big case somewhere in US, that's it.
> I'm actually curious to know how many people have a problem between condom and bareback sex. That might be an interesting poll.
There was such a poll back in March; only 25% of people have said "I have no issue with condoms".
|
11-24-07 10:14am
|
Reply
277
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Reply
I've tried to make a distinction between photo content and photo quality. And while content can be different (which I've mentioned), technical photo quality (focus, lighting, color balance etc.) just plain sucks (I'm not sure that I've seen one picture with a good technical quality except for those obviously stolen from porno sites).
|
11-24-07 08:51am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> anything that puts a performers life in danger, is simply unaceptable to me.
Hm, I'd say that condomless porn puts performers life in danger more than A2M (not sure about A2P). Not that I'm a big fan of A2M myself, but your argument doesn't look too viable to me.
> What's the next fetish???
I agree that there should be a line drawn somewhere. And about the next fetish: I think that from softer to harder it goes like this:
softcore - oral - vaginal - anal - a2m - 'golden showers' - ...
So I've just submitted another poll asking the same questions about 'golden showers'; if it's accepted, we'll see how many people are into it (I don't think there will be much, but let's see).
|
11-24-07 02:03am
|
Reply
279
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Good idea, but it can possibly help only if somebody really reads e-mails (which is not guaranteed :-( ).
|
11-22-07 03:28am
|
Reply
280
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
You really think that you'll get better support for $10 site? I REALLY doubt it. Adult site support stinks regardless of price, that's it :-(.
|
11-21-07 08:47am
|
Reply
281
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
!#*!&^@!*&^! I hate sites with non-existing support :-(. Unfortunately, in adult most of the sites are like that :-((.
|
11-21-07 07:50am
|
Reply
282
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
And what does their support say?
|
11-21-07 06:04am
|
Reply
283
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
I see, thanks. But in such videos girls don't talk much anyway, do they? And Seventeen has always been an European company, and they had never used US models (originally used Dutch, now East European - what's the big difference?) Or you mean that Dutch models did know English well, and East European don't? - that I can confirm, and that is indeed a problem in Seventeen chatroom, but IMHO not the biggest problem there.
|
11-21-07 06:03am
|
Reply
284
|
Sexy Goa
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
> The worst is the file-sizes. Some 1.3 Gb others up to 2,0 Gb for 20-25 minutes video.
Ouch, what is the bitrate then? 2G for 25 minute video should be around 10MBit/s, shouldn't it?
|
11-20-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
285
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
Maybe it makes sense to leave a comment (but NOT review) titled like "Anybody wants to review this site (membership is FREE)?" - it would allow for unbiased review by somebody from this site (even better - by some known and trusted member of this community). I hope it won't be against PornUsers policies.
|
11-20-07 03:04pm
|
Reply
286
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Wait, what site you're talking about? :-) ClubSeventeen or OnlyCuties?
|
11-19-07 04:36pm
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
TBP "Search niche" feature is a nice one (and it's a pity it doesn't exist in PU). Still, IMHO the very need for it illustrates that plain list of 94 items is useless, as it is very difficult to look through it to find what the user needs.
And disbalance is a bad thing exactly for this reason: the more garbage (which almost nobody's is interested in - see 'Balloons') you have at top level, the less useful it becomes for everybody else.
On the other hand, I don't think it makes sense to argue as you're already sure that it is done the best possible way, so could you please just add 'Search niche' feature to PU?
|
11-19-07 02:39pm
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Ok, it's just another argument for subcategories: probably it should be like:
- Solo models
--- Masturbation
--- Dildos
--- Naked only
- Legs&Nylon
--- Pantyhose
--- Stockings
--- Foot fetish
...
Deal? :-)
|
11-19-07 05:25am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> when i look for other things like mastrubating women or stocking
What about 'Solo Models' (what else they will do then masturbate? :-)) and 'Legs & Nylons'? So they ARE there :-), just worded differently, and I cannot blame you for not finding them, as carefully reading list of 94 items is frustrating at the very least. So the reason why you didn't find them is exactly because there are way too MANY of the niches (if there would be less B/S like Balloons, it would be easier to look through niche list and find things) :-). Subcategories (which I'm voting for) would also help it BTW.
|
11-19-07 05:01am
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> there can`t be enough "filtering" :)
What about "Balloons"? If all the niches will be 8 sites in size, like Balloons or a few others, there will be several thousands of niches, and I'd say it will be way too much of filtering; don't you agree?
|
11-19-07 04:25am
|
Reply
291
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Reply
I see; it probably means tons of newbie review praising NewbieNudes here. Sigh.
|
11-19-07 02:37am
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Let me explain a bit. I've submitted this poll because I feel that current TBP/PU category/niche system is inadequate; there are 94 categories but they're VERY unbalanced: 'Hardcore' has 4000+ sites, 'Balloons' (what Balloons have to do with porn?) have only 8 sites, that's 500x difference.
So I feel that categories would be more useful if minor niches like 'Bukkake' (33 sites) or 'Cream Pies' (61 site) are merged (as subcategories) with bigger ones like 'Cumshots' (471 site). As for other examples - 'ATM' (13 sites) can be combined with 'Anal' (303 sites), 'Cheerleaders' (17) can go into 'Uniforms' (89), and 'Trampling' (18), 'Spanking' (99) and 'Smother' (16) will fit into 'BDSM' (317).
In this case 2-level category system would look as:
- CumShots
--- Bukkake
--- Cream Pies
- Anal
--- ATM
- BDSM
--- Trampling
--- Spanking
--- Smothering
|
11-19-07 01:14am
|
Reply
293
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
> which occurs to me is an inherent feature of a "review"
Nope :-). There is a subtle difference between "subjective" and "biased". It is like making an experiment in science - measurement errors are inevitable (like subjectiveness in reviews/ratings), bias (both in science and reviews) can and should be avoided.
The other points you're raising can be valid, and I should mention that if original IDoctor's review would be written in these words rather than in original infomercial style, it would probably face less opposition.
|
11-19-07 12:56am
|
Reply
294
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Review
May I ask how are you related to IDoctor99? 2 newbie reviews in single day cannot be a coincidence.
|
11-19-07 12:39am
|
Reply
295
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
> obviously you can't seem to get your mind around the idea.
No, the idea of the site is obvious (there is nothing really new about it BTW), it is you who can't seem to get your mind around the idea of THIS site, and the idea of THIS site is about unbiased reviews. And your so-called review cannot possibly be unbiased because there is your content on the site (moreover, originally you've put your ID in your "review"). You've wrote in one of your replies: "of course I want to promote it to others." - THIS site is NOT about PROMOTING anything; it is about sharing information.
> It is my firm and honest belief that there are few, if any, porn sites offering a better experience on the web for anyone interested in such material.
Even if it is firm and honest, it is biased.
|
11-18-07 02:21pm
|
Reply
296
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
> Whats the problem with finding a good thing and wanting to spread the word?
The problem is with creating your own content and trying to "review" it and put "rating" on it. Comment would be more appropriate for this kind of things (not exactly sure if even it would be ok with the spirit of the site, but in any case it would be better than fake review/rating).
> Can you guys be any more rude to somebody wanting to help out fellow porn watchers?
Sure we can, just ask about it politely enough.
|
11-18-07 01:18pm
|
Reply
297
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
Even if you do not receive any money from the site, you admitted yourself that you want to get more people there; that means that your "review" is biased from the very beginning, and rating you put in you review is completely useless. It MIGHT be suitable as a comment (not sure).
|
11-18-07 12:45pm
|
Reply
298
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Reply
As I understand policy of this site, people affiliated with the site are not allowed to make reviews of the site they're affiliated with, because it cannot be anything but shilling.
|
11-18-07 09:26am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
Movies on BitTorrent and other P2P networks? No thanks. I've got a feeling that most of movies there are pirated ones, and I've got another feeling that people making movies are entitled to get money for it.
About QT vs DivX/XVid - my experience with them was that QT is a stable product, which I cannot say about both XVid and DivX. QT original .MOV format is inferior to both WMV and MPEG-4, but as QT started to support MPEG-4 (including AVC) it became about the same quality/bandwidth-wise as WMV.
|
11-18-07 09:23am
|
Reply
300
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
> Leave me a comment and let me know you saw this review!
You're obviously shilling for the site, and this is not welcome here.
|
11-18-07 02:05am
|
