| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tan_lines
Enjoy :-)
|
02-13-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Unfortunately proof of doctor visits doesn't really provide 100% guarantee :-(. Sure, it's much better with it than without, but there is still some risk. Let's say it the following way: without STD checks it is plain suicide (and I hope at least decent companies never allow it without the check), with recent STD check it is much better, it's like a round of russian roulette :-).
|
02-08-08 08:55am
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
As a fantasy - sure, in reality - come on, I have responsibilities in real life.
|
02-07-08 04:37am
|
Reply
204
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Thanks a lot. Being a big fan of sex-related games, I'm putting 3D Sex Games on my "want to try" list :-).
|
02-03-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
205
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Wow, thanks a lot for an extremely detailed answer. Just one thing which is unclear - does 3D Sex Games use motion capture or not? How natural are movements there?
|
02-03-08 10:21am
|
Reply
206
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> even though the winner was obvious after the first 60 seconds.
Yeah, was exactly my feeling too, but with tag teams it doesn't feel that "one-way" even if one team is outclassed (when there are 2 wrestlers from one team against one from the other, obviously they dominate regardless).
|
01-29-08 09:46am
|
Reply
207
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
> The price has kept me away.
I'm not surprised; $50/month is really outrageous.
> for such a determinedly rough sex site.
I don't think it's really "rough", there are much rougher sites out there (such as SadoSlaves). Personally I'm not a big fan of rough SM (and especially don't like "abuse" theme), so what turned me on about FunnyBDSM was it's funny part.
|
01-29-08 07:06am
|
Reply
208
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> how it compares to Sex & Submission or Chanta's Bitches or Fucked and
> Bound, all sites that I really enjoy.
Depends on your preferences (see my reviews of SexAndSumbission, FuckedAndBound and FunnyBDSM). For "Real BDSM" stories SexAndSumbission IMHO wins hands down, with FuckedAndBound going close second (can't comment on ChantasBitches).
> is the action "fakey?"
For stories NOT labeled as "Real BDSM" - yes, definitely; for "Real BDSM" ones - probably not.
> Interesting stories or just silly stuff?
Depends on your point of view: for me they're interesting, but I won't make any representations :-) - for some they can easily be "silly stuff". Take a look at descriptions of "Heil Dickler" and "Court of Justice" series in public area of the site - they're pretty much accurate.
|
01-28-08 07:30am
|
Reply
209
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
Well, everybody here has some fetish; I admit I have plenty of them :-).
|
01-20-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
210
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Reply
> ccbill do not want help me ( very dissapointed for them).
Usually they're quite cooperative in cases like this (when it is not content being disputed, but site doesn't provide access). Personally I'd give CCBill another try, making it crystally clear what is the problem.
|
01-16-08 11:16am
|
Reply
211
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
If you paid with a credit card, I would suggest to go to CCBill first and explain situation in detail. If CCBill doesn't help, go to your bank with explanation along the following lines: "this was a payment for subscription service which I paid for a month and access was terminated after 2 days. All my numerous attempts to contact merchant didn't succeed"; as the service wasn't really provided, they should be able to revert original credit card transaction.
|
01-16-08 08:53am
|
Reply
212
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks. A nice change in the world where things tend to change from bad to worse.
|
01-16-08 06:37am
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Agree with Drooler and DivBZero above.
|
01-16-08 06:06am
|
Reply
214
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Personally I've never hit it, but I won't be surprised if they do. As most of really good sites, kink.com has technical stuff who're not on par with content to put it mildly. See my comments about their login system, which is one of the most annoying ones in the industry.
|
01-14-08 09:50am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
As I'm a video kind of person, I never do it :-).
|
01-14-08 09:45am
|
Reply
216
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
DiacolicChris's Reply
It would be indeed "cross-sale" and "special offer" if checkbox is NOT pre-checked (like reputable sites and processors like CCBill do). If it is pre-checked, I name it swindling; sure, you can invent your own names. BTW, I'm pretty sure that my issuing bank will side with me in disputing this charge if I will ever fail to notice such small print (on payment page I was selecting some specific price, and was charged a different one, with amount actually being charged being NEVER shown to me; that should be enough for bank, VISA or court to revert this charge and put fines as well as punitive damages to processor and/or merchant). Disclaimer: opinions here are just my personal opinions and shouldn't be taken as legal advice.
|
01-09-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Reply
> So if we all do it why does it feel so wrong!
"It's all in your head, Mr. Tweedy, it's all in your head" :-). More seriously, modern society obviously still has prejudice against porn (just like 100 years ago there was prejudice against alcohol strong enough to amend US constitution to prohibit it), and most likely you have too much respect for society to throw away it's prejudices. But things will hopefully change, like it has already changed in many areas. As a prominent example, some time ago there was a very strong prejudice against gays, but now it has almost vanished; I'm pretty sure the same will eventually happen to porn. Meanwhile, I suggest to analyze WHY it's wrong? Because it hurts somebody or just because majority says it's wrong? If it's only the latter, it's a prejudice to be thrown away (why you should allow OTHERS to decide what's right and what's wrong for YOU as long as it doesn't hurt anybody?)
|
01-09-08 06:36am
|
Reply
218
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
> I'll report any sketchy ones I see
Thanks in advance; this is what this site is for :-).
|
01-08-08 03:19pm
|
Reply
219
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I see, thanks. Things are much worse than, with CCBill probably being the only trustworthy processor to date (at least it wasn't caught doing it - I think they're doing almost the same thing but with checkbox unchecked, and it IMHO changes things dramatically from swindling to not so annoying upsell) :-(.
> generally the trial sites seem to be owned by the same owner of the sites that I'm subscribing too
I used to think so too until I've run into Epoch using the same technique on purchase of Diabolic site selling PornStarsTop, and these 2 sites don't seem to be related (I'd even say they're from very different leagues).
|
01-08-08 03:08pm
|
Reply
220
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks for warning.
Do you remember what was their credit card processor? Wasn't it Epoch by any chance? I've seen such thing (which I think is nothing short of swindling) a few times recently, and I think it was Epoch all (or at least most of) the time.
Moreover, I'm not even sure if webmasters of original sites get anything from such "trials"; it would be very interesting to see a comment from one of them here (and if Epoch is doing it without consent of webmasters, it can easily find themselves in a DEEP TROUBLE; such company as Diabolic won't hesitate to sue Epoch in such case).
|
01-08-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
221
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
> I think its fake, have you ever watched a video by them?
No, that's why I'm asking.
> The guys always seem to never be nervous. Also no way a normal
> guy that walks into a pornset for the first time, and sees a
> sexy pornstar is going to last 15 minutes during sex.
Thanks, I see your point. Probably you're right :-(.
|
01-08-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I see ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong with viewing porn. Nobody gets hurt (except for people like those who established Prohibition back 100 years ago), and after all it is MY money I'm spending, and if I prefer to watch porn to other form of entertainment (like watching Gone With the Wind), it is MY right to spend the money the way I want (as long as my family doesn't get hurt by my porn spending).
Moreover, I feel that watching porn is helping me to avoid REAL problems, like going to prostitutes (for me it's all about variety, and I'm getting enough variety watching porn).
|
01-08-08 05:12am
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
About ACDsee - thanks for suggestion. About Windows viewer - sorry, not good enough for my eyes :-). But the most important thing for me personally is that I'm mostly viewing pictures in-browser only and quite rarely outside browser (I'm more of video fan than picture fan :-)).
As a side observation: if there are lots of people like me, some kind of plugin with decent downsize algorithm can have a business case :-).
|
01-05-08 06:38am
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't like anything that requires scrolling on my laptop's screen (which is 1400 and is unlikely to go any higher any time soon). Viewers (like Irfanview) have 2 problems: they don't work inside browser and quality of resizing isn't that good.
|
01-04-08 11:54am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I see, thanks. For multi-month it isn't that big price :-).
|
12-31-07 12:48pm
|
