| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2001
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I might have been exaggerating a bit. I suspect that the network doesn't really expect us to believe that there is a guy with a dick as big as a forearm. And he never takes his pants off. And he also ejaculates about a quart of come. So I don't think they really try to pass it off as real, but it still kind of annoying. Once or twice as a gag might be okay, but not the number of scenes they use it for.
|
07-26-11 08:44am
|
Reply
2002
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
There are a few sites on the Porn Pros Network that are, um, thick with fake cocks. Yes, technically they're dildos, but they're used in a way to make it seem that they're real, which is completely different from a girl using a dildo on herself or having someone use one on her. To add to the fake-cockery going on, the fake cock shoots about a gallon of fake come to cap the scene.
So yes, they do exist.
And your line about being 'naive about porn' was great! That's sort of the modern version of "I buy Penthouse for the articles." You gave me a good laugh - thanks for that!
|
07-25-11 09:28am
|
Reply
2003
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Thanks. I read in your review that the video aspect ratios are screwed up. I suspect I'll try the trial soon.
|
05-25-13 05:04pm
|
Reply
2004
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Thanks! I'll take you up on that. Did you try the trial? If so, does it still work? Subjectively, how do you like the video quality.
And I should add that what will likely tip me in favour of joining is hearing that Sarah is uploading blowjob scenes now.
|
05-25-13 09:39am
|
Reply
2005
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Interesting review. I've always been a fan of her stuff when I saw her on ALS Scan and wondered about joining her site. Based on your review I can at least go in knowing what the flaws are.
|
05-25-13 08:07am
|
Reply
2006
|
Real Slut Party
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Funny you ask that question. I had to go out and buy a new drive over the weekend because my bride was away and I signed up to three sites.
I hadn't thought of the fact that most DVDs are about 700MB, so the fact that some of the files on this site are seven times that size sure does raise eyebrows. I downloaded several of the scenes that I really wanted to see in the 720p HD and the rest in WMV SD. The HD stuff does look pretty good though.
|
05-09-11 04:25pm
|
Reply
2007
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
You need no further explanation. I understand what you mean completely.
|
03-31-15 01:41pm
|
Reply
2008
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks for the detailed answer. Spanking isn't a niche that I'm into - yet. A few years ago I could have listed some niches that I wasn't into that I am today mostly thanks to guys like you making recommendations like these. I'll be checking out all of these sites, even the ones you say are pretty extreme, and I'll likely join one or two.
(And I should add that puns on my username are perfectly fine. It's a longstanding nickname I've had that reflects my past military service but mostly that my friends all realize that I am obsessed with the female bum. Actually, obsessed isn't really the right term, but I don't know a word for obsessed x 100.)
|
03-29-15 06:03am
|
Reply
2009
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
I don't really have an interest in this but I sort of want to check it out. If a guy wanted to join a spanking site for the first time would you recommend this or a different site?
What are the resolutions for the most recent scenes?
Thanks
|
03-28-15 05:56am
|
Reply
2010
|
Reality Gang
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Thanks for the comment. To be honest though, none of the sites here are true gangbang sites. Hardcore Partying is probably the closest to being a gangbang but while there may be dozens of people in the room only a few are fucking. In most cases there are three to five girls and they each take on two or three guys. Their fun to watch, but not true gangbangs. Think of them as mini-gangbangs with some exhibitionism thrown in for good measure.
|
09-24-12 05:03pm
|
Reply
2011
|
Reality Junkies
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I agree, but even with limited anal scenes and MILFs I still found lots to like about it.
|
12-09-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
2012
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
LoganSix's Reply
Yeah... it was a true case of bait and switch. That happened to me with a couple of Gamma sites on Black Friday. Evil Angel was on sale for $5. How could I say no? There was no mention that it was streaming-only.
|
01-03-19 02:55pm
|
Reply
2013
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Comment
I've had this problem three or four times too. I can't say for sure that it happened with a RK subscription but that is entirely possible because I do subscribe there once per year or so.
My experiences have all been different from yours though. My experiences have all been that I call the biller and I get something like the attitude you got but then I get transferred to another department and things change quickly. My impression is that whoever I'm speaking with at this other department can see the logs from the cam session because each time I've had the reply 'yeah, I can definitely see that this isn't you.' No one has said this, but it's been implied that people with hacking skills will use these cam sites to speak with family or friends around the world. In all cases I was given a prompt refund.
Also in all cases I have asked the specific question about whether or not my credit card information was hacked too and each time I get the same answer - your card information isn't linked to the cam site. In the several times I've had this happen there has been no evidence that my card was hacked too.
In my opinion there are two problems. The first are sites that create these free cam sites for their members. If I wanted to join a cam site I would. But like ads, I suspect there is enough uptake to warrant doing it this way.
The second problem is that these cam sites must be pretty easy to hack. It can't be cheap for the cam providers to have their sites hacked regularly.
As much as this is a pain in the ass, and trust me, I know it is a major pain in the ass, it is likely that your card is safe.
|
01-04-18 10:30am
|
Reply
2014
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Dave H's Reply
The issue about having the 24 hour wait for me is that if I get cut off at 9PM one night then I may not have time to go on that late the next day so my wait time becomes much longer than 24 hours. Download limits really bug me...
|
08-03-14 05:53am
|
Reply
2015
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfart's Reply
Thanks for this tip. I use IDM too and will make that change when I have a membership at this site.
Thanks also for the comments and rating.
|
08-03-14 05:51am
|
Reply
2016
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Dave H's Comment
To make matters worse, their download limit seems to be arbitrarily imposed and can even change from day to day and user to user. This is counter-intuitive, but when you download HD files you can download more. I was often able to download up to 40GB per day the last time I was there as long as I stuck to HD files. The problem is that there often isn't any consistency so what I experienced a few months ago may not be the case now. But try the HD if you have the capacity and you may find you can download more.
|
07-16-14 05:16pm
|
Reply
2017
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Gnoman's Review
I'm surprised at your comment that there is a lot of anal stuff and ATM there now. I was a member earlier this year and don't remember there being much anal. But as an anal fan I may not notice it as much as someone who doesn't like it.
|
07-14-14 04:06pm
|
Reply
2018
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I strongly agree with you - download limits seems to be a way to annoy that people who actually buy memberships. But if the limit remains as high as I found it (only when downloading the HD videos) then I can at least live with it. But I do wish RK was more clear about it.
|
04-15-14 12:22pm
|
Reply
2019
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I agree, but it seems like a bad business model for RK to not support such a popular browser.
|
04-15-14 12:20pm
|
Reply
2020
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Reply
I wish their policies were more clear because I got cut off some days at 8GB. But your experience isn't unheard of here either.
|
11-04-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
2021
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
eden's Reply
That's a good point. I use Internet Download Manager and it has that feature so that is an option. You're right that it sucks to have to go this route, but if it works, it works.
|
09-07-13 06:52am
|
Reply
2022
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
scharrukin's Comment
That's insane. I had an email offer from them last week and thought of joining but then I remembered the download limit. I'm not entirely opposed to limits, but a 5GB limit in 2013 with HD files isn't acceptable. I'd like to rejoin, but not under these conditions. Thanks for the heads up.
|
06-11-13 02:13pm
|
Reply
2023
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
There is no way to tell how close you are to the limit. They don't have any indication. But to make matters worse it seems that there is no universal application of the limit either. Some members here report having a limit imposed (like me) and other say they never had a limit. The Terms of Service are vague too in that they say there is a daily limit of 10GB (which might have been acceptable ten years ago but isn't realistic now) but there is some vague language about allowing a higher limit if you downlaod larger files. I emailed them to ask for clarification on that but never heard back.
I don't think there's any punishment factor here. I think that if at any time in a 24 hour period you hit the limit (amd I hit it at downloads as low as 7GB in a day) you get blocked from downloading for 24 hours.
Maybe with some luck you'll be one of the members who don't have a limit imposed. I'm not completely against limits, but 10GB isn't reasonable.
|
12-07-12 11:33am
|
Reply
2024
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
peskysushi's Review
I know this is just a pipe dream, but maybe, just maybe the site owners will read all the complaints here about the unreasonable daily limit and increase it. I like a lot of there stuff but I'll probably never rejoin them until the limit is removed or made more reasonable.
|
11-17-12 02:34pm
|
Reply
2025
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Probably a good idea. I like their material but found myself frustrated by the site.
Interesting note on the RA thing. I wasn't aware of that. Even though I have a naval name, I wear an army uniform. I just couldn't think of any army-oriented, ass-related pun for a name...
|
09-22-12 08:31am
|
