| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Very thorough comment which would have made an equally good review!
|
09-05-11 06:21pm
|
Reply
552
|
Naked Kombat
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
This is one site I have yet to join but I have been thinkinhg about for some time, so great to read your review. I am surprised that the matches go on so long and seem professional, I thought it was be more staged and the wrestling more token as a lead-in to the sex.
It does sound really hot, but somehow kink.com just ticks all the right boxes and looks great on paper but is just too poloished and professional for me - the guys just seem too perfect to the real and the high production values, whilst nice, just gives everything a glossy sort of sheen which puts me off a bit. Still, I might give this site a whirl for a month and see how it goes - I'd certainly enjoy watching the live shows!
|
09-04-11 12:02pm
|
Reply
553
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All models should be treated with the upmost respect at all times and they certainly don't deserve to be treated like that.
However, as long as it is done in a specifically role-playing sense, it can be important for some scenes - and some models into S&M will enjoy it. As long as it is done purely for the camera as a fantasy, I find it hot.
Still, I mainly watch gay porn and I am into S&M porn so I might have a different perspective.
I certainly would hate it if I felt that it wasn't roleplaying/acting and the model didn't want it to happen. It should never be done as a standard part of "normal" porn, it should only be roleplay as part of specialised porn with the models full consent.
Still there's no option for that on the poll - so I chose "other".
|
09-03-11 05:52am
|
Reply
554
|
The Garden Of Adam
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I probably did over-react a little to be honest, I'm not normally sensitive or particularly politically correct. I just think she could have said the same thing in a nicer way - I posted the comment quickly after I'd just seen it was still kinda shocked.
Still, whether she likes it or not I know a lot of customers for "for women" sites are actually gay men so I don't think it's a good business plan - I just think there's better ways of putting things but hey nobody's perfect. I am sure some gay sites aren't very welcoming to women either and I probably don't even notice!
|
08-31-11 08:49am
|
Reply
555
|
UK Amateur Vids
(0)
|
Reply of
Jayne's Reply
LOL I'm prone to exaggeration! But I did enjoy them - some hot men - thanks! x
|
08-30-11 07:12pm
|
Reply
556
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
A mix is good, but I chose "grimacing" as I love S&M!
|
08-30-11 10:18am
|
Reply
557
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
Cheers mate - maybe you could private message me with your username on the site so I can see your comments - do you have a favourite model on there? Submitted any challenges?
|
08-29-11 10:32am
|
Reply
558
|
Nena Blue
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Excellent, in-depth review - love their definition of a "trial" - hmmm! That's a new one on me! Seems pricey too.
|
08-28-11 11:57pm
|
Reply
559
|
Club Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Incredible review - and I agree with the previous poster, negative reviews can be even more useful than positive ones.
I had no idea that some sites recycled content like this and passed it off as new - yet another disappointment for me to watch out for - I'm learning a lot from this site! Before I joined PU I didn't evne know some sites were streaming only!
You really go in-depth to warn aboiut a disappointing site. Well done!
|
08-28-11 11:50pm
|
Reply
560
|
Straight Hell
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
I've given up mate - every e-mail I have sent has been replied to with the usual "protect models privacy" nonsense! I keep checking the site to see if they're reviewed the policy but no luck.
Maybe not worth moving abroad for but close - it is such a sexy site! If only there was a way round it, but I can't think of one!
|
08-28-11 11:42pm
|
Reply
561
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
Hey no probs - I am kind of a novice with DRM so thought maybe it did have it and I just hadn't noticed!
I am hoping to do a review of the site today.
|
08-28-11 10:52pm
|
Reply
562
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
I've joined this site some time ago and have deliberately delayed my review to see how it developed... enjoyed your review as always but was surprised to see you said it used DRM - the only other reivew site I've found that reviews it (Gay Demon) says it doesn't and I can't see any evidence of it myself as I've used the site - but as I am a current member I'm not sure. What makes you think it uses DRM?
Be good if you updated this review or did a comment if you're still a member to see how it's developed in your opinion - my review should go live very soon.
|
08-28-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
563
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I don't think I'll ever understand the appeal of photo-only sites, but I can see it's more popular than I expected on this forum and I guess compared to magazines, these sites are good value.
Good review - there seem to be very few equivalent gay sites but I can see how after hardcore video a site like this might be kind of refreshing. I think if a site told me a lot about the person, it might do more for me.
|
08-28-11 07:21pm
|
Reply
564
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm happy to let the site pick for me, as I use just one computer and stay logged in anyway so I don't have to remember it. I tend not to stay on sites for ages so making up new passwords would be too much hassle anyway. I seem to be the minority on this though!
|
08-28-11 06:17pm
|
Reply
565
|
Double Teamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
So many sites have excellent content but are let down on technical issues and/or poor customer support, it's so frustrating!
This in an excellent, in-depth review - well done.
|
08-27-11 05:32pm
|
Reply
566
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, if I can't download it to keep, DRM free, I ain't interested!
|
08-26-11 08:02am
|
Reply
567
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for that, hope you didn't mind me pointing it out, just didn't want your review to be spoiled by a little mistake it's all too easy to make!
Curious though - what's an IR performer?
|
08-26-11 08:01am
|
Reply
568
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
A good warning review, but you seem to have missed a chunk out - one of your sentences ends mid-sentence - "with multiple partners at the...."
Sounds an awful site of a good model which is always a pity - and pop-up hell is ALWAYS a bad sign.
Thanks for warning people off the site, this is what PU is really useful for.
|
08-25-11 11:53pm
|
Reply
569
|
Tara TS
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Extremely thorough review. I love that she will read comments and talks to her fans as well as making her own costumes, but like you say it seems the technical side really lets the site down - and I couldn't cope with such sporadic updates. I think a site should give you a guaranteed number of updates per month at regular intervals so you know what to expect, though I appreciate that might be harder for a solo performer.
|
08-24-11 11:48pm
|
Reply
570
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
Just thought it was descriptive, suitable for the site and lets people know what kind of porn I'll be reviewing for them!
|
08-22-11 04:19pm
|
Reply
571
|
Teasers VOD
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another superb review - this seems a unique site, and as you said very unusual for a US site. Well done!
|
08-20-11 04:29pm
|
Reply
572
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If they're broken once I'll try again later just in case the site is having temporary problems or if it's a problem with my internet connection - but if other sites are fine so I know it's not my computer or connection, and it's consistently down for a couple of days, I would forget it - if they can't get their tour pages right I don't trust their paid-for content either.
If I really liked the look of a site I'd bookmark it and try it a few days later, but if they haven't sorted it out in a week or so I wouldn't join. I'd never join from a page with broken pics - they'd have to be fixed first and I'd be extra careful checking reviews here and on TBP too.
|
08-20-11 09:19am
|
Reply
573
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LewdyPig's Review
Welcome to Porn Users, well done on a decent first review.
|
08-19-11 02:39pm
|
Reply
574
|
CMNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
Really? Nope, CMNM includes nothing else - sounds typical of this network of studios, they break everything up into as many different websites as possible and they know how to charge. I actually e-mailed them once and suggested a discount if you joined more than one of their sites - got a swift negative response on that little idea!
I think they're doing themselves out of money personally. If I had the cash I'd keep a continuous subscription going to several of their sites, but as it is I rarely join more than one and never more than two at once.
|
08-19-11 02:36pm
|
Reply
575
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Sounds like excellent value but I agree with you that it's outrageous to charge UK viewers more. The pound is stronger than the US dollar so it should actually makes things cheaper for us, so to actually charge us more makes my blood boil.
Very thorough review which mentions pitfalls you wouldn't know about until you join which is the beauty of this site.
Well done.
|
08-18-11 12:08pm
|
