Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I regret spending money on some porn I turned out not to enjoy, but that's no different to regular movies, or buying a book I turned out not to like, or clothes I don't end up wearing.
I don't regret anything specific to porn itself - I love it and I'm glad it's there!
|
09-30-11 11:31am
|
Reply
527
|
Gay Public Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
feraltom's Review
Hey welcome to the site, always good to have new gay members, we need a lot more around! This is an interesting first review and I like the way you describe it but a bit more detail would be welcome, such as pricing, download options, etc.
Hope you stick around!
|
09-26-11 04:57pm
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Same as otoh - it would have been in the 1980s when I saw a porno mag which had been abandoned in the garden of a house left empty next door - I went exploring and found it.
I was too young to find it exciting, but it certainly made me think. It was of women of course with no men in it - heaven knows what I'd have made of a gay porn mag!
The first time I saw any kind of gay porn was when I was 15, so in the 90s. I was on our last family vacation to Amsterdam and though we obviously avoided the red light district, they sell porno quite openly there in regular stores too so I saw mag with two men kissing on it - it blew my mind! Until then, I hadn't realised gay porn existed!
It made me determined to find some gay porno at home - this was pre-internet - but it took me a year before I found a place that stocked it. Until then I bought a few mens body-building mags which were nearly as good - I even bought some weights so my parents wouldn't be suspicious!
Oh, memories! I found some gay porno mags on sale in the city centre but they were about 2.5 times the price of the straight porn ones so I didn't have enough money and had to save up! When I did get my first gay porn mag it was mind-blowing - I still have it! It was published in 1995 I think. I hid it in the cavity underneath my bottom dresser drawer!
|
09-25-11 07:07am
|
Reply
529
|
Men At Play
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Hey otoh just saw your reply! Thanks - I'll bear it in mind if I ever do go "back to Mac" - I haven't ruled out the possibility.
I was just using the standard Quicktime player, but where sites wanted me to use Windows Media Player seemed to be the problem - before there was a Mac version but ever since I had to use Flip4Mac some files wouldn't play.
It was mainly DRM stuff which I do avoid now anyway but it did put me off. Porn is important to me as I am sure it is for everyone on this site!
|
09-24-11 12:17pm
|
Reply
530
|
Huge Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Wow - incredibly detailed review, well done. I had to laugh when you commented on the women moaning as they licked the dildos - yep it is just a piece of plastic, you're not fooling anyone ladies! It's a shame they feel the need to do stuff like that as its distracting as it's more comical and real and it detracts from the whole scene.
I think a lot of stuff is done in porn just because that's the way it's always been done but few sites seem to ask their customers if this is what they actually want!
Still, sounds like a good site apart from that and congratulations on a superb quality review!
|
09-23-11 06:42am
|
Reply
531
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
It might be pricey but WOW what a huge site! A million photos - it didn't realise such a site existed! It would certainly take a long, long time to look at all those pics! Photo sites aren't my thing but this is an excellent review, well done.
|
09-23-11 06:39am
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Totally agree Drooler - I've had partners who wanted to film stuff but absolutely no way. No matter how much you trust someone you never know what might happen in the future.
I once arranged to meet up with a guy on the internet and he had a camera all set up in the corner of the bedroom! I said he had to turn it off and he refused so I walked right out of there! He hadn't mentioned filming when we agreed to meet or I wouldn't have agreed, and I can't believe he thought I'd just accept it! NO WAY!
|
09-23-11 06:27am
|
Reply
533
|
Harsh Handjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Sounds an interesting site, there really is a site for almost every possible taste now isn't there! It sounds a little repetitive and focused on one theme for me, but it's certainly quite an interesting concept - might take a look. Thanks for the review, which is excellent.
|
09-22-11 11:20pm
|
Reply
534
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Hmmm thanks for such a detailed review, I've been looking at this site for a while but the high price put me off. It sounds a decent site, but seems less a "pure" CFNM site - to me if the women are removing their clothes and having full sex, you lose the "clothed" element, though I appreciate this doesn't happen in every scene.
|
09-22-11 11:18pm
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I think the guilt associated with masturbation is largely down to religion - the Catholic Church considers it a sin to this day I believe, as do many other religions.
Though to be fair I think it also has its roots in other more "scientific" approaches - in Victorian times it was considered actively damaging to health - I read about some sick Victorian devices parents could buy to prevent their sons masturbating!
If you consider it to be bad for you, morally, spiritually or even medically, I can see where the term self-abuse comes from, but it's one we should avoid using now we know it's actually a healthy, normal activity! I'd be very surprised if PU users don't do it!
|
09-20-11 10:36am
|
Reply
536
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I HATE that, thanks for warning everyone. We've got to stop using sites that treat their customers so badly so we can raise standards across the industry. Porn consumers are like any other comsumer, we are paying customers and entitled to great service and respect, not to be ripped off!
Who handles their billing? I'd complain to them and demand a full refund on the basis you were misled. If enough people do that it might have an effect, as well as warnings like yours on sites like this!
|
09-19-11 04:43pm
|
Reply
537
|
Men At Play
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
A Mac eh! Is that new? I am back on Windows after going back a while ago - I actually found Macs good for porn in the sense that they're more virus-resistant, but not all porn sites are Mac friendly so I'm afraid that just wouldn't do for me!
Now you do have a Mac a suggestion for future reviews (and updates to old ones) I always mentioned if a site was fully Mac-friendly in my reviews (some are partly Mac-friendly but not all content might work, for example older content may not be available for Mac although of course they still charge you full price!).
I try still to do that now but sometimes I forget - but some sites don't support Macs but don't make it clear - they'll bury it in their terms and conditions so if you join but can't use it, no refund!
It's mainly sites that use DRM that aren't Mac-friendly, and I avoid those anyway, but it's worth noting!
|
09-19-11 09:39am
|
Reply
538
|
Men At Play
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
Yay another manholelover review!! I look forward to your reviews and this is an excellent as ever.
I've often been very tempted by this site as suits are a big fetish of mine - but as usual with me it's the glossiness which puts me off a bit. I love fantasies and roleplay and I appreciate good lighting and camerawork, but hot as the guys are it's just too slick and they're too perfect for me!
If only I could get the quality filming and scenarios, and professional site design, but with some more ordinary looking guys! I want the usual type of the businessman you see on the train, not buff gym-bunnies!
Still they do have some hot scenes so one of those I might join for a month to download what I like and then cancel - I presume downloads work OK?
|
09-19-11 09:06am
|
Reply
539
|
Virtua Guy HD
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Heh heh it's so nice that people on here are so open-minded, when I joined I didn't know if gay reviewers would be as welcome as it is a mainly straight-orientated site, but I've been made to feel very welcome!
I've run out of sites to review for now, but if I do join any others I will write more reviews, and I like to contribute with comments, polls and replies.
Thanks again for a kind reply.
|
09-18-11 08:43am
|
Reply
540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think that would be too much even for me! I don't feel ashamed of my use of porn but a porn convention just feels kinda too much!
|
09-17-11 06:15am
|
Reply
541
|
British Doggers
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Wow - excellent review of an awful-sounding site! It really does sound desperate - what a mish-mash of stuff thrown together like that! A good warning review!
|
09-16-11 06:10pm
|
Reply
542
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Review
Welcome to PU, this is a very good first review, keep em coming!
|
09-15-11 09:53am
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, as I'm not American. I always found the idea of fraternities very odd and mysterious, like a kind of secret club with those weird names! They sound kinda elitist to me. I don't think I'd have wanted to be in one even if I was American. But I might be wrong, don't know enough about them.
|
09-15-11 09:42am
|
Reply
544
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Doctor Blues's Comment
Agree with the previous posters - many thanks for the warning, especially as I was also looking at the site manholelover mentioned - if it's part of the same network I want absolutely nothing to do with it. Glad you got it sorted out in the end, but no way am I joining anything from their network now!
This is why PU is so useful - you've probably saved a few people from the same nonsense already and this will stand as a warning now.
Thanks to manholelover for pointing out the other site in the network, I might not have made the connection.
|
09-14-11 06:29am
|
Reply
545
|
Guys Get Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
Kelon's Comment
It's awful when a site claims to update regularly and then doesn't. It's an odd business decision because once you join an non-updating site and have downloaded and looked at all you want, there's simply no reason to remain a member long-term.
|
09-11-11 04:16pm
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Exclusively videos - I just can't see the appeal of pictures when you can have video. I would never join a pics-only site.
|
09-11-11 04:56am
|
Reply
547
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Another excellent, in-depth site review - well done!
|
09-10-11 07:37pm
|
Reply
548
|
Third Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
A simply superb review, well done - extremely thorough and covers everything you could want to know - and gives a real insight into issues you simply don't know about until you join a site, which is the type of review which makes this site so useful.
Entering passwords constantly drives me mad - I hate it! Twice every time is ridiculous! Poor site design.
|
09-10-11 04:22pm
|
Reply
549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely natural, as they are meant to look! I don't understand the obsession with shaving and I've never done it!
|
09-09-11 02:18am
|
Reply
550
|
Justine's Bedroom
(0)
|
Reply of
tomjones's Review
Sounds like a classically British site! We Brits have such a sense of humour we often find it difficult to take anything seriously - including sex! I notice a lot of British porn has a slight "comedy" element!
|
09-05-11 06:23pm
|