| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Amateur Violations
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
A funny review of a funny site it made me chuckle! Well-written as always, your review gives a good flavour of an odd-sounding site!
|
10-25-11 07:52am
|
Reply
502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
None of the above - I don't use/drink any of them - and porno is quite exciting enough for me without needing other stimulants!
|
10-23-11 11:01am
|
Reply
503
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Penis!
|
10-21-11 06:29pm
|
Reply
504
|
Juicy Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
adamz's Reply
Hi Adam, many thanks for your comprehensive reply... I appreciate it very much and I am glad you're taking some of my suggestions on board.
I did state that I would hsve given the site a much higher rating but I felt that your site tour is misleading, and I still do; it's not something you've addressed specifically except to say that you can't offer all of the videos for downloads or the site would be economic.
On reflection I do accept that - I understand you have to make a profit. However, your preview simply states "unlimited downloads" - I accept that this means you don't place a limit on how many scenes can be be downloaded per month. However, it simply isn't clear before you join the site that many of the videos are not downloadable to keep. If you would say in the preview that only selected DVDs can be downloaded, then nobody will be surprised when they join.
Videobox Men, of which I am a member and joined before your site, offers all of its videos for download without exception and so with yours being a similar type of site and with no indication to the contrary, I assumed your policy was the same. As you say your other site men.com can offer all their videos for download, so if that one of your sites can offer it, why can't Juicy Boys?
Had the made the policy clear I would have known and could have made an informed decision about whether to join or not, this was my main concern.
I did not realise that I could still access purchased videos after my subscription was over - I am very happy to hear I can but again this is not made clear and it's not the standard way such sites operate - usually once your membership runs out you can't access the site.
I also rated the site down due to the disapponting chat facility which as you see from my review, was unreliable. There is a notice on your site acknowledging this and suggesting contact via an international phone number which would be prohibitively expensive to call.
I did try and rate your site fairly - I pointed out that I initially felt like giving you an awful review and a low rating but decided to wait and explore it first which improved my opinion somewhat - and I have listed the positive points. I've also explained that but for the problems outlined, I'd have given you an extremely high mark, so I do give you credit where it's due and give people enough information to make up their own minds.
Thank you for your reply though - if you could make the changes suggested and make it clearer in your preview what you do and do not get, I would be happy to amend my review and would consider re-subscribing.
|
10-20-11 01:20pm
|
Reply
505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Yes, always as they're useful in letting me know what I could improve.
|
10-15-11 12:45am
|
Reply
506
|
Assassinate That Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Hmmm seems very odd not to accept Visa! As CCBill do for most sites, I would assume that declining to accept Visa is something a site owner would do - perhaps Visa have slightly higher charges for transactions than MasterCard? Then the site owner might only want to accept a card which took less of their profit.
Or perhaps they've had trouble with Visa before - maybe they're too quick to take a cardholders site in the event of a dispute? No idea if these two are true, trying to understand why a site owner wouldn't take it. It can't be a CCBill policy or they wouldn't accept it for any site.
Otherwise I can't see why a site owner would refuse to accept Visa.
|
10-13-11 08:19am
|
Reply
507
|
Assassinate That Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
pornfalls's Comment
Are you sure? I've joined loads of CCBill sites and I only have a Visa card - it's been accepted on all of them! I'd double-check and if you're still have difficulty give CCBill support an e-mail.
|
10-13-11 04:59am
|
Reply
508
|
Haze Him
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Comment
Yes their own previews put me off here - completely fake and not even well done so you can suspend belief and enjoy it.
|
10-11-11 03:29pm
|
Reply
509
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
They're lazy.
|
10-11-11 03:25pm
|
Reply
510
|
Meow 34JJ
(0)
|
Reply of
Watson's Review
Excellent review with plenty of detail, thank you.
|
10-09-11 11:16am
|
Reply
511
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
I agree too. $29.95 seems to be a fairly standard price for porn and I think a ot of sites figure that's the going rate and so that's what they'll charge, but you've got to look at what you're offering individually and what the other sites are offering and decide on a fair price.
There's sites offering literally thousands of scenes out there charging the same or less than this!
|
10-08-11 02:03pm
|
Reply
512
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
Yes I agree - I don't like to see ordinary passers-by reactions, it's not fair to them and certainly not sexy. If you're doing exhibitionism, then the exhibitionists should be surrounded by voyeurs who want to be there and find it sexy.
|
10-08-11 01:59pm
|
Reply
513
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
Love your username by the way - honest and very down to earth!
|
10-08-11 01:53pm
|
Reply
514
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review - you sound a little in love! I agree about her being called "skinny", that's not a compliment to me. Though I think in today's world some women do see it a compliment! I'd prefer the word "slender" or as you suggest "petite".
I tend not to do one-model sites as I prefer variety, but I have had a bit of a passion for the odd model in my time and I wouldn't probably join their site as part of a network as you suggest.
|
10-08-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
515
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
Brushing their teeth?! That's a new one on me! Is this some new fetish I haven't heard about?! Sounds like an odd site!
|
10-08-11 08:06am
|
Reply
516
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Brilliant detailed review as ever. Sounds like the sort of site I would like if I were straight - a bit of everything around a general theme rather than specialising too much on heavy BDSM. Sounds like it has a bit of humour to it and is naughty rather than full-on overwhelming.
|
10-07-11 11:57am
|
Reply
517
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Prefer facials to creampies, I find it sexier.
|
10-07-11 08:28am
|
Reply
518
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well for me the more detail the better - if someone wants only a quick overview of the site, that's what the overall score and pro and con lists are for - to me the general comments should be fact-filled with lots of opinion! So your reviews are perfect for me!
|
10-06-11 04:12pm
|
Reply
519
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Wow now that is a review! Incredible detail, well done!
|
10-05-11 11:05am
|
Reply
520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Updates are most important for me. Obviously it's nice if a site is long-standing and has plenty of content for me to look at, but if there's a steady stream of new updates it keeps the site fresh and me interested. If it's a new site with little existing content then new updates are crucial. If a site updates often it's great logging in and seeing a new video waiting, it's like a little present or something new you ordered being delivered in the mail!
|
10-05-11 06:56am
|
Reply
521
|
Workin Men XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
LOL gay porn can be very creative!
Yeah it doesn't really matter it's just I feel if I join a site and love it, I'll be hungry for more when I've seen what they've got. One of my greatest pleasure in porn is to check the site to see what new updates they have. So whilst I probably will join eventually and as you say just stay for a month, I'd still join an updating site over a non-updating one.
|
10-04-11 05:28am
|
Reply
522
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
AlexMercer's Review
Welcome to the site! As the other reviewers stated I was a bit concerned when all the Cosplay reviews appeared at once but I did wonder if it was something like you said with a community of users joining at once - so it is good to see you coming back with a good detailed review of another site.
|
10-03-11 11:50pm
|
Reply
523
|
American Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Sounds like a pretty intense and creative site! If I were straight this is probably the kind of site I'd like - and to be honest with all the guys in it, it would probably do a lot for me even as I am!
Excellent review as ever - shame the site isn't updating anymore. Always makes me sad when a great site stops updating - it's nice it's still online but feels kinda abandoned!
|
10-03-11 11:48pm
|
Reply
524
|
Man Avenue
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
Yay manholelover's back with another review for me! I really look forward to a new review from you! I checked out the site preview and I gotta say it looks pretty clear it's a solo site! You need to wipe down that monitor more often big boy! ;-)
Navigation sounds crap which would really annoy me and I hate music in porn! I don't mind solos but this sounds a bit too straightforward to me. Like you say, kinda of like "beginner porn" LOL!
|
10-03-11 11:45pm
|
Reply
525
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I guess strippers are the closest thing to porn, so I'd pick them!
|
10-03-11 11:41pm
|
