Even less. And it's the weakest aspect of the content.
The most significant boy-girl action put up so far is a POV vid where Phil fucks Dawn Avril, his current girl-friend. There's more cock shown than Dawn's pussy, for some reason. I was more turned on by the pre-sex tease than the sex, which gives you an idea how weak it is.
There are also a few spanking scenes. There is a fair amount of interaction between Phil and the models from behind the camera in the vids - if you find guy's voices a deal-killer, be aware of that.
It's not like "Exploited Baby-sitters" but its there.
Dawn's got some nice stuff with Janessa Brazil and a really hot new girl that they brought to a shoot.
Nobody should join this site hoping to see boy-girl stuff. If you look through the preview material and think the girls are cute and you like solo-girl tease, then you might really like this site.
I would recommend Nubiles.net if you like this age-group but want harder stuff, and particularly want boy-girl stuff. Nubiles has 1 boy-girl scene for most of their models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
If you like school-girl themed tease, with a variety of cute girls, this site hits the spot
Pics look great - recently shot pics are at 1330 X 2000
There's a variety of non-nude to nude, including sex toy play and a small amount of boy-girl action
Vids, while not HD, also are good looking (properties on the vid pertaining to the same pic set I looked at for measurement above are 720 X 400)
Members here get access to a large number of Phil-Flash sites that are not being updated any longer, including Next Door Nikki, Seanna Teen, Taylor Twins and Phil Flash.com, which itself includes the archives of several no-longer-updated tease sites, such as Tiffany Teen. This is the motherlode of teen tease with lots of sexy clothes, cute girls & awesome ass shots.
Very little photo treatment mucking things up!
Cons:
Phil Flash is the director - it's a one-man show. Updates come when Phil gets to them - usually once a week there will be a pic set with a vid, but not always.
Updates are frequently older material re-released or released for the first time on a site rather than a zip set with a separate buy price (part of the classic solo-girl site business model)
Vids are mainly vids of photo-shoots.
No web cam action at this point in time
Bottom Line:
Porn is very subjective. I've read comments from PU members that have joined Phil-Flash site, such as Next Door Nikki, and been bored.
I'm a huge fan of hot young 18-23 year old tease, and Phil Flash is a master of just the kind of tease I like - hot young women in sexy clothes with tiny thongs or sexy panties with lots of upskirt and ass and leg shots.
If you like that stuff, you'll find a lot of stuff here to enjoy. This site was started when Phil was bored of non-nude, which he'd mainly done when he stared with models like Tiffany Teen and Megan QT. So there's more nudity and toy play, etc in FDAU, while you have access to the classic non-nude stuff, which I still find very hot and erotic - more than most of the solo-girl stuff being done today.
To get the most out of this network, you'll have to do a lot of logging into multiple sites and clicking on "Bonus" whenever you see it. I suppose that all of the Phil-Flash sites included in membership here might eventually be integrated together, but they aren't now.
Interesting - I clicked on the DDF Prod link above, clicked on "Join Now" and it refers to the $34.95/month price, but there is no button to join with a credit card.
DDF has been sending me a lot of newsletters/promos, since I had taken advantage of the 10 Site Deal for a time when they first started it. I just checked out the price they are offering in that mailing. It's 1 year at $199.95 or $26.95/month recurring.
This site is about as "prime-time" as it's ever going to get, unless 21st Sextury just goes in some completely new direction or gets bought by another company. It is what it is and it will keep on being what it is, so far as I can see. It's Euro-babes deluxe with a Tanner Mayes thrown into the mix every once in a while. They've got their style and they're sticking with it. Navigation - well, it's never been 21st Sextury's strong point and that's not likely to change. Stability of the site, well, it hasn't had a complete "where did it go?" episode in a few months, so that's about as good as it gets with 21st Sextury as well.
What does it have? Tons of content with regular updates and lots of bonus sites with lots more content of similar material.
Why don't they streamline the whole dang thing? Probably because it works for them to market their niches.
I suspect that we'll see all the extremes represented:
a) we'll have amateur sites whose updates will be pics and vids of every woman that came in the door and signed their model consent form
b) we'll have glamour sites where not a single inch of the model is as they actually looks in real life
c) we'll have tons of self-shot material - it will be one of the most popular ways for young women to earn money to pay for college, which will cost $100K/semester in 20 years
d) we'll have sites like Brazzers that will advertise with plastic surgeons they are associated with - and the sites will compete as to how much body manipulation can be done
e) we'll have virtual web-cam/lap-dance shows, which will be tremendously popular - giving adult men one other reason to not ever leave their computers
f) there will be numbers of brutal porn sites that have roving ISP's and members will have forums devoted to finding the current ISP's for the day to have access - it will be kind of like the early days of raves - only nastier
g) porn site ripoffs will be rampant - the mobs that currently traffic in credit cards will have moved into porn to a massive degree
h) we'll have alliances of web sites that used to be unique that will band together to ward off porn piracy and will have their own Standards & Practices Acts specifying 1) treatment of models, 2) treatment of customers, 3) levels of brutality
Actually, I'm probably making predictions for 5 years from now. It's difficult to predict 20 years out.
I'm not sure why this was news to you, messmer - I and numerous others have posted about the no-longer-updating sites previously at PU
a) all of these dormant sites have a good deal of material to look through (94 scenes at Brothas Fuck Teens, 97 scenes at Busty Fever, etc)
b) If 17 sites are dormant, that leaves 23 sites that are active, which is one hell of an active network, and a hell of a stash, since some of the sites have 100's of scenes already available and the most active sites update 3-4 times a week.
Though the dude-free label is soon to go away, since they already announced that they'll be releasing a bj vid of Amy Brooke with some guy - then there was the Tanner Mayes Club Sandy BTS shoot, which was extensively boy/girl
Note: you don't have a choice of your method of payment. You send an e-mail as per Alex's instructions in the blog and you get a response that your card used for your ALS Scan membership has been charged and you are informed as to your login info for ALS Angels.
This was fine with me, but people should know how the promo is being handled. If you have a desire for things to be handled differently in your particular case, you will want to include that info in your original e-mail on the subject.
Too bad that the webmaster gave up on this site - for a while, it seemed like it could get good, though the whole Sybian thing is a bit limited - maybe he started Pure MonkeyRocker
If it was hot babes, I'd download for sure - and the description doesn't even fit the vid, since I'm looking at the preview right now and all scenes start with the girl wearing clothes. There are scenes of Violet Blue, who is a must-download for me, so I'd download her scene for sure, and Cailey Taylor looks hot as well so I would definitely download her scene.
I guarantee you, this vid is 40000000% better than the vid the jokers at Videobox started things off with today - World's Oldest Gangbang - ha ha ha. I'm glad they're having a good time celebrating April Fools Day by posting that garbage. And if they made up for it with an extra posting today, then I would be sweet about it.
No problem, Advent - you've got good sites and I'm glad to give suggestions that I hope will help make them even better.
One other thing I was thinking about - I had been looking at the preview of ATK Premium and was rather surprised that all of the pics that I checked out in the preview had a copyright date of 2005. Someone checking out that site could easily reach a conclusion that ATK Premium is a site that hasn't updated in years. You might want to pass on a suggestion that you would be well-served by freshening those pics up on a regular basis to give potential members a more realistic impression of the life of the site.
Karla is actually my fave of all their models. I've tried 3-day trials of Gigi, and she's very cute, but she's clearly one of those models that doesn't move on her own, so I'll find 5-10 pics in a row where she is in the exact same position, because the photographer is clicking away and hasn't specifically told her to move and exactly how.
Karla loves the camera and moves all the time so every pic of her reflects that - plus she's got a great sense of humor and makes a lot of funny faces, which I find quite endearing and then there's those long sexy limbs - interesting that you compare her to Amy Reid's early stuff, which I also love.
The current design of the site seems to be one that hides the content rather than pointing members to the content - rather than all the "View More" huge buttons, when it comes to individual models, you might want to even have a count of the "more" that is in that direction.
The other thing is that the thumbnails frequently don't look good, then when you click on the pic, I'm amazed at how hot the pics are - I'm looking at the site now, and there's a blurry-looking pic of Lexi in the "Bonus Photos" area - doesn't look particularly inviting, but when I click on it, the gallery pics show just how freaking hot she is - and then I have to click through several more screens to see how much content you have of her - you've got a dozen galleries of this incredibly hot babe - and 5 vids - but finding that out takes a lot of clicking through screens that show a portion of the content and don't give you much info on what else there is.
There's also a design problem in the way that the vids and photos are designated. I look at the way things are presented and I'm constantly wondering - Is this where the photos are or is this where the movies are? It's just rather confusing.
But, as I said in my topic of this comment, despite the confusion, what makes or breaks a site is whether or not it has good content - and this one has quite a bit of good content - it's just not presented in the easiest way to be able to find it.
I wouldn't have recommended it on my previous one-month membership, but I'm enjoying it more this time.
There is a ton of content and I've never been a member of ATK Exotics or ATK Premium, both of which have a good deal of Petite Girl material here. It's that old thing, "If you haven't seen it before, it's new to you."
Has anybody figured out the structure of this site? It's like a labyrinth and when I was a member of the site for a month before, when it first opened, I think that I totally missed how much content there was - or they added tons later. It's difficult to tell how much content there is, I find, unless you click on every "More" button that you see, until you get presented with dozens of galleries of the model that you're looking at - lots of ATK Exotics material here and stuff from other ATK sites as well - fun but confusing at the same time.
Thanks for the review of this site, exotics - I had been a member for a month when it first opened, but wasn't sure how much new stuff they had been doing.
I wouldn't be surprised if Gigi Spice's material became a bonus at some point. I've seen some post boob-job pics of her so it's pretty clear that Pacino is working through a stash of material that has a pretty definite end-point. I don't think that she's working with him post boob-job.
Such is the reality with solo-girls. As I wrote in a comment on Karla's site, the photo-updates on that site have been reduced to every other week, so I believe that Karla Spice has also moved on.
It depends on what's going on in the scene. If it's some pro-am type crap where the girl's having a difficult time getting the guy hard, those seconds tick by like minutes - so I'd prefer it to be really short - or non-existant.
John Stagliano has done hour-long scenes, starting with being outside walking around, then picking up on a girl and following her inside somewhere, then having some encounter that leads to the sex - with lots of tease and all kind of other explorations.
He's a good enough story-teller that he can make the whole thing interesting for that length of time.
Erik Everhard is someone else that likes to do lengthy scenes with an extended set-up, then lots of tease before the sex gets started - with a hot girl, that's a lot of fun to me.
The "only do scenes this way" outlook is not one that I share. If anything, I find myself frustrated by scenes with too-little tease rather than too much
Flaccid-cock endless blow-jobs are my biggest peaves when it comes to lengthy scenes, though the people I mentioned don't have that issue in their scenes.
Bring on the dudes is right - man, I really like the 2 sample pics posted today - the one where Jimmy's licking her pussy while she holds his head there and the one where he's fucking her with the squash or whatever the hell that is - the look on her face is phenomenal and she's got a bod to die for.
Every sample pic I've seen of Amy has been awesome, in my opinion - she reminds me a bit of Courtney Simpson - another rough & ready blonde that ooooooozes sex and has an incredible bod to boot.
This is gonna be an interesting year for ALS Scan - kudos to them for not staying in one place just because they have been around a while.
I'm not sure how this is uncharted waters for ALS Scan - they had that BTS scene with Tanner doing her boy/girl shoot for Club Sandy that included all manner of penetration.
This is the first shoot that they have done where they booked the male talent, I guess.
This may partly be their response to the market and it may be them wanting to go with the flow with their models.
One of the most memorable parts of this last year's Caribbean beach shoot for me was Tanner crawling up to Jeremy while he was doing vid, asking him "You want to play never-never land?" He said, "What's that?" and Tanner said "Well, you've never been in my mouth before" and went for his cock. Jeremy cut away with the camera but I wish he hadn't. They're booking pretty naughty girls who like playing with cock and are good at it and perhaps they're feeling like they ought to bring 'em on and see how it goes.
I dunno. It doesn't upset me if they get hot material. I have to say that others who have ventured into hard-core don't do so well.
Nubiles.net's boy/girl scenes aren't good. Sarah Peachez' blow-job scenes aren't exciting, neither are Jana Cova's. Phil-Flash's ventures into boy/girl aren't as good as his solo-girl & girl/girl stuff at all. But none of them have gone to only-boy/girl, so I feel like they ought to do what they want to do because the lack of restrictions probably makes them happier about doing their sites.
I feel the same way about ALS Scan - maybe their boy/girl stuff will be mediocre, but if it keeps them feeling excited and refreshed about doing the site, then their other material will be better for it.
It's true, it's true - I'm not currently a member, but I'm sure I'll be back - absence does make the heart grow fonder, after all - and Twisty's vids have gotten better and better. If the photo-shopping were decreased, I'd probably not even be taking this break, but that's life, and it's not a bad thing to take a break anyway.
OK, I need to edit my response, because when I tried further navigation in the Babes.tv archive, it crapped out 3/4 of the time - so I would say that that Babes.tv archives are there - but the navigation sucks and you might have to try multiple times to actually look at what you want to look at.
I asked about the money-back guarantee - received a response, but their headquarters in Canada had to receive the request within 30 days of your initial join, blah, blah, blah - considering that their parent company is being sued right and left, I doubt that they are honoring any refund requests.
Yes, if you go into Babes.tv and click on "Archives", you'll have to enter your log-in info yet again - and then you're in the archives - I believe it's complete - no reason to believe otherwise at this point.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
