Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Denner (0)

Feedback:   All (2775)  |   Reviews (120)  |   Comments (399)  |   Replies (2256) Other:   Replies Received (1709)  |   Trust Ratings (1) All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user. Shown : 1726-1750 of 2795 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Reply 1726 LSG Models (0) Reply of TheRizzo's Reply Thanks, bro. And you're absolutly right about the site - and BTW: the content is certainly NOT that good - so this is probably the last time this user sign up with them...and that my experience is usefull to other users. 09-23-08  10:35am Comment 1727 LSG Models (0) WARNING - and a thumb up for CCBill LSG had an offer some 2-3 months ago: a whole year for around $40. After a couple of months my login/password stopped working last week - it should work till summer 2009. So off with mail to the webmaster - no answer after three day, then another mail - still no answer - for almost a week. In the same period they were busy with promotions for the site - I recieved three mails on that - but they obviously don't care when they allready have taken your money... So - without much hope - I mailed CCBill about it. To my surprise: After 5 minuttes I got a mail, that they had reinstated my login/password - and it worked... But for the LSG-people: Try to be concerned about your paying costumers too! 09-23-08  05:31am Replies (3) Reply 1728 LSG Models (0) Reply of Drooler's Comment This VIP, or Premium og whatever is bad politics for websites with webmasters who are a little too smart: You get some extras if you just pay a couple of bucks more... Pier 999 had it (when they were active - are these buys on the deroute?) and now LSG. It's just a way to get more money out of members/customers. I really dislike it. 02-11-08  11:30am Reply 1729 LSG Models (0) Reply of jd1961's Reply to jd1961 and Drooler: You guys make this place more fun....... 09-03-07  06:59am Reply 1730 LSG Models (0) Reply of Drooler's Reply Yeah, maybe this is a start of new undermining of this good PU. As I stated concerning this LSG- "hoax-offer": IF i'd get such a free access, I would stand down (is that the right frase?) from making any review/comments on the site in question. But it does not seem to be necessary, because I think most of these sites are doing scams - even with us PU's. It's good to warn about this and I certainly agree on the the question of credibility here at PU. And maybe we all should publish if we get an offer like that - and take it. 09-02-07  08:57am Comment 1731 LSG Models (0) Hoax These people don't play it straight - it seems. At feedback you get a promise of free access if you join their program of "extensive comments" and so on.... jd1961 feared 100 points reviews comming up. But, don't wory jd1961 - it seems like the whole setup is a hoax. Just got a reply - that particular "FREE ACCESS" is limited to 4 - FOUR - sets of photos - nothing more. AND I only got the answer AFTER extending my membership another month. It sucks! And like so much else - it's was too good to be true! Just went on CCBill and cancelled. 09-02-07  07:31am Replies (7) Reply 1732 LSG Models (0) Reply of jd1961's Reply Not from me, anyway... Like I said in the comment - if these guys give me a free access - nada about LSG on PU from this user. 08-30-07  12:30am Comment 1733 LSG Models (0) Good Stuff - maybe free access As a member of LSG you can get an opportunity for a free membership, maybe - quite interesting - moneywise. It seems like. At the slog "Feedback" they ask for your opion of the site with diffenrent Q and A - good idea!!! But what they also ask you is this: "Would you be interested in a free membership, in return for more extensive comments and feedback about our site?" Well, I would not mind. I told them yes for some 4-5 days ago, but have not heard from them. I'll let you all know - but if I get that free membership, I'll stand down from making any comments or futher review about the site here at PU - anything else would be violating consumer-trust here! And if other PU's get the same free access it would be the right thing to tell it here and not make any review, comment and so on about the site at this place..... 08-29-07  07:49am Replies (2) Comment 1734 LSG Models (0) New server One good thing has come from one of our main cons: Just got a mail: They're getting new server to give members better speed. It seems like it's tomorrow... 08-25-07  05:49pm Replies (0) Review 1735 LSG Models (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: First of all: Great looking videos of solo girls - especially for a girl-video-freak. Sexy teen girls, mostly european/east european. Good price for what you get. I'm not sure about updates at this early stage, but the amount has rissen lately - it seems. After checking out the site earlier this year. Videos are generally better than photos - the atmosphere/color in the videos are great. Cons: It's quite a newer site, so the amount of stuff here is still average, but ok for the price. I agree with ofter PU-users that the way they number the photos in zips or confusing and, yeah, not good. And watermarks two places in a photo is nonsens. Download speed needs work. Videos are split up in 2 og 3 files which makes the amout seem larger - and there is no full download for a whole scene. Thats the most irritating about this site. I tried to do a movie-join - but could not. Bottom Line: I'll probably take some heat again for too high score to this site. But folks, I love this site just after browsing for a day. Here are some extremely cute and sexy teens. Their videos are top. Something in between Teen Dreams, Nubiles and European Glamour Girls - BUT this LSG-site has something special about their girl-videos. If you try to brows the preview you'll see some fascinating young and slim teens - and some I've not seen anywhere else, like Mia, Juliet and Zoe - not in this great quality of video anyway. Most videos come in WMV, Quicktime and MPG - and there is also a small file for preview. Average size of video files is 100 MB. Quality is just great. If these guys keep up the standard and keep the updates comming, well I think. I'll be back and back again. But please, make the movie-files in whole scenes too! Follow-Up: Interaction/feedback sucks - se comment. I downgrade in spite of some extremely fine girls on video. 08-06-07  08:44am Replies (0) Reply 1736 Lusted (0) Reply of DpornGuy's Reply Looking forward to your review!!!! 04-13-11  08:43am Reply 1737 Lusted (0) Reply of DpornGuy's Reply No - never. Thanks for the reminder - I've got to take another look - and maybe a new search for info...but still for a site you do not know much about - it's a bit high price (compared to a lot of other deals at the moment) 04-12-11  06:27am Reply 1738 Lusted (0) Reply of Spencer's Reply Hey Spencer.. Thanks again - in spite of the price, I think now, I'll go for it - the site seems a bit different in style of content, ect..... 01-07-10  10:48am Comment 1739 Lusted (0) Question to Spencer Thanks - we now have a TBP-review of this site. Spencer states: 'The videos that come in high definition look better than the standard definition options for sure.' Before I join - it's not cheap (and if they're not upgrading anymore) - I'd be great to know if the HD-videos outnumber the standard - or the other way around? And it does NOT look like all the models have videos - even if it's a 200/200. 01-07-10  05:11am Replies (6) Reply 1740 Lusted (0) Reply of Drooler's Reply Great....thanks! BTW - let's keep our hopes up for the Eufrat TBP-review - soon..... 12-16-09  12:34pm Comment 1741 Lusted (0) Help for another showcase This site seems to have potentials. A lot of exclusive material - IT SEEMS - and something different. Found a few videos 'out there' and it was just great. So let's get a TBP review here - it was launched in 2006, so...... 12-16-09  10:34am Replies (2) Comment 1742 Lusted (0) Anybody??? This site looks good. The Co. only has two sites - do not know any of them. But Lusted seems to have quite a few euro-models. The preview is not good and the quality of the two trailer ditto. The model-directory says almost nothing - at least not about which model has videos and photosets or only photosets. The main reason I find this somewhat new site worth mention is an entire video I got hands on from somewhere else: And it is VERY fine. It's a video of Lexy Shawn. But again they have a model of a pretty hot girl, Ana Maria - and as far as I know, she never done any videos, so.. Yes, so - anybody been here? 02-04-09  06:43am Replies (0) Reply 1743 Lusty Grandmas (0) Reply of mr smut's Comment Still waiting for info from webmaster Damon here - just a serious thanks to mr smut for this usefull update/info....!!! And even if there's new 21Sextury deal, it's not easy to get those other infos. I'd like to join the 'motherload' (pix and video and club sandy and still get especially Grandpas fuck teens (the preview of Shalina here is great) - but I'm still in the dark.. 11-28-09  09:52am Reply 1744 Mac and Bumble (0) Reply of Monahan's Comment Monahan has a very good point here - no matter how M&B try to market their sites/deals - 'their credibility sucks' - it seems. The same with their updates - and content in general! I think, that TBP has downgraded the site lately (not sure) - but 85 is still pretty high - to say it nicely - for this site.. Thanks for this relevant update/info here from Monahan. 01-02-10  08:18am Reply 1745 Mac and Bumble (0) Reply of Xororos's Comment Mac and Bumble is one of my favorite "hate-sites". It's generally a fake concerning previews and what seems to be updates - old, old stuff (like videos of for exampel Lonnie Adams shown as new stuff) - man, it's OLD, very old. Take a look at earlier comments AND PU-reviews. One thing I really do NOT understand is how our friends at TBP can still give this site 90.8 score... BTW: Took a look at the join-page: don't see no trail - just a $19.95 for a month and a special $13.33/month for 3 months... But anyway - won't go near this site again. 06-01-09  07:27am Reply 1746 Mac and Bumble (0) Reply of badandy400's Reply When doing a kind of "warning" like this - I often think afterwards: Was I a little too harsh??? In this case, No... Follow your gut feeling, buddy! And, man - lets find some GOOD sites out there!!!!!!! ...and then....like they said it in the 1960/70th: Tell it to the people! 04-24-08  11:02am Reply 1747 Mac and Bumble (0) Reply of badandy400's Comment Was too late to edit my reply, but just this: Heard from another source, that my example about Lonnie Adams and M&B is right on the spot: She does not make more photos/videos - so the promise of Lonnie Adams-updates is - well..........if the source is right? Hope we all get some reaction/answer from M&B! 04-24-08  09:04am Reply 1748 Mac and Bumble (0) Reply of badandy400's Comment You got no reply! That may say it all. Badandy, you've been around for some time here, so just this: Don't go for it. M&B have this fine looking preview, but when you join very little is new - VERY little. I'd never go there again. Joined this site 3 or 4 times - and man, was I disapointed. There are swell photos in the preview - and a promiss of updates with - for exampel - Lonnie Adams. When you join it's all the same ol' photos and videos of the lovely Lonnie. Noting new. 90,8 at TBP need an updates, for sure - see PU-reviews........ Sorry, don't know about the charge for zip-files now. 04-24-08  08:42am Comment 1749 Mac and Bumble (0) FAKE I've finaly unsubscribed to the newsletter they been sending me for some time after being a member twice. I must have hit my head on something joining the second time... This site I certainly will give not recommended! Agree with Drooler and dilbert4100 They don't give a damm about members, the stuff they update are worth very little - yeah, we're only in it for the money. Critic like this needs explanation - let me give you some: In the latest newsletter you can get directed to - for exampel - the great Lonnie Adams. In the preview there SEEMS to be new material of this fine old timer. But bah,bah,bah - it's the old videos and the old photosets - in spite of new - alleged - thumbnail-photos. They are even so stupid, that the vids- thumbnails (with new photos) direct you to the old videos. Fake, brother, fake! This site needs a serious new evaluation by TBP! 02-20-08  11:55am Replies (2) Reply 1750 Magic Blondes (0) Reply of exotics4me's Reply Hey exotics4me... Well, that was quite easy - and ok, rather logical once you find the way.. Thanks, bro for a fine help here! 03-09-09  03:11pm Shown : 1726-1750 of 2795 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.5 seconds.