| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1751
|
Magic Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
The 21.Sextury.com has turned into an "organisation" that is much less user-friendly than before.
If you join some other site than the motherload PixandVideo, you get SOME hints of what other sites to expect for bonus-sites - and man, most of those bonus sites are primarily of some useless/old/non-exclusive crap.
You can get ONE or even TWO good sites - if you choose right at the 55 listed sites...it's close to a gamble and takes a hell of lot of time to find the right onces when your searching for the best bonus.
But if you join Pixandvideo, your're entirely in the mercy of sites-owner - you get no idea of what bonus is up from the preview...
Man, I really miss the old style in preview and in dealing with us users....
|
03-08-09 08:08am
|
Reply
1752
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
No, gaypornlover - forget it (put on hold)......just take it in consideration in the future, please (had my review up in less than 30 minuttes.....it's easy: Look at the review line - here you get both date and time....it's just some thing about consideration for other reviews - but we've been through that
No problemas!!!
|
08-01-11 09:01am
|
Reply
1753
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
BTW: Remember the words here at PU about letting new reviews stay up front for "just a little while"....before entering your own....?
|
08-01-11 08:51am
|
Reply
1754
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yes, bro - it's "nice" without all that pseudo-interview-stuff. And sure, forgot that importend issue about the missing zip - was too busy browsing all those fine videos....
|
02-08-09 05:14am
|
Review
1755
|
Mano Job
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site is for fans of tugjobs, handjobs or whatever. And one of the best in it's field.
The amount of videos here are just great - and what you can expect from a "good" site.
Almost 300 videos of (mostly) fine tugjobs - with very different kinds of girls - some quite plain, though.
Some top-porn models included.
Fine video-producing with the GIRL in the front - no f....... cameraman-yap.
Fine bj-bonus site - and one more - not so exiting - bonus site.
Fine - for most videos - quality.
Download speed ok.
Average updates - what seems to be every third day - not impressive, though.
Fine preview - go for that, first - then you get the idea... |
| Cons: |
Misserable navigation - and ditto socalled "search-engine"
One of those site where you just have to keep on pressing the bottum going through the archives.
Some stereotype-style of filming (but generally it's better than average)
Price a bit high.
Too few euro-models - but ok, this is first and last a US-oriented site, so now you know...
Annoying file-names - all have the same, so you got to alter everything after download. |
| Bottom Line: |
Take a look at TBP and the handjob-sites, tugsites and whatever they're called. No more than a 81,5 for the top-rated one.
As somewhat a fan of those hj-sites, I think I've been through them all - untill now Her Sweet Hand was the best.
But ManoJob got a lot more. You get to know the model without any stupid talk from the cameraman, the girls are well guided/edited in the manner of speaking, teasing og talking directly to the viewer.
And that part is very well done here at ManoJob.
It's a pleasure to watch those US-girls talking to the viewer, only - and if you're into sexy-talk, this could be the site for you.
And here is why this site deserves above the 80: Well produced videos with girls remembering that the thing here is like: POV.
And another pros. is the tremendous amount of videos and ditto different types of girls - AND before you get to the hj-act most girls do fine teasing, masturbating and so on - pretty good, all together.
Very fine dealing with the video-files:
You can download every scene in small parts (wmv) or download the scene in three part - and, of course full scene. Typical size for an entire scene is 180-240 Mb.
And finally you can choose to download cumshots only.
But Man: Name those files better for the user to archive downloads - and not name all the files the same.
Photosets: Download vidcaps or fullsize jpegs (1500x1000) not bad.
Bottom line: This is a fine - at the moment maybe the best - handjob site around - if you can do without euro-models - they have a few at ManoJob - no, very few... |
|
02-05-09 07:54am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1756
|
Marina Mendoza
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Yeah, I agree - IT IS Eve Angel, no question about that - and yes, none exclusive....
|
03-04-08 11:00am
|
Reply
1757
|
Marina Mendoza
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotic4me
Very interesting news you have here....
First I had some thoughts about the content at this site - not being exclusive.
Second - guess you might be right about her retirement - too bad!
|
02-07-08 02:14pm
|
Comment
1758
|
Marina Mendoza
(0)
|
|
01-18-08 10:32am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1759
|
Matrix HD
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
Good tip, atrapat....
|
06-02-08 12:12pm
|
Reply
1760
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Matt Frackas's Reply
Sorry it took some time to reply to this:
First: It's been quite some time since I wrote my review based on a membership way back.
I did not get back again - simply because the site did not appeal to me - at that time.
Maybe things have changed radical and may it's time to take another look....
|
09-30-08 06:50am
|
Comment
1761
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
|
04-09-08 08:38am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1762
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Wauw - Drooler is sharpening his pen! (again)
What a reply!
|
09-22-07 01:01pm
|
Reply
1763
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Reply
Well, DigglerFL - I'm with you all the way.
And your word here is: Integrity.
I hope your point of view is heard by our hosts!
|
09-22-07 12:55pm
|
Comment
1764
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
|
09-22-07 10:37am
Replies (11)
|
Reply
1765
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler has a point.
But I'm not so surprised by the outstanding difference in points.
This is in many ways a difficult site - some really good looking girls - and some strange navigation and some boring videos.
I've been there twice and both times was quite disapointed with the site.
I don't think I'll be back for some time
|
08-16-07 10:42am
|
Reply
1766
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Understand that - this is my first and probably my last in the short section...
Generally it's hard to supply sufficient infos in short reviews.
|
07-06-11 03:43am
|
Review
1767
|
MC Nudes
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Before pros:
This is a premiere/opening night, la,la.. of more short reviews from this user:
+ Top of the pops in nice models - a lot of really great models, to be precise..
+ Fine/Great video quality
+ Somewhat a fine variation of models
+ Great photosets - maybe better than vids
+ Zip for sets - AND choice of fine resolutions
+ Exclusive material |
| Cons: |
- Main cons: Repetition!
- Like a couple of other soft core sites MC Nudes seems to have a lot of difficult in renewal of general attraction in both sets and vids.
- They go for 3D now - who cares - for a paysite at PC-level... |
| Bottom Line: |
MC Nudes was once kind of a favorite - for two reasons:
1) Great models
2) Fine quality vids, quality has seems to go further and further - fine.
But generally the content of both vids and sets lacks a lot in "development".... not much new in matter of more sexy videos - of more refined erotica..
MC Nudes has been the same for too many years - in my book and:
It never seems to get off that special way of doing the same style over and over again.
Did not mean to join, but some models I dig, I had to go for - AND: Those models have a lot better/more erotic/more sexy vids elsewhere.
Still it's a 70 - for the quality and models.
Go elsewhere (TBP) than this review for specifics about formats ect..... |
|
07-05-11 08:57am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1768
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Bumble B's Review
I do not agree with Bumble B about the score... and I think this new user could have mentioned more cons at MC Nudes - for instance: for this user the site has problems with the repeeting style in most video-scenes (just for one).
BUT still Bumble B starts up with a decent and honest review - so talking about trusts now (see thread) I give this new user thumbs up....
Welcome, Bumble B.
|
12-04-09 06:00am
|
Reply
1769
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Andreas's Reply
I'll try to answer this in my best english-language (but, ok - that's the deal here):
This is not a matter of respect/disrespect towards the girls/models. Neither Drooler or this user say anything about the girls "giving a shit".
If a model - (and in this case - quite a few) shows little or no interest during a video, it's probably NOT the model/girl - but more likely the photografer/director/producer ect. Some of the girls at MCN are at other sites too. And some doing a much better "acting" for the viewer.
But then again: Ok, we all got different taste - and other viewers find the style at MCN good....been a member 3-4 times - and I just find the videos more and more tame or "lame" - to use your own expression...
|
08-31-09 05:36am
|
Reply
1770
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Oh, yes....PUs and webmasters/owners of MC Nudes.
Read Droolers reply and then think about the last line:
'If the models don't seem to give a shit, why should the user?'
|
08-29-09 02:42pm
|
Comment
1771
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
|
08-29-09 09:17am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
1772
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Review
Now, this seems to be an honest and well founded review by a new PU - short, but "modest".
I almost agree with the score - and certainly with the arguments.
Welcome to a new user - read his reviews for MetArt and Femjoy.
Not too many words, but well chosen.
Maybe we all could do things a bit shorter in our reviews - it's not always necesarry to make a novel out of a review - sometimes I get lost along the way. (And by all means: some of my own reviews have been far too long, too).
Instead:
Short news you can use...
PUs interested in the particular sites can always go back and ask fellow PUs for futher details..
Gotta give this new user a thumb-up.
|
01-28-09 10:04am
|
Reply
1773
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Hey again
Rather cool design - it looks great....
Still I'm more on the 78 from your review concerning content. I don't know what it is, but apart from the fine models some things are still missing to make this a great site.
Maybe it lacks some real sensuallity, some sexier ways in photos and videos - even some of the Playboy videos - and photos for that matter - are more sexy than MCN.
|
01-01-08 03:16pm
|
Reply
1774
|
Me And My GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
jeppegutt's Comment
Strange - since TBP states 'video downloads have no DRM'...
But if that's the case, it's not good.
I'd NEVER join a site with no download for videos (hate in-browser Flash). - that's why TBP makes this essential info.
Did you join before TBP put out the 'Site Facts*?
|
01-14-10 08:48am
|
Reply
1775
|
Mega Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks, exotics4me
Even if they're still like a 7 out of 10 - I'm joining. And you right there about about the girls - at least what is shown in the previews...
|
05-06-08 01:20am
|
