| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
2701
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site:
Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that. |
| Cons: |
The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks. |
| Bottom Line: |
Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so... |
|
07-23-09 06:38am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
2702
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
|
07-12-09 08:40am
Replies (1)
|
Review
2703
|
Virgin Films
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of semi-exclusive/exclusive videos - some i pretty good quality - most in low/average quality.
Good bonus sites as well. A few of these bonues sites have video to download in same general quality as Virgin Films.
Zip in the photo-sections on bonus sites - and some good HQ videos in the same bonus sites |
| Cons: |
Too many videos are split up (a few also total video for download) - to day it's a bummer if you can't get whole videos too - for that price: 29.95.
And too many videos are in too bad/low quality for 2007. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site - and the bonus sites - are a bit tricky.
If you'er into russian/eastern european girls for a change you will find some really pearls. There is one Diana solo - great looking and sexy (9 on my scale).
But it's a not good that her and must other solo/hardcore videos are low in quality.
But ok, if you can live with a little blured videos for a full/or semi-full screen it's worth a visit. |
|
05-02-07 09:22am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2704
|
Virtual Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
SHIT, buddy
That's the kind of nightmare we all fear if some kind of - yes, asshole - as you put it - mess with cookies.
Jeeeez, sorry to hear it hit you.
And man, should we all take this as a very serious warning!
I'll stay away from this mess, for sure....
|
02-16-08 10:17am
|
Reply
2705
|
Virtual Nymphos
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Excellent review (and warning).
Well, Cybertoad got around to it and the same goes for asmith: Those 3D/animated-sites.
I've been somewhat fascinated by that kind of "porn", but along the way it seems like the deal is not so attractive, after all - thanks to reviews from asmith and Cybertoad.
Maybe thing are a bit premature - and maybe it takes MORE time to develop stuff like this. Wish it did not, though...
|
10-13-08 09:20am
|
Reply
2706
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Great to get your input on this one, NS.
I really do not care that much if the HD-vids material is WMV, AVI or MP4 or whatever - as long as it is in great viewing quality and like 1280x720 (or even better).
You say:
"All newly shot scenes are available in MP4 HD."
From what date are "newly shot scenes" - and HOW many can we see at the site?
Thanks!
|
11-18-11 08:47am
|
Reply
2707
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks a lot!!! tangub - for this fine info/update...it's almost like:
Now, your're talking!
This was what I was waiting for - concerning a join...
|
11-18-11 08:37am
|
Reply
2708
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Oh,oh...does that mean, that the amount of vids in HD or 1280x720 is considerably higher in MP4??
|
11-18-11 05:20am
|
Reply
2709
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Have to second Cybertoad....GREAT and very helpful review.
Have always been a little disappointed with the quality of those vids you also can watch as bonus material at many sites - and for quite a few years now.
Then found some new trailers in top quality - so it's a bit sad to learn this:
"... but remember that WMV HD is rare here."
But hope that will turn to the better in the future....
Thanks, rearadmiral!
|
11-18-11 02:55am
|
Reply
2710
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Thanks - great to get a response so fast from a WM... and: unlike those sets/vids offered at sites like Teendreams - it's good to hear, that the main site itself has much better quality...
BUT: WHY? - at all offer that low down quality vids/sets in license that make users think: That Viv Thomas deal is not worth it???
|
09-21-11 08:39am
|
Reply
2711
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Hope you can clear this up....
There GOT to be a difference between the main Viv Thomas-site - and the one you gain access to via various sites, Teendreams as one.
The vids - via Teendreams - are almost horrible/blurred in quality and 3:4. But seen some trailers from Viv Thomas in 1280x720 (I think it was) - and in great quality...
Guess that's the "Very High Quality"?
And if so....great! And is that only for newer vids?
|
09-21-11 06:10am
|
Reply
2712
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Review
I really understand your disapointment...
Viv Thomas is not a site to join, if your going for videos - and certainly not at that price...
Stay put here at PU and read a lot of fine reviews for a lot better video-sites - for a couple of a lot better sites you should have gone to PixandVideo/ClubSandy - or again Teen Dreams (where you get access to Viv) ect...
My advice is to take a much closer look at the reviews both here and at TBP - I'm sure it'll give you better hints...
|
12-10-09 08:18am
|
Reply
2713
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Damn fine review here, RB - in spite of the cons it really looks like worth a try....
|
01-04-10 06:16am
|
Reply
2714
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, I remember ibill - and not to be trusted.
Do not know exactly when they got out of bussiness, but this may be right:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBill
BTW: Have to agree entirely with Drooler about the use of creditcard - got a couple - but always use ONLY one for porn-sites - that way it's much easier to follow the transactions!
|
12-09-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
2715
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Pretty wild - remember once seening a beautifull brunette acting as a falconer - with a real bird and all...just do not remember where (typical)....
|
08-05-08 06:26am
|
Reply
2716
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
In spite of some serious cons: No zips - no videos, this site has really got the attention of this user.
Main reason: New exclusive stuff! (including a new way of soft latina material)
Tnanks to Drooler for this first/exclusive and fine review - and though the score does not reach for the skies - I'm going for it.
Check out the preview, BTW....
|
08-02-08 02:54pm
|
Reply
2717
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
By all means...what a relief - imagine how this 20 year old bank employee with the pimples may smile at you at the next visit....
|
05-30-11 12:11pm
|
Reply
2718
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Agree, lk2 - about the preview.
And the models, for sure - but bottom line: the style! That's the main, if not ONLY the problem here - indeed so for the vids (not much into the sets at this site, either).
And thanks for the good wishes/reply about my membership.
|
08-29-11 07:20am
|
Reply
2719
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
It's sometimes hard to be rational when you preview/join a site...
|
08-29-11 03:42am
|
Comment
2720
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
|
08-28-11 06:48am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2721
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ze Droolah - you use the word "clarity" about the way they shoot the material - well, is that not precisely what this is about..
See my answer to messmer - still guess it comes down to how good - or not - those photographers/video-guys are - and there certainly is a lot of difference.
And getting back to W4B this time, I was really disappointed - those vid-shoots are getting worse in general.
|
12-06-10 09:41am
|
Reply
2722
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer - we got to admit it - times are changing - things are not what it used to be - and la,la,la...
Still I think you hit it right: The photographers/video ditto - I get a feeling some of the newer onces lack that touch of what is erotic and what is just plain simple....
|
12-06-10 09:36am
|
Comment
2723
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
|
12-05-10 08:10am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2724
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
2)
BTW - no offense, PP - a fine hint for US PUs this could be a sweet deal...........
|
11-12-10 09:04am
|
Reply
2725
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Well, yes, ok ect....IF I was a US resident..
They still got that regional pricing and an excuse:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=54643
|
11-12-10 07:46am
|
