| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2726
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
This is - very gently put: NONSENSE!
That answer from W4B only states/underlines what a lot of PUs suspect: Speculation in getting more money out certain users.
A LOT of sites I've joined they DO have an alternative billing co. - like EPOCH for one.
AND those sites gave me a link after writing to the webmaster - how to join at the $-price from Europe (or else where outside the US, for that matter)...
The excuse here is very out of line - there's NOTHING like these so called "European Union rules.........."
Well, thanks, tangub - now we know THIS about W4B.
|
11-09-10 08:26am
|
Reply
2727
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Great review with a vast amount of info!
Been a while since last join-up, but the site seems to have grown quite a lot.
Agree with most pros and cons here - but my main "cons" was then - and it looks like it still have to be according to the preview: Way too short videos - average time for a videoclip about three minuttes...!
|
01-07-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
2728
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
No Name's Review
Yes, an explanation to the answer/quarrel from the site in question as quoted would be good:
"This case is closed. If you continue to offend us, our site and other people I'll forward all your correspondence along with links to forums where you publicly offended us to our legal department."
A bit far away from the latest review made by messmer - which starts:
"+Friendly, involved and supportive Webmaster."
And BTW: How did they threatened you: "if I leave a review"????????
Man, they really pissed you off - BUT give us some details, so MAYBE other PUs can give you support....
|
06-29-11 07:11am
|
Reply
2729
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Another great messmer review - but I'll never be a (new) hairy fan: except from those vintage materials - in those times shaved pussies were not much in style - and the "natural" pussy was great - like some of those US models like Barbii, Stephanie Rage, Blondie, Racquel Darrian ect. Love that time...and keep material from then - though not the best quality, for sure - as a precious treasure.
But for newer porn it's 'shaved pussy' for this user - so one difference in taste there, messmer.....
|
12-07-10 08:30am
|
Reply
2730
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Funny, strange, weird...and then again not: got the same feeling: been a member of quite a few sites, lately - and the same sites as earlier....but how can you repeat or even update a review without getting bored....?
|
03-04-13 05:54am
|
Reply
2731
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Excellent review, RB. There seems to be some time between reviews from "we, ol' timers" here at PU - but this one seems to prove: better a few great ones, than "a lot of useless ones". And btw: I enjoyed the way you parted up bottom line - and it makes a fine, long review easier to read/overlook....this site could - also easily - be my next. Thanks.
|
03-04-13 05:17am
|
Reply
2732
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
Agree with RB - if it has the essentials, no need to be so very long..
Nice review - and welcome to this fine place.
|
08-27-12 03:40am
|
Reply
2733
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Damn fine review, GCode - had my eyes on this site earlier - and without this review I'd never stand a chance to get just some idea of the site in general through the rather confusing preview.....thumbs up!!!!
|
10-23-10 08:46am
|
Reply
2734
|
Wild Porn Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Vanessa's Reply
Thanks!
I've was just somewhat surprised here - with the score compared to the rest of the review - and the PU-review/comments.
Great that you guys deal with these kinds of inputs....and reply the way you do...
Cheers!
Denner
|
01-30-10 10:54am
|
Comment
2735
|
Wild Porn Pass
(0)
|
|
01-29-10 05:28am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2736
|
Wild Porn Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Fine review for this new DVD-site - and thanks for the 'half'-warning alike ...
Guess this site needs some better coordination, according to your review - and again according to both the preview and your review it might be worth to keep an eye on in the future ...who knows?
|
11-23-09 06:31am
|
Review
2737
|
Women Of Playboy
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A variation of mostly fabulous US-models.
Average/ok amount of photosets and videos (short videos, though.
The deal here is 6 sites in a pack (NOT 7 as stated at TBP - Playboy Plus not included)
Easy/average navigation.
Zip for photos
2 diffenrent video-downlod sizes (small for preview) WMV for newer videos - mpg for older. |
| Cons: |
Updates too rare.
Not up-to-date in currency convertion-prices.
Newer videos contains too much close-ups and background talking (see below)
Finding certain models on others sites in the pack is difficult.
Way too short videos.
No infos about the updates.
Photo-sets are too slim (too few photos in each set).
Confusions with repeating videos in different files. |
| Bottom Line: |
Been a member at some other site in this package before.
What strikes me now is the radical change in the style of filming/editing the videos.
Some models have two (a few three) videos. One with interview (forget it), one which you could regard as presentation where the model tells you (again)who she is and where she comming from, what she likes ect. ect.ect.....boring.
And then one video where you get down to bussiness and watch the real deal with undressing, posing and so on...(with background muzak) - very few videos with the models own sound/moaning or whatever...
BUT the sites seems to have changed video-editor/cameraman.
The newer videos focus way too much on close-ups - and since the videos are quite short (max. five minuttes) there NOT much whole figure filming - too bad.
Former members will remember the earlier videos where it was much better in that field.
New videos in wmv - average size: 70-90 Mb - dimension:
1280x720.
Some: 848x480
Older videos typical mpg in smaller size: 30-40 Mb.
The photosets does not live up to the otherwise fine Playboy-standard - and the sets are with too few photos - typical less than 30 pictures.
I'm still a fan of those US-dolls that this Co. finds - like some other PU once asked European Glamour Girls: Where do you find them? - It's amazing the "quality" of models Playboy comes up with - ok, a lot more US-girls want to be a Playboy-model that a "porn-model", I guess.
But, boy - if some of those models were better exposed in longer and larger videos/movies - wauw.
But the content and quality in general at these P-sites (package) leaves a LOT.
So: 65 from this user based on:
"Does more things wrong than right. Low recommendation." |
|
03-07-09 01:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2738
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I guess we can say now, that Diesel Media do not have a network - with access to more/several sites...that you have to pay for each site.
That's been my question/hope earlier, that the guys would create that "network" - a network that gives you access to, yes, again - more than just one site...but: nada.
|
10-15-12 08:23am
|
Reply
2739
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Strange....at those two links you get some beta-thing:
http://my.dieselaction.com/login/
...but not any indication of sites.
If you mean just this:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=1527
There's no network - just those sites they offers - for separate pay of each site......
|
10-14-12 12:42pm
|
Reply
2740
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
lk2..at TBP there seems to be no Diesel Network.....how did you find that????
|
10-14-12 06:51am
|
Reply
2741
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GordonFreeman86's Comment
GF...Diesel Media does not have a network...so you can't get a package.
And - officially - Wow Girls is not Diesel Media, but:
Wow Technologies, Ltd.
But go to TBP and check out Diesel Media here:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=1527
And welcome - both TBP og this PU can be a lot of help in the future hunt for paysites...
|
10-14-12 06:07am
|
Comment
2742
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
09-24-12 08:26am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2743
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Very nice review, slutty - very nice. And agree with both your score and your inputs....
This one from Diesel is probably the best from that company, so far. And even if the the amount is not that overwhelming - the content speaks for itself.
Never got around to make a review - but this time I'll let sluttys review speak for this user, too.........thumbs up!
|
08-28-12 06:17am
|
Comment
2744
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
06-20-12 08:38am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2745
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
It is a Diesel site ....see my earlier comment:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=71269
Some material seems kind of exclusive for Wow Girls, but then again there seems to be some shared with other Diesel Media-sites....and again in general: I feel those Diesel Media sites speculate in opening new sites again and again where you get a little here and a little there - but if you want all ....you'll turn out poor....
|
04-29-12 09:57am
|
Comment
2746
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
|
02-19-13 06:02am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
2747
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
|
05-29-13 07:12am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2748
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Fine review - and it's a pretty good site, I agree.
But as a serious opponent to regional pricing - this site does ok, when I'm going for join:
And that goes for both Euro and British currency..like it's $ 19.95 which I get from Europe, too - and can choose others - but they all add up to approx. the same amount as in US Dollars...the $19.95.
|
09-02-12 09:40am
|
Reply
2749
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Great review - and I agree with the score. Apart from the "classy" picking of models, I really like the sensitive hc-scenes that is so far from the wham-bam-thank-you-mam as can be (that's why I really hate the stupid Brazzers-scenes, sorry fans)
|
08-25-12 11:54am
|
Reply
2750
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Review
Very fine and informative review.
Been a member some time ago and really like the hc/bg style here - more fine/delicate erotica than most other sites.
Agree on the score - a little more hc updates and this site could rate higher.
|
01-27-11 07:19am
|
