| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2676
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I get your drift. Was a big fan of the site some time ago - I also agree this is still a very good deal for us users. But I still think a 100 - as a max. is way too much, but....
As JD puts it: your answer is pretty good.
Look forward to your comming reviews with maybe more details.
Best and welcome among us "old timers"
Denner
|
03-04-08 11:09am
|
Reply
2677
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
hey badandy
You have two pretty serious/importend cons. where I totally agree.
How can you then add it up to an extremely rare 100?
|
03-02-08 10:23am
|
Reply
2678
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hey jd1961
Guess, you're right. But I still do not regard that a low price is enough for a high score in general. You're one of the "old timers" here and know the value of our money "for what we get". I admit, there's a huge amount of good, average and bad videos at VideoBox, but are you not getting a bit fed up with all the old and bad quality videos at this site?
|
09-10-07 07:55am
|
Comment
2679
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
09-09-07 08:47am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2680
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yeah, something like that. I think you get my drift, jd1961 - and maybe agree
- about the discount-thing.......
|
08-16-07 08:13am
|
Comment
2681
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
08-15-07 12:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2682
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornomaniac's Review
I - THINK - I know what Pornomaniac means in the "Cons" -area:
"-Some videos looks a bit blurry. But I suppose the original was not better."
And that maybe is the biggest problem of the many ways great and good priced VideoBox-site: The still older and cheaper videos attached. Even if they claim some dvd-resolution, they cannot provide it.
Once the VideoBox was the overall best in its field, but the many (soon majority) of videos in bad quality is a problem.
Maybe their position as numero uno is at stake - and maybe with good reason
|
04-09-07 08:55am
|
Comment
2683
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
|
03-11-13 07:33am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2684
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Excellent review here, messmer - and a big help.
Been considering one of the two - yes, main competitors.
Think I now know which to turn to once more.
|
01-26-12 06:01am
|
Reply
2685
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
Have not been a member for almost half a year - and those serious accusations in this review, I've not noticed as a member, earlier..
When a member I found the site better than VideoBox - but, ok - with some of the same flaws - like the completely inefficient category search.
Still - as I remember the site - a 50 in score is not my experience - a lot of fine videos here - by all means - a lot with bad viewing quality, too.
Still: a 50? - it certainly must have gone down the drain in the last months?
|
02-22-10 08:08am
|
Reply
2686
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Hey, sorry - I misunderstood that..but BTW - I certainly agree about the whole DVD-industry - and the state it's in...Cheers!
|
06-24-09 08:24am
|
Reply
2687
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Exactly - on this I quite agree. And one item I miss (just a bit, though) at VideosZ is the possibility to download parts of a video at Videobox - which I find is good video-preiew...before downloading the whole clip..
|
06-24-09 08:21am
|
Comment
2688
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
|
06-23-09 04:12pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
2689
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
|
03-27-09 05:51am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2690
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I've downloaded quite a lot of those mp4 files from the site - and yes - they are not ALL that good (some are just as you say a bit pale - or even "milky") - but then again I found some older favorite stuff that I have in my archives ass wmv or mpg - and here they (the mp4-files) are certainly an improvement...
Guess it's not that easy to re-edit videoclips from back say 2002-2005 - even 1ByDay has not succeeded in making theirs crisp.
|
03-24-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
2691
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Yeah, odd - but was a member first time - loooong ago - I did not get around to write a review back then. And then Videobox was much cheaper og got stuck with than...till now..
|
03-19-09 01:09am
|
Reply
2692
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
BTW: Just edited my very early trust for The Squirrel - see it if you like - and it's not much, just a well deserved new one of the kind....
|
03-18-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
2693
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks, Squirrel..
If any doubt - check the preview...
It may take a little time to ajust to the navigation, but when you have done that, I'm sure you'll be more satisfied with this, than both Videobox and New Sensations - NS is according to my experience way behind in video-quality...
But bottomline - take the chance - for 17.95 - not that I'm promoting the site in anyway - but, man - I like it much better than Videobox - and I've found some tremendous stuff, I've never found anywhere else...just browse, bro....
|
03-18-09 11:39am
|
Review
2694
|
VideosZ
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Better quality - in general - for videos - with NEWER MP4 FILES!!! - than Videobox
+ After Videobox, I guess this is it - concerning amout of videos
+ It's not possible to count - it'll take a decade - but as they state today: 5205 DVDs or 29803 scenes - no reason not to believe it.
+ Fine navigation for the most part.
+ Fine model-search.
+ More euro-stuff than Videobox.
+ Better variation in genres.
+ Still an ok price.
+ I dig those easy screenshots preview - AND in the same time they show the other scenes at that particular DVD.
+ And finally: BETTER updates than Videobox!
+ Fine download speed.
+ No DRM - did not come across any.. |
| Cons: |
- Searching for genres does not work optimal
- Too few download formats.
- Like Videobox too many DVDs found almost anywhere else.
- Still have watermarks - though they (most) seem transparent now.
- Some - a few for now - of the new mp4 downlaods does not live up to what you could expect - AND what you can find elsewhere.
- No part-scene downlaod - like Videobox |
| Bottom Line: |
I will join VideosZ again sometime after this term - rather than going for Videobox (again)
First of all - this site has gone down in price - now at a much more reasonable $17.95 - and compared to the socalled DVD-resolution at Videobox for $14.95. (which never done any better for the user than the $ 9.95 -deal).
This site is both userfriendly in navigation and in the search for models - it just works.
VideosZ has a lot more variation of types of stuff than Videobox. First of all much finer og more rare euro-material.
And BTW - the navigation in generel is better than Videobox - and faster.
I really like the deal where you get all other info for a certain DVD when finding a certain model she appears in.
The search-system divided in three: Keywords - titles - pornstars - works. Enjoy that in my browsing.
Download-speed just fine - got 650 easy - and no delays.
Bottomline:
VideosZ does it a lot like Videobox - and even if this site has got a little fewer DVDs/scenes - I more happy with this site that I ever been with Videobox - and f... the three or four dollars more for a month.
I get better varitation in material here.
Some - or most - videos you can find in better viewing-quality than at Videobox (the normaly very fine mp4-files, thanks to them the score got to be this high).
Fast respons - when problems - had some with login/password which was my own fault - and the help came fast...great.
Finally: Been a member of many sites like this in the past: For the first time I'm generally impressed with this one - only serious cons is:
Get the search in genres together - don't want to search for "Latina" and get a whole bunch of NOT latina-stuff in my search... |
|
03-18-09 10:24am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
2695
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hello, friend messmer - well, "just came in from the storm" (vacation) and forgot about the past (and your former review). Still it's great to come back and get into porn again - and read a splendid review like yours....look forward to some fine talks.....
|
06-20-12 10:06am
|
Reply
2696
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Glad you finally took up this site (and made a review)...which I've suspected that could be your kind of deal for some time....I really like the site...and btw: great review, messmer....
|
06-20-12 08:44am
|
Reply
2697
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Another:
BTW, messmer - do not know if Michelle Thorne is your cup of tea or not (I think she's got that old-time-dirty about her) - BUT really like that vid: "Perfect Tease" and the/her audio/talk that goes with it. (the quality for this particular vid is not the best, still.......)
|
12-06-10 10:44am
|
Reply
2698
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
First, messmer - as I took the risk to recommend the site to you - sorry to hear about that very annoying download situations.
Maybe and maybe not it's got something to do with North America/Canada - do not know. But I never had that problem when a member.
Still I'm glad, that in spite you're somewhat content with the material - I got quite a collection of - what I think - fine vids from the site..
BTW: Oh, yes - we all seems to have that question about full nude in the last part of the vids - but here I think the deal is generally just fine - well, at least I really like my collection - HOPE you will too, amigo!!!!
|
12-06-10 09:22am
|
Reply
2699
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Agree - it's a fine and special site - made a review last week - see it if you like...
|
07-28-09 01:06am
|
Reply
2700
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey messmer
I think it's only about 45-50 in the large format (formats - I realize that a couple are in 1280x720) - until now.
The 640x480 and even 720x576 are not BAD - and can be viewed (not crisp, though) fullscreen...but generally the formats seems a bit varied - and even in the same formats - so does the viewing quality..
|
07-24-09 12:27am
|
