| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2651
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
moonbyrd's Reply
You got me there - joined last time less than two months ago - THEN they did not have that imidiate Euro 9.95 deal - but the same amount in $.
If you look at the "thumbnail" for the frontpage before clicking on the site here at TBP, it says: $ 9.95, but when you NOW click from a european destination, it's suddenly Euro 9.95...
I'm really supprised that also Video Box is going for that unfair conversion deal - so, that site is off for this user in the future - at leat til they get the charge back to the same/even amount in dollars.
Anyway I'll try to mail them about the euro-problem, but here I do not think it'll help ...
Anyway - it sucks.
|
12-18-08 02:02pm
|
Reply
2652
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Reply
Write/mail the webmaster - ask them to give you a link from which you can join using dollars even is your're joining from Europe - it has worked for me every time...
BTW - I had no problems (without any mailing) to join Video Box in dollars from Europe..
|
12-18-08 12:48pm
|
Reply
2653
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
One hint from this old "conversion-raider":
If you cannot obtain the price in US-dollars, but is charged the same amount in Euros (which is more expensive, of coruse - AND the Euro is still rising compared to the Dollar) - then write the webmaster or the Co. - they normally got a way around, so you can pay in dollars...thay also want your bussiness, from Europe, US or elsewhere...
BTW, KHAN is right here - just got a US-dollar membership at Video Box here in Europe (Scandinavia), no problems
|
12-18-08 07:58am
|
Reply
2654
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Did another check:
No matter what hours, I get download-speed at approx: 650 kb/sec - AND it seems rather steady.
But one strange thing is: If I got 5,6,7 or maybe 8 web-windows open at the same time, thing go wrong (the browser stops running) but that might be something with my own pc and not Videobox - still It never happens with other sites...
|
12-09-08 09:00am
|
Reply
2655
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
No problems here i Scandinavia - normal download speed for Videobox...
|
12-08-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
2656
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Yeah, I just saw it - a little too late late - but like I answered Khan after asking him to cancel my thread your citation is just great:
"No longer would the pornoholic have to fast forward through 10 minutes of inept dialog to get 5 minutes of sex. They got sex throughout the whole video."
Cheers, mate
|
12-02-08 08:52am
|
Reply
2657
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, bro - Khan
Gonzo:
What really hit me was the fact that it's related to porn that does not "beat around the bush" - AND no "ten minuttes of inept dialog to get 5 minutes of sex".
Great!
|
12-02-08 08:50am
|
Reply
2658
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
Another user here who not sure what "Gonzo" stands for - there MUST be experiencend PUs who can tell us what it exactly means....
|
12-02-08 08:30am
|
Reply
2659
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
Well, wiild1..........after browsing a lot of both new and older material in this last week, I could easyly get different notions, for sure.
One thing I've noticed is that SOME new stuff has the advantage of fine HD or DVD-quality. But the more I scan through a little older stuff - stuff I missed earlier, I tend to agree with you. Here there is no difference in viewing quality if you download a 600Mb "DVD-quality" or you just take the "high" quality at ex. 200 Mb (compared).
That has over the years been the main problem for Videobox - and, alas - still is for quite a lot of download-options.
Still I'm a bit impressed with all the newer studios (like "Private") which Videobox now seems to get in the mix....anyway I've enjoyed my browsing this site more than before.
|
11-27-08 01:47pm
|
Reply
2660
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I'm certainly not a tech-wizard here - but according Windows XP, those files I mentioned are 720x480 (not 740, sorry) - there are ALSO files at 640x480.
But bottom line - the fullscreen quality has improved a lot for most newer clips...
|
11-16-08 05:57am
|
Review
2661
|
VideoBox
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Videobox has risen to a faboulous place with still more great content.
None exclusive, by all means, but a pornsite with a zillion clips from videos at the market in general for almost every taste.
Better quality lately, better variation in general.
New standards for later video-quality.
740x480 (sorry: 720x480) fine HD-videos/DVD and streaming
Lower solutions/ipod and one fine item:
Custom Clips - see a part of a scene without having to download it all - GREAT!
Fine download speed. |
| Cons: |
Non exclusive!
Some navigation-problems - still.
Above includes search-problems where you have to use a lot of time to exclude certain search-objects.
No photos.
Massive search made my browser to get into problems? Do not know why.
Too little solo-girl stuff ( for this user). |
| Bottom Line: |
Generally our well know VideoBox has gone to the better - on all items.
I've found a heck of a lot of stuff from speciel interests: A far better and larger variation of latina-videos, great euro-ditto, some very fine teen-stuff and some great video from very rare productions.
VideoBox now has more videos from Private, 3X and the great Combat Zone.
The navigation towards "studios" - or producers are just tops. Way over 100 different producers are at your browsing-service.
But of course, this is a site where you browse through - somewhat - wellknown porn-vids. that for most has been availeble at most shops - but here you just download all you want.
Since I first was a member long time ago, Videobox now has grown into a far better and more attractive site:
First of all the quality of later video (from this year) the quality has grown far better. Formerly I did not care to download socalled HD or DVD-size, because the WMV-high was quite close. (640x480).
But bottom line:
Videobox is with a good price - both standard and DVD - a fine place to do your porn-browsing - now.
I'm much more positive about the site than I was a year ago or so.
Fine improvements here.
Recommended more than ever. |
|
11-15-08 07:52am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
2662
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
11-14-08 10:42am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
2663
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
Fine tip, thanks...
|
10-26-08 06:46am
|
Reply
2664
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Thanks for this head-up - agree:
"It would be nice if VB took the time to see if the film they are posting is actually new or if it is just a repackage of their archives."
|
10-02-08 11:00am
|
Reply
2665
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
joekerr1's Review
Good first review here at PU - welcome...
I certainly agree about some of the niches with too small an amount of videos.
Then again - I do not quite agree with the Hi-Quality Downloads. Even if you go for HQ in membership - most videos are not crisp - but comes out just the same in fullscreen as the socalled standard resolution.
But anyway there's still some kind of reason why TBP and a lot of PUs have a high score on this site...
Keep it up, joekerr1
|
05-30-08 08:24am
|
Comment
2666
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-16-08 09:36am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
2667
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Guess your right about US-porn - and it's too bad, because US-porn was the pioneer - when no one else did the job - the french, the germans - and yes, us danes came around later - but it was only a copy of US-porn.
Things sure have changed since - not that euro-porn in general is so great, but the most US-porn is getting boring and sterotype/static (I may not have the right english words, but anyway)
JD is right, quote:
"I think the quality of American porn is at its lowest point ever."
|
03-13-08 09:45am
|
Reply
2668
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey brother, like you say - where are the erotic ways, where is the "touch"...???
I want to qoute you again on this one:
No foreplay, no teasing (gradual revealing of the body), no story. Arghh. And thanks for letting me vent! :-)
Totally agree...lets hope for better porn-sites in the future...
BTW - just joined Killergram (british) again - there are some good stuff here - not all, by all means, but some fine hc-porn in between. Too bad it's so expensive. BUT it sure is somewhat of an alternative. If you do not know the site - take a look at the preview - it's alright - and the video-files are not that big - and the quality ok...
|
03-13-08 09:30am
|
Reply
2669
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Last week I made some comments about this site - a site I've visit/been a member of several times.
And every time I get dissapointed - and still go back, weird.
Fellow PU's replied to my comment about VB - good replys.
Now I just read messmers comment - and, man - he hits the nail on the head.
Great words on VB, messmer!
|
03-12-08 04:11pm
|
Reply
2670
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
No problemas - at all, pal.
And no way do I think you have "an atitude"
It's always good to exchange some info and experience.
BTW grapped a japaneese video-file at VB - and that one is just as crisp as can get.
Cheers!
Denner
|
03-10-08 07:22am
|
Comment
2671
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-08-08 09:30am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2672
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thanks, RB
Some of these files in DVD is as close to "crisp" as I've seen at VB... SO: it can be done.
|
03-08-08 08:44am
|
Reply
2673
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics4me
It sure set some things in perspective, thanks...
Still: I have great and crisp clips in 640x480 in much better screen-quality than what I've found untill now at VB...
(Don't know if it's the same kind of line af Pix And Video: The videos at the website are/were not great in quality - I found some of the same clips ripped- I thnik, it's called - from one of their DVDs and put on the "net" - what a difference in quality)
|
03-08-08 03:42am
|
Reply
2674
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Hey RB
My PC works just fine - I have several/hundreds of absolutely crisp fullscreen videos on my HD.
At Videobox I've in this term of membership downloaded some 5-6 clips i both DVD and highresolution (ex. a couple of clips with Alexis Love) There's hardly any difference in quality - and certainly not compared to the file-sizes. The same goes for some older stuff - ok I may find some better quality along the way...
Still I haven't found the upgrade worth the money.
Do you have any examples were there's really a difference, please let me know...
|
03-08-08 12:25am
|
Comment
2675
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-07-08 08:17am
Replies (12)
|
