Denner, I explained this in a comment before, but if you do choose to join this network, it can make a difference which site you join through.
For the last month or more, the network has been offering bonus sites when you join any one of their sites.
For most sites, the 1 month membership is $29.95.
To join the 18 stream site the 1 month membership is $34.95.
With all the the different memberships, you can get a different number of bonus sites. By different memberships, I mean which specific site you choose to join through.
If you choose the 18 stream, you pay $34.95 and get 2 bonus sites.
If you choose the SpunkyBee, you pay $29.95 and get 9 bonus sites.
One of the bonus sites included when you join through SpunkyBee is the 18 Stream site.
If you join through other sites in the network, you pay $29.95 and get less than 9 bonus sites (maybe 6 or less bonus sites).
So join through the SpunkyBee site, you pay $29.95, and get full access to 10 of the network sites.
That is the based on what I see being offered currently. The network can change their offerings in the future. But that is what has been offered for the past month and more.
The network said it would end the special bonuses over a month ago, then they extended the offer by 2 weeks, then they extended the offer by 2 more weeks. That I know of. They might have been extending it in the past that I don't know about.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Billing agent: SegPayEU
-No pre-checked sales agreements on the signup page
-Access to this site was immediate after signup
-No DRM.
-No site timeout.
-No download limits.
-Easy to read captcha.
-Screenshots to illustrate videos.
-Zipfile available for each photoset.
-Content is dated.
-Very little photoshopping in the photos. You see model's freckles and scratch marks clearly on her face and body.
Cons:
-No streaming
-Updates irregular
Site advertises 3 new updates every week (on one of the signup pages), but that was a goal, not a reality.
Updates stopped on July 26. Then on Sep 28 1 photoset and 1 video were added. Nothing added since then.
-Photos are available in only 1 size.
-Large watermark in bottom right corner of photos.
-Navigation is very basic.
-There is no search function.
-Preview page says, "Join now and find out what I do on weekends!" That
implies some kind of blog or diary inside the members area, but I can't find one.
The preview page has a hot link to a blog. Unfortunately, the blog has a few entries for May 11, 2010 and June 06, 2010, and that is the entire blog.
-"I love to naughty chat with my members". Quote from a page advertising her site. But I find no place to chat with her inside the members area. Perhaps the forum was supposed to furnish contact with the model, but the forum is "coming soon..."
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Currently about 25 videos and matching photosets.
Video file formats:
high, medium, low quality WMV
MPG (high quality)
QuickTime format
Video specs: (for the mpg file format):
Videos are very high quality and run about 11-30 minutes.
total bitrate: 6,488 kbps
frame width x height: 1600 x 912
Photo specs: Most individual photos are 300-550 KB. 2464x1643 pixels.
The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can
download the entire site in 30 days with no problem.
This is a solo teen site.
This is not a site where you go to watch hardcore action. The theme is more like you are watching a cute girl who is playful and friendly. The
video "plot" varies with each episode or clip: She is being playful with a boyfriend, with a girlfriend, showing off her body, whatever. The "action" can be softcore, midcore, or hardcore, but the overall impression is more that you are watching a cute and friendly girl who is enjoying her sexuality. This is entirely different from the hardcore teen video sites where 1 or 2 guys are banging away on 1 or 2 girls.
You put the SpunkyBee model in a video, and she performs with charm and attraction. The videos and photos have good clarity, focus, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. There is no talking from the cameraman, and the girl herself usually says very little. No bothersome background music. SpunkyBee appears at many sites under different names:
Abigaile, Abigaile Johnson,Abby, Spunky Bee, Veronika.
I am listing the different names because pat362 recently brought eurobabeindex to my attention again.
If you can get this site along with a bunch of other sites in the network as a special offer, it's definitely worth checking this site out.
Giving this site a 78. If they increase the updates, add the forum that is "coming soon", have the girl blog more often, the site value would go up.
By itself, the site would be very expensive. But as part of a network, where you join this site and get bonus sites as part of your membership,
the site makes a nice addition.
The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can download the entire site in 30 days with no problem.
The last update is dated July 26. So if you do subscribe, there is no reason to go beyond a 30 day membership.
TBP says the site was launched in June 2010. The next month, July, they had already stopped updating the site. A real shame. I guess they ran out of money.
It can make a difference which site you use to join. At one site, you get membership to 3 of the network sites, and you pay a higher price than you do when you join through the spunky bee site.
Joining through the spunky bee site, gives you access to 10 sites, plus the lowest price for the membership.
Sometimes there can be a big difference in which site you use to join a network.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-First month is $14.95 with PU discount. Recurs at $29.95 for future months.
-Join page is secure.
-Login page is secure.
-Member pages are secure.
-Can choose your own login details: username and password.
-Daily scene and photo set updates to the network.
-Access to the Devils Film network of around 28 sites included with membership. I call it the Devils Film network, since that is the site I use the most. But it's also called Fame Digital network, which is part of Gamma Entertainment.
-The same login details work to enter each site in the network.
-But once you are inside the member's area of any site, you can switch to another site in the network without re-entering your login details.
-Files download with the video title, model name, file definition, file type.
-Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
-FAMEHELP.COM is the billing agent. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use.
But I've been a member of this network several times, and never had a billing problem.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The last network update they did in 2017 provided a brighter, fresher look.
At the same time, it made navigating the sites and network harder and more time-consuming.
Instead of a simple drop-down menu to switch between sites, you now have a clunkier version of a drop-down menu that makes you search for some of the sites you have access to, because those sites are hidden on a second level of q drop-down menu.
Also, searching the content of each site is more difficult after the network update.
-The search is site-specific: you do a search on a model's name, it only returns her content at the site you are currently logged in to, instead of the whole network. This makes finding the network content of a model difficult and time-consuming.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: girls who squirt when they reach orgasm.
Squirting is a niche that is not well served.
There is a squirting site at Teen Mega World (Squirting Virgin), that hasn't updated in almost 7 years.
And there is this squirting site at Fame Digital (Squirtalicious), whose last update was 08/25/2017,
and this site had an irregular update schedule before then: posting 3 or 4 videos in a single month, then going for months without an update, then posting a few videos in a month, then another dry spell for months.
The videos are unusual: they put a back story in the video, to make the scene more meaningful and intense, the videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting, good sound control.
Some of the plots are amazing.
The last video, posted 08/25/2017, is about a woman who squirted so much the first time, that her husband freaked out, and fell through a glass door; the husband then required 250 stiches to sew him back up.
The wife feels remorse: the sex was so great, so intense, that she started gushing all over her husband, which led to the accident, and now the wife feels like a mutant in the X-Men series.
A male friend tells the wife this is amazing, and she has to harness the power of the squirt.
(Maybe they could make a comic book and movie adaptation from the video.)
The wife is full of grief, that she almost killed her husband because of her powerful squirting.
(I know this is amazing, but no less amazing than the comic books-movies that are being made.)
The male friend says her squirting should be a joyful moment, that she should embrace this powerful gift;
the male friend says he had a girlfriend that was a powerful squirter: the first time the ex-girlfriend squirted during sex, her fluids ran out until they covered the entire second floor of their dormitory.
(You see why this scene could be part of the X-Men series: the power of a woman-squirter, combined with the power of the Me-Too Movement, could boost the X-Men series into the heights of Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War.)
Not only does this scene have a powerful woman, exploring her sexuality, but it also has sex, which the Marvel Comic movies lack: maybe you get a kiss or two, but those movies are basically sex-less heroes who have not yet discovered the joys of raw sex.
The site offers multiple choices in video definition downloads:
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The same video definitions are offered for streaming.
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good sound control.
The videos are clear and crisp: even the 540p definition looks good on a 14" laptop monitor.
The site will appeal to fans of squirting and peeing.
Squirting, because this is what the videos are classified as.
Peeing, because the distinction between squirting and peeing is blurred: some people consider squirting as separate from peeing, other people think squirting is a form of peeing.
The site is a worthwhile addition to the Devils Film network.
But what gives it even more value is the access to the entire Devils Film network of about 28 sites, covering a variety of hardcore niches.
Giving the site (and network) a score of 85. The 85 is more for network access, than a reflection of the site-only value.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: if you join any one of the TMW (Teen Mega World) sites, I recommend joining through the main portal, the TMW site itself.
This makes navigation and searching the content far easier, than if you joined one of the satellite sites. The price to join is the same for all the sites, so do yourself a favor and join through the main TMW site directly.
These are pros for the TMW network:
-Daily update.
-High resolution images (in the photo sets).
-UHD 4K videos in the last few years.
-HTTPS login and member pages. Note: sometimes the site is HTTPS, sometimes it's not. I've never seen a site or network act like this.
-5,000+ videos.
-2000+ models: the average model is a female teen, and the girls range from slightly above average to cute to very attractive.
-30+ sites covering a wide variety of teen niches.
Membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you full access to all the network sites. There are no sites requiring a premium membership.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
Cons:
-The main con is that the last update was 2011-05-30. This is an archive site.
-The second major con is that the site is small: 31 videos (with matching photosets) total.
-The photosets are screencaps, that are not good quality. The clarity and focus could definitely be improved. Which is a shame, because a lot of the models are cute, and the site has a large photoset for each video.
-No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt you would want to collect these photosets: even though the girls are cute, the photos are poor-quality screencaps made from the video.
-Login and member pages are sometimes not secure. Which makes hacking easier.
-Vendo and other billing agents are the default billers. I've never had a problem with Vendo (or with any of their other billing agents), but I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, who make cancelling easy.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
There are many reason why TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks:
-The models range from slightly above average to cute to really attractive.
-The network has spent a lot of time and effort and money upgrading their content in the last few years. This is reflected in the improved quality of the videos and photosets. They now offer videos posted in the last few years in definitions ranging from 360p through 2160p (Ultra High Defintion).
The sets are clean and they use good-quality equipment to film and photograph the models.
-The models are Russian girls (or from the surrounding area). Russian girls are taught from a young age how to respond to stunt cock: the stunt cock slips his tongue or fingers into the girl's pussy, and she's ready to rock and roll.
Sometimes it doesn't even take a tongue or finger to turn her on: the stunt cock slipping his cock out of his pants is also a sure turn-on with these prime Russian sluts.
Until I started watching porn, I never realized that teen Russian girls can be just as horny as any American male teen.
-The membership price is low: PU has a discounted first month's membership price of 14.95/month, renews at $14.95/month.
-The teens are not just mainly cute, but also enthusiastic about the sex, and seem to really be getting off. There isn't a lot of harshness and cruelty in the sex, and the girls show their enjoyment with a lot of the moans, squeals, and cries while getting pounded by the stunt cocks.
-If you are willing to pay for a 1 year membership, you can sometimes find a very discounted price for $90 or less for a 1-year membership.
The theme of the Squirting Virgin is girls who squirt (ejaculate) during orgasm.
I always thought that the squirting was more like the girls were pissing, rather than having some sexual fluid eject from the vagina. Which would be smelly as hell, as well as messy.
But some people believe that the squirting is not pissing.
There are fans of girls who squirt.
So for those fans, this site would be interesting: cute girls who squirt during orgasm.
Except the site is small (31 videos total), and has not updated since May 2011.
The videos come in the following definitions: 360p, 480p, 720p.
That is for streaming and downloading.
The sets are cheap, because the vids were shot when the network was still a low-budget platform for cheap, hardcore teen porn.
You can easly tell the vids were made years ago, compared to the higher quality videos and photosets that have been posted the last several years.
But if you are a fan of squirting, it's still worthwhile to view the vids because the models are cute and the action can be hot.
The basic action is that the stunt cock starts by arousing the girl, fondling her all over, sticking his fingers in her pussy, ass, mouth.
Then he uses his cock to fuck her mercilessly, in her pussy, ass, mouth, squeezing and slapping her tits and face and ass, tieing her with ropes, gagging her with her panties or a rag, forcing her into uncomfortable positions to show her he is her master. Also, the stunt cock often uses a dildo to arouse the girl. There is a strong element of bdsm in these videos: the stunt cock treats the girl like a piece of meat, but she willingly goes along, and even though uncomfortable, she is able to smile and laugh when it's over.
The main problems with the site: it's small, only 31 videos. And stopped updating in 2011.
So I'm giving the site a score of 84.
However, the network updates daily, and there is a ton of good-quality teen hardcore videos at the other sites, covering a wide variety of niches.
If the site started updating again, the score would be raised.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring).
-Unlimited downloads.
-Membership in any one of the TMW (Teen Mega World) sites gives you access to all the TMW sites.
-There are not premium sites that cost extra to gain access to.
-There are 30+ sites in the network, covering a variety of niches.
-Daily update to the network. But Squirting Virgin has not updated since May 30, 2011.
-User name is your email adress. And you can choose your own password.
Cons:
-The most obvious con is that this is an archive site. The last update was on May 30, 2011.
-Small site. Only 31 scenes (31 vidoes and matching photo sets).
-They recently raised the price of a year-long membership from $89.95/year to $119.40/year.
But most PU members would select the $14.95/month membership, anyway.
-The did a network re-design to make the network more attractive: brighter images for the photos.
But the network re-design made site navigation more difficult and time consuming. Details in the bottom line section.
-Vendo is the primary biller. I prefer CCBill and Epoch. But I've had many memberships paying through Vendo, and I've never had a problem with them. It's just that CCBill and Epoch are so easy to use, and reliable.
-For a short while, they required a captcha to enter the member's area. But they've dropped the captcha requirement lately.
-Sometimes some videos will not stream. You can hear the sound track, but the video visual track does not play.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: girls who are so aroused by their sexual partner that they squirt during orgasm.
Also, many of the scenes have an element of BDSM.
This is not heavy BDSM (real or fake torture), but I can believe that many of the girls are treated harshly during the sex, but at the end, they seem to enjoy it. The BDSM is not as intense as Woodman Casting, but along those lines.
Woodman does not use the same techniques as shown in the Squirting Virgin site: the Squirting Virgin scenes show the girls being tied down with ropes or thongs, gagged, a large vibrator is often used to stimulate the girl, she is slapped on the face and ass, forceful vaginal and anal sex,
I signed up for a year at $89.95/year, recurring. But the price has since been raised to $119.40.
It used to be $89.95 for many years.
This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, for many reasons:
I like the selection of the models. They are young teens, many of them attractive to almost beautiful.
Mainly, I like the way they are presented: youthful, attractive, with a healthy appetite for sex.
There is a huge amount of hardcore content.
Over time, they upgraded the network: making the network easier to use, upgrading the sites with more expensive sets, better videos and photos, better costumes, offering the newest fads (4K video site, VR site).
The price seemed cheap, at $90/year.
They increased the yearly membership fee to $119.
Also, they did a recent network upgrade on the network structure, which makes the network harder to use.
Each site now has a model page for that specific site.
Since you have over 30 sites in the network that you have access to with a membership to any one of the sites, that means you can not use the member model page to see what her content is at any other site.
There is a partial work-around: the public preview pages have model listings for each model, which shows the sites she has conent at.
Except the public preview pages do not have hot links to her content.
So: to access her content at the network, you first have to check the public preview page model listing for the model, and note the specific sites she has content at.
And then, you have to log in to the member area of the network, and navigate to one of the specific sites the content is located at.
And then you have to bring up the model's page, where you will find hot links to her content at that specific site.
And if you want to see her content at another site, you have to navigate to that site, and again, bring up her model page with the hot links to her content.
This is a step back from the previous structure where a single model page inside the network showed you her content at the network, with hot links to all of her content at the different sites.
The software designer was not thinking of keeping the navigation easy and simple: The designer made a poor choice, and made using the network much harder and more time-consuming to find the models' contents.
Also, to switch between sites, you can't use a simple drop-down menu, but have to navigate to a page listing all the network sites, and select the site you want to enter.
The only good part of this design is that you don't have to re-enter your login details each time you want to switch between sites: your login details (username and password) are the same for each site).
It used to be that you had long time before you were logged out of the site for inactivity.
But now you are sometimes logged out for inactivity in a much shorter time frame.
I'm giving the site/network a score of 88.
This is because of network access to 30+ sites.
If I was scoring on the site itself, because it's a small site (31 videos), and does not update,
the score would be much lower.
But I just like the selection of the young models and how they seem to be enjoying the sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price of $19.95/month if you join this site directly. A better choice is to join Teen Mega World directly, which has a PU discounted price of $14.95/month, and includes access to this site.
-Teen Mega World is a mega-network of teen hardcore videos: the network has over 4,000 videos (and matching galleries). About 33 sites, covering many niches: dirty doctor, dirty coach, creampie, boy-girl, boy-girl-girl, lesbian, anal, squirting, masturbation, toys, latina, old man-young girl, etc.
-The videos are professionally shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, etc.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site time-out due to inactivity.
-The models are late teens, early twenties. Many of them are attractive to very attractive.
-Multiple choices for download definition.
-Zip file for the accompanying gallery.
Cons:
-It's a small site. Only 31 videos. The site stopped updating in its first year.
-The performers speak Russian, but the videos are sub-titled. But the dialogue is basically meaningless. The guy and girl are there to fuck. And they do it energetically.
-Some people might want a wider spectrum for the models. These are slender, white Eastern European teens.
-The stunt cocks act like arrogant pricks, and they fuck the girls hard. But the girls seem to like it.
-When I first saw this niche, I thought it was disgusting. The squirting seemed like the girls are pissing all over themselves, and I'm sure it is smelly as hell. But if you can think of the squirting as evidence the girls are aroused to climax, and it shows the mastery of the stunt cock, then it can be arousing to watch.
And some people like porn peeing videos.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: 31 scenes. With a matching photo set for each scene.
The squirting niche enjoyed brief popularity around 2011. But I've read that it's still a popular niche.
This site was started around January 2011, but the last update was in May 2011.
So it's a small site, with only 31 scenes.
The models are attractive Eastern European girls.
Each scene follows a similar script: A stunt cock plays with a girl, using a vibrator, his hands, his mouth and tongue, whatever, until the girl reaches orgasm and starts to squirt fluid from her vagina. This squirting is meant to show the
mastery of the stunt cock over the model. After the woman squirts, the stunt cock then plays with her some more: he fucks her pussy, her ass, rams his cock into her mouth, ties her down, sometimes stuffs a rag into her mouth, and again demonstrates that he is the master.
So there is an element of adomasochism in the scenes. The stunt cock is the master, and the attractive model is his sex toy to be used and abused and pleasured.
The girls do a good job of seeming to be grateful to the stunt cocks for being treated like a piece of meat for the guy's pleasure. They smile at the end and say they liked it and will be back for more.
So the sex is not gentle or affectionate, but if you are in the mood for some rough sex, this should fill the need. It's not ultra-violent, but it sure as hell is not glamcore. It's more on the lines of the Pierre Woodman casting videos.
Giving the site a score of 92. This is based on:
1. the site, even though it's small, does a good job of illustrating the Master stunt cock over the attractive female girl.
2. the Teen Mega World network, which has over 4,000 good hardcore teen videos covering many niches.
Thanks for the encouraging words, Denner. The first few times I saw squirting, I thought it was disgusting. But since then, my reaction is more mild: it's out there for people who want to enjoy it. :)
Note:
Join the network through Teen Mega World, so the membership price is $19.95/month.
Joining through Squirting Virgin costs $29.95/month, or $10 more.
The Teen Mega World membership includes access to Squirting Virgin, plus 26 other sites in the network. You get access to almost all the sites in this network when you join through Teen Mega World, plus you get the lowest price.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limit.
-Content is dated.
-4 format choices for each video download: WMV, MKV, FLV, MP4.
-The models are Eastern European, but there are English subtitles.
-There are a number of attractive models at this site, which is part of the teen mega world network (also called the royal cash network or the s&s royal limited network).
-The search engine is integrated with the entire network, so if you find a model you like, by entering her name, you will see all the videos she is in(at the entire network), and can transfer to each video through a hot link. The software team has upgraded the search and made it much easier to use.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Choice of downloading or streaming videos.
Cons:
-Small site. Started January 2011. Only 25 videos (and matching photosets).
-Each video follows the same basic plot: stunt cock stimulates the model until she squirts, then he continues stimulation and fucks her semi-roughly. Not full-blown roughness, but the sex is not gentle or loving or affectionate. The stunt cocks are treating the girls like a piece of meat, but the girls all seem to lap it up.
-Navigation is good, but could be improved. Put a hot link at each model's listing, to make it easier to search for content with that model.
Bottom Line:
The basic setup is a guy stimulates a girl, with a vibrator, a dildo, his fingers, his mouth, or some combination, the girl gets so excited she
squirts out her sexual juices, then the guy fucks the girl in different positions before finally coming on her face. The site has a strong bondage
element: the girl is usually tied, and a cloth or rubber piece is stuck in her mouth. Also, by doing the girl on a chair, or on the floor, or in some other uncomfortable position, the stunt cock is demonstrating his mastery of the bitch getting fucked. The girls moan and groan and whimper as their face is pressed against a wood floor and the stunt cock reams their vagina, ass, and mouth. The girls are real love slaves.
Some girls sound so fake with the moans and screams that it's a turnoff. But some girls are better actors and sound like they are sexually excited.
Squirting is not my fetish. To me, it looks like the girls are peeing when they squirt, which I don't find erotic. It would be smelly as hell having sex with a girl who has just peed all over herself.
But if you are able to think of the squirting as a sign the bitch is in heat, and so excited by the masterful stunt cock, then you could enjoy the action even more by the squirting, the whimpers and moans, the bondage and whatnot.
Number of videos at site: 25
Video runtime: 25-30 minutes.
Download options for videos:
High Quality (WMV)
Medium Quality (MKV)
Medium Quality (FLV)
Low Quality (MP4)
The high quality WMV files are about 958 MB for a 28 minute clip.
Frame width x height: 1280x720.
Total bitrate: 4736 kbps
The technical quality of the videos is excellent: very high definition, good lighting (made easy because these are indoor scenes); the camera is
steady, not jerked around; good framing of the model before and during the sex action. The colors are good (because of the good lighting).
The dialog and script are stupid. But the girls are attractive, and there is solid sex action in the videos.
Update rate: when the site started in January 2011, they updated with 1 video each day. By the end of January and continuing through March, they updated 1 video every 5-8 days.
Number of photosets at site: 25 (same number as the videos).
Each photoset is a video capture of a video shoot. The photos are basically screen captures. So the photo quality is not high. The photos don't appear to be photoshopped or airbrushed. They can be slightly out of focus. Each photoset has a zip file.
Number of photos per photoset: 200+
Individual photos are about 100 KB in size, 1280x720 pixels, 300x300 dpi.
Squirting virgin is the newest offering at the teen mega world network. Joining teen mega world gives access to 27 teen sites. A huge number of hardcore videos.
I'm giving the site a score of 89. You are paying for network access. Scoring the site as a stand-
alone would give a much lower score.
The network access is a bargain at $19.95/month.
See Reply #1 for $10 price saving.
This niche seems to be growing in popularity. Here's a new site (started January 2011) that caters to the fetish, where a girl squirts from sexual excitement. Supposedly the fluid is female sex juice, but to me it looks more like the girl is pissing herself. Which would be both smelly and messy.
PU/TBP needs to update the membership prices at this site.
When you use the PU/TBP hot link to go to the site, and then go to the signup page, the membership prices are:
$34.95 for 30 days (recurring )
$69.95 for 90 days (recurring )
The prices shown at PU/TBP are:
$24.95 monthly (recurring)
$49.95 3 months (recurring)
Is there a PU/TBP discount, or does PU/TBP need to update the prices?
Nice review that gives the flavor of the site.
I like Russian and East European porn. And I like attractive models, which this site has.
But I prefer one-on-one. Also, I like videos to be edited. I would like a build-up to the sex, but a lot of aimless chatter in Russian (even with subtitles) can get boring fast.
And I appreciate your comments on the sound track being poor to miserable.
And I guess the lighting could be much improved (strictly a guess, as I haven't seen any of the videos).
I prefer good lighting and good editing over the "reality" flavored porn. And good camera work. And good sound would be a bonus.
So I will pass on this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-24/7 customer support. Support is part of the MetArt network, which is among the finest csutomer support teams for any porn site. The only upgrade I would suggest would be to start a 24/7 live chat.
-Login and member pages are https. Secure.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Choice of definitions for downloads. Low, medium, high.
-Choice of definitions for online streaming of a photoset. Low, medium, high.
The online player is fast and easy to use.
Cons:
-Cons used to be basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, so you knew you were getting a quality product. But lately the site seems to be stumbling.
-Membership only gives you access to the Stunning18 site. No bonus sites are included.
-The update rate has really dropped off in the last year. From a lot of updates per month in previous years, the rate has dropped to maybe 4 updates a month recently.
-The chronological listing of photo set updates is jumbled. Instead of a continuous listing of updates for each month of a year, there are gaps where there is no listing for photo sets from different past year's months.
-I don't know if it's lack of funds or lack of technical staff, but the site needs to be better organized, to make searching the contents easier, to find what's available.
Bottom Line:
I believe Stunning18 was started and run by Antonio Clemens. He was the main photographer for the site. I don't know if he is suffering ill health or what the problem is, but the update rate for the Stunning18 site has dropped way down. And the site has some technical problems where the chronological listing of the updates, by year and month, is showing a lot of gaps. It looks like Thierry Murrell, another erotic photographer with experience in glam photography, has stepped in to supply much of the recent updates at Stunning18.
Thierry Murrell was the main photographer at Glam Deluxe, which was a small glam site that featured at lot of attractive teen models. But the Glam Deluxe site closed a few years ago. Thierry Murrell has previously contributed to the MetArt site.
My recommendation: which is based on a lack of knowledge of what the problems are at the Stunning18 site:
Thierry Murrell was the main photographer at Glam Deluxe. I assume he controls or owns or has some interest in the content at the closed Glam Deluxe site.
I suggest that MetArt staff make an offer to buy or lease the content from the Glam Deluxe site, and use that content to fill the gaps in the update rate for Stunning18.
There might be egos involved, legal considerations. But MetArt took over the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites, and runs other sites under the MetArt banner. I was a member of Glam Deluxe years ago: the models were very attractive, the photography seemed first rate.
This would be a way for the owners of the Glam Deluxe content to monetize the content, and for Stunning18 to fill the gaps in the update rate, and give the site time to settle whatever other problems the site might be having.
MetArt can publish a short blog explaining that they've taken control of the former Glam Deluxe site contents, with the approval of Thierry Murrell, to help fill the gaps in the current update rate. That should help explain to the Stunning18 members why MetArt is using previously published or unpublished content from another site.
Just a suggestion. But worth looking into.
Personally, I think it's a shame when a good site closes, and the contents, if worthwhile, are lost to people who would be interested in viewing or collecting those contents.
My recommendation is to wait for the update rate to pick up again, before joining the Stunning18 site. There is plenty of older photosets to browse, but if you want newer updates, wait for the update rate to return to normal.
I'm giving the Stunning18 site a score of 82, until they fix the update rate and the chronological listing of their contents.
Thierry Murell used to be the main photographer at Glam Deluxe.
But Glam Deluxe closed down.
I guess that Murell stopped contributing to the site as frequently and the site had other problems.
The selection of models at Glam Deluxe was quite good.
Another softcore glamour site that went bust.
Murell has contributed some nice sets to MetArt over the years, but he was never a heavy contributor.
I don't know why: maybe he didn't have the drive to create a lot of sets.
Excellent review.
Especially helpful is the recent update rate, that warns against the slowdown in new sets for the site.
But glad that MetArt support is so helpful.
What confuses me is that MetArt support states they do not own the site.
But I guess that's a legal structure, since the site is included in the MetArt network.
I BELIEVE THIS REVIEW MERITS AT LEAST 2 STARS, AND IS WORTH 2 TICKETS IN THIS WEEK'S RAFFLE.
THE REVIEW IS THOUGHT-PROVOKING, AND ONE OF THE BEST OF ITS KIND.
LET'S GIVE JUSTICE TO WHERE IT'S DUE.
Nice, basic review. I like the specific reasons you give for building the score. My only quibble would be the total score: since you think the site is probably worth a one-time membership, my guess would be a score of 70 would be more appropriate. Even though PU guidelines state that 60-69 is "low recommendation", and 70-79 is "might recommend", I believe that since 50 is the lowest score a site can be rated, most people would think that a score less than 70 means a site to be avoided.
That's my feeling/belief.
So many people, seeing your site score of 65, would think/conclude the site was a waste of money, and might not even bother to read your review.
Whereas you personally felt that the site was worth a one-time membership, and did not feel cheated.
And I definitely feel your review is worth reading, because it gives a very clear explanation/feeling of the site.
If you join one site, you automatically get 9 more sites included.
Then, if your membership goes into a second month, you get 1 additional site.
If your membership goes into a third month, you get 1 more additional site.
If your membership goes beyond 3 months, you get 2 more sites.
But: almost all of the site are small. And most stopped updating years ago.
So there are much better ways to spend your money, than on a membership to this network. You will find much more content, better quality content, easier site navigation, and more frequent updates at other sites and networks.
Maybe years ago this site/network might have justified a membership, while they were still updating, and they might have improved the quality as time went on.
But this is just one of many sites/networks that has little value compared to what other sites offer today.
But some Captcha forms are worse than others.
There are some, where the letters/numbers are so twisted, that you have to guess what the letters/words are, and I get some of those wrong again and again, that I just give up. This isn't for any porn sites that I know of, but for some other content.
There are also Captchas where the letters/numbers move across the screen, and go off the screen and come back on. That's the case with this site. So you have to watch the Captcha a few times, to get all the letters/numbers.
No big deal. Just a bit of irritation. Especially compared to sites that just require the username and password, and are very easy to log in.
I guess they use Captcha for security. But if you are really a computer expert/hacker, there are probably automatic programs that will handle the Captcha.
So the extra security just makes life a bit more difficult for the rest of us.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons:
-On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line:
This is a very softcore teen site.
Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair
I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.
There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.
In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.
No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.
Site statistics:
Photosets
Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.
Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps
You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.
The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4
minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.
The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.
The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.
There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.
The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.
The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or
story.
I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.
Thanks for the information, atrapat. I didn't look at the TBP data. Lazy. I just checked that there were no reviews or comments at PU or TBP, and figured there was no data. Before joining PU, I used to read the TBP pages, but since joining PU, I glance at TBP only rarely. I think PU reviews are more up to date and relevant because of member details and opinions. But you reminded me that TBP is still worth looking at to see what's there. You have "site facts" at TBP even if there is no TBP review.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
