You never know who is on the other end of some of these sex lines.
Your payments could be supporting some future Sex Star or Artist.
From the trivia section of IMDB for Eli Roth, the director/writer/producer who gave us Cabin Fever, Hostel Part 1 and Part 2, and other horror movies:
"Paid for his student films by working as an on-line sex operator for Penthouse magazine, back when only doctors and scientists were on the Internet. Subscribers paid $30 an hour to have sex with Roth and his N.Y.U. friends, thinking they were gorgeous Penthouse models. Roth claims that these experiences inspire many of the characters he writes today."
Download speeds.
I was a member of Naughty America back in May of this year.
I was getting between 1-2 MB/sec. At many other sites I get 4-5 MB/sec. My max download limit is about 6 MB/sec.
Thanks for your clear and intelligent reply.
I was afraid that my review was misleading. That is didn't show clearly the pros and cons of the site.
And I have doubts about the value or validity of a site score.
How the score should be used.
I've read most of your site reviews in the past.
And while I don't agree 100% with all the ideas and scores expressed, I think they are useful to help choosing which sites to join.
What I like most is that your ideas and viewpoint are fresh to me.
I feel like I've got into a rut in my reviews.
I am not trying to sell you on the site.
You look at my score of 90, and think that is a site recommendation.
It's not.
The score of 90 means that, if you personally enjoy the type of videos they offer, then you are getting a large amount of
professionally shot videos for a low price. Which would be good value for your money.
Except: If you experience the download problems that you experienced, that would reduce the value of the site.
Also, the large file sizes reduces the value.
Also, if the overpowering ads make the site harder to use, that is negative value.
I was trying to be honest and fair in my review. But it's really misleading to think that a score implies how much an
individual will enjoy a site. Personal preference is far more important in how each individual will enjoy a particular
site. But I think that if you enjoy the type of content that Naughty America does provide, it's deserves a high score--because the negatives that I experienced are less important than what the site has to offer.
I don't enjoy the site. It was a mistake for me to join-in spite of the low membership price. But again, that is based on my personal preference. Which should not be the controlling factor in rating the site. The rating or score should try to indicate how much a site is worth, versus what you are paying for access. It can get complicated trying to come up with a fair value of the site's score. But that would be a topic for another day.
I thought my review has value. It's not entirely comprehensive, but I think it tries to be an honest opinion of my thoughts.
I've read your review of the site.
I don't think anything has changed since you did your review.
I did list some cons or negative factors about the network:
1. The overpowering presence of ads on every page.
2. The over-large file sizes for videos.
3. Slow download speeds.
I gave the network a score of 90 based on the following:
Huge amount of content.
Professionally shot videos.
Wide range of niches.
Access to 4K videos.
Access to virtual reality porn.
If you joined the network, I doubt that you would enjoy the network any more than you did in your previous experience.
But---
I did not experience any PC problems while downloading files.
I did experience slow download speeds, but probably not as bad as what you experienced.
If you didn't enjoy most of the sex scenes before, there's no reason I can think of why you would appreciate them more today.
I thought I made it pretty clear in my review that I did not enjoy the network. But I believe that many people would appreciate the site/network for what it has to offer. And that was the controlling factor on why I gave the network a high score.
I mentioned that if I had remembered joining the site before, I would not have re-joined recently. But that is personal preference. I don't enjoy most of their videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $9.95 for 1 month, recurs at $24.95/monthly
-Membership includes over 30 porn sites.
-Over 4,000 scenes.
-Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name.
-Can download videos in different definitions: 480p, 720p, 1080p, (some are 4K).
-Can also chose the file format for download: Quicktime (Apple), Windows format, Mobile.
-Can download the full video, or selected clips from the movie.
-Can stream the movie in 720p or 4K.
-Zip file for each gallery
-Photos can be viewed in a slideshow
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
-The streaming option has low, medium and high definition.
-The download option has multiple choices for definition: mobile, medium, high, (and for some videos, ultra high).
-You can download the entire video, or choose which clips you want from that video.
Cons:
-Ads, ads, and more ads.
I don't remember any site or network that had so many ads.
-Have to remember, that when a thumbnail shows a scene, with the caption "Unlock", that is another ad. If you click on the unlock or the thumbnail, you are charged for that scene, or a membership fee to whatever site it connects to.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-File sizes are large. For a video with runtime of 37 min 23 sec, downloading in 1080p, the size is 3.25 GB.
-Slow download speeds. I get between 1-2 MB/sec. At many other sites I get 4-5 MB/sec.
Bottom Line:
This is a mega network, with over 30 sites.
7610 Porn Videos,
2650 Porn Stars,
Updated Daily. Unlike many sites that advertise frequent updates and have stopped updating, this network does update each day, with a new video and a photo set.
Low membership price: $9.95 for first month. Recurs at $24.95/month.
If you like to sip a few beers or some harder alcohol, kick off your shoes and watch hardcore porn of women doing nasty things, this network is right up your alley.
The network advertises:
Big tits, big asses, big tattoos, big name stars.
None of those hits my buttons. But the network is popular. Is it worth investing $10 dollars for a month's entertainment?
Yes, if you enjoy this type of porn. And if you are willing to search through the huge amount of content to find what might appeal to your tastes.
I dimly remember being a member of Naughty America before, and wonder why I rejoined. This is not my kind of site. I like attractive teens.
Actually, I do know why I rejoined. I was attracted by the cheap join price, and forgot that I didn't enjoy the network.
But--forget me and my personal likes. This network is more than worth the price if you enjoy their content.
They cover most niches. They have a wide variety of models, of race, age, body type, etc.
They cover a wide variety of fantasies:
The network offers live sex shows with famous porn stars.
The network offers virtual reality porn.
And it has 4K videos (the Ultra High Definition videos).
The videos are professionally shot: excellent camera-work, good lighting, good set design, good sound control,
The network is easy to navigate, once you learn to ignore the overpowering ads that are everywhere.
The site and network theme is girls/women being naughty. Behaving like sluts. Having hardcore sex. Raw and raunchy.
There's not a lot of eroticism or tenderness or affection. There is an attempt to add a story to the sex, but the story is not believable or realistic. But with a few beers, the story or setup might seem amusing.
I'm giving the network a score of 90. Because it's a mega site, with 7610 videos that are professionally shot. 2650 porn stars. They also offer Ultra High Definition videos. And virtual reality porn. And cam shows. This is one of the
leading networks for hard core porn.
Like I said, I found an email in my inbox saying I had joined the NALive site. This was immediately after I had joined the Naughty America site, because of the special $5.00 for 1 month promotion for Naughty America. So I assume the NALive join was directly related to the Naughty America membership, even though the email stating I was now a member of NALive did not mention Naughty America.
The NALive email specifically states that there is no charge to the NALive membership.
It also states that there are free, and paid, chats at that site. And that any pay chats/offerings are clearly marked.
I haven't really explored the NALive site yet. Not enough time, with the holidays, and the other pay sites I already belong to.
But I haven't been charged anything from the NALive site.
NALive is a cam site. But it's not entirely pay-to-play. The email states there is a lot of free chats you can watch. And there are also the chats you can pay for.
PU says NALive is a re-branded version of Streamate.com.
Streamate charges $15/month to join. But the NALive membership is free. If you go to the NALive site, you will see that it states (on one of their hot links): Join Free.
I didn't join through the NALive site. I never heard of NALive, before I got the email, stating that I was now a member of the NALive site.
Years ago, I used to watch the live cam shows at Met-Art, which were free. Many of the girls were friendly. But Met-Art stopped those shows, and later put out a--I don't know what you call it--live cam offering that was very different from its first effort, and I stopped watching them, or never really got started watching them, because they were very different from the original live chat shows.
I never got into the paid chat shows, because like you said, they can get very expensive.
I took advantage of the $5.00/30 day membership to Naughty America today.
I unchecked the pre-check membership to a bonus site.
But after logging in to the Naughty America site, I found an email in my Spam folder that says:
Congratulations you have activated your bonus membership to NALive.
There are NO monthly membership fees for accessing this new site! You will ONLY be charged if you access our clearly marked premium areas at the listed per min rate.
Please log on and enjoy the Free Guest Chats and talk to all our HOT MODELS who are waiting for you!
You can point your browser to http://www.nalive.com/ to use your membership. Your account information is shown below for reference purposes. Any purchases made on your account will be discreetly billed as Epoch.com.
Thanks for your business! If you have any questions regarding your bill please contact us at: epoch.com/billingsupport/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://epoch.com/billingsupport/
For information regarding the site, please read our Frequently Asked Questions
Could be the result of inter-generational cross-breeding. In the new permissive society, women can date men who are either older or younger than themselves. Thus, the sons and boyfriends of their significant others could also be approximately the same age as the mothers. "If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with" mentality.
It's sometimes hard to find good porn. Too many nitpicking details get in the way of our enjoyment.
I think you are just stating reality, that most video porn has been reduced to rutting and kink. I don't know whether most people appreciate porn that way, but to find anything else is not that easy. That's one major reason why I prefer photos to videos, because you can find erotic photos much more easily than erotic videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo).
-The female porn star's name is given for each video.
-The posting date is given for each video.
-The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw.
-All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video.
-There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex?
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC.
-There is no zip file for the earliest galleries.
-But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway?
-Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download.
-Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness.
-Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive.
Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive.
This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire.
-Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection.
-Quality of the older videos is poor.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex.
Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries.
I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude.
I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine.
Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price.
A great review: detailed, extremely comprehensive, you have a ton of background knowledge of this site.
Hope to see more reviews from you in the future.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join the site directly, you pay $30/month.
Join through Porn Masterminds, you pay $17.95 (with PU discount), recurring at $29.95/month, and that gives full access to New Girl POV.
-CCBill and Epoch are the billers, both trusted names.
-Site membership gives access to the Porn Mastermind network.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Only 15 models. But the models are cute teens.
-The models are American. So the dialog is in English. This gives a chance to gain a slight flavor of the girl's personality, because there is a small interview at the start of each video.
-You can stream or download each video.
-You can stream or download the full video, or select the clips you want to watch or download.
-Good download speeds. I average about 4 MB/sec at this site. My maximum download speed is 6 MB/sec. So it's not the fastest site for downloading, but a good speed for me.
Cons:
-Small site.
-Only 15 models at the site.
-Navigation is archaic. Even though this is a tiny site, trying to see all the parts of the site is frustrating. Even though there are only a small amount of contents, the layout is confusing.
-This is an archive site. No updating.
-The most recent update appears to be in 2015. Which is the same year the site was started.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The pre-checked cross-sale is interesting. It offers a free, 3-day trial to a pornsite. But the free trial turns into an expensive, $39.89/month subscription if you don't cancel on time.
-The videos offer a distorted view. I don't know if this is because the video is meant to be viewed in a virtual reality viewer. The videos are not labelled as virtual reality. But the walls and furnishings of the set are curved, instead of shown as straight lines that they are in reality. It's similar to viewing a virtual reality video without the virtual reality headgear.
Bottom Line:
-The Best Porn (parent site of Porn Users) has a review of New Girl POV that was submitted on 2015-09-29. The review has not been updated. That review has an error.
The Best Porn review states that there are 13+ galleries, and that the galleries avg. 1024 pics each.
Actually, the galleries are much smaller.
The Best Porn review assumed that the average gallery has 1024 pics because the site names each zip file for the gallery as 1024 in the filename of the zip download--so the TBP reviewer assumed that each gallery had 1024 pics.
The 1024 actually refers to the width of each photograph in pixels.
The photos are: width x height: 1024 pixels x 1536 pixels.
No big thing. But don't expect the site to have large photosets. The photosets are good quality, of cute girls, but it's not a photo site like MetArt or MPL Studios where you get ultra-high professional galleries. What you do get are nice galleries of cute models where the gallery is basically a photoshoot record of the video that was shot.
The galleries I checked range from 15 to 139 pics in a photoset.
I could not find a gallery for the model Nina. All the other models I checked have a photo gallery.
-One confusing element about the site:
For each full-length video, there are two hot links for downloading:
One hot link is labelled "HD streaming".
The other hot link is labelled "HD MP4 1080p".
As I wrote, these are the hot links for downloading the video--not for streaming the video.
The hot link for streaming the video is labelled "HD streaming" (under the 'watch movie' label).
When you use the "HD streaming" hot link to download the movie, you get an MP4 file that is HD 1080p.
When you use the "HD MP4 1080p" hot link to download the movie, you get an identical MP4 file that is HD 1080 p, with the same file name, same file size, same everything.
So why have two hot links that download the same, identical file?
If this was a stand-alone site, because of the small amount of contents (15 videos), and because the site is not updating, I would give a score in the 60s. However, you do get access to the Porn Mastermind network, which has has some nice sites, with very good, professional videos of hot teen models that range from attractive to extremely attractive, with a lot of good sex.
So I am giving the site a score of 89, based on the network access.
Before I used the VPN, that page showed my city and ISP.
Now, after opening the VPN automatically, my city and ISP are no longer shown.
So I guess the VPN is working.
Again, many thanks for recommending Nord VPN as an easy to use, low-cost VPN.
It will take me a while to learn to use it, because it seems to have a lot of bells and whistles.
But for now, all I want is some basic protection.
I don't really need a lot of the bells and whistles, because I mainly use my PCs at home, not at public WiFi places.
But thanks for taking the time to advise on a good VPN (price and reliability and ease of use), and links to test it out.
@jook,
I just signed up with NordVPN.
Wish me luck.
Cause I'm a newbie, have no idea how to use it.
LOL.
(I opened the app, but there aren't any bright flashing lights to tell me I am now invisible and protected, although I did sign in with email and password.)
I also read in one of the Google Play reviews, after signing up:
MelDan
September 15, 2018
NordVPN is probably one of the best easy to use VPN service providers. It generally is fast and effective with very few issues. The only small issue I have is some sites will absolutely not load up while the VPN is active. I got a special price last year for what worked out to be only around $1 a mo...
---------------
---------------
I wish I had seen that special price.
Well, I will keep looking.
But I paid $95.75 for 2 years, so I don't feel terrible.
As long as I can get some use out of it.
Or somehow, see that I am protected.
I'm planning on using the VPN you recommended, but haven't signed up yet.
I'm over 70, and my mind can lose track of details, or mis-remember.
I've used VLC media player for many years.
I said my FLV player would not work with these videos, but that was a mistake:
It's my VLC media player that will not play these videos.
The FLV player program is on my computer.
Why it's on my computer I don't remember, because I don't remember ever using it.
VLC media player, and the Windows Media Player (part of the Windows system from Microsoft) are the 2 programs I use to play videos.
So I'm correcting that error in my review: changing FLC player to VLC media player.
Thanks for pointing that out. And for taking the time to read my review.
But the problem of playing the videos might be because I'm making a mistake when I try to download the video file.
I used to use Down Them All download manager, which does not work with Windows 10.
And trying to download a file manually, which should be easy, from this network sometimes gives me an empty file (the filename is correct, for the video download, but the file itself is empty.).
I did not have any of these problems the when I joined the network a couple of years ago, when streaming the videos, or downloading them (because it was easy to download with Down Them All).
The main reason I joined the network was because I came across a very low-priced membership offer, and thought it was a good value.
Not expecting that I would have problems with streaming the videos, the poor online player for the photos, or problems with downloading and playing the videos because the streaming player does not work very well.
I have a 100 Mbps connection to the Internet, so I should be able to stream videos with no problems.
But at this network, I do have problems streaming a video: if I pause the video, I have to re-start it from the beginning. I can't fast forward or skip forward. The video controls (volume, etc.) sometimes disappear if I pause or try to fast forward.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure page for choosing login details.
-Secure member pages (https).
-Sometimes a great discount for membership price.
-Over 6,500 exclusive videos.
-Access to 15+ sites.
-Premium HD quality at its network.
-No captcha required for login.
-Excelllent search. Searches the entire network for a model's content, not just the site you are currently logged into.
-Multiple choices for both streaming and downloading.
-Don't have to pay extra for downloading.
-Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview.
-Nice model page, with good-sized thumbnail of the model, plus hot links to her network content.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for porn sites.
-Icons to control the video sometimes disappear (Play, pause, volume control can be hard to find).
-Need a fast internet connection to stream videos, or they can stutter or stop. My connection is fine for most other paysites, but not at this network.
-The videos have a codec that my software (including VLC media player) won't play. This is the first network I've found this problem.
-I've had problems with downloading videos.
-Ads for other paysites on the member pages.
-Once a video starts to stream, you can't do a partial rewind or fast forward: you have to re-start the video from the start. If you pause the video, you have to reload the page and restart the video from the beginning.
-The photo sets are poor-quality screencaps. Most competing paysites have better screencaps.
-The audio portion of a video sometimes cuts out during online streaming.
Bottom Line:
The videos are plot-based: You have a setup for the sex, to give meaning to the sex.
Navigation is good. The model pages have nice-sized thumbnails of the model, with hot links to her content at the network.
Most videos come with a trailer to give you a fast pre-view of the video.
Mot videos come with a photoset, but the photos are poor quality screencaps, and even if the model is attractive, the photo sets are not worth collecting.
Even though the photos in a set are poor quality screencaps, the file size of each photo can be 6 to 8 MB, which is huge. They are using a poor codec for the photos.
Sites like MetArt have high-quality photos. MetArt low definition file size for a photo is 100 KB or less. MetArt high definition file size for a photo is 200 KB or less.
But New Sensations photos, which are poor-quality screencaps, are 30 to 60 times the size of MetArt high quality photos.
I need a software program that will play the downloaded videos, because I have problems streaming the videos.
I was a previous member back in December 2016, and did not have any of my current problems with streaming or downloading the videos, or playing them once downloaded.
One of the main advantages of New Sensations is they give you a storyline that leads up to the sex, to make the sex more meaningful. And some of the videos can be hot.
For example:
From the Tabu Tales site: Raylin Ann: Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin: Posted 11/18/2016.
Raylin has been keeping her longtime crush and deep sexual desires hidden from her step brother Karlo. One massage that finally went too far opened loose her sexual awakening and her shorts. Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up.
Starring: Karlo Karrera, Raylin Ann
So you get the incest of step siblings, with the additional naughtiness of girl talking to her mother while she is seduced and fucked by her step brother.
Bottom line:
If you're lucky enough to get one of their special discounted memberships, you get a huge amount of hardcore porn covering many different niches. The video quality is good. And the price can be low.
Making this a very worthwhile join.
But technical issues (playback problems, poor quality photo sets, a clunky online player for the photosets) detract from the value of the network.
I HAVE A CURRENT MEMBERSHIP TO NEW SENSATIONS.
I HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT THEIR SITES.
FOR EXAMPLE, I AM NOW STREAMING A VIDEO AT 1080P, 12,000 kbps AT NEW SENSATIONS.
AT THE SAME TIME, I AM DOWNLOADING THE SAME VIDEO AT 720P, FILE SIZE 382 MB.
THE DOWNLOAD SPEED I AM GETTING IS BETWEEN 2 TO 3 MB/SEC, WHICH IS 16 TO 24 Mbps (byte versus bit).
SO THE FILE TAKES LESS THAN 2 MINUTES TO DOWNLOAD, AT THE SAME TIME I AM STREAMING THE VIDEO.
(I WOULD GUESS THAT MY DOWNLOAD SPEED MIGHT INCREASE SLIGHTLY, IF I WERE NOT STREAMING AT THE SAME TIME.)
YOU SAY YOU HAVE A 75Mbps CONNECTION.
I HAVE A 50Mbps CONNECTION
I USE DOWNTHEMALL, A FREE DOWNLOAD MANAGER, THAT SHOWS THE ACTUAL DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FOR THE FILES I DOWNLOAD.
THAT'S WHY I STATE THAT I WAS GETTING 2 TO 3 MB/SEC DOWNLOAD SPEEDS.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE AT NEW SENSATIONS?
IF YOU ARE TAKING AN HOUR TO DOWNLOAD A SINGLE FILE, YOU NEED TO CHECK/FIND WHAT THE PROBLEM IS.
WHETHER IT'S WITH YOUR ISP, YOUR COMPUTER (HARDWARE, SOFTWARE), OR WHATEVER.
I DON'T THINK THE PROBLEM IS WITH THE NEW SENSATIONS SERVERS, BECAUSE I'VE BEEN A MEMBER FOR SEVERAL MONTHS, AND NEVER HAD ANY SERIOUS DOWNLOAD PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Advertises:
-6,000+ exclusive videos
-2,000+ pornstars. Many of them attractive.
-Unlimited access (no download limit).
-Weekly updates
-14+ bonus sites.
-Videos have a matching photoset.
-Content is advertised as exclusive. This is in spite of the fact that much of the content is from DVDs.
-Can post comments on the scenes and photos. Negative comments are allowed (other sites often remove negative comments)
-Long time before site timeout due to inactivity.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Video quality varies. Site has been around since 1998, so the newer content is much higher quality.
-Because of the massive amount of content, it can get exhausting to search through the material.
The basic site structure is plain: They have an excellent model index: Nice-sized thumbnails to picture each model, with links to her videos. But with 2,000+ models, it's a lot of work going through all the pretty girls to find what you want. You can organize the model list alphabetically. Can search by model name, most popular, most recent, etc.
-A large part of each page is filled with ads for site models. It would be better to use the space to show only what is useful to the member.
-The photosets are screencaps of an individual scene. The quality of the screencaps is just OK. The screencaps at Teen Mega World (another long-time hardcore teen network) are much better. And the screencaps at a few other hardcore sites are much better.
Bottom Line:
Many of the videos have a plotline or backstory.
The pornstars are not Academy-award winning actresses yet, but the plot gives meaning to the sex.
And many of the plots are interesting.
"From A First Love To A Distant Memory", starring Melissa Moore and Kimmy Granger, is a wonderful example:
You learn how Melissa and Kimmy met and began a passionate love affair. However, Kimmy has to move far away, and Melissa will miss her. This makes their current sex both sad and sweet.
There are other videos of Melissa where she is seen with other girls. And one scene with her and 5 or more men in a gang bang. So the love life of a pornstar can be complicated.
It helps if the pornstar is bisexual, because then the search for new partners will be less of a burden.(joke).
Actually, the plotlines can be interesting beyond a simple tale of lust or seduction.
For example, " Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin", featuring Raylin Ann.
Raylin is a sweet, innocent girl who is getting a massage from her step brother, Karlo.
The massage is innocent. But Karlo's hands drop down Raylin's shoulders to just above her breasts.
Will they have sex?
But then the phone rings, and Raylin's mother is on the line.
The tension rises: will this phone call spell the end of Karlo's attempt to seduce Raylin?
But as the Website text explains: "Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up."
What a great story line! The actors are not yet Academy-award level, but the writers certainly are.
What surprises me, though, is that obviously Raylin and her step brother have not previously had sex.
When the brother stops massaging Raylin's shoulders to allow her to speak to the mother on the cell phone.
he unzips his pants and pulls out his cock.
This so excites Raylin that she does not need any further seduction, just the sight of her step brother's cock (and maybe the sound of her mother's voice on the phone) is sufficient to make her start sucking and humping with glee).
These videos explore the inner cravings of the female animal.
Which I never understood before watching porn videos.
Although the videos have more of a storyline/plot than most hardcore sites, the site is not really glamcore or heartcore. The plot is there, where there is supposed to be a romantic or sexual relationship between the girl and her partners, but what is lacking is the high quality visuals of a glamcore site: X-Art, Blacked, Tushy and some other sites put a major focus on high quality visuals: great lighting, great definition, solid colors, good camera-work, expensive or nice costuming, etc.
New Sensations does not reach those levels for any of those factors.
New Sensations has many of the most attractive models in the industry.
But they don't present each model to make her appear like a vision of loveliness.
Before the appearance of glamcore sites a few years back, New Sensations would have been an outstanding site:
based on the quality of their models, the storyline, the professional level of the scenes. The photo shoots would be slightly disappointing compared to what's now available at hardcore sites.
However, compared to the glamcore sites, New Sensations score drops because the visuals are below what's offered at the newer glamcore sites.
Giving the site a score of 83. That's very subjective. How much you will enjoy the site depends on your personal preferences. There is a huge amount of content. Professionally shot. With a storyline that is more interesting than the visual scene itself. If they could combine the storylines with a glamcore approach, New Sensations could be an outstanding network. However, that would be very expensive, with money spent on more expensive sets, better costumes, more professional camera-work, etc.
And the storylines would have to agree with each other. Which would be a major problem.
For example, a girl is a lesbian: she loves another girl, who moves away.
Then the girl has a gang-bang with 5 men.
Does that make sense?
(I think I may have overdosed on Porn, because I'm asking for Porn scenes to make sense.)
Based on the amount of content, which is professionally shot, and the level of attraciveness of the models, the network gives you good value for your money. But I personally prefer more glamcore sites, like Blacked, Tushy, or X-Art, where you get less content, but higher quality visuals and models who are made to appear stunning.
Not a direct answer, but Devils Film has some parodies:
Big Love
Eclipse
Fast Times At Ridgemont High
Mad Men
New Moon
The Biggest Loser
Twilight
I'm still a member, but I haven't watched any of them. So I can't tell if they are much good. But personal taste varies so much anyway, what I find funny might be boring for you, and vice versa.
Devils Film (and its network) is available for $9.95/month through PU/TBP.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
