I'm not currently a member of X-Art or Joymii. And it's been almost 3
years since I was a member of Femjoy. Femjoy has a vast number of extremely attractive models and a vast number of photosets, but I like Met-Art over Femjoy for softcore teen photos. I think the teens are presented more attractively. But that's just my personal opinion. There are Porn User members who prefer the natural Femjoy approach over the Met-Art style.
Although both Femjoy and Met-Art fall into the softcore teen category for photos.
X-Art has been around much longer than Joymii. X-Art started with small photosets (small number of photos in each photoset) of gorgeous young models. I mean, they selected a small number of lovely teens, and presented them in a very attractive way. High quality photos. But no videos. Softcore teen.
Years later, they changed the site name to X-Art, and started offering videos along with the photosets. And they started to offer sex in the photos and videos. They started with female masturbation, then offered female-female lesbian, then finally started to offer male-female sex. The sex was explicit, but not gonzo. I think of the style as softcore sex, but that's not the best term. The sex is explicit, but not gonzo. The sex is basically tender, without the spitting, slapping, name-calling you find in rough gonzo sex.
Joymii is similar to what X-Art is offering today. But since Joymii is so much newer than X-Art, you won't find a lot of content. Joymii started late 2010. If Joymii can keep the same style in the future and keep adding new content, it will be a leader in the "softcore" sex style. Joymii started with female masturbation, but now offers male-female sex as well.
Joymii is a sister site of Femjoy. Femjoy, as far as I know, does not
offer any sex in their photos or videos. Nudity, but no sex. So Joymii is a natural extension of Femjoy. If Joymii can use even a fraction of the lovely models that Femjoy offers, then Joymii should enjoy a long-lasting career. Lovely models photographed and videoed in high-quality softcore.
I tried to answer your question. But I tend to ramble a lot. :)
The soft hardcore is what Playboy should have become a leader in. But they lost that opportunity many years ago. Just lacked imagination, I guess. But it was the next logical step in what they were providing. And now Playboy (and Penthouse) are basically has-beens.
Apparently the site featured female masturbation when it started, as stated in a PU review by anyonebutme posted 12-01-10.
But since then the site has also featured male-female hardcore action, done in a tasteful way. By tasteful, I mean the sex is gentle, with the man trying to please the woman.
The videos are sharp, with good lighting and colors.
The Old 'n Young site (part of Teen Mega World network) still updates with 1 or 2 videos per month.
The site started around late 2007, and has 107 videos currently.
So if you are fan of this niche, and haven't been a member of TMW for a while, the site (and network) might be worth a join.
Especially with a PU discounted price of $14.95/month.
I'VE NEVER REALLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
I DO KNOW I'VE TRIED READING LARGE-SIZED BOOKS MANY TIMES.
SOME OF THEM WERE COPIES OF BOOKS I HAVE ENJOYED READING IN THE PAST.
BUT FOR SOME REASON, THERE WAS NO PLEASURE IN READING THE LARGE-SIZED BOOK VERSION.
BUT I THINK THE FONT STYLE MIGHT BE WHY I DID NOT ENJOY THE LARGE-PRINT BOOKS.
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THIS UNTIL YOU POINTED IT OUT.
I MUST BE DUMB, IN A WAY.
BUT I CAN ACCEPT THAT. BECAUSE IT'S THE WAY I AM, AND I CAN'T CHANGE IT.
AT MY AGE, I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OUTRUN DOBERMANS.
EVEN WHEN I WAS YOUNGER, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT.
BE WELL.
PS: (WHAT'S SURPRISING TO ME, IS THAT I DON'T LIKE READING LARGE-PRINT BOOKS. I PREFER THE REGULAR, SMALL-SIZED PRINT. IT MUST BE A PSYCHOLOGY THING, BECAUSE LARGE-PRINT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ.)
I'M GETTING OLD.
I WRITE IN UPPER CASE BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, EDIT.
NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME, THAN TRYING TO SEE LOWER-CASE LETTERS,
SOMETIMES I PUT THE REASON FOR THE UPPER CASE IN MY REPLIES/COMMENTS/REVIEWS,
SOMETIMES NOT.
I AM GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 79, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS SCORED AS A STAND-ALONE-SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE LOWER,
BECAUSE:
1. THE LIMITED AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT THE SITE (80 VIDEOS).
2. THE SITE STOPPED UPDATING YEARS AGO.
3. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK. NO ATTEMPT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. THE SETTINGS AND CLOTHES ARE CHEAP.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.95/MONTH RECURRING.
-PART OF THE PORN PROS BASIC NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES IN THE BASIC NETWORK.
-NETWORK ACCESS GIVES YOU AROUND 3,000 VIDEOS.
(I'M ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS, BECAUSE ANY ADVERTISED STATS ARE SUSPECT: FOR EXAMPLE, THEY STILL ADVERTISE THAT THE BASIC NETWORK HAS 24 SITES, WHICH WAS TRUE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, BUT IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS, THEY'VE ELIMINATED SITES, AND THE CURRENT NETWORK HAS 17 SITES.)
-CAN STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE CONTENTS. NO PREMIUM IS CHARGED FOR DOWNLOADING, UNLIKE SOME SITES WHICH RECENTLY BEGAN CHARGING EXTRA FOR THE ABILITY TO DOWNLOAD CONTENT.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-VIDEOS HAVE A MATCHING GALLERY.
-EACH GALLERY HAS A ZIP FILE.
Cons:
-TO ENTER THE MEMBERS AREA, HAVE TO ACCEPT/DECLINE THE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PLATINUM STATUS FOR $70.
-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE, WHICH ALLOWS HACKERS TO STEAL YOUR LOGIN DATA.
-ADS ON EVERY PAGE.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-NO UPDATES. LAST UPDATE WAS 2011-12-12.
Bottom Line:
THERE ARE CURRENTLY 17 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK.
THE NETWORK HAS BEEN DELETING SOME SITES OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS.
IN NOVEMBER OF 2016, THE BASIC NETWORK HAD 22 SITES.
THE NETWORK ELIMINATED 6 SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS.
THE NETWORK ADDED ONE NEW SITE, NAMED "PORNPROS", WHICH IS SIMILAR TO THE NAME OF THE NETWORK. JUST TO MAKE IT MORE CONFUSING.
THE PORNPROS SITE CURRENTLY HAS 1 UPDATE.
MOST OF THE SITES HAVE NOT UPDATED IN YEARS.
IN THE LAST 30 DAYS, THE BASIC NETWORK HAS ADDED 4 NEW SCENES.
THE SITES WITH NEW SCENES IN THE LAST 30 DAYS ARE: Massagecreep - 1 NEW SCENE RealExGirlfriends - 2 NEW SCENES
PornPros - 1 NEW SCENE
THE LAST NEW SCENE FOR JURASSIC COCK WAS 2011-12-12. JURASSIC COCK HAS 80 SCENES.
THE THEME IS AN OLDER GUY SHTUPPING A YOUNG WOMAN OR YOUNG GIRL.
(I SAY SHTUPPING, BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO BE POLITE. JOKE.)
ANYWAY, THE SITE FEATURES HARDCORE SEX, WITH VERY LITTLE PLOT. THE PLOT IS THAT THE OLDER GUY IS MORE EXPERIENCED THAN SOME YOUNG GUY, SO THE GIRL WILL HAVE A BETTER SEXUAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE OLDER MAN.
THE NICHE (OLD GUYS SHTUPPING YOUNG WOMEN) IS NOT WELL SERVED. TEEN MEGA WORLD HAS A NICHE SITE FOR THIS CATEGORY, PORN PROS (THE CURRENT NETWORK UNDER REVIEW) HAS ONE, TRICKY OLD TEACHER, OLD YOUNG ANAL, GRANDDADZ,
AND A FEW OTHER SITES. THE SITES I MENTIONED ARE OLDER-MEN-WITH-YOUNG-WOMEN. THERE ARE ALSO OLDER-WOMEN-WITH-YOUNG-MEN SITES, AS WELL.
MOST SITES IN THIS NICHE ARE SMALL. LESS THAN 100 SCENES. SOME OF THE MODELS IN THIS NICHE ARE SUPRISINGLY ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEENS/EARLY TWENTY GIRLS.
GETTING BACK TO THE JURASSIC COCK SITE SPECIFICS:
THE VIDEOS CAN BE DOWNLOADED OR STREAMED.
STREAMING IS OFFERED IN STANDARD AND HIGH DEFINITION.
DOWNLOADS ARE OFFERED IN MP4 480P, MP4 1080P, WMV 1080P.
A SIDE NOTE: THE TECHNICAL QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS POOR TO JUST OK.
IF THE SCENE IS SHOT OUTSIDE, THERE ARE RANDOM NOISES THAT INTRUDE ON THE SOUNDTRACK. THE LIGHTING IS NATURAL LIGHING. THE SETS AND COSTUMES/CLOTHES ARE CHEAP. NO EFFORT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. AND THE STUNT COCKS (THE OLDER GUYS) ARE REAL SLOBS.
THE OVERALL ATTRACTIVE OF THE MODELS IS BELOW THE STANDARD OF THE NETWORK AS A WHOLE. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO CHOOSE ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEEN-EARLY-TWENTY GIRLS. AS LONG AS THE GIRLS WERE YOUNG AND WILLING TO FUCK, THEY WERE ACCEPTABLE. AT SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS Massagecreep AND Realexgirlfriends, THE MODELS ARE BOTH YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Site had 42 videos in August, 2008.
Site has 42 videos in January, 2011, two years and 4 months later.
So no updates at all.
A shame, because the videos are very high quality in definition, and mainly well-shot. Pretty models, but most of the videos are kind of boring (or very boring).
Anyway, I guess they ran out of money to keep shooting new videos. Or they are using the money they do have for other things.
There were 42 different video titles reported at TBP on 09-21-08. Based on the Updates page, that is still the same number of video titles currently at this site. So no updates for over 1 year. The videos are short, 8 - 17 minutes runtime, high quality video of mainly very pretty models. But 42 titles for the entire site is a tiny number of videos.
Thanks for positive feedback. I read your review before I did mine, did not want to just echo what you said, so I hope I added a little to what you already reported.
When two people are reporting on the same site, I expect at least some common agreement. Unless the reviewers are totally opposite in type.
Specific site score, for me, is subjective. I don't calculate scores by the grading methods of TBP, because I have no idea how to do that kind of cold calculation. My score is a gut feel or how much I like a site based on what I see (content quality + content quantity + site ease of use versus price).
I actually joined Justteenmovie for the Justteensite, which I belonged to back in early 2006. I wanted to get updates on the huge amount of updated pix and vids at Justteensite. When I belonged back then, the site was small, and I only downloaded a small number of photosets. Now they are a mega-site.
Another annoying feature of the videos that I left out (because of space limitations on the review) was the poor sound track on many of the videos.
They need a new music editor for the videos. The music track on most videos detracts from the video; and the music track volume needs to be set much lower.
Unless you mute the sound completely, it is difficult to turn the stupid music soundtrack down enough on the playback software to a soft level that is not disturbing. Have to go into your PC
"control panel/sounds and audio devices" software to adjust the sound volume. Then, if you play a DVD movie afterwards, you then have to readjust the sound level for the DVD movie.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-Very attractive teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-No DRM
-No downloading limits
-Secret word is easy to read. Some other sites I can't enter because secret word is so distorted.
-Small watermark (watermark is not a pro, but it's small, which is positive)
Cons:
-Very softcore action.
Most videos are solo model, a few have two girls. Most videos I saw were boring. Little emotion shown by the models. Solo videos show a girl moving, walking, lying down, slightly touching herself. A few videos feature 2 girls lesbian action, basically softcore: touching, kissing, licking. Sounds hotter than what it looks like.
Cons:
There are a few erotic videos because of the models, but most of the videos are a waste of time to watch, in spite of how attractive the models are.
-Login in problems: sometimes try to log in to site and username/password not accepted. Get warning message security system will block me if I try too many times. Told (on screen) to contact Support.
But I already sent an email to Support 8 days ago about about other problems and have gotten no reply.
This site has:
-small number of videos (only found 42 video titles)
-no simple listing of number of models
-no simple listing of the model that appears in a video
-no simple listing of number of videos
-no simple listing of video titles
-no simple listing of when the videos were posted
-no simple listing of the photographer for each video
-model bios and interviews: supposed to be on the site, but I can't find them.
-there is no posting date for any video that I can find
-They do not name the model/models in the video.
Bottom Line:
Cons(continued):
-lousy navigation.
-there is no search function to find models, videos, photographer
There are very few videos on the site, and it's not easy finding a specific video by model or video name. You have to click thru each browser page where they show thumbnails for 9 videos per page.
A simple upgrade to navigation would be to use the "Free Tour" updates page, which shows a thumbnail of each video available in the members area, on a single page.
But when you get into the members area, instead of one page where you can look at all 42 videos at the site, you have to search thru 5 separate pages that list 9 videos per page. Showing all the videos on a single page would make navigation/searching so much easier.
-Advertise interviews and bios of models.
Have not found any interviews or bios for the models. If the bio is inside some video, there should be an explanation on a web page that states where the bios and interviews are located, and how to find them.
-Advertise 24/7 support staff. I sent email to support 8 days ago, still no reply. 2 other PU
members reported they sent emails to support and got no replies.
-The video run time is around 8 - 17 minutes.
-The video file size is around 400 - 700 MB in avi format. This takes a huge amount of disk space for each video.
-Updates-Advertise "12 HDV films per month"
(Can't find where I saw the advertisement for 12 HDV films per month, but that is what I wrote down as I was looking the site over. I believe that is what I saw advertised.)
-I found 42 different video titles. That is the same number reported at TBP on 09-21-08. So no updates from Sep 21 thru Dec 7.
Until I saw the TBP data on number of videos, I thought there were sections of justteenmovie that
were hidden from me, because I could not find the advertised model bios, model interviews, and other videos that are advertised that are supposed to be inside the members area.
Bottom line:
You can take the tour, where you can watch a promo trailer for the videos on the site.
If you think the promo trailers are good/interesting/erotic/whatever, then you can join for 1 month to download whatever videos you like.
In spite of hi definition videos with really attractive teen models and nice lighting and good
color, the site is a waste of money, because
-there are very few videos
-most of the videos are boring
When I watch most of these attractive young girls moving or touching themselves, I think they feel
no more emotion than if they were brushing their teeth.
This site is sister to justteensite. You join one, you get the other site included. By itself,
justteenmovie would not be worth joining. Give it a score of 55. Justtteensite is the much more valuable site, and that's where you would spend most of your time.
Justteenmovie is a real disappointment with its current content.
I guess you have to be realistic. But there are sites that have an archive of cute and attractive models that should still be worth something, but the sites go out of business, and that content can be lost.
It's happened in the past, I'm sure it will happen in the future, especially with the downturn that porn sites seem to have experienced in the last few years, whether because of the financial recession, or other factors.
It's not just porn sites. Automotive companies in the US and elsewhere have killed off brands that were around forever. The Oldsmobile brand was over 100 years old when it finally died in 2004.
I tried to load the justteensite page, and the server times out.
Is the site experiencing problems, or is it just a temp thing?
Not a member currently, just wanted to visit the public preview pages.
I agree that the Just Teen Movie site is a disappointment. They started out with high-quality short videos (8-17 minutes run time) of lovely models. The videos were mainly boring, in spite of the attractiveness of the models. I say high-quality videos because of the high definition of the videos and the other technical aspects (good lighting, good color for the skin tone, etc.)
But it's been over 15 months since they added a new video. Anyone joining that site for over 1 month is wasting his money. You can download the entire site contents of Just Teen Movie in 2 or 3 days. They only have 42 videos. And most of the videos you probably wouldn't want to watch a second time, anyway, because they are mainly boring.
A real shame. They had a good idea of a high-quality video site of lovely young models, and then didn't follow through on the updates.
I guess you just have to take the good with the bad.
JTS just posted a photoset of Linda named "Merry Xmas", dated 2009-12-23. This Linda is named Masha F at Met-art. She's one of my favorite models. Gorgeous girl. Linda is wearing a Santa-type hat in many of the "Merry Xmas" photos. There's also a border of fake snow around many of the photos to set her off and to remind us of the Christmas season.
Truth be told, the photos would have been better without the fake snow.
But this is a gorgeous girl, and the photoset is worth keeping.
She also had a recent photoset at Met-art, dated 2009.10.28, named "PREXIOSI", under the model name of Masha F.
This site gives multiple models the same name. There are currently 4 Masha models, 3 Linda models, etc. The site should give each model a unique name, to simplify the search. Even if it's just Linda_01, Linda_02, Linda_03, or Linda_A, Linda_B, Linda_C.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
pros:
-a lot of content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-hi def pics listed as up to 2900x4300
-Very attractive European teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-Content quantity- Huge number of pix sets and vids.
models : 620
photos : 101282
HDV films : 179
(The HDV films are really video clips of the models, these are not hardcore or softcore movies with a storyline.)
-No DRM
-No downloading limits
Cons:
pros (continued):
-secret word is easy to read.
-small, unobtrusive watermarks.
-updates: a new photoset or vid every 1-2 days.
Cons:
-expensive. $34.95 (recurring) monthly fee. This gives you membership to 2 sites, justteensite and justeenmovie. But the justteenmovie site has tiny content, that you can download entire site in a few days, if you think any of the content is worth downloading and keeping. There were no updates at justteenmovie in the 30 days that I belonged to that site.
-advertise friendly support, but I sent email asking for help over 30 days ago, never got a response.
-basic site navigation is OK, but could be much easier to use. Met-art has more models and picture sets, but it's easier to find models and picture sets at Met-art than at Justteensite.
The search feature could be improved a great deal.
-jitter in some of the HDV vids. While you get very sharp images, it's annoying to see the images jittering on the screen while you watch the video.
Bottom Line:
cons (continued):
-minor annoyance-Timeout disconnected from the site and have to re-login.
-no resume support for zip file downloads of picture sets. These are large zip files, so if you get disconnected, have to restart the download from the start.
-zip files for the high resolution pic sets only. No zip file for the low resolution pics in a photoset.
-model bio data can often have errors or fantasy. Age of model is often given as 18 or 19, because
this is a teen site. But I've seen models who are in their 20s listed as 18 or 19 (these are
models I've seen on other sites or in pornstar databases). Also, country of origin can be wrongly listed. The site is selling youth, so don't let the facts get in the way, as for age. As for country, I've seen Russian girls listed as being from Argentina at 1 site. Porn is fantasy anyway, so why not Argentina?
Bottom line:
This is a major teen softcore site. Huge number of very attractive models, photosets, videos. Well worth a 1-month membership if you've never belonged to it.
Also it's worth revisiting the site after a 6-12 month absence to catch up on the updated photosets and videos.
I've read articles about PC security, most of the technical details I did not understand. But I've read that just visiting some infected sites (without downloading anything) can infect your PC. Also, if you buy a brand new hard drive from a major disk drive maker (Western Digital, Seagate, whoever), the hard drive (or maybe it was the software that comes with the hard drive) can be infected before you even open the box to install it on your PC.
I try to keep all sensitive financial data off my PC.
I also run firewall, anti-virus, and anti-spyware, but there are geniuses out there who can get past any simple safety measures I am running.
Delete the comment if you want. Doesn't much matter to me.
This was the first time I came across the (AT) substitution for @.
I don't usually send many email messages to adult sites I join. The PU site is an exception, if my posts are considered emails.
Maybe I should join a computer club to pick up details on using a PC. I learned to use a PC by reading some books and trial and error.
Is this message considered email?
I personally get a small number of spam emails (6-10+) each day, but consider that part of the price of the email service.
So it was a mistake to post the email address for support at justteensite?
I've never posted publicly the email address of any person, as far as I know.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
