I just signed up for justteensite based on Drooler's review, which is fairly positive, and I also belonged about 2+ years ago.
Am having a problem viewing and/or downloading the photoset of a model named Tanya. The photoset was supposed to be posted at the site on 2008-05-08.
Anyway, I am trying to contact support about the problem, as well as the fact I can't view or download any of the videos at justteenmovie, which is a sister site that you get a membership with when you join justteensite.
The general support email address is given as info(AT)justteensite.com, when you hit the hot link for "General Support" (the other support hot links are for cancelling the membership).
The email address of info(AT)justteensite.com does not work when you put that into an email. You get an error message, "We cannot find a match for this email address. Please use an email address
that looks like: user@eample.com "
So I tried sending the email to info@justteensite.com , and that works, apparently.
Hoping I will get a response to the email I sent, that will let me view and download the photosets and videos I want.
Both Drooler and snappy said in October they sent emails to "Friendly Support" and got no response.
I am hoping I will have better luck.
If I can not view and download the photosets/videos I want at Justteensite and the videos at Justteenmovie, I will get a refund from CCBill.
Patience is a virtue.
One I've never enjoyed.
Try sitting in a chair waiting in the emergency room for 6-8 hours before you see a doctor.
Maybe I will achieve patience once I get to heaven.
But the older you get, the more you wish it was like the old days. You're right about Met-art and the 404 files.
I didn't think that was funny, until I saw your comment. Now I really understand why they say, "Misery loves company." I'm glad other people are just as frustrated as I am. Lol.
It really was a simple pleasure, looking forward to the Met-art updates, and clicking on the photosets to see how good they were. Served fresh and hot off the server. Now it's better to wait until the next day, to avoid the dreaded 404 file syndrome.
If the two sites are the same price, and you get so much more quantity at the Ron Harris site, I don't know why anyone would join the Kara Duhe if they knew about the Ron Harris site carrying the Kara Duhe photosets.
But like you mention, to be satisfied with a membership at either site, you have to like the Ron Harris style of photography. You mention that a lot of pics are nearly the same pose. What bothers me more is his glossy style of photography. I can get bored with his glossy pictures very fast, for some reason, even though he has some very attractive models. That is why a site like Met-art, with a large number of contributing photographers, is so much easier to appreciate. Met-art has a huge number of attractive models, and the photographers can present them in photos that are worth looking at. Obviously not all photosets will be equally attractive to all viewers, but there is a wide selection of styles where you can find the photosets and models that appeal to you.
You discovered my secret shame.
But in spite of my glowing review of Met-art with its high score, and my other posts telling what a great site it is, I've never gotten a free pass to Met-art, or even a thank you from that site.
Nice, comprehensive review. I'm still searching for those sites where I could write: "great videos, great pics, great girls, what more can you ask, 100."
The closest I could find was Met-art, which was my first review, and that got a 97 score. No other site ever reached that high a rating. Lol.
I have to admit that I've been searching for a paysite with elegant design with ease of navigation, but I'd also like a bit of great content to go along with it. So I'm afraid that I'll have to keep searching.
Definitely save your money by not joining this site.
In case you missed it, PU will not accept any reviews of this site for 30 days, because of the suspicious reviews.
I pasted below the comment by Khan announcing that no reviews will be accepted:
..................
..................
Khan - PU Staff 03-12-09 06:52pm
Talk Back TRUST USER? YES (1), NO (0)
OFFICIAL NOTICE !!
Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.
We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.
We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.
Save your change. The opinion of most of the PU members that commented on the recent glowing reviews of this site is that the reviews were not trustworthy. The older PU members think this is just a scam, hyping the site to get new members to join.
pat362 posted that this site contains a lot of content that is duplicated at Teen Mega World.
Teen Mega World membership is much cheaper than this site's membership fees. less than half the price.
I haven't been a member of this site, but if there is duplicate content, you would probably feel cheated if you were already a member of Teen Mega World, and you paid the high price to join this site.
I think that Teen Mega World has tons of good hardcore teen videos, at a very low price.
A lot of porn sites are run by people who speak/write very little English, so that might be part of the reason the responses from the web sites to questions can be poor.
Another reason for the poor quality of responses to questions can be a lack of interest on the part of the site personnel to answering questions.
Some sites have a positive attitude about customer service and try to provide a quality experience, or at least spend the time and effort to answer questions helpfully. But there are a lot of porn sites where the help section is apparently asleep or on vacation. I've found some sites that advertise 24/7 help for problems don't even bother answering requests for help.
I'm happy that you think the review has some worthwhile details. Looking at the site, I thought it was a waste of time, since it was so small. But I tried to review it as a regular site, with pros and cons. But the cons far outweigh the pros on this one.
Thanks, Capn. I'm kind of ambivalent about the badge. I don't think of myself as truly hardcore, but I will try to wear my badge proudly, as a member of the PU fraternity. :)
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Zip file for photosets.
-Multiple choice for video download quality: high, medium, low
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Can download entire site contents in a few hours (11 videos + matching photosets is the entire site contents).
-Long period before site timeout.
Cons:
-Tiny site. 11 videos with matching photosets.
-Expensive price. $29.95/month if you join site directly. But join through Teen Mega World, for $19.95/month, and you get Latin Shemales included, with over 20 other sites as well.
-Archive site. Apparently not updating. Don't know if it ever did update, because you only have 11 videos total (with matching photosets).
-Default file name for dowloading video files is high, medium or low (depending on which you choose: high, medium or low quality-definition). So need to rename file by date or model if want to save these files.
-No streaming option.
-No model bio information given, except for the age of the tranny, which is listed as 18 or 19 for each tranny. Which I find suspect, because these trannys look older than 18 or 19.
-The language is South American, not English. But there isn't a lot of conversation, it's mainly action. Some kissing at the start before getting
into bj and other things.
-No search.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-Unlike other network sites, there is no link to transfer to other bonus sites in this network. You have to open a page, with the URL in the address bar, and re-enter your login information to get inside a different site in the network.
-There is a link for "bonus sites" at Latin Shemales, but it only opens a page with an advertisement/hot link for a gay dating service. It does not provide any links to the other network bonus sites you get by joining this network.
BOTTOM LINE:
This niche is definitely a different offering by the Teen Mega World
network. Many of the network sites have content that could be interchangeable, but shemales is a niche that is different from the usual pornsite offering.
This is hardcore tranny action: doing whatever a guy and tranny can do to each other. The guy does the tranny, the tranny does the guy, so the
tranny is definitely not just doing the woman's part, but acting like both a man and a woman, and the guy is acting like a bisexual, except he's
getting his action from a tranny instead of a man and a woman.
The action is not rough or gonzo style. It's actually friendly sex. Both partners are having a good time and enjoying themselves. No fake screams and moans. These aren't models who are just putting on a show: they are getting paid and also having a good sex experience.
High quality videos:
Frame width x height: 720x406 or 640x480
Total bitrate: 6064kbps or 3064kbps
Video runtime: 18-21 minutes
Number of videos: 11
Photosets:
Number of photosets: 11 (each photoset matches one video).
Number of photos per set: 58-111 photos, most sets are 62-77 photos.
Photo size: 30-56 KB.
Width x Height: 640x480 pixels.
Horizontal x Vertical Resolution: 96x96 dpi
The photos are low-quality screen caps.
On the TBP review page, it states content count has not changed since December 2006. That was 11 videos.
Site currently has 11 videos. So apparently the video posting dates are not accurate. Because 3 videos are dated 0000-00-00, and 3 videos are dated 2011-04-02 (today's date).
A tranny lover would probably not join this network because the contents of the one tranny site are so small. But if you belong to the network anyway, then it might be worthwhile glancing over what the site offers. Or maybe not. I looked at all the videos at this site, because there are only 11, to get an idea of the video quality of the videos. The video quality
is basically very good: clear focus and definition, good lighting, good sound, good colors of skintones. The trannies are ok-looking to nice-looking.
Bottom line: Because the site is so small, even a tranny lover will not get much satisfaction from the site. If you like tranny, you will probably like the videos, but there are only 11 of them.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening.
-The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip.
Cons:
-Archive site. No updates since September 2007.
-Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets.
-Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend.
-More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment.
-Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other.
-The videos are not dated.
-No search function.
-No model bio.
-No streaming option.
-Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos.
-Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition.
-Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded.
Bottom Line:
The site is part of the Diesel Access network.
The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing.
LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend.
LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network:
At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets.
At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets.
Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets.
Video stats:
Number of videos: 44
Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download.
Sample dimensions:
Height x Width: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
Photos stats:
Number of photosets: 57
Number of photos per photoset: 80+
Width x Height: 799x1200
or
Width x Height: 1198x1800
Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc.
The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused.
Bottom Line:
Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a
membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted.
However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like.
Like you said, poor preview area. You click on a model's thumbnail to get a better view of what she looks like, and you are transferred to the sign-up page.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-First month PU discounted price of $14.95. Recurs at at $29.95/month.
-Site is part of the Fame Digital network. You get access to over 20 sites, including the main sites of: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
Any one of the sites listed above is worth the membership price. Plus you also get access to a boatload of additional hardcore porn at the other niche sites.
-The same login details (username and password) work for each of the sites you have access to.
-Login and member pages are https.
-There are trailers for the videos. So you can get a preview of the video instead of watching the entire video.
-There is 24/7 support on live chat, which is the best customer support service I've ever encountered.
Fast response, helpful agents who know how the site/network works.
Cons:
-The main con is they re-designed the site and network a few years back.
The re-design made the site and network harder to use, slower to navigate.
See the bottom line section for more details on the re-design flaws.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. But this is standard for most porn sites.
-Billing agent is FameHelp. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable and easy to deal with. However, I've used FameHelp a number of times in the past, and never had a problem with them.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Movies: 234
DVD: 58
Pornstars: 347
Those stats are for the Lesbian Factor site.
But with network access, you have thousands of videos, thousands of porn stars, thousands of pictures.
The re-design for the site/network made using the content much harder.
They eliminated the old drop-down menu that allowed you to easily switch between sites.
The old drop-down menu also made it easy to know what sites you had access to.
The contents of each site are no longer separated for each site, but you get videos from other sites shown on the content page for each site
So it's more difficult to explore what the contents of a site include (because you have random thumbnails from other network sites thrown in on each page).
If you are at this site, Lesbian Factor, the easiest way to switch to another site in the network is to open a new web page, and log in to the new site from there. Instead of simply hitting a drop-down menu to switch, which was the older design.
Not all changes were bad.
The old sites had model lists that often did not have a thumbnail for the model.
And finding her videos at the site was problematic.
The new model lists have photos for all the models I checked.
And the newer model page shows her videos at that site (not for the entire network).
Which makes it harder to find the model's content--since you have to search each site to see if she is present.
-This is a pro and a con: You get access to so much hardcore porn, that it's difficult to pore through all the content, to find what appeals to you. So you need energy and determination to slog through the material. But there are videos that can blow you away, the first time you see them. The raw energy and sex and physicality are impressive. Especially in some of the older scenes. You don't get the glamcore treatment, this is raw, hardcore sex. So it doesn't have the higher definition of current videos, expensive sets, or elaborate makeup for the models, but some of the older videos are gems.
I should mention that the site and network has an outstanding live chat support service.
The live chat support is 24/7. One of the best live chat services I've ever used.
The techs are quick to answer a chat, and are courteous and knowledgeable about using the site and network.
When I last joined, I had a few issues about the site re-design, and the live chat line was fast to respond, and answered my question easily. Much faster than waiting for an email response, and better than calling on the phone, since, for me, it's easier to read a text message on my computer than talking on the phone with no written record to refer to.
Many of the older scenes have a gonzo feel.
You can easily find some jiggering of the image (the camera is not held steady), a lack of focus (camera guy does not frame each shot very well) poor lighting, and other mistakes that take away from watching a porn scene.
The newer videos, in addition to higher definition, have better quality tech factors: focus, slightly better lighting, etc.
But don't expect the videos will match the glamcore sites like X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy in quality (definition, lighting, making the models glamourous, sound control, focus).
The Fame videos are basically gonzo hardcore sex.
Although there is a huge amount of content available in the network, because of navigation issues, it's hard to find the gems that you will appreciate.
I wish that they would go back to the old design, since it was much simpler, cleaner, easier to use.
But it's been around 4 years since they went to the new design, so that won't happen.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 80.
That's generous, because the network re-design really fucked up the value of the site and network, making it harder to find the content, to explore the content, to switch between sites, to know what specific sites you have access to, to find the content of a model.
But there are some videos that are really good, if you can find them.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $9.95 for first month (then recurs at $29.95/mo.)
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Content is dated.
-Long time before site timeout.
-You can watch the videos streaming, or download them.
-The models in the videos are identified.
-You click on a hot link of the model's name, and you get a thumbnail of the model, and the network sites she appears at. It would be nice if there
were hot links to each video she was in. Instead, you have to go to each individual site, and then search for her videos. And since you can't switch freely between sites, you first have to login to your signup site, and then go to the site that you want. And then you can search for her videos at that site.
Cons:
-Last update was 2011-12-19.Before that, the update rate was very irregular, sometimes every 10 days, then no updates for several months.
-Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at sign up, or you will be signed up for a trial subscription to a different site.
-Although the soundtrack is clear, all the moans and groans of passion sound fake. So instead of adding to the excitement, it detracts. I've seen videos where the girls looked and sounded like they were really getting off. But in these videos, the girls are giving a poor performance.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
234 movies. The number of movies (or videos) hasn't changed since the TBP review dated 2011-05-30, although 6 videos at the site have a posting date after 2011-05-30.
So this is more of an archive site, where you can expect few, if any, updates.
The videos run about 20 - 34 minutes.
Can watch the videos streaming:
High definition is 480p.
Low definition is 240p.
Can download as MP4 or WMV files.
High definition is 480p.
Low definition is 240p.
As the name implies, this is a hardcore lesbian site.
You get a variety of solo, two girls, three girls. With and without toys.
I watched a number of the videos. I thought they were OK, but nothing special. The videos are competently shot, OK camera work, OK lighting and
sound control. Most videos are shot indoors, in a living room or bedroom, which makes shooting the video easier. I wish the videos were higher
resolution (480p is the highest offered, which seems poor, to me). And wished that the sex was more erotic or sexy. Maybe I'm jaded, but the
videos left me bored.
The main value of joining this site is that it gives you access to the netFame Solutions network, which has some worthwhile sites.
Thanks for the positive words.
I was afraid I was letting my personal bias flavor the review too much.
But the site criticism is justified: why have a site with only 8 videos?
Unless those videos are truly exceptional, which these are not.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month for this site.
Join Naughty Amnerica for $9.95 for the first month, and you get full access to this site.
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to work with.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Can choose between multiple definitions for download.
-Choice of multiple definitions for download of full movie.
-Choice of multiple definitions for download of specific clips from each movie.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that illustrates the action of the video.
-Zip file for each gallery.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-I don't find the models attractive. That's personal taste. I don't like fake boobs. Don't like tattoos. The models are below average in looks. They aren't cute or pretty or lovely--unlike many porn models at glamor sites or hardcore sites like Teen Mega World or Diesel network.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
8 videos.
8 matching galleries.
Lesbian Girl on Girl is one of my favorite sites on Naughty America.
The site has 8 videos and 8 matching photo sets. That's it.
The first video has a posting date of 2012-12-12.
The last video has a posting date of 2013-01-15.
The reason it is my favorite site at Naughty America is that it gives me faith that I can open up my own porn site.
And maybe make a lot of money.
If Naughty America can offer a site with only 8 videos (and matching photo sets), there nothing to stop me from doing it as well.
To open my site, I would be willing to buy 10 videos, which is two more than what Lesbian Girl on Girl boasts.
Edit: some of my remarks are meant as tongue in cheek.
Why have a site with only 8 videos? The owners probably thought it would be a useful site to offer some content in this niche. So they opened the site, and posted 8 videos. And stopped posting new videos within the first month.
So, why keep it as a separate site? The main reason would be to advertise that Naughty America has one additional site to offer customers. And you don't find out that this site is so tiny until after you sign up.
As far the videos are concerned:
I actually prefer these videos over some of the other niches that Naughty America features.
The reason is the story or plot is minimal. So there is less of the bad acting these models do in leading up to the sex.
The sex itself is not very believable. These are porn stars getting paid to act sexy, make a lot of fake moaning noises to show how aroused they are. The acting is not convincing, the sex is not hot. Some lesbian porn can be hot, but none of the videos at this site are very interesting. They are basically a waste of time to watch.
This is personal opinion, but I don't find most of the models at Lesbian Girl on Girl (or Naughty America) that attractive. I don't like fake boobs. I don't like tattoos on women.
Bottom line: Even if you like lesbian porn, I doubt this site will have much value, because it's so tiny. And the videos are plain vanilla. They have no heat. No interest.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
