The site preview seems kind of short. I see that there are some sample photos and videos, but I usually like to see a list of all the models at the site, with thumbnails of those models.
I think of the idea of opening a new sister site as a marketing tool, to increase interest in the site (with the hope that more members will join) and with the possibility that the new sister site might be a source of added revenue. If you look at met-art and metmodels, that is what was done, I believe. The main purpose of metmodels was to increase the revenues (money) that was paid by potential members of met-art. Maybe the owners/operators of met-art and metmodels can claim some artistic or intellectual reasons for the creation of metmodels, but I think the basic reason was just to make more money. There is no real reason for metmodels to exist separately except for marketing purposes: The two sites are the same, except that metmodels is a site with far less content and a much smaller amount of updates. You join metmodels only if you want to see the additional photo-sets that are not posted on met-art. Personally, I don't have the extra money to join both sites, so I spend my money at met-art, which is the much more valuable site because of the massive content and frequent updates.
I am not a member, but I love giving my opinions, even when I know little about what I'm saying.
I do like eye candy, and the tour pages of inthecrack has some lovely models.
If the owners start a sister site, they could charge separately for the new sister site, or make membership in the new sister site part of the basic membership for inthecrack. There is obviously additional expense for opening a new, separate site, but the amount of content for a new site would probably be small, and even if current/former members of inthecrack really liked the Czech girl named Lexa for her looks, it doesn't seem likely the new sister site, by itself, would generate enough revenue to pay for its costs. Especially in the current economic downturn, when porn revenues are supposed to be dropping, and even major sites are supposed to be hurting financially.
So I think the best approach would be to offer membership in the parent site, inthecrack, and the new site (call it Lexa, for simplicity), for the same basic fee. And then, if the new site does become popular (measured by membership hits or whatever), the owners could possibly consider raising the membership fee, instead of spinning the new site off as separate membership fee.
Am I just spinning my wheels, or am I saying anything useful? Not really sure.
But even if the main focus of the new Lexa site is Lexa, I would assume she would have "guest" models on the site, because that is what many solo model sites seem to do. And if the sister site increases the amount of content available for your viewing pleasure, as long as the membership fee is not increased, I don't know why members would object to the new site.
Sorry, I don't really understand what your objection is to: Is it the creation of a new site, because you think the model Lexa will appear less frequently on the old site? Or is it that you wouldn't mind a new sister site, if they chose a good-looking model that did hardcore action instead of the mainly softcore Lexa? Or is it something else?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU shows a discounted price of $14.87/month recurring. But when you click on the link to the site, and hit the join page, it shows a join price of $17.87/month (recurring).
-This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network. 427 videos as of 2016-07-10.
-Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name.
-Numerous options for video download: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p.
-Good download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec. My max speed is about 5+ MB/sec.
-Access to the rest of the Team Skeet network with membership in any of their sites.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-The site theme is innocent high school girls having sex. But most of the models look like sluts who are too old for high school. And they sure as hell don't look innocent. So that takes away from the fantasy element of porn.
-Update rate is 2 videos per month. But you get 1 video per day for the Team Skeet network.
-Some of the models in these videos are actually pretty: Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace,some others. But the videos don't use the attractive models to create videos that have interest or value. Part of the problem is the script/plot is so stupid, part is the acting is so terrible, it reduces the value of the videos. You don't watch porn for the acting or script, but jesus, if you have horrible actors, don't require them to act. And if you can't write a script, don't bother, just show the sex.
-A lot of ads for other paysites on every page you look at inside the site.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: innocent high school girls having sex.
Not much effort is put into making these models attractive. Even models who are normally attractive come across as not especially attractive: for example, Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace are definitely good-looking women. But you wouldn't know it from their videos at Innocent High.
Many of the models don't look like they are in high school, unless they have been held back a few years.
The site would be better named: "horny school girls having sex".
And the models certainly don't act innocent.
This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network, with 427 scenes.
The site does offer a wide selection of definitions for download, from very low (for portable) to 720p and 1080p.
Most of the scenes take place in a classroom. The plot get repetitious fast. There's not a lot of male talent used: you get the same faces again and again. The male talent are supposed to be professional school teachers, but they look like
poor white trash.
Maybe they should name the site: "Skummy models get fucked by poor white trash"? That would be descriptive, and truthful.
I'm a fan of teen porn, softcore or hardcore. I think MetArt has great value, Teen Mega World, X-Art, Diesel and a bunch of other sites too numerous to mention are outstanding value.
But I like my teens to be attractive. To look like teens (or early twenties). Innocent High is not one of my favorite sites.
The teen models (if they are teens) look older, and not attractive.
The scenes are poorly acted, with stupid plot lines.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's not for the site itself, but because you have access to the entire Team Skeet network, which does have a lot of good scenes.
Nice solid review stuffed with details and opinions. Took a look at the site preview. I think some of the girls are a little old to be in high school. Were they held back for further instruction in sexual behavior?
If you can hit download speeds of 1 MB/s, then I think you would be able to download about 86 GB in a single day. That means you could hit your maximum monthly download limit of 100 GB in less than 2 days.
I understand why ISPs are setting download limits (to make more money, of course). Plus maybe other reasons, as well.
But it's ridiculous to have such a small monthly download limit for an account that has such a fast download speed.
I'm surprised that more people aren't writing letters of complaint to their politicians about this matter.
You, and many other people, are paying for a high-speed connection that you are mainly not able to use.
I know that complaint letters to politicians are mainly a waste of time. But complaining to the ISPs would be even more of a waste of time.
I pay $25/month for an ISP connection that has a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s. But I don't think I have a monthly download limit. Even if I did have a download limit, because of the relatively slow speed of my downloads, I don't have to worry about exceeding it.
But even so, it's probably only a matter of time before my ISP (which is AT&T) will impose a monthly download limit.
Just curious. How fast is your maximum download speed (when downloading a photoset or video file)?
My max download speed is around 150-160 KB/s.
A lot of the PU members report download speeds that are 3-10+ times faster than what I have.
But a 100 GB per month cap by your ISP seems very strict.
Some of the PU members have been reporting being capped by their ISP, but I doubt their caps are 100 GB/month. That would negate the value of their fast download speeds, because they could hit the maximum download limit very fast, in a week or less, based on the sample download speeds that I've seen reported by PU members.
Maybe I will suggest that topic as a poll question.
Switching from European or American porn to Japanese porn, there is a change in the mind-set, the ambiance, the mind-set. Change can be nice, it can refresh the mind and allow you to enjoy the same basic thing (sex or porn) more than the same-old, same-old thing.
I don't appreciate all of Japanese porn, especially the mosaics, but it makes for a nice change of pace. And there are some truly lovely Japanese porn models/actresses.
But tastes differ. If you are bored by Japanese porn, then look elsewhere for something that you can appreciate.
If you are looking for more Japanese sites, Sex Asian 18 is one you might consider. Site has a number of very attractive models, photosets and videos. They have a daily download limit which was 12 GB at the time I was a member back in July 2009.
Uncensored Maria Oazwa videos are not easy to find. She is my personal favorite Japanese AV actress. Absolutely gorgeous.
Download limits are a pain, but you get a daily limit of 15 GB. That's a lot of download.
It's your money and your choice, but if you want Maria Ozawa, or high quality vids/photosets of Japanese porn, this is supposed to be one of the best Japanese porn sites around. Expensive, but Japanese porn, and even Japanese non-porn movies and music CDs, are expensive compared to American non-porn movies and music CDs. You buy a music video (non-porn) of some Japanese singer, it can easily cost $40 or more, plus shipping.
But the shipping charge is cheaper than flying to Japan and trying to buy this stuff in person.
There are sites out there that give far better value for the money.
This site is not a scam, just very small. After it grows the content, it will be a better value.
PU lists price as $9.95/month recurring.
TBP lists price as $19.95/month recurring.
You click on the PU link to the site, and when you go to the join page, the price shown is $19.95/month recurring.
This is a small site, with only 40 models so far. The site is listed as amateur girls. I've seen a few of the same models at Metart, Femjoy, and other sites, so not all the models are complete amateurs.
Were any PU people members at this site, and have an opinion on whether it's worth joining?
I'VE ALWAYS HAD GOOD LUCK WITH CCBILL AND EPOCH.
EASY TO DEAL WITH. NO OVER-BILLING, EASY TO CANCEL.
THAT'S JUST MY EXPERIENCE. I CAN'T REALLY SPEAK FOR EVERYONE'S DEALING WITH THEM.
BUT I TRUST CCBILL AND EPOCH, BASED ON MY TRANSACTIONS. WHICH HAS BEEN QUITE A BIT, OVER TIME.
That's one reason I avoid most trials.
I also try to make sure that I avoid pre-checked trials on signup.
Because a pre-checked trial will turn into a very expensive membership unless you cancel in time.
But you can try to have your full access membership cancelled, with a refund, depending on the payment processor that was used.
If that doesn't work, you can dispute the payment with your credit card company, if you think the charge was fraudulent.
Up to you.
But with a PU discount, you pay $20 for the first month, recurring at $50/month.
There have been negative comments about the site, so it's probably not worth paying $50/month for the site.
There are many better sites that cost far less.
I don't think you are missing something.
My guess is that lesbian is not a popular niche in Japanese porn, compared to most niches.
I'm not a member of JAV HD currently.
But I was a member back in February.
And like you, I was surprised there were so few lesbian videos at the site.
I think I found one lesbian video that was pretty hot. It was about a girl that was being seduced by another girl on a crowded bus (or train?).
There are Japanese lesbian porn videos.
But for whatever reason, this network doesn't carry them.
Japanese lesbian videos are interesting, because they feature a lot of intense kissing.
When someone gives a very high score of 95+, most Pornusers members tend to regard the score suspiciously. That's just the PU mentality. The members don't believe in perfect sites. And they have definite ideas on how almost all porn sites could be improved.
To write a review and list no cons is a definite no-no.
Even if you are completely in love with a site, you should still list at least a few minor cons, just for the sake of appearing non-biased. Your review would be better accepted, and be more persuasive to the PU members.
I like your review, and believe it's your honest opinion.
But before posting any more reviews, a good idea would be to read the thread, "What should a PU review include?", especially the post by Toadsith titled: "Porn Users Cheat Sheet".
Toadsith, a PU member, posted a great outline for writing a review that shows what many of the PU members want to see included in a review.
What you write is up to you. But like I say, your reviews will have greater weight if you write a more balanced review, and maybe include some technical details.
Welcome back. I thought you had died and gone to toad heaven. It's great to see you making an appearance here. Hoping to see much more of you. (But I really liked your previous avatar, with the lovely red member.)
If you could confirm that the girl in question really had her tramp stamp done in kosher ink, that might help qualify the site to legally claim the name of Jewish Porn Girl Sex.
But the truth is, like you, I am holding my breath for the time when "BaptistBlowJob.com" will be coming out.
I am based in United States. When I check the web site Jim Slip, I see a sign-up rate of euro 19.95, approximately USD 27.76.
The prices that are displayed to someone in Italy could be different, because of something called regional pricing (I think that's the proper term). For the same item (a membership, whatever), you can be charged different prices, depending on where you are located. Sector pricing seems unfair, and stupid, but it's another way for some people or businesses to make more money off of people.
There has been some discussion of sector pricing on the PU threads, and a lot of people are really angry when they think they are being charged higher prices than some US customers are paying for the same membership.
https is a security measure that means your connection is secure, so it's less prone to hacking.
If you do any online banking, connect to your credit card online to check your balance or pay a bill or whatever, you are using https.
(It's shown in the address bar at top of your browser.)
Not just financial institutions, but any site where you enter personal information should be using https: Amazon, etc.
Porn sites are starting to use it too: the PU site and The Best Porn site have started using https. The information you give to PU and The Best Porn is not as vital as credit card #s, social security #s, etc., but it's a nice feature that protects your data from hackers.
If you read the newspapers, you will see that hundreds or millions of accounts from Credit Card monitoring services have been hacked.
Theft is a multi-billion industry.
But when porn sites use https, it makes it a little harder for hackers to steal your data.
Also, the US government (and I assume other governments around the world) keep records from your ISP (your internet service provider) on your internet usage: what sites you visit, how long you spend, etc.
If a site uses https, the records have less information:
Yes, they know what sites you visited, and for how long.
But they don't know the exact member pages you visited, because that is hidden by the https. How long you watched a video or a photoset is your secret, until you volunteer that information to your friendly government agent. (Joke, but true.)
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Like many porn sites, they now use https for login details.
-Like many porn sites, they now use https for member pages.
-Membership in any one of the member sites of the network gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites that require extra fees.
-Search is good. You put in a model's name, it searches the entire network, not just her content at the site you are logged in to.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-All content is exclusive. For the site and the network.
-Multiple choices of definition and bitrate for streaming and downloading videos.
-This is a large site. 720 videos.
-Each video has a photo set, with a zip file for easy downloading.
Cons:
-No PU discount. But wait for a holiday, and you might find a discounted price
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for most porn sites.
-You need a fast internet connection to stream the videos. My connection is too slow, so the videos stutter and stop. I have to download the videos and use a software player to watch. That is my problem, not the fault of the site.
-Archive site. Last update was in July 2015.
-The photo sets are screen shots made from the videos. So even when the model is attractive, each photo is poor quality, and not worth saving. Which is a shame, because some of these models are very attractive.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: women getting fucked and then finishing with cum sprayed on their face.
Shows how powerful the man is, and how the woman is submissive to his desires.
Side note01: Not all the scenes end with the guy shooting cum over the model's face.
Maybe if they used fake cum, and it looked real, they could have the guy shooting a massive load of cum on the girl's face, proving that he is a manly man.
Side note02: A lot of the sites have a strong backstory to set up the sex, to add some meaning beyond two or more bodies slapping against each other. But the Jizz Bomb site is more gonzo sex, with very little story before it gets into the sex.
Side note03: Although the videos are good, with crisp, clear images, the photo sets are made of screencaps of poor quality. Many hardcore sites outside of the New Sensations network have improved the quality of the photo sets made from videos, but the Jizz Bomb photo sets are poor quality screencaps.
The New Sensations network advertises:
6,500 exclusive videos.
2,500 porn stars.
Multiple weekly updates.
15+ bonus sites.
The PU price shown is $29.95/month recurring. But you can find specials.
I joined on a special discount (they come around on a lot of holidays).
For a lowered price, the network is worth joining, at least once.
But PU members reaction to the site varies a lot:
rearadmiral gave the network a score of 75.
marcdc1 and insomniacxxx gave the network a score in the 90s.
So individual opinions vary a lot.
Which is normal.
jook thinks the network is boring and a waste of his money.
Why did I join?
-I found a special discounted low price. I was a previous member, and found enough content that I enjoyed--although there is even more content that I passed on.
TheBestPorn.com site provides a valuable service that gives an over-view of many different porn sites. It also lists the PU/TBP discount, pros, cons, bottom line, and other useful facts.
Some of the facts may be out of date.
However, I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives.
My own approach to setting a score for a site depends on my personal preferences, and there can be a wide latitude in the final score a site receives.
The main factor for increasing the score a site receives if it's part of a network, and gives access to the network contents.
To me, that is an essential factor in the score of a site: how much content does a site membership give you access to?
A second essential factor is the quality of the content, which is a more nebulous concept, since it depends on a person's perception of the content.
Then there is ease of use of the site/network contents: is the site/network easy to navigate, are there download limits, fast download speeds, streaming limits: are some sites in the network treated as premium sites, requiring extra payment to access those sites.
Minor factors: is the content exclusive, pre-checked cross-sale on join page, choice of billing agent (is the site easy to cancel, does the customer service team respond to questions or problems).
I don't bother using the formulaic approach that TBP uses, where different reviewers are able to follow set rules and get a score that matches the other reviewers' score within a point or two.
I am impressed by the criteria that TBP uses to score a site: the listing is detailed. But my mind can't process each factor into a score and then combine the scores into a total score: too much analytics for me.
I prefer a looser approach, where I try to judge the value of a site for me, personally.
But I also try to indicate factors, plus or minus, that will be of interest to someone considering joining the site.
The New Sensations network currently consists of 26 sites (counting the New Sensations Network Home site as one of the sites).
In the reply section below, I list the sites that belong to the New Sensations network.
Just reading the site titles gives you an indication that the network covers many different niches.
So you can concentrate on the sites where the titles indicate they serve your interests.
Although, it also makes sense to at least give a cursory examination of each site, to see if any of the videos appeal to you.
THE SITES IN THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK ARE LISTED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
