| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
Home Teen Vids
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
The theory the network is using seems to be: the more sites the better the network is. People will join faster because the network has lots of sites.
But I think that the network would be better off deleting the archive sites and putting any good material from those sites into a general site. And getting rid of the really poor quality contents (videos and photosets). That would make using the network sites easier and more rewarding.
In your terms, eating a few appetizers that taste terrible ruins the meal, even though there are tasty dishes on the table you haven't gotten to yet. Maybe it helps to get drunk first, so you don't notice the taste of what you're eating. Lol.
|
05-17-11 09:31am
|
Review
1502
|
Home Teen Vids
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login.
-Streaming option for each video.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM. (This is a guess, based on rest of the network. I was unable to download any videos, but the rest of the network videos have no DRM, so I
assume, if you could download these site videos, as you are supposed to be able to, they would have no DRM.) |
| Cons: |
-You are supposed to be able to download a low-quality video file for each video at the site. I tried to download 10 different videos, and each time I got the error message, "404 Not Found".
-There is no medium-quality or high-quality download option for a video.
And since none of the links for the low-quality download option work, you can't save these videos (Unless you use a special program to capture
screen images. But any video you might get using a special screen-capture program would be low quality because the streaming image itself is not high quality).
-Models not identified. No name is given for the models. So if you wanted to save videos or photosets, it would be difficult to sort them by model.
-No model bios (obviously, since the models are not named).
-No search.
-No updates for over one year. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the Teen Mega World network.
This is an archive site: the last update was 2010-03-29, a little over a year ago.
Number of videos: 60.
Number of photosets: 60.
Video runtime: 15-35 minutes.
Video quality: low (based on file size of the video, and the visual quality of the video).
Photoset: 110-260 photos per photoset.
There is a single-size zip file available for each photoset. Each photoset is a photo record of a video shoot.
The photos are low quality in terms of photographic quality. The technical statistics for a single photo indicates the photos could be high quality if a competent photographer had taken the time to shoot them, but that wasn't the case: the photos are often blurry and out of focus, and are more like screen caps than well-shot photos. An individual photo is 300-400 KB, 1280x720 pixels. Which is just a waste of file size for blurry, poorly shot photos.
There are a number of attractive models at this site. And the videos are competently shot: good sound control, no annoying background music, OK to good lighting, OK to good colors (skin tone, background, foreground). The definition of the videos is low quality. If the definition was high
quality, a number of these videos would be worth saving. But you can't save these videos, because you get an error message when you try to save
them. Also, the video quality is low (in terms of definition).
The sex action is straight fucking. No story or plot, no buildup to the sex. It's one boy, one girl.
The site has little value. It's a small archive site, not updating. The videos and photos are poor in terms of image quality. You can't download any videos from the site (because of technical problems). The photosets are not worth downloading. |
|
05-16-11 07:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1503
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
"The final major change is probably the most controversial. HUHS members active on the site forum and on other porn forums seemed to really want to see more puking from throat fucking. Some of the older scenes had this too but it is more frequent now."
Maybe you could suggest this to the MetArt site, to give their videos a bigger bang.
Just kidding.
|
11-22-18 01:27am
|
Reply
1504
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
A maximum of five downloads per month seems like a deal-breaker to me.
The truth is, I download a lot of scenes from different sites that I am a member of, but hardly ever watch my downloaded videos.
So I don't know why I think that downloading is so important.
But I guess I am a packrat, who like to collect videos and galleries.
|
03-19-16 10:56am
|
Reply
1505
|
Horny Thief Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Not a member, not a lawyer. But the masked intruder(s) forcing a girl to have sex just seems like one more fantasy/fetish. The idea doesn't really appeal to me. TBP will be doing a review of this site very soon. From the TBP data, the site itself is tiny, with only 10 videos so far. The site is part of a network, and you get access to 26 sites if you join this site.
|
09-30-10 07:06pm
|
Reply
1506
|
Horror Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
THE SITE SEEMS LIKE AN INTERESTING IDEA.
AND THE PREVIEW PAGES SEEM LIKE THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT.
BUT LIKE REARADMIRAL WROTE, IT SEEMS TO ME TO TAKE A DIFFERENT KIND OF MIND TO COMBINE GROSS HORROR WITH SEXUAL AROUSAL.
KINKY.
FAR BEYOND MY TASTES.
ACTUALLY, SOME DRACULA FILMS CAN BE CONSIDERED EROTIC.
AND THERE CAN BE OTHER HORROR FILMS THAT ARE EROTIC.
BUT THIS SITE SEEMS TO FEATURE EXTREME GROSSNESS, IF THAT'S A TERM.
I WOULDN'T WATCH THESE VIDEOS EVEN DRUNK.
CERTAINLY NOT TO BE AROUSED.
|
12-21-17 02:50pm
|
Reply
1507
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
streamingeagle's Comment
Kills a lot of the motivation for signing up to site more than once.
|
03-27-10 08:01pm
|
Reply
1508
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
You ought to be a porno writer. Lol.
Except that I wish your kink was to be a superhero. It would make for better and more easily swallowed reading.
|
02-16-11 09:09am
|
Reply
1509
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Every so often I get a popup message from my Firefox browser stating a URL I am trying to go to is a dangerous site, and do I want to continue? Normally, I don't continue, but stay away from that site.
But I get no warning message if I go to hungarianhoneys site, nor do I get any warning message when I go to the hungarianhoneys models page.
Maybe you can try going back there again, to see if you get any warning message. They have some good-looking models, but I've never been a site member.
|
06-09-09 07:36pm
|
Comment
1510
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
|
06-14-09 06:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1511
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
bruce987's Reply
I don't have much experience with videos. I'm more into softcore teen photos. There are members at PU who have extensive hardcore video experience, so maybe one or more of them might reply on what are the better hardcore video sites with teen content.
DRM was reported as removed. That should not be a concern any longer.
But updates are iffy. There is no update log, so it's not that easy to determine how many updates you will find at the site if you were a previous member.
TBP (the parent site of PU) reports that Hustler is supposed to update 3 times a week. But what a site is supposed to do and actually does can often differ.
The most recent review of Hustler at PU was dated 01-24-09, by Trashman. He reported there were "no updates for 2009 yet. Last movie update was Dec 26."
I would suggest making a new comment for Hustler, asking how many updates there have been since the start of 2009, and hope that you get a response from some knowledgeable PU member. By making a new comment, instead of putting your reply on this older comment, you will get better visibility, and a better chance one of the PU members will respond.
|
06-14-09 06:02pm
|
Comment
1512
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
|
04-27-09 09:13am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1513
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
MAYBE THE EMAIL GOT LOST IN THE INTERNET, AND FINALLY FOUND ITS WAY TO YOU.
THAT MIGHT HELP EXPLAIN THE DELAY IN NOTIFYING YOU THAT YOU HAVE REACHED YOUR DOWNLOAD LIMIT.
COMPUTERS CAN BE TRICKY.
WATCH 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY OR THE ALIEN MOVIES (WHERE THE COMPUTER IS AN ANDROID) AND YOU BEGIN TO REALIZE THAT NOT ALL COMPUTERS ARE HUMAN-FRIENDLY.
|
07-05-17 05:10am
|
Reply
1514
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Nice solid review with lots of details.
The only thing I question is your opinion that there might be gentlemen on the PU site to read your review. The PU membership tends to lean towards the redneck/caveman/pervert persuasions.
|
02-16-09 05:53pm
|
Reply
1515
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
PU/TBP removed the monthly membership option today, and now shows only the 90-day membership option for $70.
PU/TBP does not give any note explaining why the 30-day membership option was deleted from the PU/TBP listings.
|
11-11-09 10:06am
|
Reply
1516
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
$70 US is much cheaper than €70. Maybe you guys should consider moving to the US? The prices they charge Europeans seem very unfair.
|
11-11-09 04:30am
|
Reply
1517
|
I Love Pop Whore
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
According to PU, there is supposed to be a monthly membership option. But like you, when I go to the sign-up page, the only membership option I see is $70 for 90 days.
Maybe PU/TBP can send them an email requesting membership prices and options, or for them to fix the signup page to show the monthly membership.
|
11-10-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
1518
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Not a Japanese expert, but the mosaic blurry-thing is something you have to learn to accept, since it is present in most hardcore Japanese porn. I don't like it blurry, but Japanese porn can have a different flavor, lots of pretty Japanese models, and I don't really know if it's worth trying to find Japanese porn without the mosaic.
Agree that Maria Ozawa is gorgeously yummy.
|
09-14-10 05:19pm
|
Reply
1519
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
When I pay for a site membership, I expect immediate access to that site. So I can understand your frustration when it took several hours, and many attempts, for you to be able to enter the site. That's why "grin and bear it" is a little hard to achieve, but what the heck else can you do?
Sometimes it takes a while before the site you paid to enter has your
username and password authorized on its servers. That's the best
explanation I can come up, when the same thing happens to me. But I
usually have to wait less than 1 hour after payment to be able to enter a site, even though I am trying to log on as soon as I make payment.
But it sounds like, from your first looks at the site, you are happy with the site contents so far. So that's a major plus.
And Maria Ozawa is my favorite JAV star. She's absolutely gorgeous.
|
06-18-10 08:29am
|
Comment
1520
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
|
08-02-12 06:42pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1521
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for friendly response. I was just confused by your comment, and didn't understand your meaning. I am a little slow at times. :-)
|
09-01-10 01:53am
|
Reply
1522
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
$19.95/month is the price listed at PU. Not really sure what you are trying to say. If you do not use the PU link, the "regular" price is $29.95/month.
Edit01: Perhaps the price listed at PU was different from $19.95/month when you made your comment. Is that why you made your comment? Your comment is so short, it's hard to figure out what you were trying to say, or mean. :)
|
08-31-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
1523
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Helvetic's Review
Nice first review, with good details. On your profile page it states you are 99 years old. Is that a joke or mistake?
|
02-16-10 10:52am
|
Reply
1524
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I agree that money rules. The owners/operators must think that, even if some people complain about regional pricing, that regional pricing brings in more money than if a standard fee was charged for all members.
|
12-18-12 01:38am
|
Reply
1525
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the tip, exotics4me. The site layout or terminology can be confusing. Or maybe I'm just lazy, and expect everything to be labeled simply. Again, thanks, it helps to have experts around who know what they are doing. :)
|
03-09-12 11:10pm
|
