Denner, did you notice that Hayden Winters has ink marks on her back (better known as tattoos), a belly button ring, and feet that are overly large? She even has a stud in her tongue. So I would not rate her as a top porn model. But I have seen the video "My Little Panties", and find it disturbing: A porn star should be wearing new underwear in her movies, and it appears she's been rubbing her panties over-much and needs a new pair (the old one has lint-balls or something over the crotch area). LOL
And that guy sniffing and chewing her panties? Does he have a fetish or what?
-You also get random samples from many other partner sites.
The samples give you a flavor of those other sites. So you can have a better idea of whether those other sites are worth joining.
(I list the sites you get sample videos from in the Bottom Line section).
-The four main sites at PornMasterMind feature young porn models in their late teens, early twenties.
Most of the models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot.
Cons:
-Expensive. Price is $29.95/month (recurring). No PU/TBP discount.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. 1-day trial at $1.00 to realitysexnetwork.com converts to a $38.89/month membership. Uncheck the trial offer unless you think realitysexnetwork is worth $38.89.
-Archive site. The latest update appears to be one video from April 2015.
In the updates section, there is one video from April 2015, one video from December 2014, one video from October 2013, one video from April 2011.
-Poor navigation. Site structure is clumsy and takes a lot of mouse clicks to see what the site contents include.
-Hard to view all the videos at the site. Hard to determine the number of videos at the site. Hard to determine the exact update rate (other than updates appear to be extremely rare).
-The streaming software is primitive. If you stream a video, and try to fast forward, the screen turns blue or green.
The site theme for FuckedHardGFs, as shown by the video content, appears to be young porn models appearing naked: they might take a shower, masturbate, or have sex. But, in truth, there does not appear to be any unifying theme other than showing naked girls.
Let me expand that: the idea of the site is that these videos are supposed to be from ex-boyfriends who are selling these "homemade videos" to the internet to make some extra money off their former girlfriends.
So the boyfriends are not only getting extra money, but they are also getting revenge on the ex-girlfriends by exposing them on the internet.
This is a popular niche.
However, you would not get that slant from watching the videos. You get that slant from the title of the site.
So if the title of the site rocks your boat, then that gives the videos a spicy thrill.
In contrast, if you watch the tushy.com and blacked.com videos (competing paysites), their videos spend a couple minutes or more setting up the basic plot of the video. That setup/plot adds to the value/fantasy of the video, because it gives the sex more meaning.
Tushy.com, blacked.com, and vixen.com are three paysites from the same owners, who are creating paysites where effort is spent on making the models as attractive as possible, as well as choosing their models for the physical beauty, and making sexy videos with a slight plot that builds the sex into a performance.
The settings, camera-work, sound control, costumes, etc. are first-rate.
So those 3 sites empasize a glamour-style shoot.
I think of Blacked, Tushy, and Vixen as glamcore, in their approach to porn. Except that there is not a lot of romance in the plots. The videos are basically supposed to show one or more girls who are attracted to a man and they fuck. It's not very romantic, but it is several steps above gonzo porn.
Is it worth joining Fucked Hard GFs or the network? I give the site/network a lukewarm recommendation. FuckedHard18 is probably the best site of the network, because it's a good massage site. The girls are attractive, the sex can be hot.
The other 3 main sites are OK, but nothing special.
The random samples from the partner sites gives you a taste of those sites. Which is nice.
I'm giving the site/network a score of 78.
For a price of $29.95/month, it's expensive.
A lower price would give you more value for your money.
I really appreciate the responsiveness of the webmaster to reviews and comments on his site at our forum. That shows a concern for customer satisfaction that is rare.
Moaning in german sounds better than in english? You might scream and yell louder in german than in english, but this is the first time I've heard that german moans sound better. Is that because the germans do a lot of moaning and whining?
I'm not a member.
I tried loading the site page, could not get it to load.
That's why I am often careful about buying a long-term subscription to a site. You never know how long the site will be around.
If the site does not come back up, you can always try to get a partial refund.
Wishing you luck, either way.
I never wanted to deal with the expense or time to get a disposable credit card.
I also never wanted to join German Goo Girls.
That site would require massive fascination and quality for me to join, after I've read so many horror stories about the cancel process.
Some sites are better off avoided.
For shady billing practices, poor quality content (or content that does not appeal to me), site structural problems (connection speeds, navigation issues that make the site difficult to use).
But some people go where others fear to tread (in the star trek tradition of heroes and adventurers).
I hereby nominate Rear-Admiral as leader of the PU Fleet.
Are you willing to accept this honor and responsibility?
AFTER PU MEMBER PITYTHEFOOL POSTED A NEGATIVE COMMENT ABOUT THIS SITE, COMPLAINING HE HAD A PROBLEM CANCELLING HIS TRIAL SUBSCRIPTION, THERE WERE 8 COMMENTS TOUTING THIS SITE FROM NEW PU MEMBERS.
SLIGHTLY SUSPICIOUS.
SPAM? OR A WASTE OF PU SITE SPACE?
IF THE SUSPICIOUS COMMENTS ARE DELETED, THEN PU CAN DELETE THIS COMMENT, AS WELL.
What review are you talking about? Please be more specific. Lol.
I found the review of German Goo Girls by RipRap to be very original in its use of the Cons section. Wish I had the brains and artistry some of these PU posters have.
I vote "No" on DRM, as well.
I think RipRap was emotionally scarred by his DRM experience, which I can understand.
"some incredibly beautiful amateurs"
AGREE COMPLETELY.
THE MODELS DON'T LOOK LIKE PORN STARS, BUT MORE LIKE THE BEST-LOOKING GIRLS YOU MIGHT FIND AT YOUR LOCAL SHOPPING MALL.
Attractive models, but the videos sound like a waste of time. And with site navigation problems, plus whatever, makes this a site that I would only join after I had explored much better sites.
Thanks for the update. The info about a 30 day delay before downloading HD videos is posted at TBP, and was also mentioned in a previous PU review. I'm looking forward to your review. If there are any bonus sites included in a membership, would you please mention their names as well in your review?
At $30/month for a relatively small site (with no bonus sites included), this seems expensive. Plus, the ridiculous rule of not allowing downloads of HD movies until you've been a member for 30+ days.
The navigation for the preview section (and probably the member area of the site) seems extremely cumbersome. The site really needs a programmer to make the site easier to use, to show what models are available, and their photosets and videos. A simple site design like Met-art or MPL Studios would be a big improvement.
But the $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) seems attractive. I've been seeing more monthly memberships in the $15-20 range lately, maybe as a result of the recession.
The $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) is what is listed at PU/TBP. When I go to the site itself, using the PU/TBP link, the monthly price (recurring) I see listed is $16.95.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Full featured site with you choice of streaming or downloading the videos in different definitions.
Downloading: 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
Streaming: 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos are professionally shot: Excellent lighting, good sound control, good camera work, nice sets, etc.
-Most videos have an accompanying photo set. The photos sets are OK screencaps, but I've seen much better screen caps from other hardcore sites like Teen Mega World and Wow Girls and Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. (Actually, the Wow Girls and Wow Porn and All Fine Girls might be screen caps or actual photos, since the quality is excellent: far better than it used to be from years ago.)
Cons:
-The sex has a set-up story to make the sex more meaningful, except that some of the stories/plots are really stupid.
-Added to the stupid plots, the models are not actresses. There are a few sites where the models do a decent job of acting, but this site is not one of them.
-The models tend to overact with moans, groans, cries of fake excitement etc. during the sex, which makes the sex unrealistic. Toning it down a lot would make the sex better.
-Many of these videos are best watched while drunk, except that being drunk would make it harder to get off from the video.
-The production standard are good: nice sets, many of the models are attractive, but the stupid plots and childish acting and fake moans and groans and screams of excitement are a turn-off.
-My preference would be to watch a video where two girls meet, have sex and it's believable.
-Video files and photo sets download with a generic file name that should be changed.
File name of 96896.zip tells you nothing.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Change the file name to:
Model name_Site name_Date posted_Title of set_File definition.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You watch a scene from Spartacus (the TV series 2010-2013), these are professional actors: in short scenes, that last only a few minutes to less than a minute, they can generate more heat and excitement than the entire video from a girlsway video. That's because, even though the Spartacus is a historical drama, the sex can seem real and immediate. The actress is desirable. The action is not hardcore porn, it's softcore porn, you don't get the close-up of the male penis or female vagina, but it can be much hotter, much more erotic, than the Girlsway videos, because of the professional plot, the good acting, the attractive actresses.
Is it fair to compare Girlsway, a porn site video to Spartacus, a professional TV production?
Yes, because many of the Spartacus scenes create more heat, more erotic content, than the Girlsway videos.
You don't need all the blood and guts of Spartacus to make heat and erotic content.
I find Teen Mega World, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, do a better job of providing erotic content than Girlsway.
Pure Taboo, another selection of the Adult Time hub/network, does a great job of providing erotic content with high production standards.
The tone of the Pure Taboo videos is slightly dark (they use slightly dark lighting, and probably a sepia filter), and the plots involve taboos, punishment, or abuse, but this is an outstanding site.
I'm wandering away from the review of Girlsway because the site does not impress me very much.
I don't mind lesbian sex, but I want it to have some eroticism, some heat.
And, hopefully, if there's a plot, that the models can act a bit.
The models at Girlsway are attractive.
But they have limited acting skills, that destroy the believabilty of the video.
Bottom line summary:
High production values, attractive models. But the videos lack heat.
Giving Girlsway a score of 80.
Note: I have access to Girlsway through my membership in Adult Time. I did not pay a separate fee for Girlsway.
Adult Time is a fantastic deal, giving you access to many premium porn sites for a very low price or a free add-on to one of their member sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
-SECURE SITE PAGES.
-CHOICE OF DEFINITIONS FOR STREAMING AND/OR DOWNLOAD FOR SOME OF THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS:
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-YOU GET THE SAME CHOICES OF DEFINITION FOR YOUR DOWNLOAD OF THE VIDEO FILE.
-FILES DOWNLOAD WITH THE DEFAULT NAME OF THE TITLE + THE MODEL, BUT YOU PROBABLY WANT TO ADD MORE DETAILS TO THE FILENAME FOR RECORD-KEEPING.
-FIRST MONTH PU/TBP DISCOUNT OF $14.95. RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH.
-24/7 CUSTOMER SUPPORT THAT IS VERY RESPONSIVE (CHAT).
-CONFIRMING EMAILS ON JOIN GIVE COMPLETE DETAILS: LOGIN DETAILS, CREDIT CARD USED (LAST 4 DIGITS), PRICE AND TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP.
Cons:
-NETWORK AND SITE STRUCTURE RECENTLY UPDATED. MAKING THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO USE.
-SOMETIMES THERE IS A SURVEY PAGE, ASKING FOR PERSONAL DETAILS. I WAS WILLING TO START FILLING OUT ONE SURVEY, BUT THEN THEY STARTED ASKING A LOT OF PERSONAL DETAILS, AND I DON'T THINK IT'S SMART TO GIVE OUT SO MANY DETAILS ABOUT YOURSELF TO A SURVEY-ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING ALL THE HACKING THAT'S BEEN EXPOSED IN THE NEWPAPERS RECENTLY.
THIS SURVEY WANTED TO KNOW MY AGE, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, IF I AM REGISTERED TO VOTE, IF I VOTED IN THE LAST NATIONAL ELECTION, WHO I VOTED FOR, ETC. ETC. I MEAN, IT WAS RIDICULOUS.
-UPDATED HOT LINKS AT THE SITE/NETWORK ARE MUCH LESS RESPONSIVE THAN THE OLD HOT LINKS WERE.
-UPDATED HOT LINKS ARE HARDER TO FIND.
-WHEN YOU STREAM A VIDEO, IF YOU MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT (PAUSE THE VIDEO, OR SWITCH FROM FULL-SCREEN TO SMALLER VIEW), THE SOUND HAS A TENDENCY TO GO MUTE. THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM FOR ALL THE NETWORK SITES.
Bottom Line:
SITE STATS (FROM A WEB PAGE, WHICH IS OFTEN MISLEADING OR OUTDATED):
MOVIES 1357
DVDs 361
PORNSTARS 1338
PICTURES 0
I HAVE A PARTIAL APOLOGY TO MAKE.
I CRITICIZED THE RECENT UPDATE TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, SAYING IT MADE THE NETWORK SITES HARDER TO NAVIGATE.
THAT IS STILL TRUE.
I NORMALLY WATCH PORN ON A 5-YEAR-OLD LAPTOP WITH A 14" SCREEN.
WATCHING THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES ON A NEWER, 25" MONITOR, GIVES
A MUCH BRIGHTER PICTURE, AND IT'S EASIER TO SEE WHAT'S ON THE SCREEN.
WHEN I WROTE THE RECENT FAME DIGITAL UPDATE (MADE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO) WAS A HORRIBLE MISTAKE, I WAS OVER-REACTING. THE UPDATE DOES MAKE THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO NAVIGATE, BUT IT'S NOT AS BAD AS WHAT I FIRST THOUGHT, BECAUSE ON MY LAPTOP MONITOR I COULDN'T MAKE OUT ALL THE LINKS THAT ARE SHOWN.
A BETTER MONITOR MAKES SOME OF THE LINKS EASIER TO FIND.
HOWEVER, THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS EASIER TO USE:
TO SEE WHAT NETWORK SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO;
TO NAVIGATE BETWEEN SITES;
TO NAVIGATE INSIDE A SITE.
SO THE NETWORK UPDATE IS A MISTAKE, BECAUSE IT MAKES USING THE SITE/NETWORK CONTENTS HARDER.
AND THAT TAKES AWAY FROM THE VALUE OF THE SITE/NETWORK.
I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO WRITE A SITE INSTRUCTION MANUAL INSIDE A REVIEW.
BUT UNLESS YOU PLAY AROUND, YOU WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A LOT OF THE NETWORK CONTENTS--YOU WON'T KNOW IT'S THERE, THE OLDER STRUCTURE HAD SIMPLER NAVIGATION.
MAYBE YOU CAN CALL CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND ASK FOR HELP NAVIGATING THE SITE.
I CALLED CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND THEY WERE HELPFUL GETTING ME INTO DEVILS FILM SITE.
AT THE DEVILS FILM WEBSITE, I ENTERED MY CURRENT LOGIN DETAILS, AND THE PAGE GAVE ME AN ERROR MESSAGE THAT MY LOGIN DETAILS WERE INCORRECT.
I CALLED CUSTOMER SERVICE, THEY TOLD ME TO TRY CLEARING MY CACHE.
THAT WORKED.
THE SITE (EVIDENTLY) REFUSED ME ENTRANCE BECAUSE MY PC HAD STORED THE LOGIN DETAILS FROM A PREVIOUS MEMBERSHIP.
SO CUSTOMER SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 24/7, AND THEY RESPOND WITHIN A FEW MINUTES IF YOU START A CHAT.
SOME OF THE MODELS LOOK LIKE TEENS, BUT MANY DO NOT.
ANOTHER SITE CON IS THAT THE SITE IS NOT CLEARLY SEPARATED FROM THE OTHER NETWORK SITES: THE SITE SHOWS THUMBNAILS (OF THE VIDEOS), AND YOU DON'T REALIZE UNTIL YOU CLICK THE VIDEO THAT IT'S FROM ANOTHER SITE. WHAT'S INSIDE THE "GIVE ME TEENS SITE" IS NOT SEPARATED CLEARLY.
AND YOU HAVE TO FIGURE OUT, WHILE WATCHING A VIDEO, WHAT SITE THE VIDEO BELONGS TO.
IT'S A JUMBLED MESS.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 75.
THERE ARE MUCH BETTER SITES AVAILABLE, BOTH FOR THE QUALITIES OF THEIR MODELS, AND SITE EASE OF USE.
SO WHY AM I GIVING IT A SCORE IN THE 70s?
NOT FOR THE SITE ITSELF.
THIS SITE IS PART OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK.
WHICH HAS SOME SITES WORTH VIEWING: ROCCO SIFFREDI PETER NORTH DEVILS FILM
I'M GIVING THE SITE, "GIVE ME TEENS", A SCORE OF 75.
I WISH THEY WOULD BRING BACK THE OLD DROP-DOWN-MENU, WHICH MADE SITE NAVIGATION EASIER.
Thanks for checking on Barbariska, slutty. There are so many models out there, and a few of them look so similar, that it's sometimes hard to tell them apart. But she is a really cute girl, who has appeared in hardcore in many sites, and she sure looked familiar. But like I say, some models can look very similar to other models, and the look on some models can change over time in just a few years.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring)
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. This site gives you access to 20+ sites in the network, including the major sites of Devils Film; Peter North; Rocco Siffredi; Silverstone DVD; Silvia Saint.
-Can choose streaming or download for videos.
-There is a photo set associated with each video.
-The photos are shot individually. These are not screen caps. They are good quality photos: not glamor style photos, but decently shot, nicely framed, good lighting, good color, etc.
-You can sort the scenes by category, series, or porn star.
-Wide selection of teen categories.
-They include the posting date of each video.
-They identify the female models in each video.
Cons:
-The general level of model prettiness/attractiveness is poor. These models are far less attractive than the models at Diesel Access network, X-Art, or other teen glamor sites. The Give Me Teens are less attractive than the models at Teen Mega World, or Nubiles.
-The photo sets do not have a zip file.
-Pre-checked cross-sell at sign-up.
-The search is basic, by drop-down list. There is no blank search box where you can enter a porn star's name, or type of sex action, or any combination of factors.
-Search is site-specific. You check a model's name, you get the scenes she is in at this
site, not across the entire network. Have to check each site individually to see if there
is any of her content at that site.
-A lot of the content was shot for Devils Film, so it is also posted at the Devils Film site.
Bottom Line:
The site is teen hardcore DVD videos. The approach is homestyle, not glamor. So you get to
see porn stars who could fit in a trailer-trash movie having sex, with the emphasis on female models (teens or twenties) and guys who appear to get their clothes from a local K-Mart or other cheap discount store going at it.
Site Stats:
Movies: 601
DVDs: 162
Pornstars: 654
Pictures: 87846
The DVD quality is OK to good. The scenes are well lighted, good colors, good sound control (no
extraneous noises, etc.), good focus, good definition.
The definition choices of the videos depend on how old the DVD is:
Older videos:
Streaming in 240p, 480p
Download in 240p, 480p
Newer videos:
Streaming in 240p, 480p, 540p
Download in 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p
Minor point:
The model named Barbara C sure looks like Barbamiska (also known as Barbara, Darya, Dasha, Diana, Elina, Elina Heaton, Mirjam, Pocahontas, Polly, Sally, Stevie, Trinity on different sites).
Is it the same girl?
She appears in two scenes at Give Me Teens:
Ass Full Of Cum #05, Scene #05
18 Year Old Pussy #16 Cream Pie Edition, Scene #05
This is supposed to be a teen hardcore site. But many of the models look to be older than teens. And the models are, on average, less attractive than the models at the glamcore/heartcore sites, and also less attractive than the teens featured at Teen Mega World. Also, a lot of the material at this site is found at other sites in the network. So even if you really like teen hardcore videos, this site is nothing special.
What gives this site value is that it includes access to the netFameSolutions network, which has a massive amount of hardcore videos covering a wide range of categories. Or if you join through one of the other sites in the network, you get access to this site.
To be truthful, I think the network would have more value if they deleted this site, because if you are looking for teen videos, you will have better luck searching through other sites on this network.
I recently saw one page on the internet that showed 16 bonus sites if you join through Give Me Teens. But those sites did not include Rocco Siffredi or Peter North, two of the top sites in the network.
However, at the Give Me Teens site, there is a page that states membership to Give Me Teens does give access to to the entire bonus network.
The 5 sites I listed above are the main sites, but there are also some other sites that have value.
So I am thinking that the one internet page I saw recently, that only listed 16 bonus sites, was only showing a partial list of the sites you get access to.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Fame Digital network. So you get access to most sites in the network.
-Can stream or download movies.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Content is dated.
-Model is listed for each movie.
-Runtime and file size (largest file size) also listed for each movie.
-I like how they identify the female models if there is more than 1 female model in the video. They show one female model in the scene, print her name in subtitles on the screen, then show the second model in the scene, and print her name in subtitles on the screen. So you immediately know the names of each model.
-A large percentage of the videos have high definition options. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition.
-The high definition movies are clearly marked, with a HD logo.
-All of a model's appearances are listed at her model's page, with hot links to each video and photoset.
Cons:
-PU discount price just increased from $9.95 to $14.95 for the first month.
-Most of the site content was apparently made for Devils Film. A lot of the movies have a Devil's Film watermark.
-Watermark is small to medium sized, at bottom right corner of video.
-Content is not exclusive. You can find some of these vids posted at other sites in the Fame Digital network.
-The photosets from the lower-definition videos are not screen caps. The definition is high. For example, width x height = 1280p x 1984p. But the
colors in the photo are poor, there is little effort to make the model pose artistically or erotically.
-This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s.
-The videos are just OK for DVD quality. The focus could be better, the framing could be better.
-No zip file for the photosets.
-The software for viewing individual photos is slow and clumsy.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Movies: 498
DVDs: 134
Pornstars: 557
Pictures: 75,388
Stream at 240p or 480p. Some have a 540p option.
Download at 240p or 480p, in WMV or MP4.
Some movies have higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p.
Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition, which is a large percentage.
-This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. And I assume that a large percent of the videos can be found at other sites in the network, especially Devils Film. You get this site included with membership to most Fame Digital network sites. But I don't think this site, by itself, has a lot of value. In spite of the high percentage of HD videos at this site, I was not impressed by the hardcore teen videos. Most of the models are not presented very attractively. If you want high quality teen hardcore videos, go to Diesel or X-Art. Or go to Teen Mega World for lower quality tnan Diesel or X-Art, but still better quality videos and real teens and more attractive teens than what you get at this site.
What membership at this site will give you is access to better sites in the Fame Digital network, including:
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
