Thanks for your prompt and informative reply. I think a 1-month subscription would be worthwhile, if only to get the photosets that I had previously from Glam-deluxe that I seem to have misplaced.
The bonus sites would be a nice bonus, even if they are not updating.
And I wouldn't expect to Glam-deluxe to update very frequently anyway. Even when I was a member about 5 years ago, the update schedule seemed very irregular, from what I recall.
Ema/Avril A is lovely. And there are a number of other models who I particularly like at Glam-deluxe.
There is a new photo set of her at Erotic Beauty dated 2013-02-10.
That is a new photo set I haven't seen before. I am currently a member of Erotic Beauty, and the photo set was actually shot years ago. I am basing that on how she looks. Her physical appearance changed very little over the years she was active, but you can still tell that she was getting older as the years went by.
The photographer, Thierry Murrell, has used her a model since she first started out. He is the main photographer at Glam Deluxe. And he also contributed a lot of her sets to Metart.
This is her first appearance at Erotic Beauty. But like I said, this is a photoset that was shot years ago.
It's been about 5 years since I was a member of this site. Back then, they had some really cute models. Nice softcore photography. Their preview pages give a very limited idea of the site contents. They advertise the site updates twice a week. But the preview pages don't show the posted dates of any recent updates.
What is new to me is that you are supposed to get a large number of bonus sites with your membership. The bonus sites are solo model sites and multi-model sites. I believe many of these bonus sites are archive sites, that have not updated in 1 or more years. But maybe it would be worth a 1-month membership to see what these sites have. Or not.
One cute model is Ema, who has her own site named Ema's Place. The site preview states she is 18, but she is also featured at Metart, under the name of Avril A, which says her current age is 25. I think Metart tries to be more accurate about a model's age than most web sites.
Anyway, Metart has 20 photosets of Avril A, the last one posted 2010-11-19.
The preview pages for Ema's Place state weekly updates, ultra fresh content. But my guess is that the last update to the Ema's Place site was probably a few years ago. I don't think Ema (or Avril A, or whatever name you use to call her) is still active as a model.
And that's probably true of many of the bonus sites you get with a Glam Deluxe membership. Bonus sites that no longer update.
I wish that the preview pages for these porn sites would more accurately reflect the current state of these sites, instead of promising you fresh, weekly updates that you won't be getting.
I think the model at emas place is very cute. She has a number of sets at glam deluxe from years ago. She also has a number of sets at metart. She's also had a few photosets at other sites (just teen site, etc.).
But I haven't seen anything new from her in over a year, I think.
Any recent members of glam deluxe care to comment on site?
Apparently there are 2 bonus sites included with membership to glam deluxe:
helens planet
emas place
It's been almost 3 years since I was a member of glam deluxe. The photography sets were high quality then, many of the models were gorgeous. But the update rate was slow. And there were no zips for the photosets.
There were only a small number of videos.
Any recent members of that site care to comment on their experience with this site?
The bonus sites are solo model sites. Cute girls. Are those sites still updating?
OK. TBP states last update for emas place was 04-24-10 (as of 05-17-11)'
Also, TBP states content count has not changed for helens planet since 2008, even though the dates for the content supposedly show recent updates. So site probably has not updated in years.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some good-to-great looking models.
-Content is exclusive to this site.
-High-quality glamour photography.
-No DRM video protection.
-No download limit.
-They do have a bio sheet on the models. But some of the information is fantasy or worthless.
Giving the age of the model, with no date to compare the age to, is not much use. Stating in
"sexual experience" that a model is a virgin, when I have seen hardcore clips of the same model
giving blowjobs and having vaginal and anal sex with different males, makes me wonder what kind of
virginity they are talking about. The hardcore clips of this model were posted on other sites long before the photoshoots of this "virgin" model were posted at glamdeluxe.
I realize that I should not be picky about factoids when posted at a porn site, but it pricks the fantasy bubble when the factoids are so obviously false.
Cons:
-Site does not update very often. Can go a week or more before a new photoset is posted. Very irregular posting schedule for updates.
-Only 1 photographer for the site: Thierry Murrell. He does glamour-type erotic photography. Usually nice clean pictures, but if you don't like his style, you won't like the site.
-Softcore only. Single-model posing. No boy-girl pictures. No girl-on-girl pictures.
-Site advertises "huge archive" of photosets and flix. But the site has only been around since 2006, and the "archive" is tiny compared to a super-site like met-art. The flix archive is really small, only 28 videos. New videos are added very, very slowly.
-The flix (videos) are basically a video of a photoshoot. And some videos are a collection of
individual pictures from the photoshoot, not a real moving-picture video.
-No zip files for the photosets. Need a blackwidow program to download a photoset. Otherwise, you have to download each picture separately, a real pain.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):-Photosets are in 1 resolution only. Do not have a choice of 3 different resolutions for downloads as you have at some of the better sites like met-art (low, medium, high resolution).
-Navigation could be improved a lot.
You go to the flix (video) page, which lists with a thumbnail of each video at the site. The hot-
link to download each video is not clearly marked. Maybe this is a French version of a joke, where
increasing the obstacles means increased pleasure when you reach the goal of downloading the video?
-Videos are listed separate from the photosets. So if you want to find whatever videos there are of
a girl, have to look at the video page, then scroll down the page to examine each video to see
which girl it is. Videos are not grouped by the model, but apparently in random order.
-They do not date the videos or some of the older photosets. I like to know when the photosets and
videos were shot, for my own interest.
-Models are white girls from Europe only. No blacks, Asians, other races.
-Photos have a watermark. Doesn't bother me, but some people dislike photos with a prominent watermark.
Bottom line:
-If you like softcore, glamour shots of single models, and you like the models you see on the tour, then this site is maybe worth 1 single-month subscription to get the basic files you want, and then maybe a visit once a year to get any updates. Hopefully, the site will last, because the
photographer does do quality work and picks some nice-to-great looking models. But a regular
subscription beyond 1`month is not worth the money.
-I wish I could give this site a much higher score, because I belong to it and hope it does not go out of business. But for this type of softcore photography, you get more for your money with met-
art > metmodels > hegre-art.
Giving this site a 75, because some of the girls are gorgeous, and the pictures are high-quality glamour shots.
justme, I think it's a nice feature when a site gives an extensive preview of its contents, so a person can get a clear idea of what he would get if he paid to join the site. Many sites provide sample photos and nice-sized thumbnails of their models, and possibly some short video clips. The more information the better, I think. The preview section is part of the advertising for a site.
That's my opinion. But if people want to join a site based on a very limited preview of the site, that's their decision. I certainly don't control what other PU members do or join.
I don't understand what you mean when you say that my comments are what we are all able to easily view for no cost.
If you mean that my comment here, and my other comments, have no value, OK, that's your opinion.
If you mean that I am not charging you to read my comments... PU is a free site that you can join or lurk at, without paying any membership fees, and the member reviews and comments and posts are free for all to read.
Advertises "over 40,000 high quality sexy photos."
The site preview is extremely limited: I see some thumbnails, but nothing larger to see what the actual photos look like. So even though there are some cute models here, I'd look elsewhere.
I'm not a person who understands the finer points of photography.
I look at photos and videos on a low-priced laptop.
Even if I had high-end monitors and expensivwe computers, I don't know if my eyes would notice a measurable difference from what I'm seeing today--because of advancing age, etc.
I respect the people who can appreciate the higher qualities of photos or videos, but it's not my thing. I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful. I'm just stating that experience (to be able to view and enjoy artwork at a higher level) is beyond me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$9.99/month membership fee with PU discount. Very cheap price.
-Ccbill is the billing agent. A trusted name.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Goddess Nudes is part of the MetArt network. The customer service at MetArt network is outstanding. If you have any problems, send an email to customer service, and they will probably respond in a few hours. I've never joined any site or network that had a better or more responsive Customer Service department. The truth is, the customer service at many paysites is either non-responsive or non-existent.
-Fast download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor, if you know what the site is.
-No videos.
-Site navigation could be improved.
-After Goddess Nudes became part of MetArt network, they included a txt file to the zip file for a gallery that includes the physical characteristics of the model. But they could also include a short bio on the model, which is what they do at MetArt. And since many of the models at Goddess Nudes are also at MetArt.com or other sites in the MetArt network, that should take very little work to do.
Bottom Line:
Domai was started around 1997. Goddess Nudes was started in 2010. Both were started by Eolake Stobblehouse. Stobblehouse said he appreciated looking at beautiful women, and he wanted to share this pleasure with others. He started Domai as a hobby, and only later started selling memberships. So it became a business. He wanted to proselytize that nudity is not sinful. That beauty is to be enjoyed. That life is to be enjoyed. He argued that tasteful, nude art is not porn, but art. Domai (and later Goddess Nudes) focused on innocent nudes of attractive young women. Both sites became owned by the MetArt network in 2014, after Eolake Stobblehouse became ill and could no longer operate them.
Domai and Goddess Nudes are similar sites:
-they both feature young women (late teens, early twenties) in nude, tasteful poses (extreme softcore) in a variety of natural settings.
-As the older site, Domai has the larger backlog of galleries and models. But Goddess Nudes has a large amount of content as well:
Both sites are photos only. No videos.
Both sites feature simple, natural photos shot by a variety of professional photographers,
Both sites advertise exclusive content.
Both sites are softcore only. Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit, but it's still strictly softcore.
The navigation (and site layout) for both sites is similar.
Both sites update with one photo set per day on weekdays.
Both sites have the photosets categorized by the year posted.
Both sites have the models and photosets categorized by the contributing photographer.
Both sites also have thumbnails of the models in a downside listing in a row of thumbnails. Which takes a long while to click through.
Both sites share many of the models and contributing photographers.
Neither site has a search engine to find models by categories or traits. You can put the name of a model into a basic search engine, and that will return the model, but then you have to click to find her galleries.
So what are the major differences between the two site?
One: Domai has more content than Goddess Nudes.
Two: The content at each site is exclusive to that site.
Three: Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit than Domai, but they are both softcore photo sites.
So why choose one site over the other?
The simple answer is: If you like Domai, you will almost certainly like Goddess Nudes.
So, join Domai first, because it has more content.
Then, assuming you liked Domai, join Goddess Nudes, because you will get access to the same type of content, but with material that will be new to you.
I'm giving Goddess Nudes a score of 85. Based on:
The attractive models.
The photography that is professional, simple and natural.
The low membership price of $9.99/month.
Do not join either site if you want videos. Neither site has them.
Do not join either site if you want more than extremely softcore photos of attractive women.
Do not join either site if you want the models made to look glamourous or exotic. These are lovely young women who are photographed in simple settings, without a lot of artifice.
Using the PU link to Goddess Nudes, and then hitting the join page link, you see the prices:
$29.99/month recurring
$39.99 for 1 month (non-recurring)
$99.99/year recurring
This is a big jump for the monthly price, which used to be $9.99 (recurring).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 21 Sextury network.
21 Sextury used to be composed of about 22 separate sites covering a variety of porn niches.
However, recently, 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network, so you now have access to over 100 separate channels (Adult Time calls their sites channels instead of sites). This means access to a huge amount of high quality porn: over 50,000 videos.
-Login and member pages are https. Secure.
-There is a trailer for each video, to give you a fast preview of the action.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset. Which has a zip file.
You have a choice of zip file for the photoset: normal and higher definition.
-Site is still updating.
Cons:
-Note: at least one PU member who signed up to 21 Sextury network did not get the Adult Time add-on. Even though Adult Time was advertised as being combined with a 21 Sextury membership. To be sure of what you are geting, do a live chat (if available in your country, for a fast record of what the customer support says), or email customer support.
I can't stress enough how much more valuable the Adult Time add-on is versus a simple membership in the 21 Sextury network, or any of the other sites included in the Adult Time network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard practice for a porn site.
-With such a massive catalog of porn in different niches, navigation is a learning curve. I suggest a long-term membership to be able to explore the very high quality porn being offered.
But again, if you don't get the free Adult Time add-on, I would scream and demand a refund.
Bottom Line:
-The stunt cocks at this site might be considered old fuckers, but the girls they bang are young and fresh. Most of the models look like they are in their twenties, so it's not a teen site, but a young woman site. But the models are attractive. And seem to get into the sex, instead of just putting up with an older partner.
Site has 431 videos, Still updating (about 1 video per week).
The girls are young (twenties), fresh, attractive.
And seem to enjoy the sexual action.
The photosets can be downloaded in normal definition or in a higher definition.
I assume the photos are screen caps from the video. However, the quality of each photo is good: not the super-high quality you get at a glamour style site like MetArt or MPL Studios, but much better than the screencaps common from years ago at hardcore porn sites.
A photoset of 134 pictures has a file size of 29.7 MB in normal definition, and a file size of 1.8 GB in high definition.
In comparison, from the MetArt site:
A photoset of 120 pix in low definition has a file size of 10.7 MB.
in medium definition file size: 36.8 MB.
in high definition file size: 170 MB.
Those stats are only an indication, because codecs and other factors control the quality of a photo.
But in general, the screen caps at Grandpas Fuck Teens are good: good focus, good lighting, good colors, good centering of the model, etc.
If you get access to Adult Time with your membership in any one of the Adult Time sites (which is the way it's supposed to work, as explained to me by a customer rep at 21 Sextury), then the Adult Time network gives you a low-cost access to over 100 porn sites (called channels at Adult Time).
Based on the Adult Time access, I'm giving the site a score of 94.
If you do not get the Adult Time access, the score drops significantly.
I posted a comment on All Gravure a couple of years ago. I wasn't a member, but from looking at the preview pages, and knowing something about some of their featured models, a lot of the pictures would be non-nude, because those models are non-nude models. They are idols, which in Japan means they have a fan base.
And a lot of the photos are non-exclusive. Apparently, this site collected photos from photo-books of Japanese models, and posted the photos at this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main attraction of the site is Japanese porn that is not pixellated (no mosaic censorship over the genitals).
-PU discounted membership of $19.95/month
-Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name.
-Large site. 942 videos. Same number of accompanying galleries.
-Multiple choices for streaming: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The same multiple choices for download: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The file name includes the name of the model. But it's better to rename the file with the date it was posted to the site, and the name of the site.
-The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, sound control.
-The videos have the posting date to the site.
-There is an element of Japanese flavor to the videos, which can make them slightly more interesting than the regular American or European porn. This can be positive or negative.
-Site is part of the JAV HD network. Membership in the site gives access to the full JAV network, and vice versa.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Search engine is poor. Enter the name of the model, and the search returns her name a bunch of names that are not hers.
-The Japanese models can make funny noises during sex, which can be annoying.
-The Japanese are big on vibrators, of different sizes and colors, and love to use them on the models. If you don't like sex toys, you won't appreciate many of the videos.
-Some members might be disappointed that the Japanese sex scenes are not hugely different from American or European sex scenes. Like the old wives' tale how Asian women have a "sideways vagina". Women are women. There are physiological
differences between races, but there's also a lot of nonsense about the differences.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: 942 videos.
Site theme: girls with pubic hair.
Site contents: uncensored (no pixillation) videos and photos of Japanese models having sex.
Some people think girls with pubic hair are attractive. Other people think pubic hair is dirty or unpleasant, and think all girls should feature the "nude" pussy that is so common in today's porn models.
Actually, it's not just porn models who have the hairless pussy fashion.
I did a google search, and found what I thought was an interesting result:
From 2 studies done in 2014 on 1,100 college-student participants (671 self-reported women, and 439 self-reported men),
nearly half the men in the study said they’d shaved off all their pubic hair at least once in the previous four weeks.
I had my pubic hair shaved for an operation once (I was in a hospital at the time), but never bothered shaving or trimming it myself.
About 95% of people in the study said they’d done some sort of pubic hair removal at least once in the past four weeks.
This would include minor trimming to a complete shave.
I don't think the hair down below grows all that long, anyway. It's not like the hair on your head, which just keeps growing longer.
(This review is getting a little strange. But interesting, I hope.)
My pubic hair, which is over 30 years old (since I was shaved for that operation), is less than 2 inches long. On some hairy models, the pubic hair might be over 2 inches long, but still under 4 inches. So even with a "jungle look", pubic hair is still short.
But I have read many complaints at porn sites when a model has pubic hair. They say the model is unclean, or less attractive, and should be bald down there. As if that was the way nature intended. Or God intended. Or fashion intended.
Or some other reason, that seems to be implied, but not always stated.
There are porn sites that serve the hairy niche. Hairy AV (part of JAV HD network) is one.
ATK Natural & Hairy is another.
Love Hairy (part of MetArt network) is another site.
Japanese porn seems to love vibrators. Dildos are also popular, but not as popular as vibrators. The vibrators come in all sizes and shapes, from very tiny to the industrial-sized. They also come in all colors.
I went on the U.S. version of Amazon.com, and they have 123 pages of vibrators.
The Amazon.com page shows 24 varieties of vibrators per page.
Counting duplicate listings, that would be almost 3,000 models of vibrators.
So I guess that vibrators are more popular in America than I realized.
I've been watching porn for years now, but I still have a lot to learn.
Maybe the Japanese aren't so crazy after all. They love vibrators, just like Americans. And Europeans. And maybe Africans, as well.
Basic site overview: Hairy AV focuses on hairy Japanese models. The videos and photos are not censored, which is the primary selling point of the site. The models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot, so you get crisp, clear views of these lovely girls in a wide variety of sex acts: blowjobs, self masturbation, masturbation from one or more men on a single women (anyway from 1 to 5 or 6 men on the same woman), vaginal and anal fucking (mostly vaginal), titty fucking, etc.
So the sex can be hot. But it's not excessively forceful or cruel. It's not the hard gonzo sex you see on some European sites. The sex is more consensual, where the woman's pleasure is important, and it's not just the guys getting off.
You have access to the 942 videos at the site, with almost daily updates of a single video per day, but you also have access to all the JAV HD sites, which has 16 sites and 16,528 videos in different categories.
Note: I suspect the 16,529 videos is a slight exaggeration of the site statistic, because it probably contains some videos that are posted to different sites in the network, possibly with different titles for the same video. Because I have found some videos that are posted to more than one site, and the same video will have a different title depending on which site the video is posted to.
Note: If you join through the JAV HD site, the PU discounted price is $39.99/month. This gives access to the whole JAV HD network.
But if you join through the Hairy AV site, the PU discounted price is $19.99/month. This gives you access to the whole JAV HD network, as well.
Giving the site a score of 80. You get access to 942 videos at the site, over 15,000 at the network, uncensored, high quality videos of attractive Japanese models engaging in hot sex. So it's worth considering, if you want a change from the American or European porn you've become accustomed to.
But don't expect a massive difference between the Japanese porn and the American or European porn you've already seen, if you have at least a moderate amount of porn experience. Sex is sex. The flavor might be Japanese, but it's not watching Aliens from Beyond in sexual heat that will blow your mind.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure login page. (https)
-Secure member pages. (https)
This keep some information safer from hacking, and leaves less of a record for your ISP.
-Superior support: live chat is 24/7, fast to respond, with knowledgeable, helpful staff.
-You can also access support by toll-free telephone, or email.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
-There is a trailer for most videos, to give you a quick look at the action of the video.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading are included in the basic membership price.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is almost standard for any porn site.
-Sometimes will experience a poor connection. Yesterday, I could not stream videos (they stuttered and stopped), and downloading files was very slow. I checked my internet connection at a test site, was was getting about 102 to 110 Mbps, which should give smooth streaming and fast downloads, but my connection to the Devils Film network server was poor.
-They did a network update a few years ago, making the site and network harder to use: They dropped the easy-to-see-and-use dropdown menu for changing sites. And they changed the structure of the entire network, so that you are now forced to use a gateway site instead of actually entering the different sites you have access to--which makes exploring and accessing the contents of each site harder.
-Slow update rate. For the last year, 1 new video per month.
-The photosets are poor screencaps of the accompanying video.
CONS CONTINUE:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-The software mechanism for viewing the photosets online is clumsy and poorly designed.
-The sound control of the videos can be poor: Sound can spike suddenly, making normal sounds into explosions.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
Site theme: For many years now, the bald pussy look has been the norm. HairyUndies is a niche site that features women with pubic hair.
The site is part of the Devils Film network.
-The most famous sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
Access to any one of the sites listed above would justify the membership price: Access to all 5 major sites, plus over 15 more sites, means you have access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
PU lists this site (HairyUndies.com) as a clone of the Devils Film site.
This is probably because all the videos and photosets (the photosets are screencaps of the video) carry the Devils Film watermark.
Also, the videos are listed as "from Devilsfilm" on the gateway site.
My interpretation: The Devils Film network uses a gateway system where you are logged in to a gateway site, and access the different sites from the gateway site, instead of actually entering each separate site completely.
This means it's easier for the network to maintain the network, since they don't have to work on each separate site, but only on the network gateway.
It makes it harder for the user to explore and access the content of each site.
And also it's more confusing about which videos belong to which site, since there's some question whether any particular video is part of one site, or just randomly thrown in from a different site.
And the watermark on the video is no help, since the sites labelled under the Devils Film section all carry the Devils Film logo. (Hairy Undies is labelled under the Devils Film section.)
Maybe a software engineer could explain it more simply: but I do not believe Hairy Undies is a clone, but a listing of a site that no longer exists as a separate site, but is a listing of videos and the accompanying photosets that formerly made up the Hairy Undies site.
Anyway, I'm giving the site and network a score of 82.
This is because you get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
There are some real gems at the network, but you have to slog through a lot of junk to find them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Screenshots illustrate the action in the video clips.
-Screenshots also show what the model looks like.
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Easy logon: enter username and password. Occasionally you might have to enter the secret word, but that is easily read, not heavily disguised
-No inactivity timeout from site
Cons:
-No photosets for picture lovers (video screenshots only)
-A series can be very repetitious. They follow the same script, the female model appears in the same room you saw a different model in, and does the same movements, then the male actor shows up and the sex is very similar.
-The site contents and site variety is smaller than the main sites in this network. This is a site for "hairy" models, models who have some pubic hair. But the site needs more content and variety in the video clips
-The video quality of the clips is ok to good, but the value of the clips is small. There are clips with more excitement or interest at other sites in the network
-Most content is non-exclusive. You can see most of the video clips at this site on other sites at the same network.
Bottom Line:
Site has limited content:
Movies 118
Total size 46 GB
compare the stats above to Devilsfilm:
movies 1,000+
total size 2,400 GB
This site is for those PU members who prefer models with some pubic hair. This is a site in the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price.
The basic site layout is the same for almost all sites in this network. I personally like pubic hair in the female model, but that was not enough for me to enjoy this site very much, because there are other network sites that have content that is larger and more varied, and the quality is as good or better than what is found here.
The model while having sex often appears as excited as if she is waiting for her pot pie to bake in the oven. Maybe if I moaned and groaned along with the model, it might increase my enjoyment, but then I have to worry what my neighbors might think. They might think I was having a heart attack or some other kind of physical or mental problem.
One way to easily improve the videos at this site would be to shoot the sound editor. Many of the models are continuously moaning and groaning with fake excitement, and it seriously detracts from any enjoyment you might have in watching these video clips. The male actors also tend to make a lot of fake-sounding moans and groans.
My bottom line is that this is a site with ice-cold girls and limited content. Am I being overly harsh? The technical specs/quality of the video clips is mainly ok to good for this site, as is true for most sites in this network. But the excitement factor, the personal enjoyment factor you get from watching the clips at this site, is at the boredom level. Even though a few of the models might be attractive, if they are just going through the motions of sex in a mechanical way, with their obviously fake moans and groans, I don't think the clips have much value.
I've seen clips (at other sites) where the gimmick is that the girl is supposedly sleeping and the guy has sex with her. In those clips, there was more erotic content, more excitement, partially because you didn't hear the obviously fake moans and groans from the "sleeping" girl, and partially because it's simpler for the girl to act like she's asleep than to act like she's enjoying the sex she is having with the guy who is bonking her.
Even though a girl has a pretty face and a nice body, maybe the guy should ignore her and screw the door knob or the keyhole instead.
Better yet, the girl could use the doorknob if she found it more attractive than the guy.
This site is one of the less valuable in the network. Glance through this site only after you've checked out the more important sites such as roccosiffredi, devilsfilm, silverstoneDVD and peternorth.
I am giving this site a score of 70. If the site was not part of a nice network, the score would be much lower.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
