I'm seeing the same $30 sign-up rate when I click thru on the PU and TBP links to the site. So I guess that PU hasn't fixed the discount rate issue yet.
Great review. But no matter how good the site contents, I could not put up with the password issues. You must have a ton of patience to deal with that.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Dyked is part of the basic Team Skeet network. You get access to the the basic Team Skeet network of over 20 sites with a membership in any one of the basic sites. But the premium sites in the network each require a separate additional membership fee.
Note: when you go to the Dyked site, there is a banner stating that Dyked is a Team Skeet premium site. This is misleading. Dyked is included in the basic Team Skeet network.
They used to call the premium sites in the network "Unlock" sites. Now they call the premium sites "Upgrade Now" sites.
-PU offers a discounted price of $17.87/month (recurring).
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Streaming is offered in low, medium and high definition. There are 3 choices of high definition.
-Download is offered in low, medium and high definition. There are 3 choices of high definition.
-Each video has an accompanying photo set.
-Zip file for each photo set.
-Content appears exclusive to this site.
Cons:
-The main con is that some PU members have experienced a very slow connection speed to the site/network, which makes viewing or downloading the contents difficult. The problem seems hit and miss, because other PU members have a good experience with the network speeds.
-Pre-checked cross-sale for $1.10 for 3-day trial to bang.com converts to $39.97/month. Which is a very expensive membership price.
If you want to join bang.com, you can do so through a PU discount of $17.95/month recurring.
-SegPay is the default payment processor. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable, easy to use processors. But I've used SegPay many times, and never had a problem with them.
-Dyked is a small site. Only 46 videos.
-Dyked updates slowly with 1 or 2 new videos per month.
-They mix the basic and premium sites in the network in a listing.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
You have to open each site, to tell if the site is basic or premium--requiring extra payment to see the content.
They used to list the premium sites at the bottom of the listing, which made it easier to tell what is basic and what is premium.
BOTTOM LINE:
Dyked is a lesbian site.
The site has a sub-theme, where powerful women show submissive teens what a real lesbian experience is.
The site started around 2016.
There are currently 46 videos at the site. That's a small number, with 1 or 2 new videos added per month.
So the site is small, and growing very slowly.
However, the basic network adds 1 new video per day, spreading the videos out over the 20+ sites in the basic network.
Even though you will quickly go through the entire Dyked contents, you have the basic Team Skeet network sites to explore.
The basic network has 2913 videos.
The basic network features 2014 models.
The network covers most teen niches: massage, cream pie, masturbation, lesbian, high school, redheads, step siblings, anal, latina, black models, etc.
Most of the videos are good quality: they don't put a lot of effort into making the models glamourous, but the models are mainly young teens and naturally attractive. The videos are professionally shot, with good lighting, sound control, focus, etc.
The network is easy to navigate. You can switch between sites via a site listing, without having to re-enter your login details.
You have a model listing, which could be improved with a larger thumbnail of the model.
However, when you click on a specific model, that brings up the model's page, which is excellent: You have nice thumbnails that show you what the model looks like, as well as thumbnail hot-links to all her contents at the network--which is an improvement over sites which only show the model's contents at the specific site you happen to be at.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 85.
This is a small site with a slow update rate: if it was a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. However, you get access to the basic Team Skeet network, which has 1,000s of hardcore teen videos in different niches. So if you are into teen porn, the site and network is a worthwhile join.
The exception would be if you experience slow connection speeds, which would destroy the value of your membership price.
USUALLY, WHEN I WRITE A REVIEW, I STATE THAT THE SCORE REFLECTS THE NETWORK ACCESS, AND THAT THE SITE WOULD SCORE LOWER IF RATED AS A STAND-ALONE SITE.
THIS IS MENTIONED AT THE END OF THE BOTTOM LINE SECTION, WHERE I GIVE THE SCORE.
A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION/JUDGMENT/WHATEVER-YOU-CALL IT.
SO I OFTEN GIVE THE DIFFERENT SITES IN A NETWORK THE SAME SCORE, OR SIMILAR SCORES, INDEPENDENT OF THE ABSOLUTE VALUE OF THE INDIVIDUAL SITE.
AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, IF YOU GAIN ACCESS TO A BOATLOAD OF CONTENT BY JOINING A SITE BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS, THE NETWORK ACCESS CONTROLS THE VALUE OF THE SITE.
AS AN EXTREME EXAMPLE:
EVEN IF A SITE IS WORTHLESS AS A STAND-ALONE SITE, IF THE NETWORK ACCESS IS OUTSTANDING (LARGE AMOUNT OF GOOD QUALITY VIDEOS AND PHOTOS, GOOD NAVIGATION, GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS, ETC.), THEN THE SITE WILL DESERVE A HIGH SCORE.
I TRY TO MAKE IT CLEAR IN THE BOTTOM LINE, THAT IS MY THINKING, THAT I'M GRADING THE SITE AS PART OF THE NETWORK, AND NOT AS A STAND-ALONE SITE.
I COULD INCREASE THE FONT SIZE, BUT IT'S EASIER TO USE CAP LETTERS, INSTEAD OF USING LOWER CASE LETTERS.
BY USING CAP LETTERS, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE, EDIT, AND READ THE CAP LETTERS ON MY COMPUTER SCREEN.
AND WHEN I PASTE THE TEXT INTO A REVIEW, REPLY, COMMENT, WHATEVER ONTO A PU PAGE, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ/EDIT THE POST IN CAP LETTERS.
I USE NOTEPAD (A SIMPLER VERSION OF WORD) TO WRITE MY REVIEWS, AND MOST OF MY REPLIES/COMMENTS/WHATEVER FOR PU.
THAT IS WHY, ON MANY OF MY REVIEWS, MY PROS, CONS, BOTTOM LINE POINTS OFTEN MIGRATE INTO THE NEXT SECTION. I WRITE ON A NOTEPAD FILE, AND CUTE AND PASTE INTO THE PU FORM.
NOTEPAD IS A SIMPLER FORM OF WORD PROCESSING DOCUMENT, IT DOESN'T HAVE THE BELLS AND WHISTLES OF WORDPAD OR WORD.
BUT I ALMOST NEVER WRITE A REVIEW INTO THE PU FORM. IT'S TOO EASY TO LOSE THE REVIEW, AND HAVE TO START FROM SCRATCH.
I USE NOTEPAD TO WRITE ALMOST ALL MY REVIEWS.
AND EVEN MOST OF MY COMMENTS, AND REPLIES, AND POSTS.
THE MAIN VALUE OF DYKED IS THAT IT'S PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
JOINING ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES (CURRENTLY 27 SITES) GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES.
THE PREMIUM SITES THAT YOU MENTION (DAUGHTER SWAP AND DAD CRUSH) ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE BASIC NETWORK.
I LOOK AT IT AS A VALUE PLAY: FOR ABOUT $18/MONTH, OR LESS IF YOU FIND A BETTER RATE, YOU GAIN ACCESS TO A NETWORK OF 27 SITES, COVERING A WIDE VARIETY OF NICHES, WITH OVER 2,000 HARDCORE TEEN VIDEOS, AND OVER 1,300 MODELS, MANY OF THEM ATTRACTIVE.
IF DYKED WAS A STAND-ALONE SITE, I WOULD NOT JOIN IT. THE CONTENT IS TOO SMALL (CURRENTLY 27 VIDEOS).
AND THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS GOOD, BUT NOT EXCEPTIONAL.
I GAVE DYKED A SCORE OF 85 BECAUSE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK ACCESS.
SEPARATELY, I DO NOT PUT A LOT OF WEIGHT ON THE ABSOLUTE SCORE I GIVE A SITE.
I DO NOT THINK A SITE SCORE ACCURATELY REFLECTS HOW SOMEONE ELSE WILL VALUE A SITE/NETWORK.
THERE ARE TOO MANY INDIVIDUAL FACTORS THAT CAN ADJUST EACH PERSON'S VALUE/TASTE/PREFERENCES.
UNLESS A SITE SCORES IN THE 50s, WHICH IS A WARNING THE SITE HAS MAJOR PROBLEMS.
BUT EVEN SITES THAT SCORE IN THE 90s FROM SOME REVIEWERS, MIGHT BE A NO-JOIN FOR ME, BECAUSE I WOULD NOT ENJOY THE SITE, BECAUSE OF PERSONAL PREFERENCES, OR OTHER FACTORS.
AS FAR AS MY WRITING IN CAP LETTERS:
MY EYESIGHT IS PROBABLY WORSE THAN YOURS.
I'VE WORN BI-FOCAL GLASSES FOR MANY YEARS NOW.
BUT IF I LOOK AT A COMPUTER MONITOR, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO TAKE OFF MY GLASSES, AND READ THE SCREEN NAKED (WITHOUT MY BIFOCALS).
AND IT'S EASIER FOR ME IF I AM READING A TEXT DOCUMENT IF THE WORDS ARE ‌IN CAP LETTERS.
EASIER FOR ME TO READ. AND IF I AM WRITING THE TEXT, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, AND EDIT, IF THE TEXT IS IN CAP LETTERS.
SITE NAME------------------UPDATES-------PREMIUM?
BFFS--------------------------5 PUNISH TEENS-----------------89----------PREMIUM
BFFS-------------------------75----------PREMIUM
TEEN LOVE BLACK COCKS--------70----------PREMIUM
FAMILY STROKES--------------104----------PREMIUM
SIS LOVES ME-----------------68----------PREMIUM
DAUGHTER SWAP----------------43----------PREMIUM
DAD CRUSH--------------------42----------PREMIUM
SHOP LYFTER------------------36----------PREMIUM
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, AND EDIT.
-PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH.
-EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLING AGENT, A TRUSTED NAME.
-CAN ALSO USE PAYPAL AS THE BILLING AGENT.
-DYKED IS PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PREMIUM SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS EASY TO USE, WITH A LOT OF USEFUL FEATURES.
--CAN SWITCH BETWEEN SITES, WITHOUT RE-LOGGING IN.
--CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS.
--STREAMING IS OFFERED IN LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DEFINITION.
--DOWNLOAD OPTIONS INCLUDE LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH DEFINITION.
--DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE GOOD.
--YOU CAN SORT THE VIDEOS AT EACH SITE BY DATE POSTED, OR BY POPULARITY OF THE VIDEO.
Cons:
-SMALL SITE, ONLY 27 SCENES.
-IRREGULAR UPDATE RATE. 1, 2 OR 3 SCENES PER MONTH.
-PERSONAL CON: SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE OBVIOUS BREAST IMPLANTS.
-PERSONAL CON: SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE TATTOOS.
-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE. YOUR LOGIN DETAILS ARE EXPOSED TO HACKERS EACH TIME YOU LOG IN TO THE SITE.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
Bottom Line:
SITE THEME: LESBIAN SEX, WHERE POWERFUL WOMEN SHOW INEXPERIENCED, SUBMISSIVE TEENS WHAT A REAL LESBIAN IS.
THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD CAMERA-WORK, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, GOOD COLORS IN THE VIDEO, ETC.
THE SCENE IS SCRIPTED (IT HAS A PLOT, THE DOMINATRIX HAS A REASON FOR SEDUCING THE INEXPERIENCED GIRL). ALTHOUGH THE PLOTS ARE NOT BELIEVABLE, THEY ARE FUN TO WATCH. SORT OF LIKE A PORN FANTASY FOR LESBIANS WHO DREAM OF SEDUCING YOUNG GIRLS.
THE MODELS ARE NOT PROFESSIONAL ACTORS, AND THE SILLY PLOTS DON'T MAKE A LOT OF SENSE, BUT IF YOU TURN OFF YOUR BRAIN, YOU MIGHT ENJOY THE VIDEOS AS LIGHT-HEARTED LESBO SEX.
THE SEX IS NOT EXCESSIVELY HARSH, THERE IS USUALLY A BIT OF LIGHT SLAPPING AND NAME-CALLING. BUT THE SEX IS BASICALLY MILD HARD-CORE, NO REAL PAIN OR PUNISHMENT IS SHOWN.
SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE OBVIOUS BREAST IMPLANTS.
SOME OF THE MODELS HAVE TATTOOS.
THE MODELS ARE NOT ACTORS, AND THE FAKE MOANS AND GROANS AND FAKED EXCITEMENT ARE NOT BELIEVABLE, BUT THE VIDEOS CAN BE AMUSING.
SOME OF THE MODELS ARE CUTE TEENS OR EARLY TWENTIES GIRLS. SUCH AS NAOMI WOODS AND ELIZA JANE.
THE MAIN VALUE OF THE SITE IS THAT IT'S PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES (BUT NOT THE PREMIUM SITES, WHICH REQUIRE EXTRA PAYMENT).
DYKED IS A SMALL SITE, WITH 27 VIDEOS.
THE UPDATE RATE IS SLOW, WITH 1, 2 OR 3 UPDATES PER MONTH.
HOWEVER, YOU GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK, WHICH CURRENTLY HAS 27 SITES.
27 SITES MEANS THE NETWORK COVERS A WIDE VARIETY OF TEEN NICHES.
THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK UPDATES WITH 1 NEW VIDEO PER DAY.
THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK HAS OVER 2,000 VIDEOS. MOST OF THEM ARE EXCLUSIVE TO THE NETWORK.
THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK AS OVER 1,300 MODELS.
MOST OF THE MODELS ARE TEENS, YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE.
MOST OF THE MODELS ARE NATURAL: WITHOUT BREAST IMPLANTS.
MOST OF THE MODELS DON'T HAVE A LOT OF TATTOOS OR PIERCINGS.
SO EVEN THOUGH THE DYKED SITE IS SMALL, YOU WILL GAIN ACCESS TO A BOATLOAD OF HARDCORE TEEN VIDEOS, MOST OF THEM EXCLUSIVE TO THE NETWORK, WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF TEENS TO VIEW.
THIS IS NOT A GLAMCORE NETWORK. IT MAINLY FEATURES YOUNG GIRLS IN HARDCORE SEX.
NOT A LOT OF EFFORT IS PUT INTO MAKING THE GIRLS AS ATTRACTIVE AS POSSIBLE: HOWEVER THE GIRLS ARE YOUNG, AND NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE.
THE NETWORK GIVES VALUE FOR THE MONEY: WITH A LOW PU PRICE OF $17.87/MONTH (WITH PU DISCOUNT).
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85, BECAUSE OF THE NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS GRADED AS A STAND-ALONE SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE MUCH LOWER.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW.
WITH A LISTING OF THE TEAM SKEET SITES.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Can stream or download videos.
-Videos stream in 320p, 480p, 720p.
-Video download choices: 320p, 480p, 720p, 1080p
-Excellent download speeds. I got around 3 MB/sec.
-Allows use of download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Matching photo set for each video. The photos are like excellent screen caps of the video shoot.
-The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good camera-work. Good sound control.
-The models are uniformly attractive. They are not the drop-dead gorgeous models of X-Art, but X-Art has some of the most beautiful or cute models in the business.
Cons:
-Uncheck pre-checked offer on signup page.
-Primary biller is MBI-Probiller. Try to switch to a secondary biller, which is easier to cancel your subscription.
-Small site. Only 36 videos and matching photo sets.
-Updates with 1 video and matching photo set per 10-15 days.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is anal sex.
This is a glamcore or heartcore site. The girls are treated with respect. You don't find any spitting or hitting or slapping or crude sex here (except that in the old days, anal sex would have been considered crude or raw. But times change. Anal sex (in porn, at least) is almost considered normal today.
This is a small site. You can join directly, or get full access through a membership to babes.com (also known as BabesNetwork.com). Why they use two different names for Babes.com and BabesNetwork.com, I don't know, it makes it more
confusing.
The models are attractive. In their late teens or early twenties. White. (I found one Asian model out of 36 models.) Very little tattoos or piercings.
As an add-on to babes.com, it's an OK site. But for someone who's fetish is anal, it's too small of a site to satisfy your needs for long. And with an update rate of 1 video per 10-15 days, you won't get much new content with your membership.
If you're into anal, I'd suggest Teen Mega World, which has the Anal Angels website, and lots of anal videos that appear in their other web sites. Teen Mega World is not glamcore or heartcore, it's basic medium grade teen hardcore sex, with lots of niche sites, a ton of backlog videos going back for years, and a very low membership price that makes it an attractive option for teen hardcore.
Giving the site a score of 75. Main complaint is the small size. The models at the site are attractive, but not the beauties or cuties you can find at other glamcore or heartcore sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Erotic Beauty is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect the following:
-Excellent customer service. Fast and responsive and helpful for most questions and problems. However, this is an email service, so expect a delay of several hours or days before you get a respone. A live chat line would be much faster.
-A catalog of attractive to beautiful women. Ranging in age from late teens to about 30 years old. Mainly white. Mainly from Eastern Europe.
-High quality glamour photography. The models are not dressed up in fancy costumes, or made to look glamourous, but these are attractive women and the photos are designed to showcase their beauty.
-Site structure is designed for simple navigation: Photos can be viewed in 3 different
definitions: can also be downloaded in 3 different definitions in zip files.
-No streaming or download limits. (The streaming refers to viewing photo slide shows. The site has no videos. This is a photo only site.)
-PU discount of $19.99/month recurring.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Login and member pages are https.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, which offer sites with high standards: simple navigation, high quality photography, excellent (responsive) customer service.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They used to update with 1 new photoset daily. But starting in 2019, they update with 2 new photosets per week. See bottom line section why this is probably the main knock against the site. They are charging full price, but giving poor service on the updates.
-Site has no videos. But truthfully, most softcore videos are boring anyway.
Bottom Line:
Erotic beauty is softcore nudity. It's a photo only site (no videos).
The bottom line: There are many fine softcore nude sites. Erotic Beauty is a good site, but the competition is fierce. MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, to name some of my favorite softcore sites, offer more bang for your porn dollars than Erotic Beauty.
MetArt is the outstanding value, with its massive catalog:
-Photosets------19,839
-Videos---------1,600 (Almost all softcore videos are boring, and a waste of time and effort. MetArt has a genius for photographing beautiful naked women and making you wonder why they bothered. Except that recently MetArt is improving, and trying to make the videos slightly more erotic, and allowing the models to touch themselves, so there is starting to be a sexual element in the videos.
-Models---------3,622
-Updates--------4 updates per day, except the first of each month, 6 updates.
Compare that to Erotic Beauty:
-Photosets----------5,066
-Videos-------------0 (none)
-Models-------------2,130
-Updates------------2 per week
MetArt blows the competition away in terms of quantity of photosets, models, updates.
And the quality of the photosets and attractiveness of the models is outstanding.
So if you are into softcore nudity, my advice is:
First, join MetArt.
Then join either MPL Studios or Femjoy. Both are outstanding sites, with gorgeous girls, high grade photography.
As I wrote, there are many good to excellent softcore erotic sites out there:
But in my opinion, MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios are best in class.
Erotic Beauty is good, but it's a second-class offering compared to the leaders in softcore nudes.
I'm giving the site a score of 80: the exact score is very subjective, but in simple comparisons, I think you get far more value for your porn dollars with MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios.
Note: If you didn't have sites like MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios, Erotic Beauty would be a wonderful site. But since we live in the real world, where the average person wants the best return on his money, Erotic Beauty falls by the wayside. Yes, it has lots of attractive to beautiful models, and yes, there many outstanding photosets of these lovelies, but the competition has even more attractive models, more photosets, and a faster update rate.
On the other hand, I do recommend joining the site for a month, at $19.99 (or a lower price if you can find one during a holiday special), and downloading like mad all of your favorite models. Because the site has lots of lovely models featured in sets that are worth keeping.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
PROS
-NETWORK CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE. I'VE NEVER SEEN ANY OF THE CONTENT AT AN OUTSIDE SITE.
- $19.99/MONTH WITH PU DISCOUNT (LIST PRICE IS $29.99/MONTH).
-LARGE PHOTO SITE WITH A SOFTCORE GLAMOUR-STYLE FOCUS.
-ABOUT 1,900 MODELS, MOST OF THEM ATTRACTIVE TO LOVELY.
-OVER 4,400 PHOTO SETS. HIGH GRADE PHOTOGRAPY, BY MANY OF THE WORLD'S BEST SOFTCORE PHOTOGAPHERS.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-DOWNLOAD MANAGERS ACCEPTED.
-THE PHOTO SETS CAN BE VIEWED ONLINE, WITH THE SLIDESHOW PROGRAM.
-THE PHOTO SETS CAN BE DOWNLOADED IN LOW, MEDIUM, OR HIGH DEFINITION.
-UPDATES WITH 1 NEW PHOTOSET PER DAY.
Cons:
-NO VIDEOS. THIS IS A PHOTO ONLY SITE. HOWEVER, I'VE FOUND VERY FEW SOFTCORE VIDEOS THAT ARE WORTH WATCHING, FROM ANY SITE I'VE EVER JOINED.
-EXPANDING ON MY BELIEF THAT SOFTCORE VIDEOS OF EROTIC WOMEN ARE USUALLY NOT EROTIC: THIS IS A PERSONAL REACTION. MANY SOFTCORE SITES (METART, MPL STUDIOS, FEMJOY, ETC.) DO MAKE SOFTCORE VIDEOS, SO THERE MUST BE AN AUDIENCE THAT FINDS THEM TO BE EROTIC.
HOWEVER, SEVERAL PU MEMBERS OVER TIME HAVE COMMENTED THAT VIDEOS AT METART AND OTHER SOFTCORE SITES ARE MAINLY BORING.
-EROTIC BEAUTY IS A STAND-ALONE SITE. IT'S PART OF THE METART NETWORK, BUT MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE SITE IN THE NETWORK IS SPECIFIC TO THAT SITE.
THERE IS A MEMBERSHIP OPTION WHERE YOU CAN PAY $50/MONTH FOR ACCESS TO 9 OF THE METART SITES (OR $350/YEAR), BUT THIS GETS EXPENSIVE.
-ECHST.NET IS THE DEFAULT BILLING SERVICE. EROTIC BEAUTY IS ALSO SERVICED BY CCBILL AND EPOCH. I RECOMMEND USING CCBILL OR EPOCH AS THE BILLING SERVICE TO USE.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
Bottom Line:
-EROTIC BEAUTY IS PART OF THE METART NETWORK. THE STRUCTURE IS SIMILAR TO METART, WHERE YOU
HAVE MULTIPLE CHOICES IN HOW YOU VIEW THE SITE:
-YOU CAN SELECT:
-RESOLUTION OF PHOTOS VIEWED ONLINE (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH)
-# OF THUMBNAILS PER PAGE
-OPEN IMAGES IN SAME WINDOW OR NEW WINDOW
-LIST VIEW GRID OR DETAILED
-COMMENTS SHOWN OR HIDDEN
-NAVIGATION SIMPLE OR ENHANCED
-THUMBNAIL SIZE FULL OR SQUARE
-TAGS SHOWN OR HIDDEN
-DESCRIPTION SHOWN OR HIDDEN
-MEASUREMENTS IMPERIAL OR METRIC
-SLIDESHOW INTERVAL: CHOOSE NUMBER OF SECONDS FOR EACH IMAGE TO BE SHOWN
EROTIC BEAUTY IS A SITE THAT COMPETES WITH MANY FINE SOFTCORE SITES: DOMAI, ERROTICA ARCHIVES, FEMJOY, GODDESS NUDES, HEGRE, THE LIFE EROTIC, METART, MPL STUDIOS, ETC.
I'VE BEEN A PAST MEMBER OF ALL OF THESE, AND OTHERS BESIDES.
I THINK ALL OF THESE SITES I LISTED ARE WORTH JOINING, AT LEAST ONCE, TO SAMPLE THEIR CONTENTS.
HOWEVER, MOST OF US HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF MONEY, SO WE HAVE TO PICK AND CHOOSE WHICH SITES TO JOIN CURRENTLY.
EROTIC BEAUTY OFFERS HIGH-GRADE PHOTOS, BUT SO DO THE OTHER SITES I'VE MENTIONED. ALL THE SITES FEATURE ATTRACTIVE TO STUNNING TO ABSOLUTELY LOVELY MODELS.
ACTUALLY, ALL THE SITES I'VE MENTIONED SHARE MANY OF THE SAME MODELS: IF A MODEL IS AT EROTIC BEAUTY, YOU CAN OFTEN FIND AT LEAST ONE OR MORE APPEARANCES BY HER AT A COMPETING SITE I'VE LISTED.
SO WHICH SITES DO YOU JOIN?
I'M ASSUMING YOU ARE A SOFTCORE PHOTO FAN.
IF YOU'RE NOT A SOFTCORE PHOTO FAN, THEN EROTIC BEAUTY AND THE OTHER SITES LISTED ARE NOT WORTH JOINING.
I WOULD JOIN METART FIRST, OUT OF ALL THE SITES I'VE LISTED: METART IS THE LARGEST, FINEST SOFTCORE PHOTO COLLECTION OF MODELS ON THE INTERNET:
BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS: METART HAS 17,100+ PHOTO SETS. METART HAS 1,400+ VIDEOS. METART HAS 3,300+ MODELS. METART UPDATES WITH 4 NEW PHOTOSETS/VIDEOS PER DAY, EXCEPT ON THE FIRST OF THE MONTH, WHEN IT UPDATES WITH 6 NEW UPDATES.
METART BLOWS AWAY THE OTHER SOFTCORE SITES, IN TERMS OF AMOUNT OF CONTENT, NUMBER OF MODELS, AND RATE OF UPDATES.
AND THE PRICE IS EXCELLENT: $19.99/MONTH, WITH PU DISCOUNT.
I'M GIVING EROTIC BEAUTY A SCORE OF 85. IF METART AND SOME OF THE OTHER FINE SOFTCORE SITES DID NOT EXIST, I WOULD GIVE EROTIC BEAUTY A HIGHER SCORE. BUT SOFTCORE EROTIC SITES ARE WELL SERVED, AND EROTIC BEAUTY, ALTHOUGH WORTH JOINING, WOULD BE A SECONDARY CHOICE AMONG THE SITES I'VE LISTED.
Setting the options to display 1,000 thumbnails per page makes it easier to view the thumbnails for an entire gallery, without having to click through different pages.
I hope I did not come across as negative on my review of Erotic Beauty.
I think it's a fine site, and I've been a monthly member of the site for over 2 years now, since I was offered a very inexpensive membership price.
But I think that for most people, that a membership to MetArt is the better value, since most people will pay the same monthly or yearly fee to belong to MetArt or Erotic Beauty, and MetArt has far more content, as well as a few other advantages over Erotic Beauty.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection.
-Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents.
-Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like.
-Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition.
-This is a high grade photo site.
-Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity.
-Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
Cons:
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful.
-Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites.
-Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete
set without a lot of mouse clicks.
Bottom Line:
I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites.
I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two
years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive.
I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years.
Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models.
It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site.
Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty.
If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money:
As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness.
Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa.
In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and
interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time.
That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are.
Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content.
Both sites share the same basic structure.
Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition.
Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model.
But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty.
Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the
advantage obviously belongs to MetArt.
I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value.
I've been a member of MetArt more times than I have of Erotic Beauty. But as far as I can tell, there was no reason to start or continue Erotic Beauty except as a marketing decision to make more money from 2 sites instead of 1.
There is, as far as I can tell, nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt. Nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness. Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted in the MetArt site. And vice versa.
MetArt has far more content than Erotic Beauty. The same high level of photographic excellence. The same softcore teen subjects. The same setup of 3 levels of definition for each photoset. And many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty are also found in MetArt.
As far as I can tell, even though both sites use many of the same models, the photosets of the model that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site, as far as I can tell, has exclusive content at that site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Access to live cams.
-Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec.
-Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like.
-Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here.
-If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option.
-Content is exclusive.
-No watermark on their photos.
-You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are
all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach.
-The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site.
-No videos. Photosets only.
-A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them.
-The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of.
-You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details.
-Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has
been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt
updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 0
Number of models: hundreds+
The dimensions of the recently posted photosets:
low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels
medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels
high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels
You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup.
Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value.
Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt: MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site.
MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude).
Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has.
If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty.
Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field.
I signed up for Metart and Erotic Beauty yesterday morning. The processor was CCBILL, a well known agent.
What's surprising to me is that I did not receive any confirming email with my subscription details.
I wrote down my username and password, as well as the credit card I used. With my sometimes spotty memory, that's for safety's sake.
But I was surprised I did not get any confirming email with my subscription details.
If you forget your username and password, or the details on your subscription, you can look them up at CCBILL online.
But to get the details on your subscription on the internet, you need to have 2 out of 3 pieces of information:
1. The email address you used to sign up with.
2. The credit card number you used to sign up with.
3. The subscription number you were given.
Since I did not get a subscription number assigned to me when I signed up, I was able to use my email address and credit card number to find my subscription details at CCBILL online.
But I am really surprised I did not get a confirmation email on my subscription details. Especially from a company like CCBILL.
I have checked my email inbox. And I checked the spam folder for that email address.
Review has lots of nice details. If money is no object, then belonging to both met-art and metmodels would be nice. Because then you would get to see all the sets at both sites. But since money is limited for most of us, met-art is the better value. The quality and style (teen glamour) of both sites is basically the same. The main difference is that met-art has a huge amount of content compared to metmodels.
I believe the reason met-art removed some "Lolita" sets was for legal reasons.
The main photographer for met-art in its early days was Grigori Galitsin. He also provided pictures to Domai.
Later, Galitsin worked with Petter Hegre to set up an erotic website, and then Galitsin set up his own erotic websites.
Galtsin has had legal problems in recent years. In 2006 Galitsin was put in jail in Russia for his erotic photography.
His wife was also arrested and put in jail in 2006, released, then put in jail again. His wife was the model named Valentina at met-art and named Val at Domai.
Her photosets have all been pulled at met-art and Domai.
As far as I know, Galitsin is still in jail in Russia.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
