Review Replies (8)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
A LIST OF THE TEEN SKEET SITES, WITH THE CURRENT NUMBER OF UPDATES AS OF 2017-05-09:
SITE NAME NUMBER OF SCENES IS PREMIUM?
EXXXTRA SMALL 170
TEEN PIES 82
INNOCENT HIGH 438
TEEN CURVES 64
CFNM TEENS 30
TEENS LOVE ANAL 49
MY BABYSITTERS CLUB 49
SHES NEW 220
TEENS DO PORN 82
P.O.V. LIFE 150
THE REAL WORKOUT 94
THIS GIRL SUCKS 203
TEENS LOVE MONEY 53
OYE LOCA 220
TITTY ATTACK 83
TEENY BLACK 75
LUST HD 90
RUB A TEEN 100
STEP SIBLINGS 38
HER FRESHMAN YEAR 20
SELF DESIRE 30
SOLO INTERVIEWS 144
TEAM SKEET EXTRAS 114
DYKED 27
BAD MILFS 12
GINGER PATCH 3
(LIST CONTINUES IN THE NEXT REPLY BELOW):
|
05-09-17 07:03am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
LIST OF SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK:
SITE NAME------------------UPDATES-------PREMIUM?
BFFS--------------------------5
PUNISH TEENS-----------------89----------PREMIUM
BFFS-------------------------75----------PREMIUM
TEEN LOVE BLACK COCKS--------70----------PREMIUM
FAMILY STROKES--------------104----------PREMIUM
SIS LOVES ME-----------------68----------PREMIUM
DAUGHTER SWAP----------------43----------PREMIUM
DAD CRUSH--------------------42----------PREMIUM
SHOP LYFTER------------------36----------PREMIUM
|
05-09-17 07:07am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
I'm a big fan of most of the sites this company puts out but the business model they seem to be using now is for these smaller, themed sites. They often don't offer good value but with a discount it can be worth a membership or, as has happened to me several times, I just like the niche so it's worth it for me to join at full price. Daughter Swap is among my favourite sites these days and Dad Crush isn't far behind.
Based on your review I might be tempted to join Dyked but it really isn't the kind of porn I collect. That's no criticism of the site or of you for liking it - that's just a big advantage of being a member here at PU.
Please don't take this the wrong way: my eyesight for seeing things close up has deteriorated badly in the past couple of years and I'm too stubborn to switch to bifocals. In most cases I find anything I post here is easier to write using Word (or another word processor) and turn up the font size a bit. For me it has the added advantage of being able to edit any post more easily too. That's also how I write all my reviews. I can take weeks to write a review because I'm always going back and reworking it with new things I want to add or things I criticized but rethought my position on. The final advantage is that some PU members have lost their reviews while they're writing them right on the site. That's not a risk I worry about.
|
05-09-17 03:52pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :
THE MAIN VALUE OF DYKED IS THAT IT'S PART OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
JOINING ANY ONE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES (CURRENTLY 27 SITES) GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK SITES.
THE PREMIUM SITES THAT YOU MENTION (DAUGHTER SWAP AND DAD CRUSH) ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE BASIC NETWORK.
I LOOK AT IT AS A VALUE PLAY: FOR ABOUT $18/MONTH, OR LESS IF YOU FIND A BETTER RATE, YOU GAIN ACCESS TO A NETWORK OF 27 SITES, COVERING A WIDE VARIETY OF NICHES, WITH OVER 2,000 HARDCORE TEEN VIDEOS, AND OVER 1,300 MODELS, MANY OF THEM ATTRACTIVE.
IF DYKED WAS A STAND-ALONE SITE, I WOULD NOT JOIN IT. THE CONTENT IS TOO SMALL (CURRENTLY 27 VIDEOS).
AND THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS GOOD, BUT NOT EXCEPTIONAL.
I GAVE DYKED A SCORE OF 85 BECAUSE OF THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK ACCESS.
SEPARATELY, I DO NOT PUT A LOT OF WEIGHT ON THE ABSOLUTE SCORE I GIVE A SITE.
I DO NOT THINK A SITE SCORE ACCURATELY REFLECTS HOW SOMEONE ELSE WILL VALUE A SITE/NETWORK.
THERE ARE TOO MANY INDIVIDUAL FACTORS THAT CAN ADJUST EACH PERSON'S VALUE/TASTE/PREFERENCES.
UNLESS A SITE SCORES IN THE 50s, WHICH IS A WARNING THE SITE HAS MAJOR PROBLEMS.
BUT EVEN SITES THAT SCORE IN THE 90s FROM SOME REVIEWERS, MIGHT BE A NO-JOIN FOR ME, BECAUSE I WOULD NOT ENJOY THE SITE, BECAUSE OF PERSONAL PREFERENCES, OR OTHER FACTORS.
AS FAR AS MY WRITING IN CAP LETTERS:
MY EYESIGHT IS PROBABLY WORSE THAN YOURS.
I'VE WORN BI-FOCAL GLASSES FOR MANY YEARS NOW.
BUT IF I LOOK AT A COMPUTER MONITOR, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO TAKE OFF MY GLASSES, AND READ THE SCREEN NAKED (WITHOUT MY BIFOCALS).
AND IT'S EASIER FOR ME IF I AM READING A TEXT DOCUMENT IF THE WORDS ARE ‌IN CAP LETTERS.
EASIER FOR ME TO READ. AND IF I AM WRITING THE TEXT, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, AND EDIT, IF THE TEXT IS IN CAP LETTERS.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
|
05-09-17 08:17pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :
I COULD INCREASE THE FONT SIZE, BUT IT'S EASIER TO USE CAP LETTERS, INSTEAD OF USING LOWER CASE LETTERS.
BY USING CAP LETTERS, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE, EDIT, AND READ THE CAP LETTERS ON MY COMPUTER SCREEN.
AND WHEN I PASTE THE TEXT INTO A REVIEW, REPLY, COMMENT, WHATEVER ONTO A PU PAGE, IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ/EDIT THE POST IN CAP LETTERS.
I USE NOTEPAD (A SIMPLER VERSION OF WORD) TO WRITE MY REVIEWS, AND MOST OF MY REPLIES/COMMENTS/WHATEVER FOR PU.
THAT IS WHY, ON MANY OF MY REVIEWS, MY PROS, CONS, BOTTOM LINE POINTS OFTEN MIGRATE INTO THE NEXT SECTION. I WRITE ON A NOTEPAD FILE, AND CUTE AND PASTE INTO THE PU FORM.
NOTEPAD IS A SIMPLER FORM OF WORD PROCESSING DOCUMENT, IT DOESN'T HAVE THE BELLS AND WHISTLES OF WORDPAD OR WORD.
BUT I ALMOST NEVER WRITE A REVIEW INTO THE PU FORM. IT'S TOO EASY TO LOSE THE REVIEW, AND HAVE TO START FROM SCRATCH.
I USE NOTEPAD TO WRITE ALMOST ALL MY REVIEWS.
AND EVEN MOST OF MY COMMENTS, AND REPLIES, AND POSTS.
|
05-09-17 08:18pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :
I've heard horror stories of people who've put some time into writing a review and then lost it if the site crashed. I'm guessing that a lot of regulars here use some form of what we use.
|
05-10-17 05:35pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
jook (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :
Thanks for the review. I consider any review to be excellent that can help me decide whether to join a site.
Regarding upper case, while content over format is by far always my primary concern, it's nice to read text pleasing to the eye. While I'm not near a Windows computer at the moment, I believe that in order to change between upper and lower case in Notepad, all you need do is select the text and right click to toggle to choose upper or lower. In Word, similarly, highlight the text and press SHIFT + F3 to toggle the choices. Not a big deal to me though one way or the other.
I use Word to write reviews. I had to learn the hard way too many times not to write reviews directly in PU lest the cloud gods will have a field day with it. And like RA, I don't write reviews in one sitting any longer. I generally write them over a few days while I'm learning about a site.
Last and a little more controversial, is reviewing sites in a network. If you recall, I suffered a great deal of angst about this not long ago and brought it up in the forum.
I've settled on scoring and writing such reviews based solely on the merits of the individual site or the network as a whole - one or the other. I try not to give much weight when reviewing an individual network site that it is part of a network other than mentioning it. To each his own though and this is not meant as a criticism of anyone else. Hell, far be it from me to be judgmental about a matter I've had such a hard time coming to grips with ;)
|
05-12-17 04:59am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - jook :
USUALLY, WHEN I WRITE A REVIEW, I STATE THAT THE SCORE REFLECTS THE NETWORK ACCESS, AND THAT THE SITE WOULD SCORE LOWER IF RATED AS A STAND-ALONE SITE.
THIS IS MENTIONED AT THE END OF THE BOTTOM LINE SECTION, WHERE I GIVE THE SCORE.
A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION/JUDGMENT/WHATEVER-YOU-CALL IT.
SO I OFTEN GIVE THE DIFFERENT SITES IN A NETWORK THE SAME SCORE, OR SIMILAR SCORES, INDEPENDENT OF THE ABSOLUTE VALUE OF THE INDIVIDUAL SITE.
AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, IF YOU GAIN ACCESS TO A BOATLOAD OF CONTENT BY JOINING A SITE BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS, THE NETWORK ACCESS CONTROLS THE VALUE OF THE SITE.
AS AN EXTREME EXAMPLE:
EVEN IF A SITE IS WORTHLESS AS A STAND-ALONE SITE, IF THE NETWORK ACCESS IS OUTSTANDING (LARGE AMOUNT OF GOOD QUALITY VIDEOS AND PHOTOS, GOOD NAVIGATION, GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS, ETC.), THEN THE SITE WILL DESERVE A HIGH SCORE.
I TRY TO MAKE IT CLEAR IN THE BOTTOM LINE, THAT IS MY THINKING, THAT I'M GRADING THE SITE AS PART OF THE NETWORK, AND NOT AS A STAND-ALONE SITE.
|
05-12-17 05:43am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
