ONE THING ABOUT YOUR REVIEW THAT IMPRESSED ME WAS YOUR COMMENT THAT DIGITAL DESIRE IS BETTER THAN METART BECAUSE THEY AVOID PUTTING THE MODEL INTO UNCOMFORTABLE POSITIONS.
FOR ME, MANY OF THE PHOTOS IN A TYPICAL METART SHOOT ARE WASTED, BECAUSE THE MODEL'S BODY IS HUNCHED OVER OR TWISTED LIKE A HUMAN PRETZEL.
OR THE NUMBER OF SHOTS CROPPED AND FOCUSED ON THE ANUS OR VAGINA, EXCLUDING THE REST OF THE MODEL.
I'M IN THE MINORITY, IF I DON'T SCREAM PRAISES FOR THE METART SETS.
SO I'VE STOPPED READING THE MEMBER COMMENTS ON THE SETS, BECAUSE MY TASTES ARE SO DIFFERENT.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Sometimes, cookies or other problems show a faulty price, so I can never be sure if the price has changed, or if there is a computer error, or some other problem.
I hope it's temporary, but clicking on the hot link to Digital Desire at PU or TBP, the page takes a long time to load, and finally a page loads with the message:
There was an error.
An error occurred and has blocked you from viewing this page. We're very sorry; please try again later.
Click here to go back to the homepage.
..............
Clicking on the homepage link apparently does not work, because the home page does not load.
Digital Desire is not my favorite site, but it features a lot of stunning models in mostly softcore. The photography is very bland, but very sharp.
I hope the problems are temporary. A nice site. J. Stephen Hicks, their main photographer, died in February of 2013.
For a while they had an offer of $9.99/month. But that apparently expired.
I was just a member, and they sent me an email inviting me back, at a special price of $24.99/month, which is their regular price.
PU offers a discounted price of $14.95/month (recurring).
(Automated programs sometimes don't make a lot of sense. It's nice that they have a automated program offering a special price to former members. But when the special price turns out to be the same as the regular price, you sometimes wonder if anyone is asleep at the wheel driving your machine.)
Unrelated topic:
Why do they have a captcha when you want to check the balance on your gift card?
You have to enter the number of the gift card.
Then you have to enter the captcha.
Who the heck is going to use this service to steal something, or play games, or whatever. Why add a captcha, when some of them are so fricking hard to read, you have to enter the captcha several times before you guess it correctly.
If I were God, I'd design to world to suit me better. First, I would assign 100 of the most beautiful girls to satisfy my wants. Then I would increase my wants to satisfy those lovely girls.
LOS ANGELES — Acclaimed adult industry photographer and videographer J. Stephen Hicks passed away Feb 06 2013 .
Hicks’ career spanned more than three decades. His work appeared in nearly every adult magazine including Penthouse, Hustler, Club, High Society, Gallery and more.
Hicks’ website —DigitalDesire.com — will continue to carry on his legacy.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Join this site directly, PU discount is $19.95/month.
-But join Teen Mega World directly, PU discount is $14.95/month, and you get full access to Dirty Coach.
-Epoch is payment processor, a trusted name.
-Attractive teen models. White Eastern European girls.
-There is an active comment section, where you can read what other members think of the model, the sex.
-Zip file for each gallery.
-A matching gallery for each video. Good quality photos. The photos are like excellent screen shots. Good focus. Good definition. Don't expect MetArt or MPL Studio quality photos, but these are surprisingly good screen shots of the video.
The gallery gives you not only a fast impression of the what the video will be, but the photos are worth keeping as well, because the models are attractive, and the photos are crisp and well-framed. There must be some software program that does a good job of making these photos from a video, because there were no annoying flash shots during the video shoot.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-Another good feature is the software used to display each gallery. You can easily view each image, and enlarge it if wanted.
-The site owners have spent a lot of time and money making improvements to the network, trying to make it easy to use.
-Good download speeds. I averaged 3-4 MB/s.
CONS:
-Pre-checked cross sale to VideosZ on join page, which renews at $39.97/month after 2 day trial.
-Or you can join VideosZ for $17.95/month with PU discount.
-Small site. Only 56 videos.
-Last update was in 2014.
-The basic plot is thin. A guy is training a girl. He puts his hands on her, she is attracted to him, and they have sex.
Very little build-up or eroticism. This is the Russian equivalent of foreplay: a guy presses his hard-on against a girl, and she is so turned on, that she gives him a blow job, and then they fuck.
Why didn't I get to watch these videos in high school, so that I would have learned the basic techniques of how to seduce Russian girls?
Bottom Line:
Site theme: a male coach or trainer seduces a girl he is coaching.
There is almost no plot. The girl is ready to fuck. So the guy does what guys do, and fucks her strongly.
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but I find the girls at this site (and Teen Mega World network) attractive to very attractive. They are almost all white, slender teens who enthusiastically enjoy sex.
The site (and network) is easy to use. They've put a lot of time into making the navigation easy. And over time they have built a massive collection for the network of good quality hardcore teen videos. If you go back several years, the quality goes down, of course. But for the last few years, the quality is very good for basic hardcore teenage sex. This is not a glamcore site or network. The stories are basic to non-existent. So there is very little build-up to the sex, not much eroticism. It's strictly bread-and-butter fucking (in most positions, with toys or without toys, usually with female cocksucking as well).
Dirty Coach site is small, but you get access to the Teen Mega World network, which is huge.
To the best of my knowledge, the content at Dirty Coach is exclusive. Scenes from other sites in the network are not necessarily exclusive, and I know I've seen some of them at Diesel network and Team Skeet and at 18X Girls. But I believe the material was first posted to Teen Mega World.
Based on a low price for a huge amount of good quality videos and photo sets at the network, of hardcore teen sex, I am giving the site a score of 92. Because membership at the site gives access to the Teen Mega World network.
However, please remember that you save $5/month if you join Teen Mega World directly, instead of joining Dirty Coach directly.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $19.95/month.
-But join through PU discount Teen Mega World for $14.95/month, and you get access to all of Teen Mega World network, which includes Dirty Doctor.
-Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name.
-Can join by credit card, or using PayPal for extra security.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Fast download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download limit.
-Accepts download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Small site. Only 37 videos.
-Archive site. The last update was in October 2014. Site started around April 2012, had a slow update rate, then stopped updating. This is an example of the Teen Mega World style of starting numerous sites, but then failing to keep updating them with new videos. Which can be irritating for those members who enjoy the site theme. However, TMW has many sites in different niches, and there should be plenty of videos that will appeal to most members.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
37 videos.
37 matching galleries.
Site theme: a young teen is examined by a doctor, and the doctor ends up fucking the teen.
So if you have a fetish about playing doctor, or remember back to the days when you were a child and played doctor yourself (which seems to be common among very young children), this site might appeal to you.
This is a small site. But you get access to the entire TMW network, which has over 4,400 hardcore teen videos.
One new video is added to the network every 1 or 2 days. So the network keeps growing.
The site and network are easy to use: a lot of effort has been put into making the network user-friendly.
The model indexes have a nice-sized thumbnail of each model.
Years ago, you had to search for a model's videos at each separate site, but now you just hit the model's name, and her videos at all the network sites are shown.
Moving between the sites is easy: you don't need to re-enter your username and password.
The network offers new sites that fit the current market: They recently added a Virtual Reality site. Before that, they added a site that features 4K videos. And they add videos to some of their other sites in a random manner. The newer videos are offered in 1080p, 720p, 540p, and 405p (for mobile).
The sets have improved over the years, from low-rent apartment buildings to more expensive, clean apartments or studio settings.
The models, in the main, wear low-cost street apparel. There is little or no air-brushing. The models are mainly natural teens or early twenties. Very few implants, not a lot of tattoos or piercings. Many or most of the models are attractive to very attractive, in spite of the fact that very little effort is put into making the models appear more attractive. The models don't wear a lot of make-up. But most of the models are cute enough that it doesn't matter. And some of the sex can be very hot.
Because of the small amount of content, the site itself would deserve a score in the 60s. But because you gain access to the entire TMW network, which has a huge amount of good quality videos, the network access bumps the score up to 85 or more. And I think that some of the sites bump the score up to 90, because the girls are both cute and hot.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Adding 1 new video about every 5 days.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Videos cab be streamed and also downloaded.
-There are multiple choices for download: high quality, medium quality, and MP4 for portable devices.
-You can use a download manager such as DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds.
-Easy logon.
-Long time before site time-out.
Cons:
-There is a link to live chats. But the free chats that I saw were a waste of time.
-Tiny site. only 14 videos so far.
-The acting is amateur.
-The plot is unbelievable. An older doctor examines a teenager's vagina. Then he sticks his penis in her mouth. Then he fucks her. She is
supposedly so aroused by the examination that the sex follows naturally. But the sex that is shown has all the passion of a soggy French Fry.
-The doctor and the model speak in a foreign language. Possibly Russian.
No subtitles.
Bottom Line:
This is the newest offering from the Royal Cash network. The site is tiny. It only has 14 videos so far.
The site theme is teenage girls visiting a doctor, who examines them. He uses a speculum to examine their vagina. He stimulates the vagina with his finger. Also uses a stethoscope to listen to the vagina. Somehow, the girl is supposedly turned on by the doctor stimulating her vagina with his finger and his tongue. He then puts his penis in her mouth. She then sucks on his penis, and they fuck.
The action is completely unrealistic. The niche where a guy gives a girl a massage and turns her on and they then have sex is a much more believable fantasy. But this theme, of a doctor examining a girl and turning her on, is done in a completely amateur way.
Instead of adding videos to this site, it would be more valuable if they updated the Tricky Masseur or the Squirting Virgin sites. The models they feature at those sites are more attractive. And the plot is more believable. And the models put more passion into their sex.
You have about 14 models at this site, but they are not up to the average attractiveness of the Royal Cash network. The network has a lot of
attractive models, some of which are really good looking. But the models at this site are, so far, just OK looking.
A lot of the models have a backpack. This is supposed to demonstrate the girls are teenagers, in school.
But the girls look like they actually are teens, anyway, and the backpack as a prop is unconvincing. Maybe they could suck on a lollipop, or wear multicolored stockings, which are the normal porn props to show the models
are young.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. That's because you get this site with access to much better sites in the Royal Cash network. But if this was a standalone site, I would give it a score in the 50s.
One last point. If you join this site directly, you pay $29.95/month. Join through Teen Mega World and you pay $19.95/month.
I don't know if access to Dirty Doctor is included with a Teen Mega World membership. But Teen Mega World gives you access to a number of hardcore teen sites: The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models. And a very low price for all that content.
I'm curious. You say your connection maxed out at 11-12 megabytes per second. Is that 11-12 MB/sec? Or is it more like 1.5 MB/sec (because of the conversion factor of bits to bytes)?
My max download speed is about 1.3 MB/sec.
How much are you paying for a connection that fast? (If you don't think that's too personal.) I have a connection through AT&T, and that usually runs around $45/month. I shudder to think what a faster connection would cost. Especially one that was maybe 9 times faster than mine.
A fine, professional review.
I'm putting this network on my list of sites to join.
I was put off by the stupid-sounding network name, but your review has sold me.
LOL.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$9.95/month PU discount.
-Update rate: 1 photoset per day Monday through Friday.
-Ccbill is payment processor. A trusted name.
-There was no pre-checked cross-sell on sign-up page, when I joined.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Large collection of attractive girls, in simple settings.
-Zip file downloads with a file name that shows:
Site name - Date posted - Photoset title - Model name - Photographer name - file definition.
Cons:
Cons are basically minor. But slightly annoying.
-I keep getting logged out of the site. I get a page telling me "Access the full set of 60 photos by joining today!"
I am already a member. How many times do I have to join--before they remember that I already paid?
I have cookies enabled. I don't have this problem with MetArt, The Life Erotic, or Erotic Beauty.
-Once Domai became of part of MetArt, they added a text file to the zip download, that shows the models physical statistics:
Age when shot: Eye color: Hair color: Height: Weight:
But there is no personal history for the model. Which might make a connection in the audience mind to the model. Her hobbies, profession, likes and dislikes, etc.
Note: The zip files of model galleries posted before Domai became part of MetArt, and for a short while after, the text file only includes the name of the model, with no other information.
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-Navigation is basic. It could be improved a lot.
Bottom Line:
I did a review of Domai for PU on 2008-11-17. So it's been almost 8 years since my first review of this site.
Has anything changed for the site since then?
I've gotten 8 years older.
(Joke)
Domai was started by Eolake Stobblehouse in 1997. It was one of the first softcore sites. It contained nude pictures of attractive women, with stories and articles about nudity, beauty, and culture. It promoted the simple enjoyment of life's pleasures, and the enjoyment of nude photography of women.
Stobblehouse became ill, and he sold Domai (and Goddess Nudes) to the MetArt network in 2014. He stated that he could not continue to run the sites because of his illness, but that he believed MetArt would continue to operate the sites in the same manner and style he had done.
Basically, that has been the case.
The membership price has gone up over the years, and MetArt dropped the membership loyalty discounts that Stobblehouse offered. But that is to be expected.
The monthly membership price for Domain is $9.99/month (recurring).
Domai offers a simple, natural approach to female nudity. It is softcore. Mainly solo female sets, but there are some sets of two girls together. But the two girls are not engaged in any sexual activity. And the solo sets are strictly softcore.
No female masturbation or explicit poses. The models are photographed in a wide variety of settings: in a house, at the beach or lake, in a park or woods, in an artist's studio.
The style of the photos is very simple, very natural. The models are not heavily made up, they are not glamorized. They don't wear exotic costumes.
The models are attractive to very attractive young women, in their late teens or early twenties. Mostly white. Mostly natural. I haven't found a single model who has an obvious boob job. Most of the models are tattoo-free. Not a lot of
piercing.
So the models would fit the girl-next-door description, except they are uniformly attractive to extremely attractive.
A better description of the site models would be the prettiest girls in high school or college.
Except they are nude.
And I haven't visited any nude high schools or colleges that I can recall.
(Another joke)
Domai has a cam site, domaicams, that is basically the same type of cam site offered by many porn sites.
You can watch the free cam portions, where the girls basically do nothing of interest, or you can pay for the private shows. The private shows can be expensive. Even the "free" part of the shows encourage tipping the models.
I haven't bothered to join any of the private shows. From what I've read, it can be cheaper to go to a live strip club or nudie bar and watch live girls, instead paying for cam shows. Cam shows are not a habit I want to support, because it can get expensive in a short time.
Years ago, MetArt had cam shows, that were basically free. You could tip the models, but the shows were like 30 minutes or an hour, and the girls were friendly, and attractive, there might be nudity or not, but it was far different from today's cam shows that are designed to get as much money from the viewers as possible.
The MetArt shows from years ago were designed to offer a free experience of the MetArt girls on cam. It was a simpler, less greedy mind-set that seems quaint. You could also pay for a private show in the old MetArt cam, but I never did.
The public cam shows were popular, and watched by a large number of MetArt members per session.
The photo sets are exclusive to this site. I've only seen 1 Domai photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site. Alinda had 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels under the name of Alina. But that photo set is no longer posted at Domai. Although it's still posted at Amour Angels.
-Navigation is based on the structure that Eolake Stobblehouse had for many years. If they re-
designed the site to follow the Met-Art.com structure, the site navigation would be simpler and faster, and the search engine would be improved.
-Each photo set has multiple choice for download: low and medium until May 2013.
Starting in May 2013, low, medium and high definition for download.
-The file size for download is small. Two factors control this:
1. The number of photos in a set is small. Usually 60 photos or less, many being 20-50+ pictures.
2. The encoding is good.
For a price of $10 for a month, you can enjoy a large selection of naked girls in natural settings. The girls are not glamorized, but they are attractive. If you have extensive experience in softcore porn, you will recognize many of the
models. If you are in the mood for extremely softcore photos of beautiful women, Domai is worth trying.
Giving the site a score of 85.
There are a large number of attractive models (994).
There are a large number of contributing, professional photographers to the site (133).
The photography, although simple and natural, is professional.
Email offer to join Domai and GoddessNudes for $9.96.
Check your in box or spam box for discount membership offer from Domai and GodessNudes.
Got an email offer to join Domai and GoddessNudes for 4.98 each for 1 month.
Each site will renew automatically at $9.99/month.
Have to sign up for both sites for total of $9.96, can't choose just one site for $$4.98.
I'm in a nit-picky mood, so feel free to ignore this.
But I don't think this is an artsy site. I think it's more like a simple, natural site, very low-key photos. A lot of lovely models, and models that are less lovely but still nice. A lot of simple photos of women that can be lovely or pretty or just nice-looking. Not artsy or glamour-style photography, more like a "natural" style photography.
You can search for all photo sets of a model in an easier and simpler way than searching by updates for each individual year.
There is an Alphabetical Model list.
If you find a model that you like, and want to see what photo sets she has on Domai:
1. Go to the Alphabetical Model list.
2. Select the first letter of the model's name.
3. Scroll down to where the model's name is listed.
This will show the model's name, with hot links to each photo set she has on Domai.
There is a thumbnail of each model above the model's name, to help you identify the model.
(I didn't know whether to put this in a "reply" to this PU review, or to make this a separate comment, where it would be more easily visible, and thus more useful to PU members who do not know about the Domai Alphabetical Model list.)
Trying to look through a complete listing of each year's updates, to find the photo sets for a particular model, takes a lot of time and effort.
The Alphabetical Model list is really helpful, in searching for a model's photo sets.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Emphasizes simple, natural look for models. Models can be in a variety of environments (in a field, at the beach, in a house, wherever), but they are trying to appear normal girls, not artsy,
glamorous or exotic
-Small sized sets of many different models. Most photosets range from 20-50+ pictures
-Wide selection of photographers that contribute to this site
-Easy entrance to site for members
-Navigation fairly simple and direct
-Choice of 2 file sizes for most photosets to view or download
-Zip file downloading for photosets
-No download limits
-Has an index of contributing photographers. Under each photographer's name is listed the photosets he shot (with hotlinks to each photoset)
-Exclusive content. You will see many of the site models at other sites, but I've only seen 1 Domai
photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site.
Alinda has 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels as model Alina, photoset named
Cons:
Pros (continued): "Wonderful Time". Amour Angels has at least 3 models named Alina: The Alina I'm writing about is the blonde, slender girl with small breasts, waist-length hair, and a pretty face.
(Links to free low-res sample pictures of the model were removed due to pornusers guidelines.)
The girl is much more attractive at the higher resolution pictures at Domai and Amour Angels.
(If anyone has seen other photosets of this model, please let me know where, in a reply. I obviously like her.)
Cons:
-Photosets only. No videos. No live cams.
-Strictly single-model photosets. Softcore nudity. No boy-girl, girl-girl action.(They have a few
photosets where there are two girls together, but the girls are sitting/standing/lying together, not interacting sexually).
-The bonus features they offer are worthless: a newsletter, a few short stories.
Bottom Line:
Cons(continued):
-offers small number of short fictional stories by the site founder; useful to put yourself to sleep as an alternative to staring at your navel (as I get older, I find myself getting to be more snippety). Seriously, I find much more humor and enjoyment reading some of the reviews at pornusers
than reading the simple, love life-fellow-man-fellow-woman short stories of the site founder.
-Site newsletter is same style: love life and enjoy nudity and love your fellow man
-Site advertises 36,200 photos. You would think the site would have many more photos than that. The photosets are usually around 20-50+ pictures, and they average around 6 new sets a week recently. That would indicate well over 86,000 pictures because they've been around
since 1997. So why so few pictures listed?
-No bio data on the models
-No posting date listed on the photosets. You can find when the photoset was posted, but that takes
a little work: Have to search each yearly archive for the model's name, to see when that photoset was posted.
-Models are white European girls. Very few girls of other races.
Bottom line:
-On a cost-conscious basis, join for a trial or a 1 month membership, download all the files you want, then rejoin once a year for one month to update any new files.
-Or not rejoin, if you don't appreciate the photosets available at Domai.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
