| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2601
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
wintersking's Review
If you don't get the problem resolved to your satisfaction, email yujin@thebestporn.com .
He's on the staff at the Porn Users site, and they have more weight in getting problems solved, and they are usually willing to help.
You should either get your membership re-activated for whatever term you signed up for, or get a refund. Whatever.
|
11-22-18 01:01am
|
Reply
2602
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
I'm a fan of Blacked and Tushy sites.
Think they are excellent.
As soon as Vixen grows some more, I will be a fan of Vixen as well.
Quality product, with lovely models.
|
10-20-16 06:43am
|
Reply
2603
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks, Pat.
It makes a difference, on expectations, in valuing a site.
I agree that the site is worth $10 currently, but I will probably wait a few months, for the site to grow, before I join.
Or maybe I will join before then, because the models and videos are very high quality.
I think Tushy and Blacked are excellent sites, as well.
|
08-21-16 08:37pm
|
Comment
2604
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
|
08-20-16 02:14am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2605
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
This is a minor point that is probably too minor for most people to pay any attention to; but, in the "preview" amateur free gallery, there are 6 photos of a cute blonde girl. I saw one of the photos years ago, never saw a full set.
Cute girl, stuck in my memory.
My quibble is that the photoset (of 6 photos) is dated 05 Nov 2009.
I wish the sites would be more clear or accurate about these dates. 05 Nov 2009 is probably when the 6 photos were posted on the site. But the photos themselves were taken years ago, because, like I say, I saw one of the photos of that set (partial set?) years ago, and have seen that same photo many times since.
I'm also a little disappointed that the quality of the photos isn't higher (better definition or resolution). I wonder if maybe the site is deliberately offering a lower-resolution picture to add to the "amateur" or "reality" effect.
These are just quibbles on my part. Easily ignored.
|
01-03-10 03:45pm
|
Reply
2606
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Onyx's Review
Excellent review.
Strong overview, lots of fine details.
I don't have VR, so wouldn't join this site.
But the review was worth reading, for general knowledge.
And the review just looks elegant (strange word, for a review, but I think it applies).
|
01-11-18 07:12pm
|
Reply
2607
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
ANDREW ROBINSON PLAYED THE SCORPIO KILLER IN THE FIRST DIRTY HARRY MOVIE (CLINT EASTWOOD AS DIRTY HARRY).
HE RECEIVED DEATH THREATS AFTER THE MOVIE CAME OUT.
I GUESS SOME FANS CAN BE CRAZY. IN REAL LIFE.
BUT ROBINSON PLAYED EVIL PUNKS REALLY WELL.
|
09-21-17 01:26pm
|
Reply
2608
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
IRINA ANN (FRESHBLONDE) WAS ADORABLE.
BUT HER PORN CAREER SEEMED VERY BRIEF.
MAYBE IT'S BETTER THAT WAY.
A PORN CAREER CAN BE DAMAGING.
YOU NEED TEFLON CORE TO SURVIVE AND PROSPER.
|
09-19-17 04:10pm
|
Reply
2609
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks for responding so quickly to my question.
What Bosque emailed sounds reasonable.
As far as not accepting Visa for payment, probably a financial reason. Each credit card company can charge differently to business they are dealing with, and Bosque apparently feels Visa would charge his company too much for the transactions.
It's not simply a financial transaction from member to Bosque's site, but there might be currency translations as well, and that could get expensive.
(Just guessing.)
What really burns Bosque is they not only stole his membership money, they also demanded 2000 euros to install the billing service on his web site.
The gall of some of these thieves is amazing.
I read where some of these Internet scammers in Africa justify their thefts by saying they are only taking a small amount of money from people who can afford to lose it.
|
12-09-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
2610
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Drooler, your personal favorites at this one site include 17 different models.
How many porn favorites do you have?
I am guessing enough to fill a small telephone book. Lol.
|
12-09-08 12:09pm
|
Reply
2611
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Seems like your email quote was cut short.
Did you have any comment/opinion on the email?
I'm surprised there is not a lot more fraud in porn, because there is fraud in commerical businesses, and you would think that porn, with a lot of very small businesses, would have an even bigger problem. Can a small businessman in South America afford to sue someone in Germany or Spain? What would be his chances of collecting anything?
|
12-09-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
2612
|
Wankz VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
"Freakin huge file sizes(average is around 7-9 gb), some in excess of 19gb"
I'm not into VR.
Don't have the equipment for it.
But even if I did have the VR equipment, you would also need a fast net connection.
And loads of disk space to store the files.
So, a huge investment, that requires lots of money.
But the review is excellent, for pointing out details for VR fans and not-fans.
|
04-21-19 09:54am
|
Reply
2613
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Impressive review. As usual, but this one is really fine.
Great details, covering the entire site.
|
07-31-18 06:41am
|
Reply
2614
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Zoltan's Review
Nice review. Nice selection of models. European teens are some of the loveliest girls in the world.
|
03-13-13 10:04am
|
Reply
2615
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I had a little time on my hands, so I was re-reading some old reviews.
This review of yours is excellent. Gives lots of the site details and useful opinions. And is very readable.
|
01-18-13 08:55am
|
Reply
2616
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
It's been a very long time since I've been at this site. Wow, in the preview, it shows some really far-out "glamor" style photos that are what used to be far out, crazy modern art.
You take a good or great looking model, splash her with gobs of makeup and weird costumes to make her look like a freak, and you have photographs that could hang in a museum. But not one that I would want to visit.
Thanks for the heads up. You've saved me a membership fee that I would have truly regretted.
At the same time, they do have a number of truly attractive young models (late teen, early 20s), and they are putting out traditional "glamor" style, met-art style, photosets.
So I hope you will get some value from your membership, by browsing what are the more traditional offerings at this site.
|
08-28-11 07:30pm
|
Reply
2617
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I agree with tangub. How many of us are going to give a Christmas gift of a subscription to a porn site to one of our friends? Even as a joke. If you're in college, you might be able to get away with it, because you're still supposed to be "young and wild and carefree". But anyone older than early twenties would be shooting themselves in the foot by giving a subscription to a porn site as a gift, unless they knew the friend was into porn and would accept the gift willingly.
Actually, I could easily imagine lawsuits arising from this gift. It's very easy to sue in the U.S. (and elsewhere). And I could easily imagine people suing because they don't consider the "free membership" a joke or acceptable behavior.
|
11-12-10 11:21am
|
Reply
2618
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They still only have 19 videos at this site today, so no new videos added in the last 3 weeks. Maybe they will add updates sometime in the future, or just add recycled videos from their other sites.
But the network has a lot of really attractive models.
|
03-18-12 03:49pm
|
Comment
2619
|
Wave Hos
(0)
|
|
05-28-11 11:58am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2620
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Comment
Computers can be mysterious beasts.
For me, anyway.
Can you use a different computer with the same internet connection, to see if the erratic download speeds are repeated?
If you get better results from a different computer, using the same internet connection, that would seem to point to some software/hardware blockage in the computer you normally use.
Just a suggestion.
|
05-30-19 12:49am
|
Reply
2621
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
If you're an expert with Photo Shop, maybe you can transfer some of the hair on the model's head to where you would rather see it: armpits, legs, crotch, buttocks.
I thought you grew up after the hairy phase of the 1970s and maybe the 1980s had passed.
So it must be an esthetic choice that you prefer the ultra-heavy hair from that period, rather than nostalgia.
I admit that I often grow tired of the bald-faced pussy, because I was in my prime when women still had pubic hair.
But maybe the fashion will turn once more, while I'm still alive to enjoy it.
Some of my favorite models were from the pages of Playboy and Penthouse from the 1970s. They were not only gorgeous, but the pubic hair gave them an element of mystery and eroticism that the bald-faced look does not have.
|
09-15-18 04:28am
|
Reply
2622
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Review
Nice to see you submitting another review.
This is an excellent review.
The major con for this site is the high price.
If you are into hairy models, the MetArt network offers a LoveHairy.com site.
This is mainly hairy sets that were previously posted on one of the other MetArt sites.
I doubt that you have subscribed to most of the MetArt network sites recently.
So almost all of the content at Love Hairy should be new for you.
The update rate is irregular, not daily. More like once a week.
The main attraction of Love Hairy is the low price:
$7.99 monthly recurring.
But you can cancel the first month, if you don't want the sub to continue.
Or $60/year, if you are willing to pay for a long term sub.
Either way, this is a very low-priced site with excellent content:
Quality, high grade photography, lovely models, excellent customer support.
I did a PU review of the site on 09-24-17, that might give a few more details, if the site interests you.
The preview pages are a good way to see the quality of the models, and to give you an idea of the type of photography the site offers. This is a softcore glamour photo site. Although they do have a few videos, it's mainly photo sets.
|
09-15-18 03:41am
|
Reply
2623
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
messmer, if you are into lingerie, there is a site that might interest you.
Art-Lingerie
The models are teen/early 20s. Many of them very attractive/pretty.
I'm not a member, but I have seen a couple of photosets from the site.
The photos are not as good as what you get at met-art or mplstudios.
The poses are very similar/repetitive.
You get a series of photos of a girl who is almost entirely naked except for wearing nylons (and maybe a tiny brief/panties).
The monthly price is not bad: $19.95/month.
You don't get strip-tease or any kind of tease. Just a bunch of photos of a single girl who is wearing nylons.
If nylons (and a garter belt) are your thing, the site might have limited value.
But I thought the quality of the photos was slightly less than what you get at met-art and mplstudios.
And there is too much similarity in the poses. Which is boring.
Only if you really like nylons (and good-looking young women) would you like this site.
But I am glad you found a site you thoroughly enjoy, even if you could not give it the magic score of 100. :)
|
12-05-10 10:15pm
|
Reply
2624
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Considering how new this site is, the site has a large amount of content. And the update rate is extremely strong.
Besides, video fans are a breed apart. Photo fans are the ones who are constantly thinking. :)
|
03-27-10 10:13am
|
Reply
2625
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil's Reply
God bless, I've never seen the quick responses from any Webmaster to a PU member like this. This Webmaster seems really on the ball. I just wish the rest of the Webmasters were 1/4 as responsive as this one.
|
03-20-10 11:24am
|
