As I wrote in my review, I think Web Young is a good site.
But the owners/manager of the Adult Time network need to make it clear on their individual websites whether you are getting the Adult Time network for free with a membership.
Because I would feel cheated, or at least disappointed, if I joined one of their network sites, and did not get free access to the Adult Time network.
But I'm glad you got Adult Time for free with your Web Young membership.
There is a huge amount of sites and content to explore with Adult Time.
And you should be able to find a lot of content that you enjoy, if you take the time to explore what is available.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The most important fact about the site is that it was folded into the Adult Time network.
So if you join Web Young, you should get the Adult Time network for free.
-PU discount $14.95 for the first month.
-Nice-sized content: 413 videos, with matching photosets.
-Photosets have a zip file for downloading.
-Photosets have over 100 photos per set.
-The photos are possibly screen caps, but very good quality.
-Photo dimensions are 1280 x 1920 pixels.
-Nice sets and settings. Sometimes outdoor scenes that are well-photographed that add an element of difference to the regular indoor-shoot. Shooting outdoors can cause problems with the lighting or sound control, but these are professional videos, that handle the technical elements very well.
-Models are young and clean, with very few tats.
Cons:
-The biggest con would be if you joined Web Young, and did not automatically get Adult Time included. You should learn, before joining Web Young (or any of the Adult Time satellite channels/sites), if you are getting Adult Time access as a free add-on.
Many of the sites (including Web Young) do not make it clear on the public site page if Adult Time is included.
Adult Time is one of the best bargains in internet porn, because of the massive amount of high quality content (over 51,000 hardcore videos, over 141 channels/sites).
But they need to make it clear, before you join one of their included sites, whether you get full access to the Adult Time network, as a free add-on. Or whether you have to pay an additional fee for Adult Time access.
-Photosets download with generic filename, that has to be manually re-named to include model-set_title-date_posted_site_name.
Generic filename is 35718.zip or 33018.zip or similar.
-Background music is often annoying.
CONS CONTINUE IN SECTION BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Watching the creamy smooth skin of some of these attractive lesbos, you want to cover them with kisses, or, if more energetically inclined, jump on top of them and show them what a man can do. Only in your dreams, of course.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Web Young is a lesbian site.
-Most of the models are slender, white, attractive teens with great bodies. Softcore solo masturbation or two girls masturbating or having sex with each other.
The videos are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good colors, good focus and clarity.
And since the girls are mainly young and attractive, you want to not just watch the scene, but be there as part of the action. So it's a tease for a male to watch these horny young lovelies getting their rocks off.
Web Young is a good lesbian site: a large number of attractive models, good professional videos and photosets.
But the main advantage to the site would be the Adult Time access.
Adult Time is like a goldmine of high quality porn: with over 51,000 high quality hardcore videos, thousands of photosets, thousands of porn stars, many of them attractive to lovely.
The Adult Time network, and any site included in the network, needs to make it clear if Adult Time network access is included as a free add-on in the membership of each of their sites.
If the site membership automatically gives you access to the Adult Time network, the value of the membership would score 95, ranking it as one of the outstanding bargains for your porn dollars.
If the site does not automatically give you access to the Adult Time network, and you have to pay an extra fee for Adult Time, then you are basically getting screwed, whether you realize it or not: because the Adult Time network is the gold mine, and if you are only getting access to a single one of its member sites, you are wasting your porn dollars on an inferior product.
It's that simple.
And the people running Adult Time should wake up and make it crystal clear what the policy is:
Do you automatically get Adult Time access with a membership in any one of the Adult Time sites?
Or not?
I'm giving Web Young a score of 95. That is assuming you get Adult Time access as a free add-on. If you don't get Adult Time as a free add-on, the score would drop significantly, because Adult Time is the main value, although Web Young is a fine site.
But since they started the Adult Time network, offering access to such a huge amount of quality hardcore porn across a wide variety of networks and individual sites, I believe the porn world has changed dramatically: For a very low price, you get access to a huge backlog of quality hardcore porn.
I suggest waiting for a holiday special discount before joining, because these holiday discounts save you a lot of money, and seem to be offered frequently.
But even without the holiday special, Adult Time is still worth joining at the regular price, because it's still a great bargain.
An Irish Budda? The hat is for St. Patrick?
Your avatar has really changed over the years.
Somewhat frightening at first, but now almost friendly.
I'm hoping that reflects the change in your inner life. Lol.
I HAVE A DIFFERENT MEMBERSHIP TO ADULT TIME (THROUGH MY 21 SEXTURY MEMBERSHIP), WHICH OPENS TO A PAGE THAT SAYS I HAVE ACCESS TO 142 ADULT TIME CHANNELS FOR FREE.
BOTTOM LINE:
THE ADULT TIME NETWORK IS ONE OF THE CROWN JEWELS OF HARDCORE NETWORKS.
IT HAS OVER 100 SITES, MOST OF WHICH ARE PREMIUM SITES THAT REQUIRED A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIP TO ACCESS, UNLESS YOU JOINED THE SMALLER NETWORK THAT THEY BELONGED TO.
BASICALLY, IF YOU CAN GET A FREE ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP INCLUDED IN YOUR MEMBERSHIP TO ONE OF ITS SATELLITE SITES, THE VALUE OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP INCREASES DRAMATICALLY. BECAUSE THE ADULT TIME NETWORK HAS A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF HIGH QUALITY HARDCORE PORN.
IF I GRADED WHITE GHETTO AS A STAND-ALONE SITE, I WOULD GIVE IT A SCORE IN THE 50S.
HOWEVER, ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK INCREASES THE SCORE TO THE LOW 80S.
AND WHEN YOU ADD IN ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK, THE SCORE RISES TO THE 90S.
BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE AMOUNT OF HIGH QUALITY PORN.
BECAUSE OF THE NUMBER OF QUALITY PORN STARS.
BECAUSE ADULT TIME IS THAT GOOD. AND THE PRICE, DEPENDING ON WHEN YOU SIGN UP, CAN BE RIDICULOUSLY LOW. HOLIDAYS ARE THE BEST TIME TO LOOK FOR SPECIAL DISCOUNTS.
WHEREAS THE ALLISON LANE VIDEO, THE GIRL SEEMED LIKE SHE WAS BEING AROUSED BY THE PUSSY EATING, AND THEN REALLY ENJOYED THE FUCKING.
PORN IS FANTASY, BUT THIS VIDEO IS BORING.
Ethnic Gang Bang #05 - Part 01. POSTED 12-25-2018.
Description
Linet Slag knows a lot of guys and has fucked almost all of them. Each Friday fifty two times a year she has a fuck party at her house. She makes a large dinner of beautiful food for all of them and makes sure they all feel fit and happy before she asks them all to take off their clothes and one by one she sucks each of their dicks. Then she lets each of them fuck her one at a time. That's right about when the fucking party gets started as she orders all of them to gang bang her for the next couple of hours and there is only one rule. There are no rules! JUST FUCKING GANG BANG HER GOOD!
Categories
Interracial Hardcore Petite Natural tits Big Tits Anal Double Penetration Deepthroat Gonzo Blowjob Big Dick Ass to mouth Pussy to mouth College Brunette Open Mouth Facial Ass Gangbang Cumshot Black
ANOTHER WORD DESCRIPTION OF A VIDEO WHERE THE WRITE PROBABLY DIDN'T WATCH THE VIDEO, BUT WAS FREE TO MAKE UP A BACK STORY ABOUT A GANG BANG WHERE A WOMAN IS FUCKED BY 5 MEN. THE VIDEO WAS PROFESSIONALLY SHOT (GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD CAMERA WORK, SIMPLE, DECENT SET (A COUCH IN A LARGE ROOM). BUT THE VIDEO IS STRICTLY FOR GANG BANG FANS: NOTHING CREATIVE OR EXCITING OR INTERESTING HAPPENS, OTHER THAN THE WOMAN GETTING ALL HER HOLES FILLED BY 5 DIFFERENT GUYS.
NOTE THAT I SAID 5 GUYS, NOT 52 GUYS LIKE IN THE DESCRIPTION. ALSO, IN THE DESCRIPTION, THE GIRL FEEDS THE GUYS WITH A MEAL SHE CREATES. THAT IS MISSING IN THE VIDEO.
IN THE VIDEO, THE GIRL IS NAKED ON THE COUCH, 5 NAKED GUYS APPEAR (THEY DON'T UNDRESS), AND SHE STARTS LICKING THEIR COCKS BEFORE THEY START TO FUCK HER.
THE VIDEO IS MUCH SIMPLER ACTION THAN THE WORDS DESCRIBE. I DOUBT THE BLURB WRITER ACTUALLY SAW THE VIDEO HE WAS WRITING ABOUT.
ALL THREE WOMEN IN THE VIDOES ABOVE WERE OK LOOKING, WHICH IS A BIG IMPROVEMENT OVER THE MODELS FEATURED IN OLDER VIDEOS, WHO LOOKED LIKE LOW-GRADE SLUTS.
MAYBE THE SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY GOING FOR LOW-RENT SLUTS DOING LOW-RENT PORN.
THE CURRENT LOOKS SEEMS TO BE AVERAGE-LOOKING GIRLS DOING PORN.
EXCEPT THE SETS ARE CHEAP, AND THE VIDEOGRAPHY, WHILE PROFESSIONAL, SEEMS BARE-BONES: THEY ARE NOT SPENDING A LOT OF MONEY MAKING THESE VIDEOS.
AT THE WHITE GHETTO SITE, I SEE TEXT THAT STATES YOU GET ACCESS TO 69+ ADULT TIME CHANNELS FOR FREE. HOWEVER, WHEN YOU ENTER THE ADULT TIME AREA FROM A LOGIN TO WHITE GHETTO, YOU ACTUALLY GET ACCESS TO 142 ADULT TIME CHANNELS.
AT LEAST, THAT IS MY EXPERIENCE. IT'S POSSIBLE THAT A PERSON'S ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK COULD BE DIFFERENT MY FROM MEMBERSHIP, BECAUSE THE TEXT DOES STATE THAT YOU WILL HAVE ACCESS TO 69+ ADULT TIME CHANNELS.
CONTINUED:
IT'S POSSIBLE THAT ANOTHER PERSON WHO SIGNS UP TO WHITE GHETTO OR SOME OTHER SITE IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK WILL GET ACCESS TO A DIFFERENT NUMBER OF SITES.
ALTHOUGH ADULT TIME ANNOUNCED THAT IT ENDED BETA TESTING AROUND JANUARY 15, 2019, IT SEEMS THAT THEY COULD BE MAKING CHANGES AS THEY GO ALONG: ONE PU MEMBER POSTED A REVIEW OF 21 SEXTURY WHERE HE STATED HE WAS PROMISED (BY THE ADVERTISEMENT AT THE 21 SEXTURY SITE) ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK, BUT WAS NOT GIVEN ACCESS.
I ALSO READ A COMMENT FROM ANOTHER PU MEMBER THAT HE WAS ABLE TO ENTER SOME PORN SITE THROUGH HIS ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP, WHILE ANOTHER PU MEMBER STATED HE WAS NOT ABLE TO ENTER THAT SITE, EVEN THOUGH HE WAS A MEMBER OF THE ADULT TIME NETWORK.
GETTING BACK TO THE WHITE GHETTO SITE, WHICH IS ONE OF THE POOREST SITES IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK, IN TERMS OF QUALITY OF PORN:
THE SITE GIVES A DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION THAT'S SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE FOR EACH VIDEO.
HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT MANY TIMES, THE GUY WRITING THE BLURB (THE SUMMARY FOR THE VIDEO) DID NOT BOTHER WATCHING THE VIDEO HE WROTE ABOUT:
EXAMPLE: My Daughters Fucking A Black Man #10. POSTED 02-19-2019.
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Allison Lane was a sweet young slut, who loved big cock. She lived in an area where there were not many black guys. When she ran into the local black up and coming street hood, she fell in love! She would text him, and hope one day to get a chance to make love to a black guy. Well within a few days, her dream came true! But Ethan Hunt did not make love to her, he fucked her ghetto style and she loved it, and came over and over again!!!!
THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION IS WELL-WRITTEN, BUT THE WRITER PROBABLY DIDN'T BOTHER WATCHING THE VIDEO: THE SEX IS NOT HARSH, CRUEL, OR GHETTO-STYLE. IT'S JUST A BLACK GUY EATING THE GIRL'S PUSSY TO GET HER AROUSED, THEN FUCKING HER UNTIL SHE COMES. NO HARSH SEX, NO CRUELTY, NO DEGRADATION OF THE GIRL. JUST TWO YOUNG PEOPLE HAVING A NICE, STRONG FUCK THAT SATISFIES BOTH.
Black Kong Dong #30. POSTED 02-05-2019.
SITE DESCRIPTION:
It seems some girls just can't get enough dick. They go from one guy to the next. Brittany Angel is one of those girls. She craves cock and now is in search of some new BLACK MEAT. She showed Julius Ceazher that she knew how to handle sweet black meat. She showed him tricks he had never seen and worked his cock like a true champ. He could almost not handle her tight pussy, it took everything he had not to cum too fast. When he did pop she loved it and wanted more, what a hottie Brittany is!!!!!
ANOTHER WORD DESCRIPTION THAT SOUNDS BETTER THAN WHAT THE VIDEO PRESENTS.
TRUE, IT'S A BLACK MAN AND A WHITE WOMAN.
THE WHITE WOMAN SUCKS AND LICKS THE GUY'S PENIS AND BALLS, THEY FUCK. THE SEX IS LESS HOT THAN THE VIDEO "My Daughters Fucking A Black Man #10". MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE THE WOMAN IN THIS VIDEO IS ACTING LIKE A PROFESSIONAL WHORE WHO IS DOING HER JOB.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: PARDON THE CAPS. THEY ARE EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND EDIT.
-IF YOUR CRAVINGS INCLUDE TRANNY OR GRANNY OR KINK, THIS SITE WILL GIVE YOU LOW-RENT VERSIONS TO FILL THE NEED. BY LOW-RENT, I MEAN THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, BUT THE SETS ARE CHEAP, THE MODELS ARE NOT VERY ATTRACTIVE.
-WHITE GHETTO IS NOW INCLUDED IN THE ADULT TIME NETWORK. YOU SHOULD GET ACCESS TO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN WHITE GHETTO.
-PU OFFERS A DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $14.95/MONTH TO WHITE GHETTO.
-ONE NICE FEATURE ABOUT THE ADULT TIME NETWORK: WHEN YOU DO A MODEL SEARCH, IT BRINGS UP THE MODEL'S CONTENT AT THE ENTIRE NETWORK, INSTEAD OF JUST THE SITE YOU ARE CURRENTLY LOGGED IN TO. WHICH MAKES SEARCHING FAST AND EASY.
Cons:
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. STANDARD FOR PORN SITES.
-NAVIGATION IS POOR. YOU CAN PUT "TRANNY" IN THE SEARCH BOX, AND FIND PAGES OF TRANNY VIDEOS LISTED BY THUMBNAIL, BUT TO FIND SPECIFIC VIDEOS, YOU EITHER NEED TO KNOW THE PORN STARS OR THE TITLE OF THE VIDEO. A BETTER APPROACH WOULD BE TO JUST BROWSE THE HOT LINKS TO FIND IF ANY OF THE VIDEOS MIGHT HOLD YOUR INTER
-MANY OF THE TRANNY VIDEOS HAVE THE WATERMARK "DEVILS FILMS". SOME HAVE THE WATERMARK WHITE GHETTO. PROBABLY A LOT OF THE TRANNY VIDEOS WERE MADE FOR DEVILS FILM, AND THROWN INTO THE WHITE GHETTO SITE.
-YOU GET A PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO. BUT THE PHOTOS ARE LOW-QUALITY SCREENCAPS THAT ARE NOT WORTH SAVING.
Bottom Line:
WHITE GHETTO IS A LOW-RENT SITE: THE VIDEOS, ALTHOUGH PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, ARE LOW-RENT VIDEOS: THE SETS ARE CHEAP, THE MODELS ARE MAINLY UNATTRACTIVE.
THE SITE COVERS 3 MAIN NICHES:
TRANNY: SEX WITH SHEMALES.
GRANNY: SEX WITH OLDER WOMEN (NOT MILFS, BUT WOMEN OLDER ENOUGH TO BE YOUR GRANDMOTHER).
KINK: KINKY SEX, WHICH COULD BE INTERRACIAL, INDIAN (FROM INDIA, BUT THE PERFORMERS ARE NOT REALLY FROM INDIA), INCEST, ETC
RECENT UPDATES TO THE SITE SHOW IMPROVED QUALITY.
SITE STATS:
VIDEOS: 793
DVDS: 269
PICTURES: 411
PORN STARS: 286
NOT ONLY DID YOU GET FULL ACCESS TO THOSE 5 MAIN SITES, YOU ALSO GOT ACCESS TO OVER 20 OTHER SITES THAT COVER A VARIETY OF NICHES.
HOWEVER, NOW THAT WHITE GHETTO (AND THE REST OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK) HAS BEEN FOLDED INTO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK, YOUR ACCESS TO PORN HAS MULTIPLIED ENORMOUSLY.
THE ADULT TIME NETWORK HAS 142+ CHANNELS (SITES ARE CALLED CHANNELS).
THE ADULT TIME NETWORK HAS OVER 50,000 VIDEOS, WHICH IS A HUGE AMOUNT OF HARDCORE PORN.
THE ADULT TIME NETWORK HAS 5+ UPDATES EACH DAY.
THE MAIN NETWORKS THAT WERE MERGED INTO THE ADULT TIME NETWORK INCLUDE:
21 NETWORKS: 21 SEXTREME NETWORK
21 SEXTURY NETWORK 21 NATURALS NETWORK 21 FOOT ART
21 EROTIC CANAL
THE VERY BEST OF 21 SEXTURY
PLUS OTHER, SMALL SITES THAT COVER DIFFERENT PORN NICHES.
NOTE: IT APPEARS THE OWNERS/OPERATORS OF THE ADULT TIME NETWORK HAVE A FEW KINKS TO WORK OUT IN RUNNING THE NETWORK.
THERE IS A PAGE OFFERING DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIPS TO PORN SITES.
ONE DISCOUNTED MEMBERSHIP IS FOR BURNING ANGEL.
HOWEVER, IF YOU CHECK THE SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THROUGH YOUR ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP, YOU WILL PROBABLY SEE THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE ACCESS TO BURNING ANGEL.
SO IF YOU PAY FOR A SEPARATE MEMBERSHIP TO BURNING ANGEL, YOU WILL PROBABLY KICK YOURSELF IN THE HEAD ONCE YOU REALIZE THAT YOU PAID TWICE TO ACCESS THE BURNING ANGEL SITE.
IN THE WHITE GHETTO/DEVILS FILM SECTION OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP PAGE, IT STATES YOU WILL HAVE AN ADULT TIME MEMBERSHIP WITH ACCESS TO 69+ PORN CHANNELS FOR FREE.
HOWEVER, ONCE YOU ENTER THE ADULT TIME MEMBER PAGES, YOU WILL PROBABLY SEE THAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO 142 PORN CHANNELS.
I'M USING THE WORD PROBABLY, BECAUSE I AM RELATING WHAT MY MEMBERSHIP TO ADULT TIME SHOWS.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Separate from the site or network score (although related), I do try, when writing a site review, to mention some of the positive and negative aspects of the site I am reviewing.
In the case of White Ghetto, the major positive factor is that it is part of a nice network. I searched really hard to find something positive to say about the site. :)
On the negative side, other than I didn't like any of the models or the video clips or anything else about the site, I tried to say it in an intelligent way. But I'm afraid that it mainly came out as "I just don't like this site".
So I'm glad that I finished with my review of that site, and will hopefully focus more on sites that are easier for me to enjoy.
But the truth is that a site score has limited value. What is more important, on an individual basis, is whether the site caters to your personal tastes. My tastes are mainly softcore. I don't mind some hardcore, but I would like it to be good-looking or glamorous or nice. I don't like rough.
Site content (quality and quantity) and ease of use and price are the main factors in determining score, for me. My approach is different than the TBP approach, which does not consider price. But those are the factors which are important to me. Price does matter.
But I do try (and hope) that my reviews will have some usefulness or value to a PU member who might read the review, as an indicator of whether a site might be worth a membership or not. Based on individual tastes, of course. For a lot of PU members, my personal tastes are far too softcore.
I am not following the PU suggestion of rating an individual site that is part of a network as an individual site.
Instead, I am rating the overall network of sites.
I have reviewed several different sites in this netFameSolutions network, and I gave the same score to each site. Each site has a different individual value, but most of the value comes from the ability to access all the sites in the network, to access all the videos (and pictures, which are a minor part of this network).
I explained in each separate review in the BOTTOM LINE (summary) section the basis of my score: that I was not giving the site a score based on the value of the site itself, but on the network of the sites.
Perhaps I did not make that point clear enough.
You are entirely correct that, if I was thinking consistently, based on the negatives I reported about this individual site, my score would have been far lower than the 87 I gave the site--if I was rating the site on an individual basis. But I am not rating the site on an individual basis, but on a network basis.
I wrote at the end of this review: "I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value. As a stand-alone site, this site personally has zero value for me. But tastes vary. Some PU members might find it worthwhile to visit."
Technically, I am being too hard when I say the site has zero value, but I basically regard this site as a waste of time for me, personally.
But I wrote in this review, "I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value". What I meant was that the network of sites has a score of 87, even though this individual site has, for me, little or no value. Individual tastes vary, so maybe some people will enjoy at least some of the video clips.
Sorry to write such a long explanation to a simple remark, but I am trying to explain clearly what I meant when I said I was giving this site a "network score", instead of a score as an individual site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-no DRM
-no download limits
-search engine: can search by movie title, category, series, or model
-visual quality of the videos is ok to good
-advertises exclusive content
-updates each day with one video scene/clip
-White Ghetto niches:
--squirting
--curry (models are supposed to be Indians from India)
--transsex
The site also has videos of older men with young women, lesbians, heavy MILFs, heavy models, older women (I think of MILFs as women in their 30s or 40s, but this site has videos of women in their 50s+), etc.
Cons:
-Files download as WMV files only, no other format available
-Personal taste varies, but the models that are supposed to be from India, are not attractive. I've seen gorgeous Indian models, but these models are not good-looking.
-The same for the transsex models: they are mainly on the plain-to-less-than-plain side of looks.
-Actually, I looked at vid caps of every single model at the site, and I did not find a single model that I thought really attractive. The best that could be said for any of them is that some of them are OK looking.
-I did not download a single video clip from this site.
-That is my personal taste. Maybe other PU members might find some of the models attractive, or the action interesting or exciting or whatever.
Bottom Line:
White Ghetto is part of the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites. Access to any one site gives you access to all 19 sites. The PU/TBP special price is $14.95/month recurring, which is a nice discount from the $29.95/month recurring regular price. The network has some very nice sites, some sites that have less value, and some sites that have very little value.
"White Ghetto Films was built on one principle; give the fans what they want!" That is a nice idea, but what this site serves is not my cup of tea.
This site is built on non-glamor models, non-glamor sex. If you like a little kink in your sex (like squirting or transsexual) or favor plain-looking models or heavy models or older models, you might enjoy some of the videos at this site.
I'm giving this site a score of 87 for its network value. As a stand-alone site, this site personally has zero value for me. But tastes vary. Some PU members might find it worthwhile to visit.
"a couple of the movies I have downloaded have the most ridiculous watermark I have ever scene - a solid Wicked smack in the middle of the video."
I don't remember ever seeing that before: a large watermark in the middle of a video.
Those might be collector's items some day. I suggest downloading all you can, and storing them somewhere safe. And if the videos themselves are any good, you can always show them at the porn parties you put on for your friends.
I know that I have seen old porn novels from the 1970s and 1980s advertised on the Internet. Those novels originally sold for $2-$4 each. The current prices can range from $25-$50-$100 each for a single copy of those $2-$4 novels, depending on the condition of the novels (which are paperbacks).
That gives me hope for the re-sale value of our porn stashes. Except that we would have copyright issues that don't come into play when re-selling an old paperback that we own.
I've had many different credit cards declined at many different sites.
The reasons for the decline can differ.
If you really want to join the Woodman site, you can call each of your credit cards that were declined, and ask if the card charge was declined by the card company.
Many times, the decline, when applying for a porn site membership, is because the card company suspects fraud.
If the card charge was declined by the credit card company, you can tell them the charge was valid, and they will process the payment for membership.
The algorithm credit card companies use to decline charges is sometimes flawed.
I've had charges declined on one card that had a recurring charge to a payment processor, and I tried to use the card as payment for a new porn membership with the same payment processor, and those charges were declined (because of suspected fraud).
WHAT IS NICE IS THAT YOU GIVE A REVIEW OF A SITE THAT MANY PU MEMBERS KNOW, BUT THE REVIEW STILL SEEMS FRESH AND FILLED WITH WORTHWHILE OPINIONS.
I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY THAT SOME GIRLS IN PORN, AFTER A FEW YEARS, SEEM TO HAVE AGED A LOT. FOR ME IT'S NOT BITTERSWEET, JUST FUCKING SAD.
BUT YOU PUT IT IN MORE POETICAL TERMS.
I think the theory is that the watermark is supposed to be a sign of ownership. So the watermark is supposed to discourage piracy. As well as being a form of advertising.
But like I said, and I'm sure a lot of PU members will agree, there's no need for large watermarks. They are just ugly and distracting, and can actually hide part of what you want to see in a video or photo.
The logo "Woodman Casting X dot com" is very large and annoying, placed at the bottom of the video screen. I'm surprised more people don't complain about it. You don't need a very large watermark on the videos (or photos) to identify your company. A smaller, discrete logo will do just fine, or no logo at all.
Slutty, I thought your review was good, I was not trying to criticize it in any way. Please understand that. It's just that I thought you would be more enthusiastic or satisfied with the site when you gave it a score of 82. We seem to have similar tastes, because I have enjoyed many of the sites you have reviewed, and I thought your scores for those sites I knew about were close to what I would have scored them.
So I am not quibbling with your score. I just thought you didn't personally enjoy the site very much. But I was just trying to read more into your review than what you wrote.
But like you say, there are good and bad points to the site, and how much you enjoy it is a personal matter. Even though we are writing a review that is supposed to be a guide for others.
I keep flipping from one side to the other, which can be annoying. LOL. I keep saying the same thing in my own reviews, that "how much you enjoy a site depends on your personal reaction to the contents, and not just the contents themselves".
Nice review, but I get the impression that you scored the site higher than you actually enjoyed the site contents. Or maybe you are trying to become a professional reviewer and giving an "objective" score/rating instead of one based on what you feel. Or maybe I've read too many reviews lately, and need to take a break. :)
Informative review with nice details and personal opinions. He's not my idea of a nice guy, but is extremely persuasive in getting the girls to do what he wants.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of site contents.
-All 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) have a decent amount of content: both vodeos and accompanying photosets.
-The catalog of models is excellent: The girls are teens. They range in looks from attractive to exceptionally attractive. That is one of the main strengths of the site. The quality of the models.
-Most of the videos and photosets are shot professionally: good camera control, good lighting, good sound control.
-Many years ago the quality of the photo sets were like medium- or low-grade screen shots. But they upgraded the quality of the photo sets years ago, and while the photos are not MetArt quality, they are good quality. Except I wish the quality was even better, because most of the models are attractive to very attractive, and you want to see them close up and personal.
-Secure login and secure member pages. They use HTTPS.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Easy login. Many sites are now using captchas before you can enter the site. Wow Girls does not. With cookies enabled, login is simple and easy.
-No download limits.
-No streaming limits.
-Videos and photosets download with the names of the models and the title of the set or video.
-Most videos can be streamed or downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Videos can also be split into scenes for streaming or downloading, if you want to focus on the parts you find interesting.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well-known as CCBill or Epoch. Some PU members have complained that cancelling is more difficult with Vendo than with CCBill or Epoch. However, I've never had a problem with Vendo, after using them for many years.
-Most photosets offer you a zip file in 2 definitions: 1000 px and 2000 px. I wish the sets were even higher quality, because these girls are cute to gorgeous.
Bottom Line:
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Wow Girls updates with one new video or photoset per day. Wow Porn has recently slowed to one new video or photoset every 5 days.
Apparently, the AllFineGirls site stopped updating around May 2018.
It's hard to say exactly when, because of the site layout.
The current membership structure means if you join any one of the 3 sites, you get access to all 3 sites.
When I look at the update page of All Fine Girls, it seems to show the site is updating.
However, that is misleading.
The updates shown are actually from the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites.
I emailed customer support, and asked if All Fine Girls is updating, and if not, when the site will start to update.
Customer support replied that All Fine Girls is not updating, there is no current plan for the site to start updating again, but the other two sites (Wow Girls and Wow Porn) are updating.
Under the current membership structure, membership in any one of the 3 sites gives you access to all 3 sites, and the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites update regularly.
So you get a huge amount of content at all 3 sites, plus fresh content from the 2 Wow sites.
But there's no way to estimate how many videos and photosets the All Fine Girls site holds. There is a listing for the updates, but since they show content that belongs in the other sites, you can't distinguish what content is specific to the All Fine Girls site, and what content is from the other 2 sites.
I'm explaining this confusion in detail.
Under the current membership plan, if you join any of the three sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), you have access to all 3 sites.
Formerly, membership in All Fine Girls only gave you access to that site: You did not gain access to Wow Girls or Wow Porn until you remained a member of All Fine Girls for 2 months. So if you joined All Fine Girls under that membership plan, on the update pages for that site, you would see lots of updates, but you couldn't access them until you were a member for over 2 months. Which you wouldn't understand unless you wrote to customer service to find out what the problem was.
Edit: under the current structure, it seems that the distinction between the different sites is becoming blurred.
The model Lena Reif has 17 sets (video + photoset) at All Fine Girls.
The same content is found at Wow Girls.
The same content is found at Wow Porn.
I don't know the specific mechanics of how the 3 sites are set up, but from this example, it appears that they are posting content to a server, and all 3 sites have access to at least some of this content.
Which makes for easier maintenance of the sites, I assume.
But it blurs the distinction between the sites, if at least some of the content appears at all 3 sites.
You can log in to any one of the 3 sites, and access the same content for the model Lena Reif.
The same is true for the model Lady Bug.
She has 17 sets (video + photoset).
The same content can be accessed at each of the 3 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn.
The same is true for the model Aina.
The same content is posted at all 3 sites.
It appears that, in essence, the 3 sites have been merged into a single site, although they are still being marketed as separate sites.
Membership in any one of the 3 sites, under the current marketing plan, gives you access to all 3 sites.
The URL address of the 3 sites is different from each other, but the content at each site appears to be the same content.
-Navigation can be poor.
Try to find the hot link for customer support. It's almost hidden.
The hot link for customer support is at bottom of each member page, in tiny letters.
However, in spite of those glitches, all 3 sites are basically good to excellent sites:
-The catalog of teen models range from cute or attractive to gorgeous.
-The videos are professionally shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control.
-The photosets are nice: Not poor screen caps, from years ago. I assume they have some software program that makes good quality screen caps. I wish the quality was even better, because most of the models are cute to really attractive. But the photosets are still worth collecting.
-The have zip files for the photo sets in different definitions.
The three sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) used to be part of the Diesel Access network, but they dropped that name, and even though the 3 sites are currently marketed under a plan which offers access to all 3 sites, All Fine Girls is listed as under one company, and the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites are listed under a different company.
I'm giving the Wow Girls site a score of 95. This is because, under the current membership plan, membership in any one of the 3 sites gives you access to all 3 sites, which means you can watch a huge amount of teen hardcore of very cute girls.
And if you catch one of their holiday special discounts, the price becomes even cheaper.
I'm jealous.
I'm paying $40 for a 75 Mbps internet connection from ATT.
But the download speeds I'm getting (over wifi) are from less than 1 Mbps to about 20 Mbps.
Which means it takes many hours to download a video, with a lot of failed attempts.
4 hours to download a file that is 683 MB (assuming no failed attempt).
So at least you have a great internet connection to watch the news and whatever else you want to see, in spite of the cold.
LOL.
Spectrum was supposed to roll out 1 Gbps lines in Southern Calif. in 2018.
But my local Spectrum office only offers 100 Mbps speeds.
But if I can't increase my ATT wifi speeds, I might switch back to Spectrum, because I was getting much better speeds with their 100 Mbps rated service.
Sometimes the wifi speeds dropped down, but they were usually better than the ATT speeds I'm getting.
Excellent review.
I'm surprised you get access to all three sites.
Formerly, if you joined one of the wow sites, you immediately got access to the other wow site.
But you had to stay a member for 2 months before you got access to All Fine Girls, unless you paid an extra fee to access all 3 sites.
Maybe that's changed. The sites don't do a good job telling you publicly what the rules are (for getting access to all 3 sites).
If you joined All Fine Girls, formerly, you didn't get access to the 2 wow sites, until you were a member for 2 continuous months.
Again, that seems to have changed, based on your experience.
Congratulations on the upgrade from Spectrum.
I was paying around $46 for a 100 Mbps connection.
I don't think they even offer a 1 Gbps connection in my area (north LA county).
I recently switched to AT&T because I had some problems with Spectrum.
Now I'm on a 75 Mbps connection, but my average download speed is much slower, running anywhere from 1 Mbps to about 25 Mbps.
Which makes downloading a photo set or a video a multi-hour task, and with a lot of failed downloads.
Did you have to pay extra for the 1 Gbps upgrade, or did they throw it in for free?
I just went to the Spectrum website for my location, and the only download speed for internet is 100 Mbps listed.
So I don't know if they even offer a faster speed in my area.
The 3 sites are one of my favorite teen networks.
I'm currently a member.
Like you said, the quality of the girls is outstanding.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
