1366 x 768 is the best my laptop offers. I know I've seen higher (better) resolutions from other PU members for their laptops, but my laptop does not offer that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-3 sizes for photosets: 800, 1200, 4000 px.
-zip file for each size px for each photoset.
-Online slideshow for photosets.
-Can download the videos or view as streaming.
-Material is exclusive.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark bottom right hand corner of photos.
-Vids have a larger watermark than the photos, small but not tiny, placed at bottom right corner of the picture.
-No DRM.
-No timeout from site.
-Can rate the model, photoset, and video. But this is a matter of personal taste, and I don't agree with a lot of the scores.
-Simple site navigation. Easy to get to the sets and videos of each model.
-One update per day (photoset or video).
-Most photosets have 100+ pictures each.
Cons:
-Videos download as avi files. No other choice of format.
-Videos download as one file size only (no choice of high, medium, low resolution).
-Downloaded files have no descriptive name. Instead, the download file name is a number with "big", "medium" or "small" attatched, depending on whether you are downloading the big, medium or small px set. Downloaded videos are named with a number and the prefix "zemani-v".
-Search is basic but adequate. Can search by model name, age, or hair color. There is a limited number of models and photosets and videos, so this is not a big con.
Bottom Line:
I resisted joining zemani as long as I could. But some of the models at this site are absolutely mouth-watering. I want to sink my teeth and other
body parts into these gorgeous creatures.
Although there are a nice number of photos and photosets for a site that started in 2006, I can't help wishing there were more photosets for my favorite models. Most models only have 1 or 2 photosets.
Site stats (April 4, 2010):
photos 64,806
galleries 471
videos 130
130 videos sounds like a lot of videos. But like many other softcore sites, the videos are short, most less than 10 minutes in runtime. Even
though the videos might have a gorgeous model as the subject, like most softcore sites, the videos are mainly forgettable. The real value lies in the photosets.
The photographic quality of the videos is good to high, but the videos are just ok. I'm much more into softcore than hardcore, but at most softcore
sites, the videos are just plain boring, no matter how attractive the model is. I don't really understand the psychology of why softcore
photosets of a model can be arousing, but a softcore video of the same model is usually boring. That is my reaction to the videos at softcore teen mega-sites.
The TBP review of this site, release date 6 Mar 2010, states the video "content ranges from softcore nude portraits to pussy spreads, girl-girl erotic posing, and more." I saw a number of videos, not all, and the only
content I saw was strictly softcore: no pussy spread, no girl-girl interaction that went beyond two girls that were nude. I found no solitary
or mutual masturbation, no toys, nothing that remotely approached hardcore porn.
There are some videos where the model performs a strip-tease. But you get better, more exciting strip tease at college night at a bar, where the
strippers are non-professional, probably less attractive than the zemani models, but they put on a much better show than the zemani models.
Also, the canned soundtrack on the videos is obtrusive; it adds nothing to the video, and often sounds annoying.
The models are 18 to very early 20s. Almost all Caucasian.
There is a nice mix of different settings/backgrounds for the photoshoots and videos: interior in a house, in a field, a stream, a lake or sea. Most photosets make nice use of colors in the background, the photosets are mainly nicely focused, the model is nicely featured in the shots. Not all shots are perfect, of course, but the photosets are equal to what you find at met-art, mplstudios, high quality glamor-style softcore photosets.
If you are looking for something more explicit than very softcore nudity, go elsewhere. If you are looking for softcore tease or strip tease, you are better off at a different site.
On a value basis, because the softcore teen mega-sites have far greater content, you are better off joining them first. But this is a nice
addition to the category, and the content will build over time. And the site does feature some absolutely yummy girls.
News
Hello everybody! It's been ten years since I'm modeling and for almost three years we're doing my personal site. It was a wonderful three years, I never imagined I'd get so many friends and so much love. I had a fantastic team and gorgeous girls to 'work' with. But I decided it's time to move on. I want to start my own business and be more than a pretty face for who knows how long. You know, modeling is not something you can do for twenty years :) So I want to thank you all for your support and love. You are the best, guys and girls!
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Beginnings
So I am back and had first shoot on Monday. It was a very strange shooting, for Szilvi's new site nudefightclub.com. You know it is a vry strange style on this website, models are very natural and they wrestle and who wins will have sex :) It is no posing and no glamour and I don't do any regular sport to be very active here. Fortunately I was with Cindy Hope and she is soo crazy girl, I love her! So it was not hard to fight. When she put me on the floor she always whisper 'You allright? Is it okay?' :))) Yesterday shooting day again... the girl was late because of Lufthansa strike, so I had scene in the morning, solo, then scene in the evening. In between I just sit and wait, wait, wait... I was very tired when I got home!
The last porn update to her site was back in December 2008.
Then in January 2009 she posted she had retired from the business.
But in February 2010 she posted she had returned, and there would be new material for her site, as well as appearances at other sites.
So the Met-art photo set is just part of the new material on Sophie that will be available.
A lovely girl. Glad that she is back, but also slightly sad that her retirement apparently did not work as she wanted it to.
Met-art has a photoset that posts tomorrow of a new model named Sophie D. She is better known as Sophie Moone. Back from retirement, she is still a great-looking woman.
In folders by site seems to make the most sense. But I lose track of models that have different names at different sites. In the world of porn, it seems that models can change names more often than they change the color of their hair.
Drooler, if you ever do run out of money and bs, just tie a tin cup around your dog with the message: "Will work for food". With a mug as cute as his, people will be glad to drop dollar donations into the cup.
Do you know if they are updating again at 18magazine? Looking around the preview pages, the last update seems to be in late 2009. I joined a few years back, and the site was not updating at that time, all the material was from years earlier, I thought. A lot of cute models, but the material did not impress me much. The photos were just ok, and the videos were poor. This is strictly a softcore site, and the content is from years ago. The comparable content from mega-sites like met-art, mplstudios, etc. is so much better.
I didn't join the site because of the raffle. But I think it's a nice feature, and I probably post more often because of the raffle. Then again, I also post whenever I have a thought bonging around in my brain, to clear the air inside my head.
I'm seeing the same $30 sign-up rate when I click thru on the PU and TBP links to the site. So I guess that PU hasn't fixed the discount rate issue yet.
TBP earns money when members (and others) join thru their links. I have more faith in TBP reviews (which give a large number of factual details in their reviews) than in the reviews at most porn review sites. But the best source of information is the PU reviews, which are written by people who are, like us, actually paying for the porn they see.
PU reviews often have less factual details than TBP reviews, but the opinions of the site value are easier for me to understand and evaluate than the scores at TBP. I certainly don't agree 100% with all PU reviews, but the reviews can be useful in judging whether a site might be worth my money to join.
The softcore teen glamor sites emphasize photosets over videos, although they are now producing more videos than in the early years (2003 and earlier). Today's videos are also better quality than in years past, in terms of resolution and other technical factors. Maybe one day the videos at softcore teen sites will even be interesting and worth watching.
More than most softcore teen glamor sites, Hegre seems to make people respond in different ways, from loving the site to finding the site a bore. The PU score for the site is 77, while the TBP score is 92. That is quite a range.
VideosZ has a PU score of 75 and a TBP score of 92. VideosZ is a hardcore video site, instead of a softcore glamor photo site.
But I think it's interesting how some sites seem to polarize the members at PU.
CCBill is usually an easy billing company to deal with. My suggestion would be to ask for a refund of your membership fee. Explain to CCBill why you are asking for a refund, and you should get one. And then sign up with a site that offers you better service. There are many sites on the Internet that offer you, for the same price as this site, a much greater amount of content (videos) than what this site offers. Look through the sites that have similar content (hardcore teen videos) and a high score at Porn Users, and pick one you might like, after reading the reviews or looking at the previews of the sites.
Didn't we have a similar poll a while back?
10 minutes is long enough, especially since there is no story leading up to or as part of most scenes. Most scenes are straight sex. If there was some story to make it more interesting, then a scene might last longer. But if it's just straight sex, then 10 minutes is long enough; after that it starts to get repetitious.
I actually joined Zemani as a member 3 days ago, based partly on Drooler's review and partly on the site preview. I like pretty girls, and this site has a few beauties.
Not a mega-site, but a smaller site that started in 2006. Softcore teen glamor. Some very attractive models, nice high-quality photography. If you've never joined the major mega-sites for softcore teen glamor, then join those first, because there are many quality sites out there. But this is a nice addition to the category.
There's a lot I don't understand, but what's the sense for blocking a single porn site for users with Czech IP addresses? Is there a Czech crackdown on porn, and the Czech government or the porn provider is placing the block for legal reasons? I've read that some countries make porn illegal. So is that part of the reason the Czech IP addresses are being blocked?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
