| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2126
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
fairguy112's Comment
You have the start of a worthwhile review if you add more details and opinions. Welcome to PU.
|
09-01-10 09:51am
|
Reply
2127
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for friendly response. I was just confused by your comment, and didn't understand your meaning. I am a little slow at times. :-)
|
09-01-10 01:53am
|
Reply
2128
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
$19.95/month is the price listed at PU. Not really sure what you are trying to say. If you do not use the PU link, the "regular" price is $29.95/month.
Edit01: Perhaps the price listed at PU was different from $19.95/month when you made your comment. Is that why you made your comment? Your comment is so short, it's hard to figure out what you were trying to say, or mean. :)
|
08-31-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
2129
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
True Alex's Reply
Agreed, some very attractive models.
|
08-31-10 06:28pm
|
Comment
2130
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
08-31-10 05:17pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Not in my backyard. If you understand the reasoning behind that, then you understand that porn is evil, will contaminate anyone who comes into contact with it, and if you are foolish enough to admit that you might have seen a pornographic image once in your life, you risk being excommunicated from polite society.
Of course, those same people can fuck and suck and do whatever, because that's their God-given right.
It's not quite hypocrisy. It's more like double-vision: They see themselves as blessed, and we are obviously damned.
|
08-31-10 03:22pm
|
Reply
2132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan, you were born around 1952. So you were around 10 years old in the early 1960s. So what happened: instead of hiring a baby sitter, your parents dropped you off at a burlesque theater with strippers? No wonder you grew up addicted to porn? Lol.
|
08-28-10 05:32pm
|
Reply
2133
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
The same sort of thing happened to me a few days ago.
I joined the Devils Film network, and was signed up for a separate trial membership to Porn Access. The Porn Acess membership was only $1.95 for 3 days, but it would renew at around $30 after 3 days unless cancelled. I looked for, but did not see, any pre-checked agreement for a trial membership.
But I was lucky that I was only charged $1.95 for the trial membership I did not want. I called customer service immediately, told them I did not want the trial membership, did not see the pre-checked agreement. Customer service would not cancel my charge of $1.95 for the trial, but they did cancel my trial membership.
I never used the trial membership.
But it was only $1.95.
I got a message from my credit card company to contact the credit card company. They wanted to know if the charge for $1.95 was valid, or if there was fraud (evidently, they have a program flagging charges by the billing company Porn Access uses). I told them the charge was valid, because I didn't want to get a new credit card number and whatever else I would have to explain about the charge.
You would think that we would be experts about these pre-checked agreements. But I sometimes wonder that sometimes the agreement might not even be shown on the sign-up page, because I was looking for the pre-checked line, and did not see it.
Live and learn. But what can we learn if we honestly don't see the pre-checked agreement?
|
08-27-10 07:43am
|
Reply
2134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Is it too much to ask for some good old-fashioned sex, with maybe a little tenderness or emotion or eroticism in there?
People can get bored with sex, so how about some fetishism.
But I would prefer some sex that is less kinky, less gonzo.
|
08-27-10 02:51am
|
Reply
2135
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner, I was just watching a German porn video, and I realized something. I could understand the Aaahhhs and Oooohhhs in German without any subtitles! Do you think I would understand a Danish porn video that was using the same Aaahhhs and Oooohhhs? I think the accent might be slightly different, because a German Aaahhh sounds slightly different from an American Aaahhh, but it's still understandable. Both the boy and girl were making the same kind of noises, so I think they were supposed to be showing excitement at what they were doing, which was having sexual intercourse in a bathroom.
(It's a slow day, very hot, over 106 degrees Fahrenheit. So I thought I'd toss off a note to hopefully cool myself down.) :)
|
08-25-10 03:19pm
|
Reply
2136
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner, do you happen to know if the photosets of a model named Lora at AV Erotica have been deleted?
She is no longer listed in the preview section of the model listing.
And in the gallery listings, it appears that her sets have been deleted.
She appears at other sites, named:
Lora at Domai
Darsi A at Met-art
Darsi at Metmodels
Don't know why a site would delete the photosets, but I've seen it happen sometimes. I don't like it when it happens to one of my favorites.
|
08-25-10 12:42pm
|
Comment
2137
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
|
08-25-10 11:35am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
2138
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
$50 per month for membership? I am not John D. Rockefeller. :)
|
08-25-10 10:06am
|
Reply
2139
|
Querro
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm not a member, but your summary seems accurate.
The site seems similar to Met-art or MPL Studios.
The site has some cute models, that are new to me.
I've seen some of the photosets from this site, and the photosets could just as easily have been posted at Met-art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, or any other top line softcore teen site.
The reason to join would be because you haven't seen the models/photosets elsewhere.
But this is a much smaller site than the mega-sites I mentioned.
Edit01: A few of the models have appeared at other softcore mega-sites.
But I do believe the content is exclusive to this site.
|
08-25-10 09:52am
|
Reply
2140
|
Purrfect Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
My reply to a comment made by mr smut on 11-27-08 on the Purrfect Girls site: (quote): "One model, Eva, is absolutely yummy."
So I guess we like at least some of the same models. :)
My impression from the preview pages is that this is part of a small network, but each site is joined by itself. Which makes it expensive.
Most of the sites I looked at appear to have stopped updating in 2009. And the updates look to have been slowing before then.
The reannamae site appears to still be updating. But she is, to me, less attractive than Eva or Princess Alla (Princess Alla is named Christina at Purrfect Girls).
A shame, because they have some cute models.
|
08-25-10 09:36am
|
Reply
2141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't think the season of year makes much difference. Except that during the holidays when you're around family the porn is obviously less viewed (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc.).
|
08-25-10 03:46am
|
Comment
2142
|
Purrfect Girls
(0)
|
|
08-25-10 02:28am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2143
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Very well said.
And that's why PU is such a valuable site. The members are intelligent, courteous, and helpful.
|
08-24-10 03:28am
|
Reply
2144
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I made a similar type comment in my review of Femjoy, saying that I preferred the Met-art look over the Femjoy look in the photosets. And I got a couple of responses that preferred the Femjoy look as more natural. So taste is very much a matter of personal opinion.
Nobody agreed with me that the Met-art look is better than the Femjoy look. :)
So I can't dictate what other people prefer. I was just making a comment that this site is more of a "natural" style than a "glamor" style.
I definitely do prefer a more glamorized style. Not ultra glamor, but some glamor.
|
08-24-10 03:21am
|
Reply
2145
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
FuckingGambler's Reply
I really appreciate the responsiveness of the webmaster to reviews and comments on his site at our forum. That shows a concern for customer satisfaction that is rare.
|
08-23-10 05:57pm
|
Comment
2146
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
|
08-23-10 05:32pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
2147
|
Cherry Jul
(0)
|
|
08-23-10 03:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2148
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
The site models seem real amateurs, and the low current price seems attractive. I certainly don't recognize any of the models I saw in the preview pages. :)
|
08-23-10 12:30pm
|
Reply
2149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
tangub's answer is very close to mine. I mainly prefer softcore sites. And since the videos at softcore sites are usually boring, no matter how attractive the models are, you are left with the pictures to enjoy. I am also looking at hardcore sites, where the photos are usually boring, and the good videos that appeal to my tastes are hard to find.
Good softcore pictures are found at many sites. Good hardcore pictures are difficult to find. Good softcore videos are almost impossible to find. Good hardcore videos are difficult to find.
So I focus on softcore pictures, because it's easy to find high quality, erotic photos.
|
08-23-10 11:58am
|
Reply
2150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not worth the effort. I almost always go for the 1-month membership. Haven't found any sites I am interested in that are offering me a $1 trial. Also, the $1 trials I've seen have a very expensive renewal rate, far more expensive than the regular 1-month fee.
|
08-21-10 02:16am
|
