I'm still waiting for turboshaft and drooler and the rest of the PU members to post their tanline photos before I make my final decision. So I can't say if they really look better with or without. :)
But for female models, I don't think tan lines usually make a big difference one way or the other.
After cancelling my 3-day pre-checked unwanted membership to Porn Access, I got a confirmation email that my subscription had been cancelled. They also included a coupon code that entitles me to rejoin Porn Access within the next 3 months for the reduced price of $14.95 for 30 days membership.
I was a member of Porn Access over a year ago. I thought the site was a waste of time because of the horrible navigation and massive amount of duplication and low-quality vids.
I am more than willing to give my coupon code away free to some deserving PU member. But any PU member (and non-members), can use the PU/TBP link to join Porn Access at a lower price than the coupon code allows.
So what do you call a coupon code that has a negative value, to a site that I believe is basically a waste of time?
Note: the site is not a scam. It has a massive amount of videos, many of poor quality. And the navigation is terrible, and there is massive duplication of their videos. If someone wants to spend the time, there is probably good material to be found. I just don't have the patience or time to wade through all the garbage videos at the site.
I just signed up for Devils Film today. I know I am supposed to look for the pre-checked offer, but I did not see it anywhere. But after signing up for Devils Film, I got an email telling me I was now a member of Pornaccess. This is a separate charge and a separate membership from Devils Film. I used the computer to check the billing company, to see the details, and could not find the membership (or fee) listed for my Pornaccess account. (I did find the Devils Film account information at the billing company). I tried contacting support by computer chat, but gave up after 10 minutes, and called on the telephone to support. I was able to cancel my subscription to Pornaccess, but was not able to cancel the $1.95 charge for 3 days membership.
But at least the Pornaccess will not renew at $30/month.
I know that Devils Film (and related sites) have a pre-checked problem, but I honestly did not see the &*(^ pre-checked line. And I was looking for it when I signed up.
For $1.95, it's not worth arguing about. And I'm not going to involve the credit card company over a $1.95 charge.
But I think I was a patsy.
Totally agree. I mentioned in a comment over a year ago that the site was very expensive, and wondered if there was a discount available. But there is no easy way to get a discount to this site.
Remind me to stay on good terms with you, even with an ocean separating us. I don't want any of your hitman buddies coming after me. :whaa
It makes perfect sense to me that the victim should blame the guy paying for the job. The hitman is a professional man getting paid for his work. Why should the victim blame the hitman? The guy that's paying for the job is the one with the grudge against the guy that's getting hit.
Actually, in many movies, the target of the hitmen is rather foolish. Instead of trying to defend against the hitmen, the target should be trying to kill the evil boss or the one who is paying for the contract. That might stop the hitmen from trying to complete the job, because the reason for the target to be killed would be gone. You kill a bunch of hitmen, the evil boss just hires new hitmen. You kill the evil boss, there's no one to pay the hitmen, so there's no reason for them to keep trying to kill the target.
Many thanks for the blog examples, nadiencendia. I think you have to be a real fan of these models if you are going to follow/read these blogs. I think the models are pretty, but the blogs simply don't appeal to me. I understand the idea is to help their fans feel a connection to the models, and to increase the fan interest and loyalty, but the blogs just don't connect to me.
On the other hand, I bought a DVD of Rabid, a movie that Marilyn Chambers was in back in the 1970s, from Marilyn Chambers at a convention, and was happy to get it, because I had seen the movie when it played originally in the theaters when it was first released in 1977. Marilyn Chambers was a famous porn star back in the 1970s, when porn movies were first gaining acceptance and starting to make big money. Rabid was a non-porn zombie movie by David Cronenberg back when he was still doing small movies, and he since went on to become a big-time director. I was happy to get the DVD. But I haven't even opened the case or played the DVD (partly because she signed the outer plastic cover with a cute message). But I still remember pretty much what the movie was about, even after all this time. It was just a low-budget zombie movie, but I thought it was well done and enjoyed the movie at the time, so the DVD still brings back memories. :)
And Marilyn Chambers seemed like a really nice and friendly person when I met her. Very down to earth.
Agree that the site seems expensive.
A 1-year subscription to this single site is $199.95.
A 1-year subscription to this site plus 9 other sites in the network is $239.95.
For the 1-month option:
Single site is $26.95.
10 sites is $29.95.
So if you are going to join this site, it seems you might as well pay a few dollars more and get the 10-site membership.
But that is a heck of a price to pay for a 1-year membership.
Where do you find these blogs? I assume you're not talking about model bios, but an actual blog that is done by the model. The sites I join might have a short model bio, which can often contain inaccurate data (country of origin, age, even getting the physical description of the model wrong at times). But I don't often come across a model's blog.
I'm located in the US, so I've never had to deal with regional pricing for pay sites. But I do know that people in Europe often get hit with unfair prices.
Khan (a PU staff member) says the regional pricing policy is set by the paysite, and not the payment processing company (which might be CCBill or Epoch), though the payment processing companies do get a lot of angry comments because potential subscribers blame them for the higher prices.
I went on vacation to Europe years ago. And at different places, our tour group was charged higher prices for items we bought, than the natives of the region. I'm talking about buying a can of coke or whatever at a refreshment stand or whatever. I felt I was being ripped off, seeing other people paying less for the same items we were buying. That was the first time I encountered what was basically regional pricing.
Except that in an extended form of regional pricing, maybe, when I went to college in the US, people from out of state had to pay a higher price to attend a state college than an in-state resident. So that might be considered a form of regional pricing. That is still true today, that out of state residents pay a higher price to attend a local state college, I assume. The theory is that the state colleges are supported in part by the income/property tax that residents pay to the state. Even though state sales tax is paid by anyone who purchases any item within the state.
What the theory behind regional pricing for porn paysites is, I don't know, other than businesses usually try to grab as much money as they can from whoever they can. :)
I usually like to use CCBill as payment processor for a paysite. But Epoch, the payment processor for Teen Mega World, seems to be an easy to use, reliable payment processor as well. Cancelling my subscription to Teen Mega World was simple and easy.
I mentioned in my review that the posting dates for the videos/photosets are not reliable. A video (with its associated photoset) might have a posting date of last week, but you can see comments about the video/photoset that are dated months or even a year earlier.
So there is no easy way to tell how often the site updates with a new video/photoset.
I think there were 2 updates to NubileGirlsHD in the month of July.
This site is part of the Royal Cash network.
The way it works is this:
You join a single site, you get that site plus most of the Royal Cash network sites. Most, but not all. The specific sites you get is a mystery, until you actually join. Kind of a strange way of doing business. To know which specific sites you get by joining any specific site in the network, you would need to email the webmaster. And he would have to check with somebody else (I saw a reply of his at PU, where he answered someone with the information about some of the sites that were included when you join some site, and he had to check with somebody to get that information. And that information was specific to that one site chosen as the membership entrance. If you had joined a different site in the network, the sites you had access to would have been slightly different.)
(I've posted a couple of comments about what a stupid system it is, and confusing. Why not just give access to all the sites in the network when joining, instead of access to most of the sites?)
Anyway, most of the sites in the network do not update. When they add a new site to the network, they update that site for a while, then stop updating it, and add a new site, which they then update.
Someone could write a college research paper on their business plan (trying to find the logic in the plan).
Anyway, out of the maybe 33 sites you have access to, you will get about 17 updates a month total. That's my guess. 17 updates spread out to those sites that are actively updating, which might be 4 sites that are actually updating out of the sites you have access to.
adultlabs seems to be an interesting site. First time I've seen it, I
think. The quality of the photos seems to be better than what the same photos are, when posted at the Royal Cash network sites. And the prices to license the photosets and videos seems reasonable. If I was tempted to start up an adult site, this is one of the places I would have to check out for source material. :)
As far as model names, it seems a tradition for Internet porn sites to randomly assign names to their models. In a single network, the same model can have a different name at some of their sites. And
sometimes the same model can have several different names at the same
site (Met-art does this sometimes). And of course, a single site can
use the same name for several different models, like JustTeenSite,
because all these girls are interchangeable anyway, as far as the site
is concerned. :)
Thanks for the encouragement, TheSquirrel. I know exactly how you feel about waiting for years to join a site. There are many sites I've looked at for years, but still haven't joined. But on this site/network, I was actually a member 8 months ago, but was too lazy to write a review on any of the sites. There are currently over 30 sites in the network, and joining any site in the network gives you access to most, but not all, of the network sites. This is a teen network site, mainly gonzo style. Not really my style, so I don't know why I rejoined the network, other than I was looking for something new, and ended up here instead. There are times when I definitely don't understand my own actions. :)
Joining nubilegirlshd (thru the PU/TBP link, or just directly from the site itself, costs $29.95 for 30 days recurring.
But if you join the Royal Cash network thru TeenMegaWorld, you will probably get nubilegirlshd included as a bonus site in your membership for $19.95 for 30 days recurring.
To be certain, you can email the webmaster to check which sites you will get specifically when you join any one of the sites in the Royal Cash network. When you join any one site, you get access to most, but not all, of the sites in the network.
Thanks for the kind words. But Nubiles is a different site, not connected to the network that contains Nubile Girls HD. There are so many porn sites that the ones with similar names can get confusing. If you join this site because you think you will be getting Nubiles, you will almost certainly be disappointed.
Nubiles is a very popular teen site. Nubile Girls HD is a tiny site that is part of the Royal Cash network.
Hope this helps.
Many site reviews don't mention prices, because you can find/see the membership prices when you click on the site hot link for PU or TPB, and the membership price (with any discount for using the PU/TBP link) will be prominently listed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No site timeout.
-Nice-sized thumbnail of the female model to illustrate each video.
-Some cute models.
-The girls are real teens, not twenty- or thirty-year olds trying to appear much younger.
-Can add/view comments on videos and photosets.
-Can rate the videos photosets.
-Small watermark bottom right-hand corner of photos.
-The videos are mainly clear and crisp, with adequate lighting. The videos and photosets are less gonzo style than the other sites in the network, but are not glamor-style, more like in-between gonzo and glamor style.
Cons:
-There is no search. Not a major problem because the site is so small. Only 75 videos so far. Can list the videos by name of model or by date posted
(but date posted is not accurate or reliable).
-Occasionally, a photo will not display when you click on the thumbnail, get an error message: "cannot be displayed, because it contains errors".
-Hard to tell what the update rate is, because the posting dates are unreliable.
-Only 1 size of file to download video (no choice of hi, mid, lo quality).
-Videos download as WMV files (no other file extension choice).
-Only 1 size of zip file to download photoset.
-Limited types of models: they are all white Eastern European teens.
Bottom Line:
Hardcore teen site, with some good looking young teens.
Sample size for the videos and photosets:
Videos are 400 MB to 1 GB
Photosets are 40 MB to 120 MB
Currently 75 videos with a matching photoset for each video.
Usually 1 video per model. A few models have 2 videos. Photos are crisp, but mainly to illustrate the video action; the photos are not artistic or glamor style such as the softcore photo sites like metart or mplstudios.
The style of the photos is more natural than glamor. I personally don't like the photos, but some PU members might appreciate them: they are
clear, usually crisp, hardcore photosets, with some really nice-looking models. Natural style of photography. The video and photoset are mainly
hardcore boy-girl; a few sets are softcore or midcore, where the girl is solo or with a second girl.
The photosets approach high quality in terms of photo size. But you don't actually get the quality of a met-art, mplstudios or other softcore photo site. I don't understand why it's so hard to make a quality hardcore
photoset. This site has plenty of cute girls, doing hardcore, but the photography is poor or lacking: in the flesh colors of the girls, in the
presentation of the girls, the girls just lack attractiveness or allure in the photos. I grew up in the days of Playboy and Penthouse. I didn't like every Playboy or Penthouse photoshoot, but in many cases, the girls/women looked extremely attractive, sexy, luscious, gorgeous, adorable, lovely.
You don't get that in these photosets. You can find it in the met-art and mplstudios and other glamor teen sites. The problem is that the girls are not presented at their best. It's like you buy an off brand of some product you like, Cheerios, or Rice Crispies, and the taste is blah
instead of what you get from the major brand.
They don't use photoshop or airbrushing on these photos, and that's part of why I rate the photos lower. But it's also the skin tone of the models,
the posing, the composition, everything that factors into how attractive or erotic a photograph is. The photosets are high quality in the size of the photos (each photo is 100 KB to 1 MB), but the quality of the photos is not up to the standards of the softcore glamor sites.
Some of the models at this site are also at met-art, glamdeluxe, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. And they look much more attractive on the
other sites, because of the photography or videography.
If this site is included in your network membership, you should definitely check the site out. Some models here (mainly the same ones shown on many of the other sites in the network) are very attractive, the videos are shot less gonzo style, the photosets are worth looking at.
My first thought is that some Japanese porn is censored with the mosaic effect. And if you're into Japanese porn, that's something you have to accept. I skip sites from the US or Europe that use censored photos or vids in the preview.
Going to the Porn Access site, I see the $5.00 for 30 day membership offer. I don't know how long this offer will last.
But I also don't know if the site is even worth it. There's a ton of vids, most low quality, and the search and navigation of the network sites is very poor, with massive duplication of the videos at different sites. I prefer paying a little more, for sites with easier navigation and good material that I can more easily find.
But if you use the PU/TBP link to go to the site to sign up, you see the regular PU/TBP discount of $14.95 for 30 day membership (once you go to the signup page and start the signup process).
So maybe PU/TBP can contact the pornaccess site and make the $5.00 offer available through the PU/TBP link.
The model should definitely be showing some kind of emotion or enjoyment or arousal. I don't want a lot of fake moans and groans, but I don't want the female to be a slab of meat who is just lying there getting pounded on.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
