What about vagina reduction products? Everyone knows that men want a tight fit, no matter what the size of their penis might be. I bet that we could make a ton of money with the right product in that area. And if we could get the PU/TBP seal of approval on our "secrets of vaginal reduction for the one size fits all clitomizer", we could probably make 2 tons of money.
Of course they would still be advertised. I thought there was supposed to be some kind of truth in advertising law, but if there is such a law, it doesn't seem to be enforced widely or strictly. Or maybe the Internet is a different area or field, where U.S. law doesn't always strictly apply.
A brilliant idea. Maybe some PU member with computer programming skills could make a simple program that will be able to make tags for our porn collection files and set up a "use it or lose it" system for deletion. But I would scream if it deleted some of my favorite files that I had not watched in a long time. So it would need an option to tag a file as "favorite" or "to be saved until hell freezes over".
No zips for springtimebeauties is still the case.
I like photos, but the ones I like are the high quality that you find at metart, justteensite, mplstudios, etc. The photos here at springtimebeauties are much lower quality (with no zips). So even if the site had zips, in spite of the cute models, I would not save these photos. That's just me. Because the photos are low quality, in my opinion.
Edit01: I also like a small amount of photoshopping, because I think it makes the models look better. But there is no photoshopping in these photos. You see all the freckles and moles and whatever on these girls. I just like a little glossier appearance.
They do have some very yummy models, though. Thanks for mentioning the site. :)
Denner, I explained this in a comment before, but if you do choose to join this network, it can make a difference which site you join through.
For the last month or more, the network has been offering bonus sites when you join any one of their sites.
For most sites, the 1 month membership is $29.95.
To join the 18 stream site the 1 month membership is $34.95.
With all the the different memberships, you can get a different number of bonus sites. By different memberships, I mean which specific site you choose to join through.
If you choose the 18 stream, you pay $34.95 and get 2 bonus sites.
If you choose the SpunkyBee, you pay $29.95 and get 9 bonus sites.
One of the bonus sites included when you join through SpunkyBee is the 18 Stream site.
If you join through other sites in the network, you pay $29.95 and get less than 9 bonus sites (maybe 6 or less bonus sites).
So join through the SpunkyBee site, you pay $29.95, and get full access to 10 of the network sites.
That is the based on what I see being offered currently. The network can change their offerings in the future. But that is what has been offered for the past month and more.
The network said it would end the special bonuses over a month ago, then they extended the offer by 2 weeks, then they extended the offer by 2 more weeks. That I know of. They might have been extending it in the past that I don't know about.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Billing agent: SegPayEU
-No pre-checked sales agreements on the signup page
-Access to this site was immediate after signup
-No DRM.
-No site timeout.
-No download limits.
-Easy to read captcha.
-Screenshots to illustrate videos.
-Zipfile available for each photoset.
-Content is dated.
-Very little photoshopping in the photos. You see model's freckles and scratch marks clearly on her face and body.
Cons:
-No streaming
-Updates irregular
Site advertises 3 new updates every week (on one of the signup pages), but that was a goal, not a reality.
Updates stopped on July 26. Then on Sep 28 1 photoset and 1 video were added. Nothing added since then.
-Photos are available in only 1 size.
-Large watermark in bottom right corner of photos.
-Navigation is very basic.
-There is no search function.
-Preview page says, "Join now and find out what I do on weekends!" That
implies some kind of blog or diary inside the members area, but I can't find one.
The preview page has a hot link to a blog. Unfortunately, the blog has a few entries for May 11, 2010 and June 06, 2010, and that is the entire blog.
-"I love to naughty chat with my members". Quote from a page advertising her site. But I find no place to chat with her inside the members area. Perhaps the forum was supposed to furnish contact with the model, but the forum is "coming soon..."
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Currently about 25 videos and matching photosets.
Video file formats:
high, medium, low quality WMV
MPG (high quality)
QuickTime format
Video specs: (for the mpg file format):
Videos are very high quality and run about 11-30 minutes.
total bitrate: 6,488 kbps
frame width x height: 1600 x 912
Photo specs: Most individual photos are 300-550 KB. 2464x1643 pixels.
The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can
download the entire site in 30 days with no problem.
This is a solo teen site.
This is not a site where you go to watch hardcore action. The theme is more like you are watching a cute girl who is playful and friendly. The
video "plot" varies with each episode or clip: She is being playful with a boyfriend, with a girlfriend, showing off her body, whatever. The "action" can be softcore, midcore, or hardcore, but the overall impression is more that you are watching a cute and friendly girl who is enjoying her sexuality. This is entirely different from the hardcore teen video sites where 1 or 2 guys are banging away on 1 or 2 girls.
You put the SpunkyBee model in a video, and she performs with charm and attraction. The videos and photos have good clarity, focus, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. There is no talking from the cameraman, and the girl herself usually says very little. No bothersome background music. SpunkyBee appears at many sites under different names:
Abigaile, Abigaile Johnson,Abby, Spunky Bee, Veronika.
I am listing the different names because pat362 recently brought eurobabeindex to my attention again.
If you can get this site along with a bunch of other sites in the network as a special offer, it's definitely worth checking this site out.
Giving this site a 78. If they increase the updates, add the forum that is "coming soon", have the girl blog more often, the site value would go up.
By itself, the site would be very expensive. But as part of a network, where you join this site and get bonus sites as part of your membership,
the site makes a nice addition.
I've read some comments/replies at PU that state that some of the sites in this network have stated they are/will be streaming only for the newer updates. But I've also read PU comments/rep;lies that seem to indicate that streaming only has not yet actually been put into effect.
If I definitely knew streaming only was in effect, I would not join, even at a lower price. I like the idea of being able to save a copy on my hard drive, even if I don't own it legally. I'm not really sure of the correct wording here. When you download a photoset or video from a paysite, you don't "own" the file, you just have the right to use it. Or something like that. Or maybe you do own it, but you don't have the right to sell it. I don't know what the legal interpretation is on this area. Just like, when you pay for a copy of some software program, I don't know if you own your copy, or what your legal "ownership" means.
Not a member, but I have seen a couple of videos from the site. The videos I saw were clean and sharp, the models are young and attractive. But $29.95 for 1 month to a single site seems expensive. This is part of a network. Obviously, if they included membership to a number of their other network sites in that price the membership would be much more attractive.
I don't usually search for models directly.
What I do is go to the sites I am currently a member of, and look through those contents.
And I also look for other sites I might want to join, and look through the preview pages there.
I go to PU almost every day, but I don't use it to directly search for specific models, though I do use it to search for sites.
I rarely go to EurobabeIndex or FreeOnes. Maybe I should use them more, but I just never got into the habit.
There's supposed to be software to block spam. But if we could come up with better software that really works to block at least some of this spam, we should make a fortune.
I also get a lot of random spam emails for sex, medications, whatever. Most of that goes into my spam box, but some of it gets into my regular email box. The amount of spam I've been getting recently has increased significantly.
And I'm too lazy to get a new email address, because then I would have to change my email for all the accounts that I really want to get mail and notices from.
Edit01: I did open two email addresses, that I was hoping would get the bulk of my spam. But my regular email address has been put on the list for spammers. And they also use my email address as a "fake" email address of origin when they send out spam, because I sometimes get notices that some messages (that are spam) were not able to be delivered, or that I have gone over the limit of the amount of email I can send. And I did not, obviously, send those spam messages, and I send out very few emails in any one day.
The thrill is in the hunt. But it's surprisingly painful to delete, except items that are truly bad or worthless. I want to keep even the average stuff, even though I will probably never go back to view it again.
Slutty, I thought your review was good, I was not trying to criticize it in any way. Please understand that. It's just that I thought you would be more enthusiastic or satisfied with the site when you gave it a score of 82. We seem to have similar tastes, because I have enjoyed many of the sites you have reviewed, and I thought your scores for those sites I knew about were close to what I would have scored them.
So I am not quibbling with your score. I just thought you didn't personally enjoy the site very much. But I was just trying to read more into your review than what you wrote.
But like you say, there are good and bad points to the site, and how much you enjoy it is a personal matter. Even though we are writing a review that is supposed to be a guide for others.
I keep flipping from one side to the other, which can be annoying. LOL. I keep saying the same thing in my own reviews, that "how much you enjoy a site depends on your personal reaction to the contents, and not just the contents themselves".
Nice review, but I get the impression that you scored the site higher than you actually enjoyed the site contents. Or maybe you are trying to become a professional reviewer and giving an "objective" score/rating instead of one based on what you feel. Or maybe I've read too many reviews lately, and need to take a break. :)
My best guess is that they are trying to make those pornhogs with fast Internet connections pay for slurping their site. Lol.
But don't forget that you get a bunch of bonus sites with membership to this site. So unless you have a massively fast connection, it's probably better to go for the 1 month membership.
I haven't been a member myself, so I have no idea whether you would think a 1 month membership is worth the money.
Even if I had been a member, I still wouldn't know, because individual tastes (and values) vary from person to person. :)
I think you are basically right, that your expectation of "DVD" quality was just too high for what is mainly available on the Internet.
I've never watched a porn file I downloaded on a TV either.
My only experience is with PC monitors.
And Maggie and the other TBP reviewers have far more extensive experience with all kinds of porn than I will ever have.
But there is a wide variation in the bitrate and other quality factors in the porn videos you find on the Internet at different sites. There are some sites that have some extremely high quality videos, and the quality keeps going up as time goes on.
So one day, if we are still around, we will be able to watch these porn videos on our TV sets, when the quality becomes good enough. Lol.
The video files you don't like for their "low quality" are low quality as regards bitrate.
Whether you've been spoiled or whatever, it's wonderful to be able to watch a video and see it with good to great definition, which takes a higher bitrate than what is available on many older videos.
A lot of "DVD" quality videos are not really very good quality, especially if you want to watch them full-screen.
I don't like watching videos that are fuzzy or unclear. Most PU members don't either.
So welcome to the club (but I think you were already a member before I was). :)
Edit01: Watching a video in a smaller window makes the video appear clearer. The poor quality is not as noticeable.
The high bitrate videos you think are poor quality might have been remastered (?, not sure what the correct term is) from lower bitrate videos, without really improving the original video.
Someone like Toadsith is an expert in this area, and could give you a complete and accurate explanation of your problem.
What is the total bitrate of the video files you think are low quality? It could be that the files you think should be high quality are much lower in quality (bitrate) than you are expecting.
Bitrate is a major factor in the quality of a video, although there are certainly other factors.
Salvation is what I voted. The only way this adorable woman will get into heaven, where she belongs, is to be saved. And she can only be saved by sleeping (and doing other things) with yours truly, because I am the gateway to salvation and heaven on earth. Or maybe she is the gateway to heaven and earth. Anyway, it should be a lot of pleasure and fun getting into the gateway. Yahoo, ride 'em, cowboy!
And if that doesn't work, go to Plan B: Beg her for sex.
We were both teasing. But sometimes it doesn't come across as clearly as it should. :)
But I also mean it when I say there are new, attractive girls turning up in porn all the time. Back in the 1970s (which is ancient history) an attractive-looking girl in hardcore porn was rare. But now it's very common. You can find them easily.
Denner, did you notice that Hayden Winters has ink marks on her back (better known as tattoos), a belly button ring, and feet that are overly large? She even has a stud in her tongue. So I would not rate her as a top porn model. But I have seen the video "My Little Panties", and find it disturbing: A porn star should be wearing new underwear in her movies, and it appears she's been rubbing her panties over-much and needs a new pair (the old one has lint-balls or something over the crotch area). LOL
And that guy sniffing and chewing her panties? Does he have a fetish or what?
justme, the poll is supposed to be answered based on your own personal experience. If the first poll selections do not supply the answer you believe applies to you, select the "other" option, and then write in a brief explanation of your response as you already did.
Seems like a fairly simple thing to do. Which you appear to have done already (I am assuming you voted for the "other" option).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
