Denner, a beautiful story. As good as any porn novel I read back in my younger days (Nowadays, I watch porn on the Internet instead of reading it.).
I dimly recall my first bj. I didn't feel disbelief, but it was a blissful experience. Except my first intercourse was even better. Memories. I haven't thought about either of those experiences in many years now.
If you do decide to join the TonyBucks network, check to see which site offers you the best deal. Joining through Teen Burg gives you 6 bonus sites. Joining through Spunky Bee gives you 9 bonus sites, for the same price. The Spunky Bee membership includes the Teen Burg site and almost all the TonyBucks sites.
The models at this network are the standard Eastern European models. Not any skinnier than usual. There are even a few girls that have breasts that are medium to large sized. But most have the smaller breasts that are grown in the wilds of Eastern Europe. :)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of videos for a site of this type.
-Site advertises more than 500 videos, more than 300 photosets.
-Note: TBP update 09-20-10 states 296+ videos, 37+photosets.
Why the big difference in the numbers, I don't know.
Looking at the site, without actually counting the separate videos, it seems the site contents is much smaller.
-Site advertises daily updates. The update rate is actually about 1 update every 7 days.
-Free live cams with models. You pay USD $2.95 (EUR € 2.30) for 30 days of access to several hours per day of nude public shows. Private chats are optional and cost extra.
-There is also a separate "Models online" service that offers a xxx webcam live show.
-Large number of cute models.
-Search engine: can search by model's name, month and year, video or photoset.
-Content is dated.
-Model's name is clearly listed for each video.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
Cons:
-No streaming.
-A simple text list of the models at this site, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, would be very helpful.
-Single size for photos. No choice of low, medium or high resolution.
-No biography. Models identified by name only.
-Basic search. Can search by model's name or when video/photoset was posted. But can't search by description of model, type of sex, or any other factors.
-A faq page would be helpful, listing basic site facts: number of videos, number of photosets, number of photos, total size (GB) of videos, total size of photos, number of male models, number of female models.
-No text on the site identifies which videos are high definition. The HD videos are the ones that are 1 GB+ when you download them.
Bottom Line:
Photos are 1643 x 2464 pixels
Videos 720x576 (1100kbps)
File Sizes (HQ):
WMV = 200MB-1GB
This is the town where I should have grown up. Lovely, nubile chicks that fuck at the drop of a hat. Or the glance of an eye.
This is a hardcore teen video site. The videos far outnumber the photosets. Most of the videos are a boy and a girl.
Each video/photoset has a few thumbnails to show what's inside the file. It is difficult to get a clear idea of what the model looks like from the thumbnails that are actually furnished by the site. A much better system would be to have a nice-sized photo of the model that shows her clearly, plus 4 thumbnails that clearly show the model from the video/photoset.
The videos are good quality.
The technical factors are handled well: lighting, focus, action, a lot of good looking teens.
The photos are high quality: the size of a single photo is around 300-500 KB. I was surprised the photo size is so large, because the photos sure don't look high quality to me.I am not talking about the attractiveness of the model, or her makeup or costume. I am talking about the extreme clarity that photos can have, which is not found here. The colors are not brilliant or sharp. I just find the photos at major softcore glamor sites so much more appealing than the photos at this site.
If you are into hardcore teen action, this site has a lot of videos. The videos are good quality. The sex is gentler than the gonzo sites, and the teens actually talk and kiss before getting down to the action. The teens are ok to nice looking, very little tattoos or piercings.
The site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. Membership in any one site will normally give you access to some of the other sites. How many bonus sites you get, and what those bonus sites are, varies depending on which site you join through. It definitely pays to check each site for the bonus details. One site will offer 2 bonus sites, a different site might offer 6 bonus sites, another might offer 9 bonus sites.
I joined through Spunky Bee, which charged me the same or lower price for the membership, as joining a different TonyBucks site. And I got access to 9 bonus sites (10 sites total).
I am giving the site a score of 85, because it's part of a network that has a number of attractive models, and a large number of good quality videos.
Once I got past high school, it was definitely porn that gave me the most education about sex. And then, many years later, the Internet showed me even more amazing things, many of which I would gladly have passed on. There is a ton of crap out there in pornoland. And the fetishes you can come across: Geez, no thanks!
Comments serve a variety of purposes. You can give useful information about a site, your personal opinion about a site, specific problems or, more rarely, valuable features of that site. Or you could ask general or specific questions about the site, hoping to get a helpful response from a PU member who's been a site member.
PU allows us wide freedom to post our thoughts in a comment, but they also reserve the right to censor our comments. Unless the comment is total spam, they usually let you comment (and post in the threads) however you like.
Which makes for the question: why is the PU site so member-friendly, where the people are courteous and helpful to one another. We aren't saints, but this is one of the nicest sites I've been a member of.
For many sites, where you have an open membership, you have a large number of people who enjoy being idiots and flaming other posters to show their superiority.
But any disagreements at PU are usually mild. The members seem to respect one another, even when they have differing opinions and tastes. And the tastes of the PU members go all over the place, in their search for "enjoyment". Lol.
So if you want to comment on the tour area of a site, go right ahead. I know that's what I've done a number of times in the past.
The tour area of a site is a major introduction to a site, and can be a valuable resource. Or it can also be a waste of time. More sites should put more effort into making the tour area an attractive source of information about the site, that gives you a good idea of what the site is like.
mbaya, in case you do get into trouble, don't think that you will be safe just because you try running off to Canada.
Back in the 1970s, protesters and deserters from the US Armed forces could run off to Canada and be safe.
But in today's more security-minded climate, the Arm of the Law has been strengthened.
Case in point: Randy Quaid:
(I think the man needs counseling as well as legal aid because of the recent legal problems he's been having. He's apparently lost or spent a huge amount of money on bail money because he does not show up in court to face his criminal charges. And his criminal charges are not what should be major crimes: using a bad credit card, breaking into a house he formerly owned (because he did not realize he no longer owned it?).
=========================================================
Randy and Evi Quaid Arrested in Canada
Source: The Hollywood Reporter Fri Oct 22, 2010, 1:00 pm EDT
Actor Randy Quaid and his wife Evi have been arrested in Vancouver for alleged Immigration Act violations, the CBC is reporting.
The arrest follows a California judge issuing $50,000 warrants against the couple after they failed to show up to a Santa Barbara court hearing on Monday.
Vancouver police issued a statement on Friday saying that an unnamed couple, which the CBC identified as the Quaids, was arrested on Wednesday afternoon.
"While checking the identity of a man and a woman at that location, they learned that the two were wanted on outstanding warrants from the United States," the police statement said.
The couple was turned over to the Canada Border Services agency and was due to appear before the Immigration Refugee Board on Friday afternoon.
The Quaids are facing felony burglary charges and misdemeanor counts after allegedly moving back into and damaging a home they once owned in Santa Barbara, CA.
Perhaps you should apply for a green card, mbaya, in case Homeland Security stumbles across your Internet records. Better safe than sorry, I always say. Lol.
Or maybe a passport would be more appropriate? I need to speak to a lawyer about this. In case I move out of California to some other foreign state, like Nevada to visit the gaming tables. I was born in California, but the wanderlust bug has bitten me and I yearn to roam free. A little green stuff would help.
You click on the PU/TBP link and you get the error message:
"The site is down for maintenance and will be back online soon."
I hope the message is true, that the site will be back online soon. In the restaurant business, you see a sign that the restaurant is closed for remodelling, and it often means the restaurant will be closed for good.
This is a nice site. I hope the downturn has not forced them out of business.
TBP states site does not have zip files for photosets.
Photosets do have a zip file, you just have to know how to find it.
There is a single zip file for each photoset (only 1 size of photo to download).
First, select a photoset you want to download from the general index page, or from the listing for the photosets for that model. Go to the page for the photoset you want to download. Select the "VIEW High Quality Pictures" hot link. That brings up a new page, which has pictures from the photoset of that model. Select the "Download full archive" hot link. Your computer will save the zip file with the filename "all.zip".
You will need to rename the file before you download another photoset zip, or you risk overwriting the previous zip file you downloaded (unless you have changed the location you are downloading to, or have moved the previous zip file from the selected download target folder, or have changed the name of the zip file you are downloading from the default name).
Sorry for the bit about overwriting the previous "all.zip" file. Most of you already know that. :)
That's what we all want, a site "to do something for me". But as we get older, that changes. When I was an early teen, looking at a copy of the Sears catalog (the women's swimwear or lingerie sections) would do it for me. But now I can look at a catalog of Victoria's Secret, which is far more colorful and explicit than what I ever saw in the Sears catalog, and
Victoria's Secret is just a catalog, even though it has beautiful women in lovely lingerie.
I used to be exclusively softcore. Then I joined PU, and I've been getting into hardcore. I'm still mainly softcore, but I'm looking for new material and new sites that I hope I will find entertaining. Most of what I find doesn't really appeal to me. But I keep searching. Because there is a lot of good content out there, somewhere. :)
As far as your score for this site, that's an entirely personal opinion. I used to worry when I gave a site a score whether it was the "right" score. But then I finally realized that a site score is very subjective. Some people think a site's score is based on objective factors, and they even have a rigorous system to create a score based on specific factors. But I personally believe a score is both subjective and objective, as long as the basic factors of download speed, ease of navigation, basic quality of contents, basic amount of contents are at the site. And each person's standards of acceptable varies, as does the person's tastes and opinions.
Sorry you were disappointed, graymane. You did get a nice price at $29.95 for two major softcore sites. Unfortunately, Metart is famous for its non-erotic videos of lovely young models.
From what you write, it sounds like you should avoid softcore sites, and look for something harder. Most softcore sites, like Femjoy, MPL Studios, etc. would probably be too soft for you.
There are plenty of sites out there. The problem is finding the ones that appeal to your personal tastes, at a reasonable price.
There's also a ton of crap out there. Metart and Errotica Archives are quality sites, they just don't meet your tastes.
500MB x 50 scenes = 25 GB. If that's for 1 month, that would be a tiny download limit.
I joined a Japanese site about a year ago, that had a daily download limit of 12 GB. The photosets and videos only had 1 file size (no low or medium option, just the high quality was offered).
For downloading, my DSL connection maxes out at 150-160 KB/s. That's the best I can hit, and if I download more than 1 file at a time, the total download speed splits the 150 KB/s between the files. So it's no faster to download 2 files at the same time than to download a single file.
Anyway, even with 150-160 KB/s download speed, I could sometimes reach the 12 GB daily limit. Because the video files at that site were large (the photosets are much smaller, of course).
So I downloaded a bunch of videos and photosets, because there are some absolutely gorgeous Japanese porn stars.
But I haven't looked at a single one of those files since downloading them. Lol. And that was over a year ago.
What percentage complete nudity (including photos with lingerie that shows all the good bits) is there in the photoshoots? A wild guess is fine by me.
What is the name of your "real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos"? Or is she part of your private stash?
Also, why would a recently posted video (August 2010) be of such low quality? Is this a file they dug up from their unused historical trash? Most sites that post updates use files that are their average quality or above average quality. Why would a site post a below average quality file, unless it had some historical or collector interest?
Wild guesses on my part, because I have no knowledge of this site, except for its name. :)
But unless there is a significant amount of nudity, I doubt I would be interested in joining. I like softcore, but I still want to see the "good" bits. (Bits is a British term, you understand. LOL.)
Edit01: I just looked up "bits". I want to see everything interesting, not just the cunny.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Easy login: username, password, captcha (easily read letters).
-No site timeout.
-Streaming options: low, medium, high quality.
-Download options: low, medium, high quality WMV.
: MPEG.
: QuickTime.
-Little or no photoshopping in the photos.
-No download limits.
-Updates 1 photoset or video approximately every 10 days.
Cons:
-Only 1 size for photos.
-If you want to download individual photos instead of the full zip, you sometimes get a "show.php" file instead of the photo file you are trying to download.
-In some videos and photosets, it can be hard to see what the face or body of the model is like. This is true for outdoor scenes, where the
cameraman/photographer does a poorer job than if the scene is indoors.
-The index listing pages are cluttered with thumbnail photos advertising other sites.
-I found very few cute teen models at this site.
Bottom Line:
The theme of the site is interesting: young teen couples having sex in a natural way. But many photosets and videos are lacking. They are shot in an amateur way, especially the outdoor scenes.
The best way to improve this site would be to fire the photographer and video man and get someone who knows how to take a photograph, how to shoot a video. If you're shooting outdoor scenes, get a shooter who knows how to take a photo, how to shoot a video so the model is shown clearly and attractively.
In some outdoor photosets and videos, the face and body of the model is hard to see clearly. The camera is only a few feet away, but the model's face is not shown clearly, because of focus or lighting or shadows or some other reason.
-How a photographer shoots a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. There is no effort to make these girls look more
attractive (from lighting, makeup, costumes, whatever). Even the two models I've seen at other sites that I thought are attractive, did not seem special in their appearances at this site.
The audio track is often poor. A boy and girl are in a meadow, nothing but plants and dirt around, and you hear loud microphone noises, you also hear what sounds like a jet plane overhead, but the sky is clear except for clouds. Maybe it's the wind you hear, because it's windy, and the
microphone noises are loud to begin with. But when you hear the couple speaking, it's not loud enough to make out the actual words. You can often hear the camera clicking in the background for a photoshoot of the video, and the cameraman and photographer walking behind the couple that are being shot can be making noises as well (footsteps).
The lighting outdoors is hard to control, and the model is in and out of shadow, it's distracting.
The indoor scenes are better shot than the outdoor scenes. You have less noise from the microphone, better closeups of the model and the sex action, better control of the lighting. The outdoor scenes are a nice idea in theory, but the photographer/cameraman need to improve his technique to make the outdoor scenes work well.
In a few scenes, where the boy and girl are playfully teasing each other before they start kissing and getting down to business, their acting is good enough that the scene is interesting, even though you can't
understand the actual words they are speaking(German, maybe?). But in other scenes, the prologue to the sex is just wasted time. Porn actors are not often noted for their acting ability, especially in low-budget shoots like these.
The site theme is "natural teens, natural love". This translates to teens making love in outdoor scenes: in a field or meadow, by a lake. If you've been a member of femjoy or zemani, you will have seen videos where, in addition to a lovely nude model, you also see some great outdoor scenery. At this site, the scenery is there, but it's not shown to advantage.
Bottom line: I found no photos worth saving, and only a few videos to save.
I was never very accurate guessing a person's age from looking at him or her.
A few porn models do have a very young appearance, and can still look like a teenager long after they are into their twenties.
Thanks for the links, but I can't really tell much difference in her appearance between the three scenes. The major difference, to me, is that she has a greenish white skintone in one because of the green paint on the walls:
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/001/
I'm pretty sure she is also at the teenmegaworld network. But I don't know if I even bothered to download her material there, because I was signed up to too many different sites, and with a slow DSL connection, it takes a long time to download these large files. And when I download, I usually go for the high quality, so it can take 1-2 hours to download a single video file.
I really need to get a faster Internet connection.
Some of these video files are now over 1 GB, which is ridiculous. Especially when I find I don't even like the file, and delete it, after watching it partway through.
There are a number of videos at this current network, TonyBucks, that are 1 GB or more.
TBP states the content is not dated. But each file (video or photoset) is listed with the day and month it was posted to the site. Also, the files are listed in reverse chronological order at the site, listing each file from newest to oldest in that order.
Sometimes when I mention that a photographer can make a girl look much better, by makeup, lighting, whatever, I get a response that "natural" is better, and that to some PU members, at least, the less makeup, photoshopping, the better: any change from the real model is for the worse.
But I definitely think, as long as it's not overdone (which is a highly personal opinion), makeup and lighting and good skin tone and colorful costume and other factors can make a huge difference in how attractive and erotic a model will be presented.
I think I started seeing this model maybe a year ago. One of the first sets I saw her in she was really cute (because of the lighting and other factors). Since then, I've seen her at many different sites, and she rarely looks as good as she did in that early photoset. It wasn't that she was wearing a lot of makeup: she just looked really cute or pretty.
Some models can look very different from one site to the next. But this model's only been here a very short time, so, if she doesn't age fast, change hair color or hair style, she is easily recognizable at the different sites.
A few porn models can last for 5-10 years or more, and they don't appear to age that much. Most models don't last anywhere near that long, but in a few years, they are already starting to look much older. The porn business can be very hard on some models, I think.
Relations between the U.S. and the UK have been rocky off and on ever since the War of Independence (1776). But even your fellow European porn sites will charge you in Euros when they can get away with it. Porn operators will normally show no mercy to their customers. That's the law of the Porn Jungle! Eat or be eaten (better when you have a female partner with you).
The idea behind the founding of the FDA was great, and I'm sure that over time they have done a lot of good work and helped to increase the safety of products sold. But just as with almost any government authority, there is a lot of criticism of the way they operate, and how it can take years before a product of questionable safety is recalled or stopped from sales. But even the idea of questionable safety, in practice, becomes a legal quagmire. You stop the sale of a drug from a major pharmaceutical company, and you are going to have billion-dollar lawsuits because of that.
But that's the American way, where lawyers can make a fortune suing everyone in sight. The way I understand it, the only person a lawyer won't sue is himself, and they will probably come up with ways to do that and make still more money.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DRM: none
-Site timeout: none
-Download limits: none
-Easy login: requires username and password, no captcha
-Download: low or high resolution WMV files
-Streaming: low or high resolution
-Large number of attractive models
-Models have very little piercings, tattoos
-Models are clearly identified in each clip by name and thumbnail
(that is a really nice feature; I wish more pornsites would include the
model name and a clear thumbnail of the model to show who she is and what she looks like)
-Videos are 10-30 minutes, a nice runtime
-Videos have 20-30+ screenshots to show model and action
-Large amount of hardcore videos with nice variety
-Updates 1 new video every 5 days
Cons:
-Check carefully for the pre-checked cross-sells when you sign up. I got stung the last time I signed up, even though I knew they were supposed to be there. I just didn't see it on signup, so I lost a few dollars down the drain.
-Video quality is acceptable but not great.
-It would be really nice if they could upgrade/increase the visual clarity of their updates. The updates are mainly older scenes from DVDs shot years ago. But if they could remaster the scenes to increase the clarity of the video, that would be a really nice feature.
-Screenshot photos do not have a zip file. But few people would want to save these photos anyway. The photos are low quality: they are useful to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and the video action, which is great. But the photos have little erotic value.
Bottom Line:
The video quality is acceptable, but a site like Nubiles or X-art or Mplstudios can give you crystal clear videos, and you don't get that here.
This is a DVD site, and even for the "high quality" streaming or downloaded files, it's like you are watching an older movie: the quality is OK, but not excellent: the colors are not vibrant, the clarity is not great. All the technical factors are good: professional lighting, professional focus, background music is better than most porn videos, the action is good, everything is good, but not the high quality video clarity you can get at some sites. But at the sites where you get the high video clarity, the quantity is small compared to the amount of content you get at this site.
This site is one of the main values of the netFameSolutions network.
The network currently has about 32 sites. About 5 of those sites are general hardcore sites that make up 90% of the value in the network. The
other sites are niche, that might have a limited number of videos for fans of that niche/fetish, but that most PU members will probably skip over.
With a single membership to almost any site in the network, you gain access to about 22 of the network sites.
The sites that I believe have the most value are:
This is a video network. It has a large amount of photos, but I consider the photos low to medium quality. The photos compare poorly to Metart, Mplstudios, Femjoy, or other photosite pictures.
The network (and this site) has a number of attractive models. There is some ethnic variation of models: You have not just the standard East
European models, which make up the bulk of the models, but also a significant number of Latina models. Also a small number of Asian models. A very small number of black models at the network. The Curry Creampie site features models that are supposed to be Indian-looking (from India).
At this site, the videos have a tiny plot setup, where the boy and girl meet, then almost immediately have sex. But the setup tries to give a little more meaning and flavor to the sex instead of just two or more people banging away on each other. The sex is pretty straightforward: for 1 boy 1 girl: start with a blowjob, guy eats girl, they fuck vaginally, maybe fuck anally, then cumshot to girl's face. The action is not rough or harsh or abusive. This is definitely a hardcore site, but not the harsh, gonzo action found at some sites. Not a lot of tenderness in most of the sex, or affection, but not the harshness or abuse found at many sites.
The monthly price of $9.95 (through PU/TBP link) makes this site a real bargain, based on the good quality of the content, the large amount of
content, the large variation in content, and the low price.
Giving the site a score of 87 because the site is good, plus you get access to a solid network of sites.
I think there's a huge amount of truth in your statement that psychology can be as important or more important in sales than logic. And the water example proves it.
But there is also a small minority of people who resist advertising, the value buyers, who focus on price and value. They spend far less than what other people in their salary brackets do.
You certainly express the idea more elegantly/compactly than I am doing. Lol.
That Nathalie is a true slut. The first time I saw her, I thought she was lovely and pink and soft in a photoset, wearing an adorable smile, a white wrist band and a white-and-pink collar around her neck, and nothing else. But then I started seeing her on one site after another, banging away with boy after boy after boy. And my illusions were shattered, because I had thought she was waiting for me to show up, and I was forced to realize she was not really waiting after all. :)
The photography can make a huge difference in how attractive a girl appears. In that one photoset I first saw, Nathalie looked really cute. But in many of the photosets/videos of her I've seen since, she looks just OK to mildly attractive.
I really wish that more sites would pay more time and attention and care to making each girl as attractive as possible, in the photographs and videos. I don't think it would take that much more effort, as long as the photographer/video man was competent.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
