Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Multiple download formats:
--WMV: low, medium, high quality.
--MPG.
--MOV.
-Streaming: low, medium, high quality.
-Videos and photosets are paired.
-Content is dated.
-Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video.
-Zip files for photosets.
-No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login.
-Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity.
Cons:
-Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset.
-Only 1 size for photos.
-Slow-loading system for viewing photos.
-The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites.
-Models not listed for some videos and photosets.
-No model bios.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed).
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through.
The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common.
There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site.
Sample data for a high definition video:
runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds
size: 1.12 GB
frame width x height: 1600 x 900
total bitrate: 6336 kbps
frame rate: 25 frames/sec
Type of content:
Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus.
Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex.
The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens.
The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors.
The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each).
You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site.
On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you.
I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access.
Thanks for the reply, and taking the time to edit and check the update facts at the different sites.
My impression (which could easily be wrong) was that at the time I joined TeenMegaWorld, the fuckstudies videos were not part of the TeenMegaWorld content. I definitely know that the fuckstudies site was not one of the bonus sites at the time I joined.
At the time I joined TeenMegaWorld, when you joined any one site in the network, you got, as a bonus, access to most but not all the sites in the network. The specific sites you got was arbitrary: It changed depending on which site you joined through, and the date you joined that site. Also, when I last joined (July 2010), if you joined through the PU/TBP link, you got a discounted price, but you were penalized by getting access to a smaller number of bonus sites.
I posted a comment about the smaller number of bonus sites when joining through PU/TBP link, and Khan or someone else at PU contacted the network to get the higher number of bonus sites for the PU/TBP link.
So Khan and the PU/TBP team are looking out for us. Sort of like a big brother, or maybe like the mafia? Lol.
I joined teenmegaworld back in July, hoping that fuckstudies would be one of my bonus sites. But I didn't get it as part of my membership. So I am giving fuckstudies a fucking low grade of 30 because I never got inside the members area.
Regarding anal versus vaginal, there doesn't seem to be all that much of a difference, except when the guy sometimes pulls out and shows how enlarged the anus is. Which doesn't turn me on very much.
So maybe I should drop my score for the site another 10 or 15 points. What do you think?
I did see a few videos from the site, and they seemed to be very sharp in focus and clarity and color with good action with good looking models. Which is why I wanted to get into the site to see what else they had.
So which site did you join that gave you fuckstudies as part of the package?
I actually saw "I, a Woman" back around 1966, which was considered an extremely erotic movie. The Mr. Teas series was erotic comedy, I think, but I'm not an expert on these classificatons. Depends on your definition, I guess, because the novel "Ulysses" by James Joyce was banned as porn for many years after it was written, but I studied that novel in college in the 1960s because it was then considered a classic. But in the 1960s movies (unless they were real porn) did not show actual penetration or pussy shots. But just watching a guy stick his hand under a woman's skirt and feel her crotch (without actually seeing the hand or the crotch) was considered massively erotic. That's about all I remember (or think I remember) from "I, a Woman". There was also the idea that an unmarried woman was having sex, and with more than one man!
This was before VHS tapes (and DVDs), so I saw it in a theater, but I don't remember if it was a mainstream theater or what.
Even then, I did not consider "I, a Woman" as porn, but as an extremely erotic movie. Today's audience, especially the PU members, would not consider it porn. Today's younger PU audience would laugh at the idea that "Ulysses" was considered porn.
Thanks for the update on My Precious Virgins. I'm not perfect, but I try to be generally factual in my reviews. So I wrote in the review: "Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating."
I did not know if they were currently updating, which for many smaller sites can be an on-or-off proposition, which is why I wrote the "supposed to be currently updating."
But since you were a recent member, you have the facts to back you up.
Also, a large part of my reviews are personal opinions. So even though I gave the SpringTime Beauties site a low score, someone else might find the site to be a much better value or experience.
Sometimes, when you read movie reviews by "major" film critics, you wonder if they are writing about the same movie, when they can score the same movie so differently, both high and low.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DRM: no.
-Download limits: no.
-Most models will be present at more than one TonyBucks network, but most of the models are not found at a large number of other sites. So the faces you see here are mainly fresh faces, at least until you have gone through the TonyBucks network.
-There are some models that are really cute or outstanding, that you will probably have seen at one or more other major sites.
-Multiple download formats:
--High, medium or low resolution WMV.
--MPG.
--QuickTime.
-Easy login.
-No site timeout.
Cons:
-The biggest con is that the site is not updating. The most recent update I saw was from January 2009.
-So this is an archive site. Some of the content is ok, but once you have downloaded the material you want, there is little reason to come back again. A shame, because they chose some nice models at this site, and you want to find more material on them, and that won't happen at this site.
-No zip file for photosets.
-1 size only for photos.
-No streaming option for videos.
-Watermark, bottom right corner of photos. Not large, but could be smaller, less noticeable.
-Download problems? I was downloading 2 videos from the site using DownThemAll download manager. Both videos stopped downloading, giving me a
"timeout" error message. Each download re-started from the beginning of the download. I do not know why each download stopped, or why each download could not resume from the point that it stopped.
Bottom Line:
This is part of the TonyBucks network. Joining any site in the network can give you access to 10 or less sites in the network, depending on when you
join and which site you join through. There are currently 11 sites in the TonyBucks network.
At this site the photosets outnumber the videos by a large margin. At most TonyBucks sites the photosets and videos are close in number, and several sites have each video paired with a photoset. Not here.
The size of a single photo (up to 250 KB) indicates high definition. But you don't get the "professional quality" you will find at top photo sites like Met Art or MPL Studios. The photos are "ok", but not high quality regarding colors, clarity, etc. There are some attractive Eastern European models, but they could look much better with professional photography.
The content is softcore teen nudity, with some masturbation. Even though the site was
launched in late 2008 and stopped updating a few months later, the photo quality seems more like something from the 1990s: some very pretty models, but the quality is not high. If you know Teen Stars Magazine, the photography style is very similar: more skin is shown at SpringTimeBeauties, there is some mild solo masturbation at SpringTimeBeauties(no masturbation that I can remember at Teen Stars
Magazine), but the photography is better at Teen Stars Magazine: the colors are better, the models look better.
With the large file size for the "high quality" videos, you expect high quality playback, but you don't get it. The first video I saw had a tiny jittery effect that creates eyestrain. The second video I watched did not have the jittery effect, but the video picture is not crisp. 572 MB for a 15 minute clip, so the video picture should be extremely sharp, but it's not: it's like you're watching the scene through a very faint fog.
You do get the impression you are watching amateur teen models who are just starting their porn modelling career, these girls are young and fresh. I just wish they were presented better (better photography).
The soundtrack of the videos I saw was music from a radio (music mixed with talking from an announcer). The volume level of the music is low, which is better than loud, but it would be better to have no background music at all. The music
is a minor distraction that does not really fit the video.
If you like softcore striptease videos, this would be a nice site, except:
1. The site is not updating.
2. The videos are just ok.
3. The photography is not excellent.
By itself, I don't think the site is worth joining. The videos I saw had some attractive models, but the video quality is just ok in spite of the large file size.
If you like this style of photography, I would choose a site like Teen Stars Magazine, which is a site that doesn't update, but the photos are
nicer, and they have zip files. Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating.
None of the above. First porn movie I saw was at a stag party, it was an 8mm film, that I thought was crap. I did not watch the whole thing.
Later, in the 1970s, when porn movies had really improved and were becoming more commercial, I saw my first porn movie in a regular theater. It was Emanuelle. That was a good porn film. I also saw The Story of O when that came out in the theaters. That was also a very good movie. Both those movies had an interesting plot, good looking girls. Both those movies would probably be considered softcore by today's standards. But I believe they were X rated at the time.
I have copies of Emanuelle and The Story of O on DVD that were commercial copies. But the video quality is not up the standard of the movies when they came out. They keep putting out new releases of those movies over the years, but why they can't make a high-quality version I don't know. Maybe because they can't find a good master to copy from?
I personally like Win XP better than Win 7. Win XP just seems easier to use. But the new computers all come with Win 7, and I'm not going to pay extra (a large amount of dollars) to add Win XP to my PC.
Microsoft charges a large amount of money if you are buying an OS separately from them. Nowadays, the cost of the Microsoft OS is what, maybe $200, and you can buy a low-priced PC for $500 with all the hardware and software that comes with it.
The price for buying items separately instead of bundled with a new PC has always been high, but it seems even higher nowadays. Unless you really know where to buy, and can do it yourself, instead of having a PC tech guy do it for you.
There's also supposed to be a Black Screen of Death and a Red Screen of Death out there, but I've never seen either one of those, that I can remember. The Blue Screen of Death pays me a visit every so often, and has ever since I started using a home computer.
Do you have any opinion on the value of the site? And old review from about 3 years ago rated the site very low, a score of 50. And the replies to that review also say the site is poor. One old reply even mentions the site had DRM.
RB, I've been getting a big increase in the number of spam emails the last few days as well. I can't prove who the source is, or the cause. But I can say that the spam emails I've been getting from AmateurMatch are almost certainly from my partial signup at porn pros.
So my feeling is that the rest of the increased spam came from the same source, my partial signup at porn pros.
Have you been getting any emails from AmateurMatch as well? It wouldn't prove anything, but it would be an indication that your signup at porn pros was the cause of some of your increased spam.
If money didn't mean anything, I would join a lot more porn sites than I do.
But since my funds are limited, I try to join sites where I think I'm getting real value for my money.
There are plenty of sites out there I would like to join, or at least look over to see what they have, but my funds are limited.
The first few times I saw it, I thought: Ugh.
Then, after seeing it so many times, I think: Ugh.
Unless it's done by a girl who can really act like she is enjoying it, I would prefer they come up with some other action to show how hot they are.
You should make that fact a separate comment, BadMrFrosty, because the fact a site stopped updating in 2008 is a major factor in the value of a site or network. It would certainly stop most people from choosing any membership that went beyond one month.
A comment gives the fact greater prominence than if it's buried in a reply to a comment. :)
Thanks for the kind words, Denner.
As you say, it's the $9.95 offer through PU/TBP that makes the network so appealing.
At a much higher price, I would be looking elsewhere to spend my money.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login. Enter username and password, which can be saved.
-Updates with new series and older series. Offering parodies of Mad Men, Fast Times At Ridgemont High, Twilight, etc.
-Huge amount of content. 1722 Gb.
-Wide variety of content. 4637 movies, with wide variation of sexual activity.
-Can stream or download videos:
--Stream in high or low definition. Many videos can be streamed in HD (supposed to be higher than the regular "high definition" used at their site).
--Can download as high or low definition WMV file.
-No DRM
-No download limits.
-No site timeout.
Cons:
-Uncheck the pre-checked agreement to join another site on signup, or you will be charged for a trial membership to another site.
-Poor search engine.
-Video quality (definition) could be improved. This is basic DVD quality video. Many PU members want better quality videos to watch, and will
complain about much of the video content at this site. But the newer material is higher definition.
-The only download format is WMV.
-No zip file for photosets.
Bottom Line:
This is a major site in the netFameSolutions network. There are about 5 sites in the network that update consistently. The other sites have few to no updates. Many of the updates at the smaller sites are older clips from one of the 5 main sites.
The 5 main sites in this network: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
The other sites in the network are niche sites.
Each of the 5 main sites is large, with a large number of DVD quality video clips. These are professionally shot videos, with good basic
technical features: good lighting, good focus, etc. There are a number of attractive models at each of the main sites.
The video quality is good, not great. Don't expect high-quality definition, because you will be seriously disappointed if you have that
expectation. Most of the video content is from 5-10 years ago or more. The videos have not been remastered to today's higher quality standards. But if you are familiar with the DVDs from 5-10 years ago, you will have a huge selection of video clips that cater to a wide range of sexual
preferences: mainly boy-girl, but also group sex (meaning 3 or more people in a sex scene); and there are niche sites that offer tranny, granny,
lesbian, MILF, Indian, etc. The quality of the newer videos is better than for the older videos. You do not get the HD quality of some sites, but the newer videos are nice quality.
The high quality clips are about
-400 MB for a 27 minute clip.
-total bitrate of about 2100 kbps.
-frame width x height: 720 x 400
Devils Film itself, like the other 4 main sites, has a wide variety of content. The content is mainly separated by category or series.
There are photosets, but they are useful for illustrating what the model looks like, and what the video action is. The site uses a software system where you can view each photo. But the system is really clunky and slow. You slowly load each photo as a thumbnail separately. You are supposed to be able to enlarge the thumbnail by clicking an icon, which might or might not work to enlarge the thumbnail. And to get to the next thumbnail, you click an icon, and wait for the thumbnail to load. A really stupid and slow system.
No zip file for the photosets, but most of the models in the photosets are not attractive anyway.
Search is basic and could be vastly improved. You can search by series, by name of model. The results for searching by name of model bring up clips at the Devils Film site plus other sites in the network the model is featured. But you have to know the name of the model for this to work. Not all models are listed for every clip. And there are other problems with the search. The model named Barbara at DevilsFilm is supposed to be in a clip at RoccoSiffredi, but the model named Barbara at RoccoSiffredi is a different model.
The price to join the network is $9.95/month, through PU/TBP. That gives you access to a huge amount of content of wide variety.
Excellent, comprehensive review. Lots of good details and opinions, giving a solid basis for the high site score. Also agree that nubiles is one of the best teen sites with material that goes beyond softcore. There are truly excellent softcore photo sites, but nubiles has fine videos that are both softcore and hardcore.
I started to sign up for a membership at this site, then stopped before completing the process. I did enter a username and email address, and a password, but did not enter my credit card number. Then I decided not to join, and went to another site.
Less than an hour later, I got 3 emails. One email told me "Your account has been set up and will be activated the first time you log in." That account is for AmateurMatch.
My email address was the same I had entered at Porn Pros Network.
The username on the account was the name I had entered at Porn Pros Network + 1 digit at the end.
I got 2 other emails from AmateurMatch:
1 email is the AmateurMatch September newsletter.
1 email advises me to add a photo of myself and complete my Advanced Profile to increase my chances of finding someone.
I never heard of AmateurMatch before, and never signed up for it.
I made a mistake giving my main email address to Porn Pros, even though I did not enter my real name, just a user name. And that user name I gave formed the basis of my membership name in AmateurMatch.
And I did not even finish the signup process at Porn Pros. Their server apparently copies usernames and email addresses, even in a partially completed signup process.
Edit01: The only other time I used that same username was at a different porn site I did sign up with about 2 1/2 months ago, but I doubt the AmateurMatch spam came from that other site, because I gave the other site my full information on signup (Legal name, credit card data, etc.).
I personally think a 100% is easily doable. In all modesty, if I were rating myself, I know that I deserve at least a GB%. And with the way I'm improving day by day, I will soon reach the next step of greatness, with the TB% rating.
For porn sites, the more modest 100% is a goal to be aimed for, rather than achieved, because 100% in theory would be a perfect porn site.
Something is obviously very wrong. I gave MetArt the highest score I ever gave any site in my review. And all of my comments on the site were extremely positive.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
