Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of site contents: About 275 video clips.
-Models listed for each clip.
-Content is dated.
-Updates: Currently 1 video about every 10 days.
-DRM: no.
-Easy login.
-Site timeout: no.
-Models are real teens: a number of attractive teen girls, and the boys are clean-cut teens (few tattoos or piercings).
-Multiple choices for download formats:
--WMV: high, medium, low quality.
--MPEG.
--QuickTime.
Cons:
-No streaming option.
-No photosets.
-Only 4 tiny thumbnails and a larger thumbnail to illustrate each video. And the thumbnails are not enlargeable.
-No bios for models.
-Limited amount of information on video clips: does not show runtime, file size.
-Watermark: Yes, small to medium sized watermark bottom right corner on videos.
-Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites.
-Basic, limited search: can search by name of model, or by date video was posted.
Bottom Line:
The site theme: Hidden cameras capture the hardcore action of real teen sluts.
The idea of spying on teens having sex is supposed to add spice to the sex. What you get is videos that could be improved by better camera work (better lighting, better control of the colors). Some black and white parts of the videos are supposed to suggest real-time video capture, but I would prefer good colors for skintones and background, instead.
You also have portions where the teens are supposed to be videotaping themselves. This is also supposed to add to the "reality" of the
experience. So the teens are kissing, and glancing at the camera, and fucking, and glancing at the camera, and it's distracting. It doesn't add to the realism or excitement. They would be better off dropping the idea of "hidden cameras" and "self video-taping" and just get a good cameraman who can take good videos. Because they are using a cameraman anyway, but the video product is supposed to be showing an amateur real-life capture of teens having sex, and that theme is not really working.
This is a good-sized site for hardcore teen.
Currently 275 video clips.
Clip run about 20 to 30 minutes.
Most of the action is boy-girl.
-Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites.
I click on the thumbnail of "Top Rated Videos", and I get a full page of thumbnails of videos. But when I click on any of the video thumbnails, it turns out these videos are all from Young Libertines, a different site that I would have to join to see any of their videos. So I have to hit the "back button" on my browser twice, to get back to the Teen Sex Reality site. I didn't even realize I had left the Teen Sex Reality site until I saw the signup page for Young Libertines.
There are many ads for other sites on each page, but most ads you can guess are ads, and not videos at the Teen Sex Reality site. But it would make the page far less cluttered if they removed the ads, so you can see (and focus on) what this site has to offer.
This site is one of many hardcore teen video sites. The sex is gentle and not abusive. But it's also not very exciting. Maybe the girls (and guys) that are having sex are having a good time, but it certainly doesn't come through. It's more like they are having sex because it's something to pass the time. No real passion or excitement or enjoyment.
My belief is they are having sex because they are getting paid for it. Which is, unfortunately, not a joke.
The video quality is ok to good. The quality would be improved if they dropped the "hidden cameras" idea and concentrated on making good, sexy videos.
When you join this site, which is part of the TonyBucks network, you currently get access to a number of the other TonyBucks sites. How many
sites you get access to, and which specific sites, depends on which site you join through. Most of the sites you join through have the same
membership fee, but some sites give you a greater number of "bonus" sites.
Nice review, covers what seems to be the main points.
Two main strikes against the site for me:
1. Site seems very expensive at around $38/month.
2. I'm not into young-old fetish.
There are other cons you noted, but the high price alone is a deal-breaker for me. Unless there was a lot of really excellent content that was easily accessible, I can't see paying that much money. There are plenty of good sites that cost far less.
You didn't mention bonus sites. With a membership, is this the main or only site? Or do you get access to a bunch of other sites as well?
I know I'm spoiled, but paying $20/month for Met-art, which is a mega-site, makes paying for a smaller site seem very expensive. I like some video network sites, but paying for a limited 1-site membership, unless that site is exceptional, is a poor use of my porn dollars.
There are few limits when it comes to ways people can grab more of your money.
When I bought my first computer, many years ago, I bought it from a mail-order company. The company was out of state, which means it was located in a different state from the one I lived in. I live in the United States. At that time, and it's still the case, out of state sellers did not charge state sales tax (no sales tax from the state of the seller, and no sales tax from the state of the buyer).
But I was charged my state sales tax on the purchase of the PC, by the seller.
In theory, the seller was supposed to turn the "state sales tax" money over to the state I lived in.
On a practical basis, there was no way to check to see if the seller did turn the money over to my state, or just kept the money.
And legally, I believe the seller could keep the "sales tax money", and claim that it was holding the money to turn over to my state. If the matter had ever gone to a court of law.
But my guess is that the "VAT tax" would be kept by the seller, with the intention of turning it over the the British government. This would happen when the seller dies, and goes to heaven, and does pay the British government it's fair share of all revenues.
I just checked, and I am seeing the $19.95/month special price.
But I live in the U.S.
So I guess you are being hit with regional pricing, if the price you see is about $30/month.
I used the PU hot link to go to the site. Did you remember to use the PU hot link?
graymane1777, I'm not saying this situation can't happen in real life. But I think it's far less common than it's portrayed in porn: The younger girl going after the older man.
I knew a guy whose wife left him for another man.
The first guy and his ex-wife had a daughter. After living with the woman, the second man dumps the woman, and married the daughter.
True story.
Actually, I don't think the young girl, or the ex-wife, were chasing after the second man: I think he was the one doing the chasing.
But RustyJ and I are not saying your life is a porno film: If your life really was a porno film, you wouldn't have the time or energy to spend on porno subscriptions. :)
The TBP facts on the site state videos are downloadable, with no DRM.
A comment at PU dated 01-14-10 states the site is streaming only, with no downloads for videos. A reply to that comment, dated 01-30-10, agrees the site is streaming only, and states that according to a reply from support, the site does not intend to offer a download for videos.
So which is it: can you download all, or only some, or none of the site videos?
If the site is streaming only, for some or all of its videos, the facts at TBP should be changed to reflect that.
Score should be an indication of the value of a site. If a site has very little content, even if the content is extremely high quality, then, unless the price is very low, the score should be adjusted to reflect the small amount of content.
The score of a site should reflect:
1. the quality of the site content
2. the amount of the site content
3. the ease/difficulty of accessing the site content
4. the price of the site
5. If the site gives access to other sites, then that should be reflected in the score as well.
6. So I don't believe the score for a site is a precise number set in stone, but a judgment on the part of the reviewer
7. And different people can come up with very different scores for a single site, depending on how they value the site contents, and ease of site access
8. And there can be other factors affecting the score of a site, such as pre-checked cross sells in the signup form, or regional pricing for people living outside the U.S. Which could be considered part of the membership price, or as separate items that can affect the membership price.
This site has been around for a number of years.
It used to be called "Beauty Is Divine".
At that time it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. There were no videos that I remember.
Most of the models were really stunning.
The problem was that you only had a small number of photosets, and each photoset had a small number of photos.
Then the name of the site changed a few years ago to "X-art".
They started adding videos to the site.
The videos over the last couple of years or so are becoming hardcore.
The videos have a short runtime, 10 minutes or less.
The videos are very high quality (in lighting, focus, high definition, etc.).
The photosets are also becoming not just softcore, but hardcore as well.
I think the photography of the photos is as good as any major photo site, but some PU members have commented they thought the photography at this site was not excellent.
This site is not a mega-site in the amount of photosets and videos. But almost all the models are extremely attractive. And the videos and photosets are extremely high quality.
There are definitely more photosets than videos at this site, but that is because of the site history, when the site was strictly photosets.
The current updates at the site include both photosets and videos.
The preview pages show you nice-sized thumbnails of many of the covers for the site photosets and videos. The preview could be improved by including sample photos, and by a few sample 1-minute videos, so you could get a clear idea of the quality of the photos and videos.
You will probably wish each photoset had more photos, because the models are mainly lovely, and you want to see more of them.
And the videos, at less than 10 minutes each, seem very short. You will almost certainly wish the videos were longer.
If you like the type of photography at this site, I think the
site is well worth at least a 1 month membership.
I'm thinking of taking this comment, and turning it into a site review, because it sure as hell looks like it could have been written as a site review.
Copyright Nov. 16, 2010, by lk2fireone, in case I do write a review of this site, and the material in this reply is used as the basis for a site review.
I don't see hairy legs or armpits on females very often, but I don't understand what all the fuss is about. The first few times I saw male porn guys with shaved pubic hair, I thought it was strange, and then I started reading that female porn girls were supposed to be disgusted when they had to do a scene with a guy who didn't shave his pubic hair.
I prefer seeing a female model with some pubic hair. That's what I grew up with, and I think it's more erotic for a female to have some pubic hair. The bald look is ok, but some hair down there shows the girl has reached the stage where she has started to grow some fuzz of her own.
Fashions change, and I can't wait until it becomes fashion mandatory for guys to shave their armpits, chest, legs, groin and ass, and take it all off the top.
Then the girls can start to grow their hair long all over their body, to show that women are taking their rightful place as rulers of this planet. Will they be able to do a better job of running this planet than the men? Probably not. But they probably wouldn't do much worse.
Power to the women!
(I'm thinking of getting a sex change operation when the women take over, because it always pays to stay on the right side of power.)
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Download limits: none.
-DRM: none.
-Currently updates: 1 update about every 10 days recently.
One week you post a post a photoset which is a record of a video shoot, 10 days later you post the video made during the photoshoot.
-To view individual photos in a set, click on the thumbnail, and you get an enlarged picture. This is easy and fast and wonderful compared to the
slow, clunky software viewing system used at most of the other TonyBucks sites. All the sites in this network should use this simple system, and
get rid of the fancy software that makes viewing individual photos a slow and laborious process.
-Easy login. There is a captcha, but it's easily read, not the messy squiggles that make you wonder what the letters or numbers are supposed to be. I dislike the messy squiggles, and even when I guess them right, I feel irritated that I have to pass a test that I believe is unfair and
stupid. And when I fail to guess right, I am even more irritated.
Cons:
-Streaming: Not available.
-Zips for photosets: Not available.
-Photos available in 1 size only.
-Models: less attractive than most of the TonyBucks models. On the plus side, there are few tattoos or body piercings on the girls.
-Thumbnail ads clutter the listing page of site contents. The thumbnail ads are not identified as ads, you have to figure out which thumbnails show you the site contents, and which thumbnails are ads for other sites.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Can search by type of content (video or photoset). Can also search by date the content was posted, which is basically useless.
Bottom Line:
Tinseks is part of the TonyBucks network, a small network of 11 sites that focus on hardcore teen.
The sites have both videos and photosets. The photosets can be from ok to good quality regarding photo size, focus, lighting, skin tone, etc. But the photos have little erotic quality. The photos are mainly a capture of a video shoot.
It's cheaper to have one session where you do both the photoshoot and the videoshoot. But the results, for the photoset, would be better if you had a separate session for the photoshoot. You would get better pictures (more erotic, more interesting, better posed, etc.). That is assuming the photographer was competent.
So the main value of the photos is to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and maybe an idea of what the video action will be.
But the main value of the sites is in the videos. The photos can be of good quality, but the eroticism does not approach the photo sites like Metart. The videos are a different matter: The
TonyBucks videos are mainly well shot, feature a number of ok looking models, and are hardcore. Metart and most major photo sites are
mainly softcore, and their videos are usually more boring than erotic. At TonyBucks it's the other way around: the value is in the videos, the
photos are a minor addition (even though the photosets have a large number of photos per set, and there is usually the same number of photosets and videos). So a lot of effort was put into making the photosets, but the effort was basically wasted.
Unless otherwise noted, what follows refers specifically to the tinseks site:
The tinseks theme is European college students having great sex.
-Site contents:
94 videos
94 photosets
-Videos can be downloaded in different formats:
WMV: low, medium, high resolution
MPG
MOV
The videos are large files, 580-765 MB for a 20-30 minute clip for high quality WMV file:
Frame width x frame height: 720x576
Total bitrate: 4128kbps
The figures shown are as high or higher than what some sites advertise as high definition. There are other TonyBucks sites where the total bitrate
can be as high as 6300kbps for some videos, but even 4128 is extremely good or "high" definition, as far as I can tell from watching the videos.
The videos are very sharp and clear, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone.
The sound is pretty good. A little annoying random background noise, but they usually don't bother with a music soundtrack, which is a plus.
I personally didn't find many pretty models at this site. This site has a lot of hardcore videos. The action is not rough. It's a boy and a girl getting a lot of enjoyment from sex. Or they are certainly trying to. I just find the action slightly boring. I want a connection,
something erotic to stimulate the imagination. Even if the model were pretty, I still want
something beyond her getting banged.
I'm giving the site a score of 78, because access to the bonus sites raises the value of this site.
Thank you, graymane1777. You are now being considered for the position of my number 1 acolyte, for recognizing what I revealed to the PU community: lk2fireone is Truth.
Based on the way the poll question is worded, some of the possible answers seem invalid.
If you are forced to get rid of your porn stash, you can't hide it. Hiding it would still be keeping it.
The same for asking a friend to keep it for you. You are still keeping it, or keeping control of it.
The logic is slippery, the answers are slippery.
Just like President Clinton was speaking "truthfully" when he said he didn't have sex with Monica Lewinksy. His definition of sex didn't include a bj. Spoken like a true lawyer. Or a true liar. What's the difference between a lawyer and a liar? I'm not sure if there is a difference. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
But if I had to get rid of my porn, I would just delete it from my hard drives. To be 100% certain, I would have to trash the hard drives, or throw them into the trash.
On the other hand (isn't there usually another hand out there somewhere?), if you are faced with a difficult decision, it's only human nature to change reality to come up with something that better fits our desires.
So instead of trashing my hard drives, I could swallow hard and say, "That's not porn. That's erotic art." And poof. My porn stash has disappeared. I now have a collection of erotic art.
And there is a lot of truth in that. Because what has been considered porn or smut has often changed to become art or erotica, and could now be valued in the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars.
Nice start with your first review. But adding a few more facts or opinions to the bottom line would make your review even more complete. That's just a suggestion, I do like what you have written, it's just that your review seems a little short.
On the other hand, the reviews I write go on too long, and I wish I could write them shorter, but I tend to ramble, and use a lot of words to express an idea.
I agree with tangub. How many of us are going to give a Christmas gift of a subscription to a porn site to one of our friends? Even as a joke. If you're in college, you might be able to get away with it, because you're still supposed to be "young and wild and carefree". But anyone older than early twenties would be shooting themselves in the foot by giving a subscription to a porn site as a gift, unless they knew the friend was into porn and would accept the gift willingly.
Actually, I could easily imagine lawsuits arising from this gift. It's very easy to sue in the U.S. (and elsewhere). And I could easily imagine people suing because they don't consider the "free membership" a joke or acceptable behavior.
Nice review: short but comprehensive. I need to learn to write more leanly like you. :)
It seems like a lot of sites are starting out with a very nice update schedule, and then, less than a year later, some in 3 or 6 months, stop updating altogether. I think the financial downturn, which has been with us for years already, lasting much longer than usual, might be partly responsible: sites start out with good intentions, but apparently the money for updates runs out. And it's also partially because networks want to advertise as many member-sites as possible, to lure more subscribers in. The more sites a network has, obviously, the more wonderful it becomes. Except when most of the member-sites are no longer updating, and many of the member-sites might have little content.
You find a site you like, because of the model selection, or the good video or photo quality, and it's a real disappointment when the site stops updating. Lack of updates definitely affects the value/score of a site.
I picked "other". I like long reviews, that are full of site details and personal opinions. But there are reviews that can be fun or interesting to read because of the writer's talent: Toadsith writes the most professional reviews, he even wrote a couple of guidelines on how to write a review and what points to include, that are well worth reading. There are others who can inject some welcome humor or really interesting point of view. And there are many more writers who can give you a clear idea of whether a particular site might be a worthwhile join for you.
The reviews and comments (and some of the threads) can provide really useful information about these sites: both the positive and negative values.
Not a direct answer, but Devils Film has some parodies:
Big Love
Eclipse
Fast Times At Ridgemont High
Mad Men
New Moon
The Biggest Loser
Twilight
I'm still a member, but I haven't watched any of them. So I can't tell if they are much good. But personal taste varies so much anyway, what I find funny might be boring for you, and vice versa.
Devils Film (and its network) is available for $9.95/month through PU/TBP.
Welcome back. I thought you had died and gone to toad heaven. It's great to see you making an appearance here. Hoping to see much more of you. (But I really liked your previous avatar, with the lovely red member.)
Thanks for the kind words, Denner. And it would certainly be a lot easier, as well as cheaper, if all networks sold a general admission membership to all their sites (hopefully, for the same price they charge for membership to a single site, or a selected number of "bonus" sites).
But why would they want to make it easy on us paying customers? Their job (as they see it) is to try to grab as many dollars and euros as they can from our outstretched hands. That is the beauty of capitalism: helping people get rid of their filthy lucre. :)
Fuck Studies is part of the TeenMegaWorld network, or maybe it's called the Royal Cash network, or the Royal Cash network.
That network is a solid teen network.
If you do sign up for that network, be sure to look for the pre-checked trial that will sign you for a 3-day trial to some other site. That trial turns into a high-priced subscription to the other site unless you cancel if you are accidentally hooked into a subscription. There's no reason to get the trial, so make sure you uncheck the box.
Only a few of the sites in the TeenMegaWorld network are currently updating. But there is plenty of hardcore teen content to look through.
The navigation is poor, the search is poor. But you can't have everything.
There are some very sharp (good clarity, good definition) videos at this network (TeenMegaWorld). The action is almost all gonzo: 2 or more teens banging away. But you have a lot of good-looking teen girls at this network.
The above is talking about the TeenMegaWorld network, not the TonyBucks network of my review.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
