I go along with otoh. If the photos in a gallery have a watermark, you can't get rid of the watermark, unless you use photoshop or some editing software. And I don't photoshop or edit my photos. I leave them the way they were downloaded, except I might delete a few photos from a set if the photos are really poor. Or I might just delete the set if most of the photos are poor.
Starting in the days when it first became legal to show pubic hair in the magazines (Playboy and Penthouse) back in the 1970s, the pubic hair was not "natural", but trimmed. Today, looking at the old photos from back then, you might think it was natural or bushy or whatever you want to call it, but most models back then were trimmed before their photoshoots.
I'm not sure exactly what the poll question is asking.
But I think that when PU members spend money on a porn paysite, they are hoping for, or expecting, that they will get at least reasonable value for that money. That means the site should be easily accessible, easy to navigate, with contents that have both quantity and quality.
If the site contents (the videos and photos) are crap, or it is difficult to access the contents because of poor download speeds, or lousy navigation or other problems, then the PU member will feel he has wasted his money.
I am still trying to feel my way to what the poll question means: "Do you feel some users overthink thier porn?"
I doubt that many of us try to study porn like some people study the bible. But we certainly spend time trying to organize our porn collection. Which can take a bit of thought. That would be well spent, because a disorganized mess of a collection is extremely difficult to search through after the collection becomes large. And it's very easy for a porn collection to keep growing over time. You have to prune and weed out the junk, and organize what you have. Which takes time and thought.
Some of the more intelligent and thoughtful and organized PU members should take pity on the rest of us and create a software program that will let us organize our porn collection more easily. That way, we could spend less time trying to keep the files organized and more time enjoying the contents.
But, in general, I do not believe most PU members overthink their porn. They spend a lot of time trying to collect it, and some time trying to organize it, and maybe some time trying to enjoy it. And where is the time left to think about it, after all those other activities take up what is, after all, only a hobby?
I don't know anyone who really studies their porn like people who study great literature or great art.
Porn is more for enjoyment, rather than for study, I believe. Like popcorn movies are made for enjoyment, rather than for study.
I get the same "Server not found" error message when trying to load the site page. Temporary problem, or site gone out of business? Probably better to wait before joining until you have a better idea of what is happening at the site (except, how you could join when the site does not have a working page might be a problem).
The members at PU are looking out for you, Denner.
There is one stunt cock at Teen Mega World that seems to be in a huge amount of their videos. I can't stand the guy, he really irritates me and detracts from the value of the videos he appears in. For some reason he appears in more of their videos than any other stunt cock. You have also seen him in many other networks or sites, although he is not featured in quite as large a percentage of most other site videos.
"-EACH ZIP is of the TEN PICS in a gallery you’re viewing"
From your review, it almost sounds like this site is trying to create their version of the custom zipfile.
It also sounds like a lot of work to download a full zipfile of the photoset.
Glad to see you back with a new review. Actually, checking your review history, it's been about 3 months since your last review. But it just seems longer, somehow.
It's easier and simpler for me to download the entire photoset as a zip. Then, if I want to, I can delete any individual photos from the set that I really dislike.
But I almost never delete or change any of the photos in a set. I am not a purist. I'm more like BadMrFrosty, a hoarder. Or perhaps a kinder explanation would be that I am a purist, who admires the purity of the original artform, the original photoset as selected by the photographer or whoever edited the photoset in the first place.
I did not say the older material has been re-edited.
What I meant was that, if they would re-edit the material and give it the higher resolution of what some sites provide, that the value of the contents would be much improved.
What I meant to say was that I understand your disappointment with the site because of the better, clearer, higher definition videos that can be found at some other sites.
But for people who have not seen the material at the Devils Film network, because of the low price, large amount of content, and variety of content, it's worth checking the site out in spite of the lower resolution of the videos.
Sorry you were so disappointed on your last join. I agree the video quality is not the higher resolution you can find at some sites, and it would be great if they could remaster or increase the quality of the videos. What they do offer is a large collection of many DVD video categories, almost all of which you have seen with your prior memberships. And the PU discounted price of $9.95 is a very low price if you haven't seen these videos before.
But at least you have Teen Mega World and some other sites to fall back on. Wouldn't want to quit cold turkey on your porno addiction. :)
Interesting, informative review. I enjoy the British/Old English writing style, which adds a personal flavor to the review. Really, a lovely review of a very nice site.
This seems to be a very small site. With very limited information from the site preview area. PU discount price is $17.97/month. But the site preview only shows maybe 15 models in the "all girls" section. 15 models at this site, that's started in September 2009, according to TBP?
TBP states 18+ episodes (videos) for the site (facts updated 01-05-11).
So apparently this is an archive site, with little to no updates. I mean, 18+ episodes for a site that launched in September 2009? A very tiny site.
There are supposed to be 7 bonus sites, so possibly it's worth a 1-month membership.
Have any PU members been a member of this site, and would comment on whether it's worth joining this site (with the bonus sites)?
Khan, I took advantage of your added option, and voted for "None of the above."
But I wasn't really being serious with the gay suggestion. I was also kidding when I said that "Semen is the nectar of the gods." Sometimes my jokes don't translate well, and people might think I was being serious.
This new Squirting Virgin is not one of my favorite sites. Even more than the oversized dildos, I dislike the squirting. To me, it looks like the girl is peeing, which I don't find erotic. That would be messy, smelly, and unsanitary. Ugh.
In spite of some really attractive models, I don't find the videos here erotic. The squirting is too much of a turn-off for me.
How can anyone be so mistaken? Semen is the nectar of the gods. All you have to do to realize that is to see all those porno videos where the girls are gulping down the stud cock's semen and smiling like crazy. So why should it be only the girls who get to have all the fun.
There is a new site in the Teen Mega World network (or maybe it's the Royal Cash or S&S Royal network, it's hard to figure out what to call some of these networks). The new site is Squirting Virgin. I am a current member of Teen Mega World, but do not have access to Squirting Virgin. Perhaps someone who joins Teen Mega World in the future will get access to this new site in the network.
Edit: I logged in to Teen Mega World later today, and I now have access to Squirting Virgin. So that's pretty cool: gaining access to the newest site in the network, based on a currently active membership in Teen Mega World.
I like PU the way it is. These possible discount offers seem less an improvement than added clutter. But if you want to try out these offers, why not put them on a separate page at TBP, where they will be available for viewing if desired, but otherwise out of the way?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Videos: Small watermark appears briefly at different times in a video.
Not obtrusive.
-Photos: Small watermark.
-No DRM.
-Videos and photosets have posting date.
-Site has a models list, which is a an alphabetical list/pages of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the number of photosets and videos for each model.
-Very long period before site timeout.
-Can watch videos streaming or download. The streaming option is not very good. You get a small window to watch the video. Much better to download the video and watch it on your PC. Streaming option is OK to watch briefly to see if the video will be of interest. But trying to fast-forward the streaming video does not work well: the video stops playing, and it's hard to get it to resume at the place you want to try next.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Large number of models (320+).
Cons:
-The software for viewing individual photos is clunky. There should be an easier way to view individual photos.
-Navigation is basic. It should be easier to browse through the photosets and videos. The videos and photosets are split into two separate sections, but it should be easier to browse through the site contents.
-The search is basic, and could be improved by being able to search for the title of a photoset or video, or being able to search for a specific
type of content such as type of sex action, etc.
-No model bio or information on the model is offered.
-One size only for each photoset. No choice of low, medium, high quality photosets.
Bottom Line:
There are a number of attractive models at this site. The site theme is young teen girls who are amateurs. These are not girls being naughty, but
attractive young girls who are filmed on camera enjoying their sexuality: by themselves (masturbation), with their female friends (lesbian), less often with a boy. It's good clean enjoyment and fun, not dirty, not abusive, not rough.
-Large number of models (320+). The models are teen or early twenties, white Eastern European girls. Mainly slender, mainly small-breasted.
Number of models at this site: 320
Number of photos per photoset: 40 - 100 photos.
videos:
number: 800+
runtime: 15-20 minutes
size: 200 MB - 1 GB+, depending on which quality you choose.
Format: WMV
Definition/quality: medium, high, HD (the best, highest quality)
Photosets:
number: 1,000+
Photo dimensions: 1000 x 1500 pixels width x height.
Photo size: about 200 KB.
-Update rate:
1 photoset per day, average.
1 video every 2 days, average.
I don't know why the the photosets at 18 Only Girls are so unsatisfying.
The quality of the photosets is far below what you find at a glamor-style site like Met-art or MPL Studios, in terms of definition, appeal, etc. The style of the photosets is like what is shown at sites like Teen Stars Magazine (an archive site) or My Precious Virgins. Except that what
is shown at Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins is done much better. The photosets at 18 Only Girls are like a pale imitation of the
much better photosets at the other two sites. And compared to glamor photo sites like Met-art or MPL Studios, the photosets at 18 Only Girls are
almost worthless. The photosets are like snapshots from the 1960s or 1970s. Even though they are nude photosets, the 18 Only Girls photosets lack sexiness. My guess is that the lack of sexual appeal is due to the washed-out appearance of the colors in the photos.
Content appears to be shared between the 18 Only Girls site and the Young Legal Porn site. This is true of photosets and videos. I am looking at a
recent photoset at 18 Only Girls, titled
"Horny_coed_girl_striping_and_toying_her_snatch_1295819441_only_674", with the model named Drew. But even though the photoset is posted at 18 Only
Girls, each photo has a YoungPorn.net watermark.
There seems to be some confusion in naming The Young Legal Porn site: The Young Legal Porn site is called both Young Legal Porn and is also called Young Porn. The site is advertised as Young Legal Porn, but the address bar of the site itself uses YoungPorn instead, and the watermarks on the photosets show YoungPorn.net.
The videos, unlike the photosets, have value. The videos are professionally shot, and are very high quality: Good to excellent lighting, focus, definition, camera-work. There are a large number of videos at this site worth watching, as long as
you are satisfied with a softcore approach to pretty young teens: the sex is solo, or lesbian, or some boy-girl, but it's not hard-edged or abusive.
A short review, but the points are made very clearly. You gave a simple but effective explanation for your lowered score for the site. Your review is definitely worth reading, not just for your opinion of the site, but also for why software updates can be annoying.
Weird, but the novelty would soon be lost.
Actually, back when I read porn, pre-internet, I remember there was sometimes used as a device, a girl would be naked in some kind of basket that could spin, and she could be fucked from below. I think the origin of that device was supposed to be in Asia.
So the spinning basket seems like an earlier variation of this spinning table.
My guess/opinion is that the belly button displayed by Kasey Chase is an innie belly button. But I'm not really an expert on the subject. That could be an example of an innie/outie, or perhaps a mutated form of navel that is still to be named.
Excellent review, a pleasure to read. I probably enjoyed reading it more than you enjoyed writing it. Human nature to enjoy looking at car wrecks and the suffering of others.
But as pat362 says, you took a bullet for the rest of us. So you can feel noble in your sacrifice. :)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
