Jay G, my suggestion is to take a video of yourself and post it on PU. Then our fellow PU experts could make suggestions on how to improve your performance.
My personal opinion is that some of us might be interested in how you achieve this "Put-put-put" orgasm. Something drawn out like this might be even better than the very strong but brief "Wow" climax of some members.
You expect porn networks to make it easy to find the best deals? One reason we use PU is so that we can read where other members have done the work and can point us to the sites with the best value, whether it's number of included sites, or great content, or easy navigation, or fast download speeds, or whatever.
Being a porn hound is not always the easy way out: it takes real effort, determination, and cash. Lol.
There are plenty of kinks I don't appreciate: vomiting, abuse (including slapping, spitting, name-calling, hair-pulling, making the female scream or cry from painful excess), peeing, etc.
It takes a real man to pee in a girl's mouth. Wow, what a stud. I've seen some videos where Pierre Woodman is doing that. I guess it's not enough for him to make a girl scream from rough sex: now he has to pee in their mouth for additional kicks. What's the next step: pulling out a gun and pulling the trigger as he cums? Or maybe he could use a knife instead. That would really show his power and domination.
The videos are short, 6-10 minutes. Very high quality: clear focus, sensuous, softcore erotic. I say softcore, because that is the overall feel, but there is female solo masturbation, girl-girl lesbian action, and boy-girl sex, but it's erotic or sensual, not gonzo hardcore.
Site used to be, years ago, very small photosets of models, no videos. But for last few years, they have been adding videos. The most recent videos are hardcore (with a softcore style, like I said). The earlier videos from a few years back were solo girl videos.
But they have been adding a lot more videos in last few years.
A very nice site, small compared to mega-sites like Met-art, but goes beyond Met-art in the explicitness of the sex they now show, in both the photosets and the videos.
I think it's a great site, well worth the price, as long as you are not expecting gonzo hardcore sex.
I wouldn't mind at all if the video runtime was longer, because you are left wanting to see more, or have the action last longer. With most softcore and hardcore videos, the videos last too long, and you skip over parts. But here, you wish the video would last longer, because they are really nicely done.
Never had a Mac. They are supposed to be easier to use, and less prone to malware. But I've already learned to use Windows, so learning to use a Mac would be like starting all over again, plus Macs are supposed to be more expensive.
Call porn access or devils film by telephone (there is a toll free number to call) immediately to cancel your trial subscription.
If you don't cancel, your trial subscription will normally convert to a monthly subscription at a much higher rate than what you would pay with a PU discount. You could easily pay $30 or even $40 a month when the trial subscription converts to a monthly subscription.
I got stung the same way, when I signed up for Devils Film the last time. I looked for the pre-checked offer, but did not see it, and was charged for the trial. I immediately called on the telephone to cancel the trial, within minutes of signing up, when I was notified I would be charged for a trial to porn access.
I could not get the telephone representative to cancel the charge for the trial sub, but she did cancel the trial subscription, so it would not turn into a monthly fee.
I never used my trial sub to porn access, but at least it did not turn into a monthly fee.
It depends on whether the URL is really from Brazzers or not.
If the URL is genuine, then it sounds like a mistake from Brazzers.
But if the URL is not genuine, then it could be a phishing attempt to get you to visit the site and then they will ask for confidential information from you, which you might give, thinking the site was genuinely from Brazzers.
I've gotten emails from fake Ebay addresses that told me my Ebay account had a problem. When I sent those emails to Ebay support, they almost always told me the emails were spam, or phishing attempts, and that I should never click on the URL link or give any confidential information to such a site.
I also got emails from fake Chase bank addresses that told me my Chase account had a problem. Since I didn't have a Chase bank account, I automatically knew those were spam, phishing attempts.
I would send an email to the genuine Brazzer support address, with the suspect email attached, asking if the suspect message is fake or real.
The "sending" email address is not really the one to check. You want to check if the URL in the email address is genuine. The "sending" email address can easily be faked. I get spam, fake emails, which sometimes have my own email address listed as the "sending" address.
Since I know that I didn't send these emails to myself with my own email address as the "sending" address, I automatically know these are spam emails.
Your review back in 2007 was accurate for the site back then.
The site photos are still not very good, in general.
The site videos are much improved. They still have the videos from years ago, but the newer videos are much better quality: crystal clear definition, good lighting, good camera work, in general. Solo teen, girl-girl lesbian, some boy-girl. This is not a gonzo-style site, but a more gentle sex style that I think of as softcore, even though it shows masturbation and lesbian and some boy-girl.
But if you want hard-edged fucking, you should look elsewhere.
This site and 18OnlyGirls are very similar: run by the same company (Diesel), same type of content, same models, same layout. The two sites also swap some content (videos, photosets). So if you join one, you will see, not exactly the same photosets and videos, but very similar ones, at both sites.
It's easy to get confused about the names of sites, because there are so many sites out there. Many of the sites have names that are very close to one another.
Sometimes I look at a site name, and I have to check PU to see if I've already written a review on it, or have even been a member at the site.
My memory is certainly not what it used to be. Lol.
Yes, it's the same site. Some of the videos/photosets are watermarked YoungPorn, some of the videos/photosets are watermarked YoungLegalPorn. And the site is named YoungPorn in the address bar, but the site advertising lists the site as YoungLegalPorn.
They changed the name, but still use the old name as well.
I mainly look at pictures, which are silent. But I guess that reading a blog would be silent as well. Never thought much about looking for blogs on these models. Certainly was not interested enough to follow a blog any of these models might have written,
Maybe if I was a really big fan of one of these adult actresses I might read her blog once in a while. But I've never been on Twitter, or Facebook. And I've never really been a big fan of any adult actress.
Unless he's been badly beaten by his male opponent, maybe he could turn around and fuck the girl giving the titty fuck. I don't think I've seen a titty fuck before now. How much does it hurt?
I said the same thing, basically, that I liked the old home page better, because it was easier for me to use, and more useful, because I really liked the simplicity of a large number of the most recent updates with a thumbnail that, with simple click, brought up a full-page version of the cover sheet.
But the new home page design is a better advertisement for newbies and casual browsers, in that it shows more of what the site offers.
I've said it before, but Met-art is my favorite porn site. They have an incredible number of attractive models, an incredible amount of good-to-great looking photosets, and the site is, in spite of massive content, easy to use and easy to navigate. They also have an update rate of photosets and new models that is incredible.
If they wanted to improve the site, I think they should stop making/posting new videos, and spend the money on even more photosets. Because I can't remember if I ever saw more than a tiny number of videos I liked at this site. All the time and effort and money put into videos that I think are boring.
But the number of photosets they post, on a daily basis, blows away any other photo site I've ever joined.
Met-art has re-designed the updates page. Met-art is constantly tinkering with the site design to improve the Met-art experience, to make the site easier to use.
The old update page was basically a listing of the most recent updates (photosets and videos) with a nice-sized thumbnail of each cover sheet. By clicking on any thumbnail, you would get a full-sized page of that cover sheet.
In the new update page design, you get a reduced number of update thumbnails. The updates are now sorted into a photoset grouping, and a video grouping. Before, the photosets and videos were lumped together, and sorted by date (most recent to oldest). By clicking on a thumbnail for the cover of a photoset, instead of getting a larger, full-page version, you now get 14 tiny thumbnails of photos within that set.
New to the updates page is a section of thumbnails that shows the Live Met Cams models.
Also new to the updates page is a listing, with thumbnails, of the top rated Metart models.
Personally, I liked the old design better, it was simpler, and showed a larger amount of the most recent updates.
But for someone who is just browsing, and is new to this site, the new design does a better job of showcasing the huge content that Metart offers with a membership.
All of this information was available before, but the new design places more information on the primary updates page.
And the technical expertise of the site design is impressive. The thumbnail links work easily. You click on a thumbnail of a model in the highest rated section, and it brings up a listing (thumbnails) of that model's photosets and videos.
Nice review that gives the flavor of the site.
I like Russian and East European porn. And I like attractive models, which this site has.
But I prefer one-on-one. Also, I like videos to be edited. I would like a build-up to the sex, but a lot of aimless chatter in Russian (even with subtitles) can get boring fast.
And I appreciate your comments on the sound track being poor to miserable.
And I guess the lighting could be much improved (strictly a guess, as I haven't seen any of the videos).
I prefer good lighting and good editing over the "reality" flavored porn. And good camera work. And good sound would be a bonus.
So I will pass on this site.
I didn't know what a glory hole was until I just looked it up. Looking at the name, I thought it meant something else.
I've seen some sites that have glory hole pictures/videos, but never went inside the sites. This isn't my area of kink.
So my response to the poll would be, "Not interested". If the poll had that choice.
Based on the current poll answers, I don't think any of them fit my position. I don't hate glory hole, but I don't love it. I guess I feel a mild dislike of it, even though I haven't seen any examples (pictures or vids). Why waste my time looking at what will almost certainly be crap?
When I had dial-up, which I had for many years, I was lucky to see download speeds of 3-4 KB/s, which showed in the Windows system tray when downloading a file.
I switched to DSL, and then got 150-160 KB/s download speeds (again, from what appeared in the Windows system tray area when downloading a file).
I recently switched to a faster DSL, and now get up to 630 KB/s download speeds, which is a huge improvement.
I knew there was a difference between bits and bytes (8 bits per byte), but it was still confusing when I looked at speed ratings because I didn't know which were being used or referred to.
But if everyone follows the simple rule that "b" stands for bits, and "B" stands for bytes, then I hope to remember that.
But I ignore the difference between "K" and 1,000 (K = 1,024), because my brain can only hold so much. :)
The preview pages for Teen Stars Magazine shows updates/photosets for models dated 2010 and 2009. But the thumbnails for the photosets are old photos that are probably 5 years old or older. You might get the idea that this site is still updating. But my best guess is that this is still an archive site, which has not updated or added new photos or videos in years. I'm basing that on the fact that the site did not update for years, and that the photosets in the preview section, although dated as 2010 and 2009, were probably shot 5 years ago or more.
Also, a lot of these models have suddenly changed citizenship from Eastern Europe to USA. I wonder if immigration is aware of all the models that entered our country by the Internet?
Finally, many of these models have been 18 years old for many years. I thought I was the only one who had discovered the secret of staying young. But this porn site has an amazing number of models that have stayed 18 or 19 for years and years.
Truth in advertising. As consumers of porn, we must be confident our porn sites are diligent in their search for truth and justice and the American way of life. Hi-yo Silver (I ride along with the Lone Ranger).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
