I'm not a member.
I tried loading the site page, could not get it to load.
That's why I am often careful about buying a long-term subscription to a site. You never know how long the site will be around.
If the site does not come back up, you can always try to get a partial refund.
Wishing you luck, either way.
The worst addiction is breathing. I am waiting for a gorgeous female vampire to bring me into the Life, where I won't have to breathe any longer. I just hope she isn't one of these new vegetarian twinkies from Twilight, because I respect the old-fashioned blood-chomping vampires that I grew up with.
But I think that james4096 is right, that a serious chemical-dependent addiction would be hard to break, because you have not only the psychological addiction but a chemical addiction as well.
My impression is that Nubiles provides a much broader range of content than Diesel. Regarding type of sex action shown, degree of explicitness, etc. Diesel seems much more focused on lesbian and masturbation, with very little boy-girl.
I will look again at the update rate of the Diesel network. I didn't actually study it closely, I was giving my impression of what I found. So I could be off in my impression.
Glad you were able to find a site that meets your strict standards. Hopefully the sites you join will provide satisfaction for the price you pay. Looking forward to reading your review.
My guess would be that the girls can come and go very fast in these shoots. While the guys might be more of a regular thing. There are far less guys used than girls. So the girls are more disposable, in that sense. So it's easier to keep track of the guys, since there are less of them. I mean, the main guy is Rocco himself, who's used time and time again. Then you get a few other guys who Rocco chooses.
So it's just easier to find the guys' names than the girls. Trying to track the girls you might like from one clip to the next, if you don't know what the girl is named, is annoying.
I don't know who would want to track the appearance of a guy. Except there must be fans of Rocco himself, who look for clips featuring Rocco.
I look for the girls. And I agree (with your implied statement) that when you don't know what the girl is named, it can be frustrating looking for her video appearances.
I have a current membership in the Diesel network. That gives me access to all 14 sites in the network.
I think the 3 best sites in the network, that have the most value are: 18 Only Girls
Young Legal Porn
Beata Porn
18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are very similar sites that seem to trade material between the two sites, and still update.
Beata Porn is one of the other sites in the network that is still updating, and has an attractive model. Beata is not gorgeous or lovely, but she's a nice-looking model with a very nice body.
Denner,even if you haven't been a member of 18 Only Girls for over a year, I think if you rejoined the site, you would feel disappointed with the content because you would have seen most of it before, and the new material, while nice, would not justify the membership price. That's just my opinion.
The network has a slow update rate. (Most sites in the network don't update.)
There are some attractive girls in the network, but some of those attractive girls are from the "archived" content, material that was done years ago. And the amount of content on many of those attractive models is very limited regarding photosets and videos.
The Diesel network is definitely not a scam or a cheat. But for the money, once you have seen the contents, they just don't come up with enough new content to justify rejoining for a very long time. Much more than a year, because of the slow update rate. If they had the massive update rate of Nubiles or Teen Mega World, then a return membership to Diesel through 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn would make sense, depending on your tastes. Because the Diesel network has more limited audience than Nubiles or Teen Mega World, in my opinion.
But even if you like the material at Diesel, which I assume you did, you've already probably seen most of it. And you won't feel happy paying for a new membership based on the new content you will find.
The problem is not with the quality of the content: I think the quality of the new content is fine or acceptable. The problem is with the amount of the new content.
I think I deserve a special star for giving such a long, winding answer to such as short question.
Maybe it should be named: the Star for Being Unable To Simply Answer A Simple Question.
I like plenty of different models. And I have looked for additional material/content from them once I've found that I like them. But I am not especially searching by whether the content is soft or hard: I am just looking for content with them, and if I find it, looking at the content to see whether I like it or not.
My collection is not categorized/organized by hardcore versus softcore, but rather by paysite-model. My focus is the model, not whether the material is hardcore or softcore.
Most of my collection is softcore. That's my main interest. It's much easier to find and collect good to great softcore than to collect hardcore. Also easier to enjoy good softcore more than good hardcore. You can look at one or more softcore photos of a lovely girl, and just enjoy them. How often do you come across hardcore photos that are truly enjoyable or lovely? The answer is, rarely.
I'm sure there must be plenty of good to excellent hardcore videos out there, but the crap you have to go through to find worthwhile hardcore material makes the search exhausting.
Collecting is supposed to be enjoyable, not exhausting. Exciting, not endless toil through a lot of mediocre or worthless hardcore garbage.
You find a treasure like Met-art, you should cherish it. A low-cost, endless source of new and lovely-to-great photos about beautiful teens. It doesn't get better than that.
Communicating on the Internet, and in person, often leaves out a lot of meaning.
I did not feel criticized by your post. I thought it was a sensible, honest observation, a little bit of wit.
My reply was intended as a simple explanation of my review reasoning, with no wit.
Your comment was more interesting reading than my reply. :)
As I understand it, the PU system really dings you for a one-sided review if you don't list pros.
My score of 50 shows what I thought of the site. I would have given a lower score, but 50 is the lowest score in the PU system.
So I tried listing pros.
But almost no one would join this site and think it was worth anything.
And stretching is good for you. I really need the exercise (physically and mentally). Lol.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Zip file for photosets.
-No download limits.
-No watermark on the videos.
-Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update January 2007.
-Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios.
-Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very
complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos.
-OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos.
-No search engine.
-Very basic navigation.
Bottom Line:
-This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site.
Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness.
-This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site.
Small site.
Videos: 47
Photosets: 73
Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips.
Frame width x height: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp.
The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex.
-If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find
anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets.
The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known.
None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members.
The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring.
Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first.
A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos.
My PC is a laptop, and it's giving me problems sending duplicate posts, etc.
Anyway, figure out if the problem is at your end or at the Young Legal Porn end. Computers can be very touchy. A firewall can cut off access to a site, or to images at that site, or slow download speeds, or the problem could be some incompatibility in one of the programs on your computer with the Young Legal Porn server hardware/software.
Or it could be a problem at the YLP end.
Try to figure out the source of the problem, and then ask for expert help on solving it. Go for the free online help first. There are experts willing to help for free. Use google to find those groups.
You give your location as Unknown in your personal data, but you used the word "blimey" in your reply, and use English/British spelling for words like "favour". So I assume you are probably in the U.K. or somewhere in Europe.
I'm in the U.S. California.
Europe is supposed to have, in general, faster Internet connection than the U.S. But if the servers are located in the U.S., then U.S. residents might have an advantage. Maybe.
So you should look for people in your general location, if possible, to judge yourself against. If someone in your area is reporting speeds as fast as 500 KB/s, and you are supposed to be able to achieve those speeds yourself, you might try going to some computer help boards to see what possible easy solutions there might be to your problem. Your problem might be easily solved by an expert who is willing to help (offer advice) for free. Or it could be that your problem is difficult to solve, unfortunately, and you will need to call in friends or even pay a real expert to look over your computer.
The best approach, the cheapest, is try fixing it yourself, at the same time going online to computer help groups where some extremely knowledgeable people are genuinely willing to help others for free.
If that doesn't work, then maybe you will have to pay someone to look at your problem, and you don't know how well that will work out. The guy could charge you a lot of money, and accomplish little except telling you that you have a problem (dressed up in some fancy terminology, probably).
I'm not a computer expert, but you have some kind of problem is your max download speed is 89 KB/s, and you normally have a much faster speed.
Are you have the same slow download speeds at other sites, or is it just the Young Legal Porn site?
If you are not having the problem at other paysite networks, then it appears the problem would be with the servers at Young Legal Porn, or their network connections/routers/equipment whatever.
So which is it: the problem is specific to Young Legal Porn, or is it general to all the paysite networks you have access to?
That should pinpoint whether the problem is with your computer hardware/software connection setup, or with the Young Legal Porn connection.
I've mentioned quite a few times that I have a slow DSL connection. Some PU members are probably sick of hearing that, because their own ISP connection is almost always faster. My maximum download speed is between 150-160 KB/s on a single download. If more than one file is downloading, then the best I can hope for is that the two or more downloads together add up to the 150-160 KB/s total. Sometimes the total download speed can drop far below that level, depending on what the servers are doing. I apparently don't have any way of controlling the speed of individual file downloads, other than selecting which ones to activate. Unless I'm using a download manager, stopping a download before it finishes can mean restarting the download from the very beginning, instead of at the stopped/resume point.
As you know, when you have a download speed of 150-160 KB/s, some of these video files can take 2-3+ hours or more for a single video file. Some files are 1-2+ GB, and the file size seems to increase every year.
But since my max download speed is 150-160 KB/s, I don't have the problem that you do: You grit your teeth if the speed drops to 150 KB/s. I feel good that I'm getting the best I can.
I need to pay more for a faster connection, and do it soon.
Anyway, I tested the download speeds at Young Legal Porn just now, and I am getting 150-160 KB/s for downloading the zipped photo galleries. I download a video file, the first two minutes is slowly building up speed, and then it hits the 150-160 KB/s and mainly stays there.
You need to check with someone who has a much faster connection like you have, to gain an idea of what you should be getting. I am a turtle compared to you, so what I am getting has little relevance to what you should be getting. You need to compare apples to apples, not to lemons.
And I need to upgrade my lemon to an apple (not the apple computer, but an apple-faster ISP connection).
But it appears that our likes in porn are very similar in some cases. I wanted to see the Beata site, thought she was cute, had seen a few of her videos, wanted more. And I agree with you about the Euro girls versus the U.S. starlets, who go in for plastic surgery and tattoos. Though some of the Euro girls have light tattoos (Part of the Russian crime culture? Or just the style for young, want to be hip kids. The Russian guys are much more heavily tattooed than the girls.) At least the Euro girls are still mainly natural, but I dislike it even when they have a belly ring. My prejudices annoy even me, because I realize how outdated they are.
But if you are down to 89 KB/s and all you are downloading is a single file (not multiple files at the same time), then something is seriously wrong. I am getting 150-160 KB/s downloads, which is my normal maximum speed for downloads, at Young Legal Porn.
I'm also a current member of the Young Legal Porn network, a network and site I've been watching a long time before finally jumping in. I wonder how many times the electronic ghosts of these PU members are crossing in the porn fields online. Lol.
I don't remember actually meeting anyone in any of the porn sites. Because I don't participate in any of the porn site forums (except for PU). And I almost never comment on any of the videos or photos. So I'm a silent ghost. Like most of us, I would guess. Actually, I don't bother checking to see if there is a forum, and I pay little attention to site rankings of which are the hottest models, and which are the hottest videos and photosets, because I prefer to find my own favorites, which suit my taste more closely.
At the moment, there seems to be a lot of material at Teen Mega World to check out. I am slightly disappointed with what I found at the Young Legal Porn network. A few good videos, but not enough to justify the price. And the photos are not near the quality of the glamor photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. They have some very attractive models, but you are now finding attractive models at many different sites.
pat362 actually mentioned in a different post, months ago, that 18xgirls is a site that has the same videos as smackmybitch, but with a much smaller number of them. And it has a cheaper price as well. So I've been thinking since then, trying to decide which site to join, the larger, more expensive site, or the cheaper, smaller site. I saw a few of those videos, thought the models were attractive, and that the videos were well-shot.
Now he tells us that the same videos (in slightly smaller quantity) are at Beauty Angels.
So he really saved me some time and money. And now I don't have to think about which of the other 2 sites to join. I'm not joining either one of them, because I have Beauty Angels.
Thinking hurts my brain.
Or maybe it just makes it numb.
It really can help at times when PU members share their knowledge. You save a few dollars here and there. And maybe avoid some sites that you wouldn't pay for before you've already paid.
And I found his answer was correct, when I joined Teen Mega World this morning, and did get access to those 2 sites, along with access to a bunch of other sites in the network.
For a listing of the sites you get access to through Teen Mega World, see reply #3 by pat362 of this comment.
I joined TeenMegaWorld today because pat362 told me he joined TeenMegaWorld 2 days ago and he listed the sites he got access to. 2 of those sites were sites I especially wanted with my membership to this network: Beauty Angels and Fuck Studies.
And when I joined today, I did get access to those sites. So pat362 saved me some money, because this membership is less expensive than another one that would have given me access to those 2 sites.
elephant also offered some site information on his recent membership with the network.
The network often does a poor job of listing the specific sites you get access to, which can depend on which site you join through, on the advertising pages and signup page. And the specific sites you get access to, by joining through a particular site, can change over time.
They would greatly simplify the process, and cause less confusion, if they simply gave access to all the sites in the network with one admission.
Or they could simply spell out which sites you get, or don't get, in a simple text listing for each site join-through membership.
Thanks for the response.
You're right, Beauty Angels only started in December, 2010, according to TBP.
I looked at the Fuck Studies signup page, and it shows clear thumbnails of the sites you get access to.
Unlike the Teen Mega World site, which shows tiny thumbnails of sites you can access with a membership, and only some of the sites are listed/shown in thumbnails.
When you go to the Teen Mega World site, and click the signup page, it shows:
"Access to 25+ bonus sites"
"INSTANT ACCESS to 18 Exclusive Sites!"
"Free Access to 16 additional bonus sites"
There are tiny thumbnails of some of the sites you get access to (it's difficult to see what some of the sites are from the thumbnails).
But there is no simple text listing of the sites you gain access to.
It would make it much simpler, and easier, to determine which sites you get access to if there were a simple text listing, or they showed all the sites with a thumbnail large enough to easily read what each thumbnail represented (along with a complete listing of the thumbnails, which they don't provide).
I joined Teen Megaworld at least a couple of times, and did not receive access to some of the sites I wanted. Which is why I am asking if you know specifically which sites you get with a Teen Mega World membership.
From wikipedia:
"Creampie, also known as internal ejaculation, internal cum shot and, in gay pornography, as breeding, is a term used in pornography to describe when a male ejaculates inside his partner's anus or vagina.[2][3][4] The term also refers to the visible seeping or dripping of semen from the anus or vagina.[2][3][5] Scenes of this type have become common in both male homosexual and heterosexual pornography since the turn of the century."
You have to be a true pervert to try keeping up with all the terms used in porn.
My impression was that a creampie was when a guy ejaculated inside a girl's vagina, and then you see the cum dripping from her vagina. I've seen a number of those scenes.
I wasn't aware that it also applies to anal ejaculation. Or to gay porn. Breeding (now used for gay creampie) was an old English (in England) term for being pregnant. So I guess the guy who thought up the use of breeding for creampie thought he was being witty or cool.
I used to read historical novels, and that is why I know that when a girl was pregnant, it was said she was breeding. They didn't say she was pregnant.
Or if they wanted to be refined, they said she was enceinte, which is French for pregnant.
Review is well written and interesting. I am thinking of hiring you to write at least some of my reviews, from now on. Especially since we seem to have joined many of the same sites. Lol.
The models may be wearing "Alp" costumes, but they seem to be the standard porn starlets we've seen before: Suzie Carina, Little Caprice, Verunka, Lizzie Ryan, etc.
Maybe, to show their Swiss heritage (which I never realized before for these girls), the girls will yodel instead of moan and groan to show how excited they are.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
