| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1526
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Attractive models, but the videos sound like a waste of time. And with site navigation problems, plus whatever, makes this a site that I would only join after I had explored much better sites.
|
03-06-12 01:27pm
|
Reply
1527
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I was wondering how many photos there are for each individual model from the 1970s and 1980s? Are there just a few photos on each Penthouse Pet for each month back then, or is there more like 20-30 or more photos of the individual models?
I've seen some of the models back then which only had like 10 photos or so from their photoshoots back then (in the 1970s and 1980s). Does the Penthouse site have more extensive photos on their early Penthouse Pets?
|
03-06-12 01:21pm
|
Reply
1528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There are plenty of ways porn can be disgusting. When I see disgusting porn or abusive behavior, I just turn if off.
|
03-06-12 01:12pm
|
Reply
1529
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Nice review, seems to cover the main points about the site and the network. I agree that the network is a bargain. I just re-joined the Royal Cash network yesterday.
|
03-04-12 04:10pm
|
Comment
1530
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
|
|
03-04-12 03:55pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
First, I don't have any contacts in porn.
Second, I don't think doing hard-core porn is a smart decision. It might look like easy money, but that's an illusion. I think most girls would be better off looking to make money elsewhere.
Softcore porn (simple nudity) might be alright, but hardcore is a poor choice.
|
03-04-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
1532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Before I started using the Internet as a source of porn, I was mainly into softcore photos.
I paid little attention to hardcore videos.
If I wanted a video of a naked girl, I would watch a regular movie. Most movies are around 1 hour 30 minutes. And if there were one or more nude scenes, the total length of a girl flashing her breasts or ass was probably 45 seconds or less. (I'm talking about one of the starlets in the movie, not some gratuitous breast shots of some stripper.)
Since I got into the internet, and after joining PU, I've joined a number of hardcore video sites.
So I don't waste my time searching through a movie for the breast or ass shots anymore.
So did PU drag my tastes down, or should I be blaming the Internet?
But in general, I still prefer softcore photos over most videos.
|
11-18-11 12:53am
|
Reply
1533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I thought this was covered in a previous poll, which asked where the camera should be focused on in a video.
Anyway, the entire girl should be covered.
With less coverage on the stunt cock.
But the videos where they mask the stunt cock's head are just annoying. If he's doesn't want his face exposed in a porn video, just use someone else as the stunt cock.
|
11-16-11 06:05am
|
Reply
1534
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
Great details, great ideas, great wordplay.
My only complaint is that your reviews don't focus enough on the teen softcore sites that are my interest.
If you ever join any of those sites, I would find those reviews more helpful to me on a personal level.
(I think I forget to take my medicines last night, so please ignore this request if it seems off-topic.)
|
11-15-11 05:52am
|
Reply
1535
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Sometimes I admire the porn studs who keep going even when the woman says "Stop."
But that's not me.
|
11-14-11 05:05pm
|
Comment
1536
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
|
11-14-11 06:50am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1537
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
This is from the same company/partner/WhatEverYouCallIt behind Amour Angels. This new site is tiny compared to Amour Angels. And I'm guessing that both sites have a similar approach to photos and videos.
So if you like the style of Amour Angels, join that site, because it has a lot more content (models, photosets, videos) compared to Showy Beauty.
|
11-12-11 04:13pm
|
Comment
1538
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
|
11-12-11 01:15pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1539
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm like everyone else. External hard drives are the easiest and cheapest and fastest way to store. And trying to burn and manage a library of DVDs would be a nightmare.
|
11-12-11 07:11am
|
Reply
1540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Fully nude, right at the climax. Why make us wait for the good parts, right?
Afterwards, the performers can sit around and discuss how they could have made the sex scene even better.
|
11-10-11 12:50am
|
Reply
1541
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the well wishes, slutty.
Believe me, I wish I had never heard of gout myself. I thought that was a disease you only read about in old English novels.
|
11-04-11 06:40am
|
Reply
1542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks for the reply, Capn. That's kind of what I was expecting. I might give a Tens unit a try, if I can find one to rent.
|
11-04-11 12:51am
|
Reply
1543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Sorry to be off topic.
But I looked up A Tens Unit. I've got gout. No joke. Would a Tens Unit actually help reduce the pain? The medicine I take for gout attacks (colcrys 0.6 mg), doesn't seem to help in reducing the pain or length of the symptoms. Does this Tens Unit really work? Or is responses to this based on the individual?
|
11-04-11 12:23am
|
Reply
1544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
None of the above (except other).
Not even sure what A Tens Unit is.
|
11-04-11 12:04am
|
Reply
1545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Very important.
Nice to see different parts of the female body. Not just the penis going in and out, which can become boring after the 15th time of viewing that action.
|
11-03-11 05:22am
|
Reply
1546
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
There have been 3 reviews about this site in the last 2 weeks.
If I didn't know better, I would think the site itself was paying for the reviews, since the reviews are generally positive.
However, since I wrote one of the three reviews, and I got no payment for my review (except for tickets from PU), I think the reviews are honest and well-meaning.
And all three reviews were excellent, including yours.
It just struck me as unusual, because this is not a site like MetArt or Nubiles, which usually attracts a lot of attention.
But the site (and network) does have some lovely models. So I think the attention is warranted.
|
10-31-11 02:32pm
|
Reply
1547
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've looked at what I thought of as BSDM, and didn't like what I saw. But blood and bruises I haven't even looked at. Ugh. Fake or real, that's just goes beyond my tastes.
|
10-31-11 01:39am
|
Reply
1548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Secondary virginity and female ejactuation are the newest things to spice up our sex lives. In the same psych-babble as "quality time" for parents or spouses who don't have the regular time to spend time with their kids or spouses in the normal manner.
It's not what you say, that always counts. It's in how you say it. Maybe in the same vein as "the medium is the message". How you say something can be just as important as what you say.
|
10-29-11 09:08am
|
Comment
1549
|
Massage Room Seduction
(0)
|
|
10-27-11 03:35am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Some of these poll questions are getting a little close to the bone. I'm taking the Fifth on this one.
|
10-27-11 01:10am
|
