Khan, when I use the PU/TBP links to Young Legal Porn, I see the $19.99 and $29.99 for single site and network access.
But when I use the PU/TBP links for 18 Only Girls, I see the $29.99 and $39.99 for single sites and network access.
I tried clearing out my cookies, but I don't know if I did a good job, because my PC froze up on me partly through the process. And then I had to reboot the computer.
But, just to check, if you use the hot links for 18 Only Girls, what you do see?
The $19.99 and $29.99 for signup?
Or the $29.99 and $39.99 for signup?
It used to be that you could join Young Legal Porn for $19.99 monthly single subscription, or $29.99 monthly for complete network access, using the PU/TBP links for discount.
If you joined through 18 Only Girls, you would pay $29.99 month single subscription, $39.99 monthly for complete network access.
So if you wanted complete network access, save $10 and join through Young Legal Porn.
The prices advertised at PU/TBP for 18 Only Girls are now shown at $19.99 month, recurring. But when you used those links, you see a sign up page that shows $29.99 month, recurring, for single site access, or $39.99 for network access, recurring.
So PU/TBP has to contact the site to straighten out whether the PU/TBP discounts will be honored, or whether PU/TBP should change to page membership back to $29.99 per month, recurring.
18 Only Girls hot links do not give discounted price.
The PU/TBP price of $19.99 for 1 month membership links do not work.
When you hit the link for PU or TBP to go to the site, and then hit the join page link, you are given a price of $29.99 for 1 month membership, recurring.
There is a separate price of network access, for $39.99 per month, but that is a different membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lovely young teen models.
-The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older
videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network.
Cons:
-The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not.
-They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating
the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that.
-A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites.
Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18.
She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
But the posted date is a minor problem.
-Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px.
-In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos.
-The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site.
-The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem.
-Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed.
The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints.
-Bottom Line (summary):
-Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive.
-videos:
high quality:
width x height: 1280x720
total bitrate: 11013 kbps
802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime
The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p.
The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p.
photosets:
4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB.
-There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live".
There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model.
I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios.
It's probably better to delete your email address from a public post, or you might be opening yourself to spammers.
Write a note to PU if you can't delete the email address from the post (because of time limit, you can't change or edit a post after 10 minutes or a reply to that post, which is part of PU rules).
You don't want a good email address published in a public area.
I get a ton of spam every day, and I've tried to keep my email address private.
I haven't been downloading a lot from this network lately. And my max download speed is 630 KB/sec, on a DSL line.
But I do use DownThemAll sometimes. I used it this afternoon, to download several files from YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls.
I had no problems downloading with DownThemAll.
And I regularly hit 620-630 KB/sec for each download.
I used to use FDM, but a couple of Firefox updates ago, there was some compatibility problem, and Firefox disabled FDM for me, and I haven't tried using it since. FDM would be nice to use, because I don't know how to que files up with DownThemAll, I have to start each file manually, except that I can start 4 separate downloads with DownThemAll at the same time, if I want.
Note: I don't get 630 KB/sec on each separate download if I'm downloading more than one file at the same time. But hopefully, the separate downloads add up to around 600-630 KB/sec, if downloading more than one file at the same time.
But sometimes, the total download speed adds up to much less than 600 KB/sec. Not referring to today's action, but from downloads in the past. I don't know why download speeds sometimes come in slower than normal.
Thanks for the suggestion. I usually do re-size my screen fonts. Like they are currently. But that makes for another problem, because now the complete page does not fit inside the monitor. I have a small section of the URL page that is outside the monitor, that I don't see unless I use the "whatever" bar at the bottom of the page, to move the page slightly so I can now see/read whatever is on that small section of the URL page that I don't see.
But it's better for me to re-size the fonts, because I only sometimes want/need to see the section of the URL page that is not shown to me.
The price seems attractive. But I read in another comment a lot of the content is duplicated at Teen Mega World, 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn. I'm currently a member of the two latter sites, and will probably rejoin Teen Mega World soon.
There's just so much porn out there, and not enough time to search through it all. Lol.
I don't really have a problem reading a message that is in all caps. Actually, since I don't usually use my reading glasses when looking at the computer monitor, it's easier to read the words when they are in caps (bigger letters).
I put money as the number one problem. Religion, social disapproval, trying to become and stay popular: those can be serious issues. But with the current economic downturn, I keep reading stories about how porn is making less and less money and porn stars are finding it harder to get work, and they are not making anywhere near the money they used to make. So that would be the biggest problem they are facing, in my opinion.
Quality of content, amount of content, model selection and updates are important to me. I pay little attention to live shows.
If I were efficient, I would join a site for one month and then return much later (6 months, a year) for the updates.
But I'm lazy. So I sometimes join a site or network for 3 months, or even a year, if the site or network is worth it, and you get a good discount for a longer term membership.
So I voted "other", even though that is not technically correct. The only option I have little interest in is the live shows, which I have found to be boring. And I refuse to pay for the private shows, which are extremely expensive.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
