| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I use Win7, because that's what came on my current computer.
But I liked WinXP just as well.
|
04-02-12 12:48am
|
Reply
1502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked the "I don't mind it" response.
I'm kind of bored by the shaven approach that is currently popular.
|
03-31-12 10:14am
|
Reply
1503
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not really sure I have a single preference. Solo, with or without toys, girl-girl lite and hard, they can all be done well.
|
03-29-12 11:33am
|
Reply
1504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Depends on the tour. But the tour and any PU/TBP reviews help determine whether I will probably join a site.
|
03-28-12 02:58am
|
Reply
1505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think what rearadmiral said makes sense and is probably true: there is a disconnect between what people say in public and what they do in private.
|
03-27-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
1506
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Mr. Frosty, is there some way you can put your download manager on the web, such as posting it on a new forum thread at PU?
I've tried download managers, but since I'm not technically inclined, have not had much success with them.
Maybe I (and other PU members) would have better success with the download manager you wrote.
I don't rip sites. But I would like to make downloading multiple files easier to do. Instead of manually downloading each file I want by itself.
|
03-23-12 06:59am
|
Comment
1507
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
|
03-23-12 03:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1508
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I think I might come back to this network again.
I really like the X-Art style, and their models are really attractive. But Joymii is the only other site that I can think of with the X-Art style and attractive models.
What other sites are out there with the X-Art/Joymii style and lovely models?
|
03-22-12 06:58am
|
Reply
1509
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Any of the first three choices sounds about right.
|
03-21-12 03:22pm
|
Reply
1510
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I'm not currently a member of X-Art or Joymii. And it's been almost 3
years since I was a member of Femjoy. Femjoy has a vast number of extremely attractive models and a vast number of photosets, but I like Met-Art over Femjoy for softcore teen photos. I think the teens are presented more attractively. But that's just my personal opinion. There are Porn User members who prefer the natural Femjoy approach over the Met-Art style.
Although both Femjoy and Met-Art fall into the softcore teen category for photos.
X-Art has been around much longer than Joymii. X-Art started with small photosets (small number of photos in each photoset) of gorgeous young models. I mean, they selected a small number of lovely teens, and presented them in a very attractive way. High quality photos. But no videos. Softcore teen.
Years later, they changed the site name to X-Art, and started offering videos along with the photosets. And they started to offer sex in the photos and videos. They started with female masturbation, then offered female-female lesbian, then finally started to offer male-female sex. The sex was explicit, but not gonzo. I think of the style as softcore sex, but that's not the best term. The sex is explicit, but not gonzo. The sex is basically tender, without the spitting, slapping, name-calling you find in rough gonzo sex.
Joymii is similar to what X-Art is offering today. But since Joymii is so much newer than X-Art, you won't find a lot of content. Joymii started late 2010. If Joymii can keep the same style in the future and keep adding new content, it will be a leader in the "softcore" sex style. Joymii started with female masturbation, but now offers male-female sex as well.
Joymii is a sister site of Femjoy. Femjoy, as far as I know, does not
offer any sex in their photos or videos. Nudity, but no sex. So Joymii is a natural extension of Femjoy. If Joymii can use even a fraction of the lovely models that Femjoy offers, then Joymii should enjoy a long-lasting career. Lovely models photographed and videoed in high-quality softcore.
I tried to answer your question. But I tend to ramble a lot. :)
|
03-20-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
1511
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Value. Content quality and amount. Versus price. Plus any information on how easy the site is to use: site design, download speeds, etc. Plus whether to site contents appeals to my tastes.
|
03-20-12 07:17pm
|
Reply
1512
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
If I do join the site in the near future, I will give you a heads-up on my opinion.
|
03-20-12 07:15pm
|
Reply
1513
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They still only have 19 videos at this site today, so no new videos added in the last 3 weeks. Maybe they will add updates sometime in the future, or just add recycled videos from their other sites.
But the network has a lot of really attractive models.
|
03-18-12 03:49pm
|
Reply
1514
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The soft hardcore is what Playboy should have become a leader in. But they lost that opportunity many years ago. Just lacked imagination, I guess. But it was the next logical step in what they were providing. And now Playboy (and Penthouse) are basically has-beens.
|
03-18-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
1515
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the input, pat. I'll probably wait a while before joining this site/network. Unless I change my mind and find a few more models on this network that look as good as Tiny Becky. :)
|
03-18-12 11:15am
|
Reply
1516
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
About the same. I still look for new sites that provide good content for the money.
|
03-17-12 06:17am
|
Comment
1517
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
|
03-16-12 08:03pm
Replies (7)
|
Comment
1518
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
|
03-16-12 03:30pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1519
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I used to leave my desktop on. But now I use a laptop and normally turn it off when I'm off the computer.
|
03-16-12 03:06pm
|
Reply
1520
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the tip, exotics4me. The site layout or terminology can be confusing. Or maybe I'm just lazy, and expect everything to be labeled simply. Again, thanks, it helps to have experts around who know what they are doing. :)
|
03-09-12 11:10pm
|
Reply
1521
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
The site preview seems kind of short. I see that there are some sample photos and videos, but I usually like to see a list of all the models at the site, with thumbnails of those models.
|
03-09-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
1522
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Poor content quality. Then slow download speeds.
|
03-09-12 12:32pm
|
Reply
1523
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anywhere from 2 to 4 days is fine with me. I could even accept 5 days if I have to. Does that make me easy to get along with?
|
03-07-12 08:19am
|
Reply
1524
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for checking. I really appreciate it. I'm pretty sure I've seen the 10 photos each for Karen Sather and Sandy Greco already.
And I was hoping the old photos would have better definition than what I've seen before. But my guess is that photos on the site are probably not better definition, after all.
So I will probably wait a while before joining Penthouse.
|
03-07-12 08:11am
|
Reply
1525
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm interested in how many photos there are of the three models listed below. They were among my all-time favorite Pets :)
Karen Sather
February 1973 - Pet of the Month
Sandi Greco
May 1973 - Pet of the Month
Cindy Mcdee
July 1973 - Pet of the Month
If you don't have the info, because your membership ran out, that's OK.
|
03-06-12 09:24pm
|
