| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Reply
I can't download shit. Unless the video is one of the new ones that has the MP4 HD, WMV HD and Ipod selections, it won't download. Tried downloading a 2008 TannerMays clip, no go. Tried downloading a March 10th 2010 Kylie clip, no go. No matter what clip I chose, it saves it as a 3.8kb file that of course doesn't do shit.
Email already sent to them. If I get no response, may be the first time I have to try and get a refund and since they don't use a real billing company like CCBill, guessing that will be impossible.
|
03-21-10 03:11pm
|
Comment
52
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
|
03-21-10 06:40am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
53
|
Kaya Luv
(0)
|
Reply of
joexdoe's Review
Would have to agree, not really a good review. How do you figure it goes to criminal activity, if it can't be proven? As said above, whats wrong with working with children from a sick hospital? How's that a con?
To be your review comes off sounding more like a guy pissed off that she wouldn't date you, then a honest review of a site.
|
03-19-09 07:10am
|
Reply
54
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
That's cool and all, unless you don't want your reviews taken seriously? If you do, then you need alot more detail. As for Bam it's in your face, that all has to do with what your desktop resolution is at. If it's at 640x480, then yeah anything image will be life size. If it's like most of us here and alot bigger, say 1440x900, then a 640x480 image is nothing more then a thumbnail.
Your review has no facts, it's nothing more then opinion.
|
03-12-09 05:02pm
|
Reply
55
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
Could use alot more detail in your review. Example, what's the image resolution? How about the video resolution? How often is the site updated? As of know your review is more of a ad, then a review. You make your review sound fake.
|
03-12-09 09:53am
|
Reply
56
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
My problem isn't with the fact that he gave the site a 100, if you think it's that good so be it, however you went into no techincal detail on anything. For example, what size are those so called "Hi Res Photos"? What size are the videos? How often is it updated? What makes this site any different from the million other sites out there? You mentioned none of that in the review. Hell, even your cons are useless.
Maybe your a spammer, I don't know. But if you really wanna post reviews your have to get more in depth then that. That looks more like a forum post selling a site, then a review.
|
03-10-09 10:38am
|
Review
57
|
LV Panty
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Nice Quality Photos (1152x1728)
+A decent panty site.
+Some pretty good looking models |
| Cons: |
-Doesn't look like the site is updated anymore. No dates on the updates to know how old they are. But I haven't seen anything new in the month I've been there.
-Horrible quality vidoes (720x480 765kbs)
-Only 46 videos.
-All the photos look pretty much the same.
-No members link on the main page |
| Bottom Line: |
LV Panties is a decent site, that is if you are a panties fan. However it no longer appears to be updated anymore. There are no dates by the updates to know just when it quit but in the month I was a member I haven't seen anything new. From the layout and quality of the vids, I'd be guessing it's been 3-4 years since anything was updated. But again, I'm not positive on that and there's no way to know.
The photos are pretty much the only good thing about LVPanties, as they only have 46 vids at a crappy 720x480 @765kbs, so the only bright spot are the photos. Resolution wise, the photos are to the low end of todays standards at 1152x1728. They have what they call closeup gallerys, the photos are all in landscape, however they are 1152x768 size. So they are pretty much useless compared to the regular galleries. The photos are not available in a zip and there are normally 50-60 images per gallery.
The biggest problem I had with the photos is the fact that it was always shot in a bedroom or a bathroom. And it was always the same bedroom or bathroom, so it made the photos all blend together. 90% of the photos are shot in front of plain jane bare white walls. Makes for a very uneventful photo.
They do not have a member link on the main page. I had to search back through my history to find the link. Thankfully I hadn't cleared it out in a while. So unless you bookmark the members page, good luck finding it again.
In Closing, LVPanties is a decent site for a one month stay. There's really no point for anything else. |
|
03-10-09 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
58
|
LV Panty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I know this is late but just wanted to let you know I signed up about a month ago (posting a review soon) and no they still don't have zip downloads. I also think they quit updating the site, as I don't see any dates for updates and didn't notice any while I was there.
|
03-09-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
59
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Since I've have never seen this error on any other website before, while using the exact same setup on tons of them, that lead me to believe it is a error with the site.
|
06-08-09 03:10pm
|
Comment
60
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
|
06-08-09 12:58pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
61
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Khan. That done the trick. I'm now seeing $14.95 again after clearing Firefoxs private data.
|
05-09-09 09:07am
|
Comment
62
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
|
05-09-09 05:47am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
63
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Reply
Thanks for the reply. It looks like Met Art is atop my list of sites to try soon.
|
05-11-09 05:51am
|
Reply
64
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Nice review. I've always wanted to give this site a try but I'm just wondering, do they start the photo sets off already nude? Or are they clothed at the beginning and then strip to full nude?
That was one thing that killed me about FemJoy, was that 90% of the gallerys the model was already full nude at the start. To me just kinda makes all the photos run together. So was just wondering if that's the way it is here?
|
05-10-09 08:20pm
|
Reply
65
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I agree, I'd love to give the site a try but there is jut no way in todays market that I'm spending $34.95 for one site. Unfortunately, I have yet to be able to find a discount from anywhere.
|
05-14-09 09:21am
|
Reply
66
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Addict's Comment
Nice to now. I've always wanted to give this site a try, just for the price, never have yet. No download managers is becoming a huge pet peeve of mine.
|
04-16-09 05:23am
|
Reply
67
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks. Ended up using a unused gift card to give us a short trial. A few things I wish they did was offer file sizes and what resolution it was shot at before downloading.
|
11-23-21 07:02am
|
Reply
68
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Thanks. I took a chance with a unused gift card as a trial run and am pretty impressed with the quality.
|
11-23-21 07:01am
|
Comment
69
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
|
|
11-17-21 06:15pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
70
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Nicole is hot.
+Nice mixture in the scenes (solo, b/g, and a few g/g)
+Included in the Twistys bonus sites. |
| Cons: |
-Hasn't been updated with new NG stuff since June of 08. All the new updates are rehashed stuff from when she was NaughyCoco.
-Photos and videos could be better. All the photos are 768x1024.
-New videos decent quality (640x480 @ 1627kbps) The older Coco stuff is pretty bad @ 320x240 and from 700-900 kbps range, it seems to always be different. |
| Bottom Line: |
NicoleGraves.com seems to be one of the many sites that I've been a member of recently that has fallen off the face of the earth.
Ealier reviews comment on her interactivity with fans, however I can't comment on that. As there seems to be none anymore. I've even tried to email her a few times, with no success.
The photos and videos are decent quality but nothing that will strain your PC to run. In todays day and age of 3000 or 4000px images, NG's 768x1024 seems a bit behind the times. The only advantage to that is that all the images, even the older Naughty Coco ones, come in at the size.
The videos are on the low end of what I'd expect for a site in 2009, the newer stuff being 640x480/1627kbps. The older(or recently updated) Naughty Coco stuff is 320x240 and between 700-900kbps.
It is one of the bonus sites included in Twisty's so I'd recommend you sign up through Twistys as it'll save you $5.
The store, which on her page says it offers signed dvd's/photos/posters doesn't work. When you go there it's completely empty.
Overall I think I just seemed to miss what appears to have been a great website. Since the site is included with Twistys, I can't really knock it too bad. As your not paying $20 for just this one site. However coming from a fan of Nicole, if your only interested in this site and haven't been a member before, then I think it'd be worth it for a month. However if you've been a member of NG.com before, then I really don't think it's worth the money. I'd have no problem paying the $20 for this site alone, if it ever gets back to what it seemed to be in early to mid 2008. |
|
03-18-09 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
71
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Nice review. Currently a member there now and have to agree that the bonus sites are complete crap. I love how they try to make it out that they are saving you like $50 on access to the bonus sites. However I think they all quit updating like 5 years ago.
|
05-01-09 01:03pm
|
Reply
72
|
Only Carla
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Nice review. I was a member about a year ago. Unless something has changed, I think it'd be beneficial to point out that it's pretty much a topless only site. When I was a member, she never showed full frontal. I understand you said not for those that like hardcore but I'd consider her site very very softcore.
Other then that, great review.
|
08-22-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
73
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review. I've always loved the style of the of OT, however I can't really handle non-nude or topless sites. To me, the tease should have always been the first 75% of the gallery. Would live if they'd created a site or to find a site just like OT outfit wise but where every women ended up with full frontal nudity. Not looking for spread eagle or masturbation, just full nude.
|
04-18-09 05:13am
|
Reply
74
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
That's good to see. As the videos were always pretty much useless before.
Is Only Tease still pretty much only a boob site? And not much full frontal nudity? I really like the site, clothing wise and shot wise but too many of the girls don't get full frontal for my tastes.
|
03-28-09 12:17pm
|
Reply
75
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'd think the tease is the first 75-80% of the photos. Just to me there are too many sets that never get past the tease part.
But no there isn't any false advertising or anything going on. As they never do promise or say how nude the ladies get. To me OT is a jack of all trades and a master of none. It seems they can't make up their mind if they want to do full nudity, just topless or non-nude.
Guess I'm just not used to paying $25 for a non-nude site.
|
11-05-08 12:22pm
|
