| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Only Tease
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality photos
+Great mixture in styles of clothing.
+Updated daily.
+Has a nice catalog style. Makes it easy to search for what you want, rather that be full nude or blonde or etc. |
| Cons: |
-Really softcore. Too many models that don't even get full nude or if they do, they don't give you a good shot of their pussy.
-Videos are pretty much useless. Seem to be nothing more then behind the scenes videos of the photo shoots. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like OnlyTease and the other Only sites. The one and only huge downside for me was that there were way too many photo sets that were either non nude or only topless. Being a fan of full frontal nudity, it seems 1 outta 5 models/sets would show full frontal nudity. Only Tease does have a option to search for "Full Figure Nude" but the problem with that is, that anytime a model takes off her panties, they label it as full figure nude. Even if they do nothing with the panties down but show ass.
Overall the Only Sites are ones that I'd sign up for once every 6 months for a month. There just isn't enough content to please me to stay a member month after month. |
|
11-04-08 06:07am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
77
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I never have had any problem cancelling online. Once you log in, you can go to member services and it'll give you a list of all active & cancelled services and you can cancel from there. And so far, I see no difference between the free month and the access I had before when I was a member.
|
04-28-09 06:13pm
|
Comment
78
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
|
04-28-09 02:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
79
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Sorry I'm just now seeing this but if you are using Firefox you can use "Download Embedded" to download older streaming only videos. You can find it here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1993. When it brings up the page with the video streaming, there will be a little red arrow in the bottom right corner. If you click on that you can download the embedded video.
|
12-31-08 08:29am
|
Reply
80
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
It really depends. Cyber Girl of the Week pictorials are normally 10-12 images and 1 pictorial. Cyber Girl of the Month are normally 3-4 pictorials with 20-25 images per set. Very seldom your get a set that has 30+ images in it.
I'd say on average most sets have right around 20 images.
|
11-06-08 01:27pm
|
Reply
81
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I never had any problems downloading movies with Firefox. I'd say there is 1-2 movies available for each model, depending of rather she's a Cyber Girl of the Month or Week or a Casting Call model, etc. Some are in quicktime or windows HD, others are just one or the other. Older ones are just widescreen/decent quality. It's not till you get to the real old ones that quality looks bad.
|
11-06-08 08:05am
|
Review
82
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
12-31-08 08:20am (Update History)
Reason: Wanted to add specs to photos and videos.
|
| Pros: |
+It's Playboy. Pretty much a extension the magazine.
+Finally upgraded and added a XL photo option. EDIT: See specs at bottom of review.
+Updated daily. And also has daily double, 2 pictures that change daily.
+HD Videoes that using Firefox can be downloaded with no problems.
+If you do the monthly option, after 3 months you can add another site for free. That site can be another Playboy site (Network sites, Special Editions, etc) or even a more explict Spice site.
+Easy to change, add or cancel subscriptions right there on the website. |
| Cons: |
-It's Playboy lol. So the photoshoping is still pretty prevelant. They seem to have a habit of trying to shade or hide the pussy if they do show it. You'll very seldom see a lady squatting down with full frontal nudity, unless she has a inner pussy.
-While the photos are finally a respectable size, they still aren't as big as other sites.
-Most Celebrity pictorials aren't available.
-Videos are great quality but they seem to have a habit of going super slow closeup from the face to the belly button and then zoom past the bottom half. Would be nice to see them pay equal attention to all of the ladys body. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's Playboy, if you don't like the content of the magazine then you won't like the site. Even though some have said all pictorials are available online, they aren't. Some celebrity ones like Christy Hemme or Pam Anderson 1994 spread isn't available online. Which is fine for older sets but even some of the newer ones, like UFC's Rachelle Leah which was in this months magazine, isn't available online. So if your joining for some celebrity pics, it can be hit or miss on whether it's available.
Photos are decent quality. I find the HD videos excellent quality. It just mainly comes down to how much they show as to rather I keep it and the over editing of the vidoes can really get on your nerves.
The site is updated daily with atleast a daily double, 2 random photos, but it normally is also updated with a new photoset. There is a lot of content but only the new stuff is available in the XL photos. Some of the older vidoes aren't hd but they are widescreen and look decent.
The one huge upside to any Playboy site is how easy it is to cancel. Just log in and go to "Member Services". From there you can cancel or renew any subscription. Playboy also has a loyalty program. Stay a member for 3 months and you can add another site free of charge. You can repeat the process every 3 months. Or if your only interest in the Cyber Club, you can save a decent amount of money doing the annual plan.
Overall if you like the content Playboy Magazine then you'll like the Cyber Club.
EDIT: I just recently canceled but now that I know a bit more about spec talks, wanted to add photo and video specs. Most "of the week" galleries have 1 set of 15-20 images with no video. "Of the month" galleries normally have 3 sets of 30-40 images with 3-4 videos. Photos are not available to download in zip. The photos default to coming up in medium, so you'll constantly have to change the photos to XL. They need to allow the option to make XL default.So as you can see, why they are decent quality, they aren't huge like Playboy wants you to believe.
The videos are available in Quicktime, WMV, & HD. Both quicktime and wmv want to stream but with Firefox there are ways around to download it. However I normally stuck with the HD videos. The HD videos are .mov files. Unfortunatly I don't know how to find out info on .mov files but they are widescreen and listed as 720p. Most videos are around 3-5 mins long. They include a strip tease and then some closeups of the body.
Over the past couple months, while I was a member, I find myself visiting the Playboy sites less and less. There are just too few images per gallery and Playboy makes sure you only see what they want. If they merged this site with the Girls of network sites then it might be worth it but right now in this economy, I can't see this site being worth $20. Unless you really like softcore glamour Playboy style images and videos |
|
11-06-08 06:28am
Replies (5)
|
Review
83
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
12-31-08 07:50am (Update History)
Reason: Wanted to add specs to photos and videos. This review also applys to the other Girls of sites.
|
| Pros: |
+You get acess to 6 sites. All are clones of each other layout wise but different content. Some models are on 2 or 3 pages but it's different sets. You get access to: Fresh Faces, Sexy Wives, Student Bodies, All Naturals, Women Of, Busty Babes.
+Playboy quality
+Great quality HD vidoes
+If you do the monthly option, after 3 months you can add another site for free. That site can be another Playboy site (Cyber Club, Special Editions, etc) or even a more explict Spice site.
+Easy to change, add or cancel subscriptions right there on the website.
+Seems to show all of the womans body more then the Magazine or Cyber Club. Videos don't seem to be as overedited as much as the Cyber Club. |
| Cons: |
-Not updated daily. But between all the sites, it's updated about a couple times a week.
-Can't view large photos from the site. You have to download the zip. Large photos aren't as large as other sites. About as large as the XL in the cyber club. EDIT: See specs at bottom of review.
-Layout kinda sucks. Just all the models headhots on the main page. Seems the number of model slots are limited and after that they seem to disappear. There is no archive or anything like that. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like Playboy or the Cyber Club, odds are you'll like these sites. They aren't updated as much as I'd like but they photos and vidoes do seem to show alot more of the ladys then what they do in the Cyber Club. To me they aren't as overedited, especially the videos.Each model normally has 1 HD video, a few have 2. Most videos are just a strip tease and some closeups of the body. The vidoes aren't just behind the scenes of the photoshoot. They are normally completley different outfit and layout then eiher photoset.
The one huge downside seems to be that there is a set number of slots available for content and after that's full the oldest seems to just disappear each time new content is added. There is no archive or search function.
Overall it's pretty much just a extension of every other Playboy site. You know what to expect. But if you stay a member long enough you can get all of Playboys sites for $19.99 a month, which for this site alone is kinda overpriced but for 2-3 of their sites or 1 of the Spice sites, it really isn't a bad deal.
EDIT: I just recently canceled but now that I know a bit more about spec talks, wanted to add photo and video specs. Photos are in two sizes, on the site they can be viewed and downloaded in 611x917. If you download the large zip set they are 1152x1728. So as you can see, why they are decent quality, they aren't huge like Playboy wants you to believe. There are only roughly 24-30 images per set.
The videos are in widescreen HD WMV's. They are 1280x720 at 3000kbps. Most videos are around 3-5 mins long. They include a strip tease and then some closeups of the body.
Over the past couple months, while I was a member, I find myself visiting the Playboy sites less and less. There are just too few images per gallery and Playboy makes sure you only see what they want. If they merged this site with the Cyber Club then it might be worth it but right now in this economy, I can't see this site being worth $20. Unless you really like softcore glamour Playboy style images and videos. |
|
11-06-08 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
84
|
Porn Access
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
05-10-09 06:23am
|
Reply
85
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I completely agree with your review. I also signed up for the $5 access but just didn't really feel like writing a review. The site wasn't even worth my time for that. :)
|
05-10-09 06:23am
|
Reply
86
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
Are you referring to the access key in this picture http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z288/...ey9910/accesskey.jpg ? If so, while I'm not a member of the site, I having no problems being able to see it or make it out.
So you've tried it on two pc's and two browsers (both IE and Firefox) and both had the same problems? What happens if you try direct linking the log in page: http://exclusive.premiumpass.com/Login/login/ ? Other then that, I'm lost.
|
05-10-09 09:18am
|
Comment
87
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
|
06-01-11 11:51am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
88
|
Real Teen Latinas
(0)
|
Reply of
robert80's Review
Could really use some more technical info. For example photo size? Video size? Just saying high quality for pictures doesn't really cut it. As what's high quality to you, may not be high quality to most people.
|
03-10-09 10:45am
|
Reply
89
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I live in a apartment and have a shared internet connection throughout the building. So really don't like to download more then 1 file at a time, which is why I use downthemall to que them up and then download.
As it is now, I have yet to download a single file from RK. Everytime I do I get a timeout error. I tried to download 2 this morning, first one just flat out says timeout error and 0% completed. Second one got to 99% and them timed out, which is what most have them do when I tried to download them. I'm not on that slow of a connection either. So I really have no clue whats going on. Sites really starting to piss me off though.
|
06-02-10 02:11pm
|
Reply
90
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
So what do you do, download one movie at a time? I don't have time for that. In my opinion, not allowing download managers is a site killer. Might as well have streaming only. Even at $10 a month, without DL Manager, I find the site useless.
I have no problem with download limits, rather that be daily or size or whatever. But I don't have time to spend hours on the site each day downloading what videos I want. Most sites I join, I download stuff 2-3 times a week and just que up anywhere from 5-30 files at that time.
|
06-02-10 06:16am
|
Review
91
|
Reality Kings
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Great content and tons of it
+Good quality videos (720x480 @ 1500kbps)
+Access to 26 sites.
+Most of the 26 sites are updated weekly, a few aren't updated anymore.
+Nice price from TBP, $17.95 a month. Otherwise it's $24.95 a month. |
| Cons: |
-Doesn't use CCBill (Uses Secure Billing Worldwide, SBW)
-Pictures are nothing more then vid caps and poor quality (900x602)
-Doesn't allow use of Download Managers |
| Bottom Line: |
I really liked the content of RealityKings and based on content alone, the site would rate high 80's or low 90's.
However what kills me about the site is that download managers aren't allowed. Well technically you can use them but you can only download 3 movies at once. You cannot que up 10 or so movies and let them download throughout the day. If you do que up lets say 5 movies, once it gets to the 4th or 5th one, it'll end up saving it as a .html file. If you open that it says "Your BigMovie link has expired! Please revisit the update page to regenerate a new one" So it comes down to only being allowed to download 3-4 files at a time. I don't know how it works with the smaller files, as I have no interest in downloading a ton of them when they have the full links available.
RealityKings is pretty much a video only site. The pictures are nothing more then vidcaps and are 900x602. The videos are good quality, being 720x480 @ 1500kbps. The videos are available to download in 4 smaller parts or in 1 big wmv.
Overall, if they'd get rid of the stupid time expiring link to download the movies, the site would be great. However the fact that you can't even download more then 3 files without the link expiring, makes it a no go for me. So if you like to just que up a Manager with 10 or so files and leave it for the day, then I can't recommend this site. |
|
04-17-09 05:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
92
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sorry don't have much to add about Ron Harris. Was really disappointed after such hype, especially for the price.
As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.
While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time.
|
11-06-08 08:12am
|
Review
93
|
Ron Harris
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+High quality photos.
+Good quality vidoes with closeups of girls during orgasm. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey $$$ for a month to month. Gets better if you pay for 2 months at once.
-Blair Witch porn. Dude has problems keeping camera still.
-Can't seem to decide if he wants to focus on her face or pussy. So in turn you get the top of her mouth in the upper left corner and the top of her pussy in the bottom right. So in turn your pretty much looking at her belly.
-One of those great camerman who won't shut the F up.
-Not updated enough and he seems to have gotten stuck on shooting 3-4 certain models |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest poroblem with Ron Harris Studio is his video work. He seems to not be able to decide what he wants to focus on. So in turn you end up focusing on her belly most of the time. He also has a really hard time keeping camera still. Not sure if he's trying to jack it while taping them or what but it makes Blair Witch or Cloverfield look they were taped on a tripod. On top of that, he doesn't know when to shut up.
It seems from looking at the updates that he's starting focusing on a certin 3-4 models. And even with that, there just aren't enough updates.
Overall every once in a while I'd come across a video that he'd be less jerky and keep it focused down below for the big O. But that seemed to be few and far between.
EDIT:As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.
While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time. |
|
11-06-08 06:25am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
94
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Well I shot them a email asking the question. They respond with a very generic email stating "Thanks for your email. Our biller CC Bill will be able to help you. You can contact them at: support@ccbill.com " And they respond with "Unfortunately, CCBill can not accept sign ups via e-mail or telephone. If you wish to join or re-join a Web site, you can do so by using the sign-up page for that particular site."
So it doesn't look like I'll be signing up to the site, since I guess neither site can understand my question.
|
03-30-09 08:24pm
|
Comment
95
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
|
03-28-09 05:53am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
96
|
Stasy Q VR
(0)
|
|
11-27-21 06:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
Stasy Q VR
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Beautiful Models
+Nice quality Videos
+Multiple payment options |
| Cons: |
-No favorites list
-Simple navigation (videos, girls, logout) |
| Bottom Line: |
My Equipment: Pixel 3XL with Daydream V1
When I first signed up I made a comment on here about the horribly slow downloads. It must have been a fluke as ever since then the downloads have been as fast as I'd expect.
Somewhere on their website StasyQVR promotes themselves as the VR Playboy. I think that's about the best comparison you can gibe this site. It's extremely soft-core. As far as I can tell they do all get completely naked (so not a OnlyTease situation) but there is no spreading, masturbation or insertion.
The Videos are great quality with very little to no sound from the model and with cheesy playboy music as the background.
There is no fancy navigation, no favorites. Just a Girls, Videos & Logout option.
I signed up for this site with a holiday special of 2 months for 1. If you like softcore VR Playboy style, then I'd recommend it. |
|
01-18-20 06:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
98
|
Stasy Q VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Reply
@Anth, I really only signed up as they had a Xmas sale, 60 days for $14.99.
@LKLK, it did actually speed up later on. It's still not as fast as Wankz or MilfVR but it went down to about a 45-60 mins for a 1.5GB file.
|
12-28-19 03:00pm
|
Comment
99
|
Stasy Q VR
(0)
|
|
12-28-19 08:41am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
100
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review. Would really love to give SA a chance but right now just can't see doing it with images at that resolution for that price. There are a few models I want from there, so I'm sure I'll join sooner or later. Sucks, as I think I would have really liked the site.
|
09-25-09 08:27pm
|
