| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Videos do work fine. And you can use download managers to download both the videos and the zips, it's just that you can't pause/resume or zips. So you'll have to download 3 zips at a time.
|
01-30-09 04:00pm
|
Review
27
|
Babelicious
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Newer videos are good quality. 08 & 09 videos are 3000 kbps (1280x720), 07 and before are 2000 kbps (640x480).
+Most images are in high resolutions and good quality. Sizes range from 1000px to 4000px.
+Great site layout and navigation.
+Easy search function. By model name, clothing, etc. |
| Cons: |
-Can only view one image at a time.
-Must download zips at once, no queing up in a download manager & no pausing/resuming.
-No option to default to bringing up all thumbnails at once, instead of default 20 per page.
-No consistency to images, a 06 set will be available in 4000px, while a 08 set will only be in 2000px.
-Only uses Epoch. |
| Bottom Line: |
Babelicious is in the same line as Twistys, a glamour style site featuring softcore & hardcore. I really liked the site navigation and the ability to search for clothing type or cup size. And both the images and videos are good quality, I had a few problems that I just couldn't get past.
First being that each image must be viewed 1 at a time. If you use Firefox, there's no way to right click and open in new tab for each image your interested in. When you do that it just brings up the full gallery again. So that means you either waste time going photo by photo, which is opened up in a new window, or you download the full zip and then sort through the ones you want. I've never been the kind to download the full zips, I prefer to just keep the images I like.
The problem with downloading the zips, is the fact that you can't que them up into a download manager. There is also no resuming of the zips. Videos seem to do fine queing up and downloading but for some reason you can't with the zips.
Each gallery comes up as default, 20 thumbs per page. You can change it to 50, 100 or all but there's no way to make all the default.
One other problem with images seems to be that there is no consistency. For example a 06 gallery may be available in 4000px, while a 08 gallery may only be available in 2000px. Or it may be 3500px or 2500px, there just seems to be no consistency to image size. It's all over the map.
They have a rating system I really like. You can rate the model, photosets & videosets. If you've been a member of a site like Twistys before, then you've seen most of the models. I guess that's one reason why it was just kinda blah to me. Different site and galleries but still most of the same models.
You do get access to bonus sites: BabesOnFilm.com, BikiniBabes.TV, BabesUK.com, CumminAtYa.com, RoyalBoobs.com, Sexy-Babes.TV, DreamBabes.com & EuroBabez.com. Some are still updated regulary, looks like mainly Sexby-Babes.tv, others look like they haven't been updated in awhile.
Overall for the TBP discount of $19.95, Babelicious is a good site. Unfortunately the quirks about downloading the photos and/or zips is enough to make me not stay a member. If your the type that downloads all zips and don't mind not being able to que them up, then I'm sure you'll love the site. Unfortunately, that's a huge turn off for me and I felt the site just wasn't worth the hassle required to download the images. |
|
01-30-09 02:08pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
28
|
BaDoink VR
(0)
|
|
01-23-20 12:43pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
29
|
Bring Me Your Sister
(0)
|
Reply of
theswedish's Comment
Are you downloading or streaming? Sounds to me like your streaming the video. If your actually downloading, sounds like the video file is messed up. But either way, I don't see how download speed would affect the quality of the video.
|
02-25-10 06:51am
|
Reply
30
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You have to have a password to extract the files? That sucks. Guess it's okay as long as your a member but what happens if over time you wanna check them out again, you'll prety much be screwed if you can't remember the password. Guess you could always just always extract the rars and then rezip them with no password but that's a step that shouldn't be needed.
|
05-07-09 05:12am
|
Review
31
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Beautiful Models
+Decent Image size (2000x3000)
+Zipped image sets to download |
| Cons: |
-Videos are pretty much crap. They say they are HD, by 2015 standards they are complete crap
-Not all models get fully nude, some are topless only and a very few don't get nude at all
-Blurry, out of focus or mid blink photos |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a member here back in 2010 and decided to give it another chance. The models are beautiful and vast majority are not well known porn starts going by a different name.
However a few things kill the site:
1) the "HD" video is far from HD. Videos are 1280x720 but quality isn't that great.
2)Blurry, out of focus or mid blink photos that you have to ask you self why any respectable photographer or website would upload.
3) And the fact that not everybody gets nude. Some are topless only or even non-nude.
Overall a decent site to check out every 2-3 years for $20 but not something you'd last more then a month at. |
|
12-06-15 05:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Cosplay Erotica
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Like the costumes and digital backgrounds.
+Attractive Models
+A good amount of content
+Natural looking girls. Refreshing to find a site isn't full of pornstars with massive bolt on's. |
| Cons: |
-Bonus Studio sets aren't really a bonus. It's the exact same set just a different background.
-They have plastered everywhere on the site that it's $14.99 a month, when in reality the 1st Month is $24.99 then renews at $14.99.
-Videos are pretty much all the same and feel like a after thought. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to bite the bullet and join the site to post a review. I'm reviewing this site as a $24.99 site, it'd be a higher rating it it was actually only $14.99 a month from the start. Overall this is primarily a photo site. Yes it does have videos but they are really all the same and I feel a after thought. With it being a primary photo site, you'd think the photo specs would be top notch. However that's not really the case. While the photos look great, they are only 1500x1000. By today's standards I'd consider that about 1/2 the size they really need to be.
Images are available in whole gallery as a zip set or to download individually.
Overall I like the site. I like that's it's something different. Can I recommend it at $25 a month? No. I'd give the site a mid 80's if it was $14.99 from the start.
Image Specs: 1500x1000, each gallery also includes a *bonus* Studio set that is the exact same as the main set but without the digital backdrop and instead all have the plain white backdrop.
Videos: Not sure on specs, downloaded on my andriod phone. Don't have a PC at moment. All videos are exactly the same. 6-7 minutes in length. All videos have the same plan white backdrop. Each video follows same layout. Model strips out of costume. Touches herself alittle, possibly spreads and dances alittle and that's the whole video. |
|
10-01-14 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
33
|
Cosplay Erotica
(0)
|
|
09-29-14 05:28am
Replies (1)
|
Review
34
|
Craving Carmen
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Carmen is very hot
+Images are decent quality (792x1200)
+Super HD videos are decent quality (1280x720 @5000 kbps) |
| Cons: |
-So called regular HD videos are fine if there isn't a "Super HD" option available. For some reason if there's both a Super HD and HD option, the HD version is 16x9 that's been zoomed out and made 4:3. So even on a widescreen monitor it's only 4:3 with huge black bars at top and bottom. Why they done that, I have no freaking clue.
-Site is pretty much dead. Pictures haven't been updated in over a year (March 5th 08) and the videos haven't been updated in 6 months (10-22-08). The only thing updated in 09 has been webcam archive.
-Expects you to pay another $18 to get two seperate video zip sets. Not sure if that's for both or only one. I have no interest in that BS. |
| Bottom Line: |
CravingCarmen is another site that could be soo much better then what it is but the people behind it appear to be more interested in just raking in money then actually putting out a quality side.
The site appears to have turned into nothing more then a ad for SpunkyCams.com. A webcam site that charges you anywhere from $3-12. For how long or for what, I have no clue. I'm not into webcams. Quality is always horrible.
The photos and the so called Super HD videos are good quality as mentioned in the Pros. As mentioned earlier, if there is both a Super HD and a HD option, the HD option is 16x9 zoomed out to 4:3. So even on a 16:9 screen, it'll actually be 4:3 with the black bars on top, bottom and sides. If there is no Super HD option, then the HD videos are actually widescreen, 1280x720 @ 5000kbps.
Her earlier sets are non-nude. She has roughly 76 movies on her site and 36 are non-nude. So just under half. Her older videos are available in mpg format. Unfortunately right clicking and properties doesn't show me any info on what quality it is, however it looks comparable to VHS tapes.
She also has archived webcam shows, which is the only thing that's been updated in 09. Those are available in 320x240 @ 447kbps. So not any quality worth keeping.
The site also try's to sell you other zipset galleries, one is a webcam video with her and Ashley and the other is a HD video of her, for $18. Not sure if that's for both or only for one but trying to charge me additional for extra content for a site that's non-updating doesn't settle well with me.
The site could easily be summed up just by looking at her journal, which hasn't been updated since 2007. This site is evidently of no priority to Carmen or Spunky Productions. The fact that they still charge $24 is ridiculous.
Carmen is hot but her site is a sure fire miss. It's nothing more then a one month hit and run at best. And that's as long as you go into it knowing that you are pretty much spending $24 for what could be a months worth of update content for other sites. |
|
03-13-09 08:40pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
35
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
11-30-10 06:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
36
|
DOMAI
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Good price ($19.95 not rebilled or $14.95 rebilled)
+Good quality photos (1333x2000px)
+On average updated almost daily. |
| Cons: |
-No videos
-No search function
-Navigation is horrible (no models page) Everything is sorted by update. So while a model may have 6 different sets on there, there is no way to find out untill you get to that update.
-Evertyhing is sorted by year, then by update date. |
| Bottom Line: |
My main problem with Domai is the same problem I have with Femjoy, each model starts out nude. Or if she's not full nude, she will be within 5 images. Then you have 40 images that all start to look the same.
The navigation is horrible. You can't search for body type, hair color or even model name. Everything is listed first by year, since 2005, then by date that they were added. So if you find a model you like, there is no way to see her other sets or even to find out if she has other sets. Technically you can cheat and look at the web address to see what gallery you are in, then you'd know if they have any other sets
available. You can then change the gallery number to go to the other ones but frankly in 2009 you shouldn't have to do that to see the other sets. EAch model should have a main page.
Most of the models are pretty attractive and the photos are decent quality (1333x2000px) but there are no videos. No users forum. No bonus sites or anything. All you've got are 5 links on the side for update year.
Overall if you want nothing but full nude women, then you'd probably like Domai. But if you are the kind that likes the art of stripping, then I'd recommend you stay away. |
|
01-05-09 02:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
37
|
Femjoy
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models |
| Cons: |
-Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.
While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.
Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy. |
|
11-04-08 06:00am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
38
|
Finest Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Nice review. The whole not being able to save image by image and the low resolution of the images will probably keep me from giving the site a try. Sucks too, as it sounded like one I'd probably like if they fix those two things.
|
05-09-09 04:40am
|
Comment
39
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
08-21-21 04:14am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
40
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rinto's Comment
I haven’t been a member in probably 8 years. As someone who liked photography, was a big fan of the site. I’ve since actually gotten into photography myself and gave the site another chance. And noticed the white balance issue a ton in the photos. I’m assuming someone new is either running the site or photographing the models. But consistent white balance is photography 101. Having it wrong is one thing but atleast make is consistent across all images.
|
04-27-21 07:46am
|
Reply
41
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I agree 100% with what both of you said. While I love the videos style and quality, the pics and website design/navigation could really use some work. Overall a good site, unfortunately too many flaws in my eyes for $30 a month, $20 maybe but not today for me at $30.
|
07-26-09 04:08pm
|
Reply
42
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Nice review roseman but I have to disagree with a few points that people are making.
People actually complain about 25 Gb a day limit? Who the hell can seriously hit that? That's pretty much impossible for 99% of people to hit.
As for the updates, do you guys realize he could do what sites like Nubiles does and seperate each gallery into seperate updates. Would that make you happier? He'd be updating the site daily but it'd just be galleries that are included in the big weekly update now.
How it's overrated in quality is beyond me. The videos can't get any better looking at 8000kbps. I'll give you that the pictures could stand to be bigger and the price for a single site is a bit steep these days.
I think FTV is a 85-90 rated site but again, good review Roseman. Nice and full review.
|
05-01-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
43
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
While I don't agree with all you said in your review and actually rated it 11 points higher, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I don't agree with your video quality remarks, as I think the 07 videos are good quality for their time.
However I will agree 100% on a few ponts: The lack of any search function at all is flat out ridiculous for a site in 2009. Especially compared to some sites who let you search everything from boob size, clothing or labia size.
The one other thing that bugs me about the site, is the fact that Rob (the guy doing the shooting and behind it) seems to always think he's ideas are the only ones that matter. For example I brought up the image resolution thing to him and he pretty much told me I was dumb and 90% of subscribers think the images are already too big. And that sites doing them that big are just gimmicky.
Overall good thought out review.
|
03-09-09 12:27pm
|
Reply
44
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Just wanted to comment on a few things:
I've been a member for about 2 months now. I never have had to login twice to access any content. Could that be something on your end? You could get on the forum, which is hidden on the voting page, and ask Rob about it. Seems strange.
I'm guessing it's just with Euro but US customers have a option for $99 for 150 days. Which comes out to $20 a month. Or US customers sometimes get a $20 a month deal when they go to cancel.
I believe the color bars are suppose to associate with hot the content is. But who decides that I don't know. Not sure if it's based off member reviews, Robs opinion or number of downloads.
But I do agree some things needs changed. Like a option to download a full movie, rather then 7-9 3-5min clips. This is the DSL age, no reason to not have a option like that.
And I also agree that in todays economical age, $30 for only one site is a bit overboard.
|
02-04-09 05:40am
|
Reply
45
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
The problem is FTV doesn't update 6-7 times a week, it averages out to 1-2 a week max.
As to Monahan, I never have understood how FTV ranks their models. For example if you go to the recent updates page, you'll see member choice under Ileana, Franziska & Miyu. However I've never seen a page to rank or vote for the models. So not sure if it's just off of downloads or how they figure it.
|
12-30-08 08:05pm
|
Review
46
|
FTV Girls
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality videos.
+Beautiful selection of young models, with different body types and sizes. They don't all look the same.
+Intimate videos with Real Orgasms.
+Lots of public nudity
+Normally 3-4 galleries per model update, around 60 images per gallery.
+2-4 videos per model update. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey ($29.95 per month, I got offered $20 per month when I went to cancel)
-Images could stand to be bigger. Currently are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. Not as high quality as some other sites.
-They do have BigPics, where are 3000x4000 or 2000x3000 but it's a seperate page from it's self and no way to know from the model update if they are available for her or not.
-No search function. Have to go by update or models first name.
-Not all models are actually first timers. For example a recent update was Franziska, who I saw alot on ALS Scan when I was recently a member to there.
-Older videos and pictures not that good of quality.
-Only updated on average 1-2x per week.
-Some videos are behind the scenes of the photo shoot, so you hear the great 3,2,1 camera click. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV is a site that I was a member of awhile back and liked back then but it was a bit too pricey for me. The site can get alittle too extreme for me (huge toys or fisting, etc) but decided to give it another try.
Photo's: In todays day and age of high resolution and high quality, FTV's photos are step behind the competition. Current updates photos are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. While updates in 07 where, 797x1200. 06 where 712x1072. So as you can see, while FTV keeps improving every year, it still doesn't compare to sites that have 3000 or 4000px images. But FTV does offer BigPics. They are 3000x4000px or 2000x3000px. But it's only of select galleries/models. I don't know why FTV doesn't do what ALS Scans do and offer two download sizes, normal res and high res. Since offering BigPics proves they have them available. For $30 a month, not offering them as standard is unacceptable.
Videos: 08 videos are available in 8000kb/s HD WMV's, 3000kb/s WMV's & Divx vidoes. Anything prior to December 07, is available in 2100kb/s WMV & Divx. The 8000kb/s videos are great quality, unfortunately my pc can't play them smoothly. So I'm stuck with the 3000kb/s. The quality is pretty good but not as good as some 720p videos from other sites. According to FTV's site, here are the following specs:
WMV Ultra HD 1440x1080 Resolution 8000kb/sec bitrate
WMV HD 720x480 Resolution 3000kb/sec bitrate
WMV 640x480 Resolution 700-2000kb/sec bitrate
Some videos are behind scenes of the photoshoots and you get to hear the lovely 3,2,1 and then the snap of the camera. However the cameraman does do a decent job of not talking too much, unless it's the interview video, he normally just lets the girls do what they want.
The videos are normally split up into 5-10 5-7 min secments. No option for full scene download.
The site could use a update in navigation. As of now you can either list by update or by model name in alphabetical order. There no way to search for a name or to find a model with a certain body type.
Some models are also not first time video girls, some can be seen on other pages, before their FTV shoots. However the models like that seem to be few.
In closing I really like FTV and it's probably one of my favorite sites. However there are changes that need to be done to break the low 90's number. They need to start putting the images up in their default resolution, instead just putting select images in a zip and slapping them up on the BigPics page. Add the user forum and drop the price. Right now $29.95 is flat out too high for any site that isn't a network site.
If they would do both of those and drop the price to $5-10 then I think it could easily be a mid to high 90's site.
In closing if you like public nudity or like real orgasms, then I'd recommend you give FTV a shot. |
|
12-30-08 04:58pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
47
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
|
08-23-09 11:51am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
48
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Speaking of the gooey and messy orgasms, do they use lube to make the girls look wetter, kinda like ALS Scans does? I've seen a few preview videos and it doesn't look like they do. But was just wondering before I decide whether to join the site or not.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
|
08-18-09 01:57pm
|
Review
49
|
Girls Gone Wild
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+If you have seen any of the videos, then you know what to expect.
+Normal Girls Gone Wild content. Alot of flashing and alittle bit of lesbian play. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey $$, frankly for the content it's a rip off.
-ALL videos are streaming. If you do work around it to get it to download, it has DRM. So you'll have to go through more hassles to remove that.
-Videos are crappy quality. Was probably decent 5-6 years ago but to today standards, not up to par.
-Photos are pretty much nothing but screen caps and pretty poor quality at that.
-Videos they have available in the members area are not the ones shown on the main page. The ones in the members area appear to be 3-4 years old and are the ones that they can't make any more money on. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has to be one of the biggest ripoffs I've ever seen for a adult site. $30 for a site with crappy screen shot photos and only lets you stream videos? That may have been okay back in the early days of the internet but not in the year 2008. It's been a bit since I was a member and I don't remember the exact size of the videos but once blown to full screen, they weren't very good.
If you want Girls Gone Wild content, Amazon has Blu Ray dvd's for $13-$20 and regular dvd's are even cheaper. You'd be better off buying a few of those for the same price as a month of this site. I can guantee that the quality will be light years beyond whats available on the website.
Again sorry for not being specific on video and photos sizes. I've just recently started paying attention to those details. |
|
11-11-08 11:44am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
50
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Just a update, not really sure what happened but I guess Firefox got corrupted or something. Tried downloading the photos and videos on another PC also using Firefox and they worked fine. So decided to come back to this one and update Firefox. Everything has worked fine since then.
The site is still a 1 month stay at best due to the price tag and the lack of ability to use download managers. Guess they must think everyone has a T1 connection.
|
03-22-10 07:47pm
|
|
