| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
I Can't Believe You Sucked A Negro
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Wasn't more than 10-15 years ago that the words Whore and Fuck were never used on a site's name.
They want to sell smut. No more, no less. Don't give it more than its due.
|
06-21-09 03:53pm
|
Reply
1127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The point of porn is the fantasy. The only thing that cannot be fantasy is that the babe must be at least 18 years old.
If a site posts a girl who was 19 years old at the time it was posted in 2006, should the site say that she was 19 when posted in 2006?
Personally, WGAF?. (Who Gives a Fuck?) If she was young looking back when the post happened that's all that matters anyway, isn't it?
|
06-21-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
1128
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Too bad they don't read PU.
Just signed up this weekend and the problems described two years ago and in this review are the same. A pity because I've stumbled into some really great stuff and some great resolution videos...and some total shit as well.
This site, with some professional website help, could be superb. Hopefully they will learn how to merge functionality with their hidden quality.
A score of 70 is very fair but with structure it could be a 90.
|
06-20-09 11:13pm
|
Reply
1129
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Boy am I with you on that. I make it a point to always use the PU link when I'm ready to sign up for a site. They (PU) earned my loyalty big time to the point where I might even sign up via PU even if it costs me an extra $5.
|
06-20-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
1130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have a brother and a sister. My brother, a professional video guy, finds porn boring so it's unlikely he would ask. By brother in law (my sister's husband) works for the US gummint so he has lots of free time at work and frequently asks me for some of my stash. Again, no problem.
|
06-15-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
1131
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I totally agree. Another excellent review by Trash Man. The network looked very promising when going onto the preview site, but thanks to Trash Man;s review it's clear that the majority of the "bonus sites" are just archived old stuff.
I'm seeing how this is becoming a more prevalant practice...advertising a big network that turns out to be a collection of dormant sites, usually with crappy quality.
|
06-15-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1132
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Since I was burned (badly) by Danni.com 3 years ago, I have a procedure that I follow religiously when I sign up for any new site.
1. I create a Word document where I copy the URLs of the preview site and of the sign up page.
2. I use Print Screen to copy the confirmation page with the subscription number and all other details. If the confirmation page permits (they usually do) I also copy and paste it to the Word document.
3. I open a new window leaving the confirmation page open, and try to log on independently. If I succeed, then I save the Word document and close the confirmation window. If not, I find the "contact us" link and will immediately call the 800 number of CCBill or of the site to confirm that my subscription is active.
4. If I'm unsuccessful, my next call is to my credit card issuer to have them cancel...or reverse the charge.
5. I then go to PU and post a comment. Recently I had an issue with PornstarXS.com accessing their trial. I received no replies at all from their contact us contacts but I did get a response from the webmaster.
To be fair, almost every site I've joined since being screwed by Danni.com has worked perfectly and where they haven't, the 800 number has worked to get things on track.
|
06-14-09 10:08am
|
Reply
1133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Others have said similar things, but the issue with me is lousy quality sites. The saving grace is PU and TBP where I can check out every site before I waste my money on a crappy one.
There is no need for more hardcore sites whatsoever. We're swimming in them already. But there is a real need for new high quality hardcore sites and/or an upgrade of the mediocre hardcore sites..
|
06-12-09 02:25pm
|
Comment
1134
|
Jan's WebRing
(0)
|
|
06-06-09 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1135
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xyzzy's Comment
Since Danni Ashe sold her site back in 2005, their support function has gone from the best in the business to the absolute worst.
If you sign up for Danni.com, do NOT expect any customer support. (Had no billing probs with their own processor.)
|
06-06-09 01:44pm
|
Reply
1136
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Being 29.95 Euros, the cost of this site can vary in US$ terms (they charge your credit card in Euros, they say.) Right now it's about US$42.00. Also, their preview site claims on one place that there are 18 sites in the network, and, in another, 13 sites.
In any case I really liked the review. It told me everything I wanted to know and, because I like the same things, I'm seriously considering joining up.
|
06-06-09 10:12am
|
Reply
1137
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
If you use the PU/TBP link to the site, you will also get the $19.95 rate for the first month...recurs at b$29.95.
|
05-31-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
1138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Agree, but the advent of internet porn has saved me tons of $ that I once spent on video rentals, magazines and other pursuits.
|
05-30-09 10:56pm
|
Comment
1139
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
05-29-09 11:06pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Navigation and Searching. Considering that each of us has favorite babes, studios and genres, and that search technology is highly sophisticated, it pisses me off royally when I know a model is on a site but is virtually impossible to locate.
A similar beef is inaccuracy. On a great site like Video Box the one serious flaw is the inability of the webmaster to be consistent in spelling a model's name. That makes it so damned difficult to find all the content they have. Jenna Doll, for example, shows up as Jena Doll, Jena, Jenna Dall, and probably others. And it isn't the studio's fault. The cover usually has the correct spelling. It's just sloppiness.
|
05-29-09 11:04pm
|
Reply
1141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Jay G said, "Storage is incredibly cheap and the numbers, I agree, don't always mean quality, but I am sure getting pickier and pickier about a "quality look" to videos. Old stuff is seldom good enough for a spoiled kid like me."
That's me. Exactly. Three or four years ago I was ok with almost anything just so long as it displayed what I wanted...plenty of PTA*.
Now, however, where the quality is so good even a gynecologist would be happy, and with a brand new Seagate 1.5 Tb hard drive ($129.99 + tax) joining my 640Gb, and two 500Gb hard drives, I'm like Jay, am totally spoiled. When I watch some of the older stuff that I used to watch over and over, I only wish it could be upgraded in quality.
The real question is, what's next? I can't imagine better quality than is now available. Maybe smell-o-vision or a form of 3-D?
*PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
05-24-09 10:12am
|
Reply
1142
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
The $14.95 price is what made me enroll. I like the concepts and the very attractive style in particular, but I also pretty much agree with the score. The only thing that might make me up the points a bit is that the site has an unusually large number of models I like and all with original content.
|
05-23-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler: "BTW I don't have an organization issue because I do it by model name --> source --> name of video or gallery. It's the last piece there that gets the treatment every long once in a while. Some titles just need ... help!"
I do the same. The model name gets adds at the end of the name, occasionally, such as (!!!), (.)(.) or ??? [when I think the name provided by the source is inaccurate]
The source is never altered.
The file name is where I use a touch of originality if the title from the source is not descriptive, but I try to be descriptive, not humorous...unless I can be descriptive and humorous at the same time.
|
05-23-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
1144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
BG or BGG - either one is fine with me. I want to see the babe and her assets and a good porno does that. A BBG is lousy because the two guys usually block the view so all we get to see is some guy's hairy ass and/or hairy balls, not what I watch porn to see.
|
05-20-09 11:08pm
|
Reply
1145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I will go up to $30 but no more...and think long and hard even then.Under $20 gets my attention and under $25 will get me but for no longer than 1 month max.
Interestingly when I cancel those sites over $25 I almost always get a "stick around" price. One site that started at $30 was persistent. Each time I answered NO to a reduced price I got yet a lower one. I finally bit aty $5.99 per month.
|
05-18-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
1146
|
Stunners
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Babelicious posts pix 5 days a week (daily except Weds & Fri) and one video clip on Weds and Fri.
SexyBabes.TV posts pix 5 days a week (Mon thru Fri) and a video clip on Saturday.
I am now a member of New Sensations and am OK with that site but not thrilled. That's really the main reason I've been reluctant to sign up with Stunners.
But if Stunners updates twice or more per day, I think I'm going to give that site a try. Their preview site is superb and if you and Denner are this positive about that site, there's no reason to wait any longer.
|
05-17-09 01:19pm
|
Reply
1147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Back in the good old days when unshaven bush was common, I really liked the snatch to match (nothing like a beautiful trimmed blonde snatch on a beautiful blonde babe), but now I like whatever color enhances the babe. I'm more into hairstyle than color.
One amazing example of how much difference hair color makes is with Victoria Vonn, who shows up with several hair colors, most of them OK but not great. But when she appears as a full blonde, Little Richard magically changes to Big Dick even before she gets naked.
Also the hairstyle on the babe can do wonders. Bald is awful but a pageboy of any hair color on a beautiful babe just drives me fucking wild.
|
05-16-09 08:15am
|
Reply
1148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Only once (where I was notified) a few years back. Of course it could have occurred since then where I've not been notified.
|
05-15-09 08:08am
|
Review
1149
|
Busty College Coeds
(0)
56.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
From my previous review [current review is in brackets]:
Pros: Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models. [Nothing at all added since the first review.]
Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
[Now part of the New Sensations network, so the entire NS network is now available for $15, a great price.]
Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month. [See above.]
Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.[Ditto.]
Galleries are Zip downloadable [Ditto]
No DRM [Ditto] |
| Cons: |
Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined. [Now part of New Sensations. No longer a "con" because of that.]
They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months. [No updates since 7/26/2007]
Videos not top quality, slow loading [Ditto]
Photos are quite small [Ditto]
Content not dated. [Ditto] |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is probably wrapping up its existence. [Not true. It's dormant and hasn't changed, but it still tries to recruit new business.]
Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download mgr, it won't take more than a few hours to drain it dry. [Ditto.]
NEW: I'm back on the site because I signed up for New Sensations this morning and this site was a part of the network.
I reduced my score because the site is dormant and based on what is now available on other sites, this site is now a total pass.
It gets 6 points over minimum only because it has single scenes of Natasha Nice and Sara Stone, two of my favorite big titted babes and 3 or 4 other scenes that are worthy of download. |
|
05-13-09 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1150
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Did you ever join this site? If so, any observations?
|
05-10-09 07:42pm
|
