| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I read 'em all while waiting for the D/L to complete. Some for entertainment, some for information and some for specific data that I want to include in my summary comments (which I prepare for each down load).
The summary lists the model name, possible/likely aliases, saved file name, source site, my personal rating and why, and other comments and narrative.
|
08-27-09 02:02pm
|
Reply
1102
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
With the popularity of the main site and the marketing efforts they continue to employ, All these guys need to do is to clean up their navigation and naming conventions.
I'm ready to volunteer to do the naming project.
|
08-22-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
1103
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
chancler's Review
That happened to me (expired cc). I called the 800 number of their billing service. They told me to sign up for the $5 trial with the new credit card and immediately sign up from the trial, while I was on the line with her. She said she would set it up at the $9.95 rate. I got the 3 days and am back on the $9.95 rate.
Seems like a silly procedure but it worked fine.
|
08-21-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
1104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't care. There are gorgeous 22 year olds and ugly as sin underdeveloped young girls who can pass for under 20.
|
08-18-09 11:27pm
|
Reply
1105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Poll
Ditto...all of the above.
My list in order of frustration (high to low):
-Lousy data in general such as no model names, no scene names, etc.
-Lousy navigation where one cannot find new posts, posts by model name, etc.
-Broken links to content
-Slow downloads
-Video identifications that are meaningless
The only thing in the list that I don't worry about is color themes. I prefer subtle to garish, but I don't really care much so long as the babes are doing what I want them to do.
|
08-16-09 09:26am
|
Reply
1106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I agree with all the foregoing comments. But I have to add that the aftermarket installations are getting better and better.
I saw one gorgeous babe whose C boobs were just fantastic and were moving beautifully during the reverse cowgirl. There was no way these beauties were fake.
So I went to work on a web search for more of her stuff. I found some that was pre-enhancement that blew me away. Unless she "blossomed" more than any other babe ever did after she turned 18, my kudos to the surgeon who did the installation. No scars and no strange shape at all.
Bottom line, if I can't tell they're fake, then I love 'em. But if they are visibly fake, Big Dick returns to being Little Richard very quickly.
BTW, one babe with aftermarkets who was a turn on for me is Carmella Bing. She claims they're all natural but I have my sincere doubts. Lately, though, she's added some additional poundage around her waist that now makes her look a bit too dumpy.
|
08-14-09 08:08am
|
Reply
1107
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm still in the site, but not by choice. The damned thing renewed me at their ridiculously high rate.
I spent some time last night trying to fight my way through the "garbage dump" structure, as you so aptly called it, to see if I was missing something that would help identify the babes and/or the scene. No luck but I did stumble on one video that was barely average in quality but was a great performance by one of my faves. But I'll be damned if I can find it again today.
My bottom line is that this site needs adult supervision and a user friendly structure.
There are so many site that are cheaper and much better out there I see no reason to remain a member and will keep trying to cancel my mambership.
|
08-14-09 07:56am
|
Reply
1108
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
Now this is one great review. Well written and it held my interest beginning to end.
I've been keeping this site near the top of my round tuit* list of sites and tjhis review may just get me off my ass and signing up for it.
*Round tuit=when I get around to it.
|
08-13-09 09:01am
|
Comment
1109
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
|
08-09-09 07:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's News
Sounds great. But the sites say "one time." Does that mean if I sign up now I will have to sign up again in Sept at the regular rate per site?
|
08-09-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
1111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
The location is not important to me. What is important is good lighting, a straight horndog kind of guy behind the camera who understands what we porn users really want to see, and a stunt cock who understands that we are more interested in a babe's PTA* than in his body so he finds positions that help us check out all the important body parts.
One good example of the kind of lighting, camera work and unobtrusive stunt cocks is the Busty Adventures website.
BTW, they normally use a living room setting because a couch provides better viewing angles and variety, but also do some good dtuff in kitchens, dining rooms, and occasionally outdoors. I can't say I recall ever seeing a scene shot in a bedroom.
*PTA=Pussy, Tits, Ass.
|
08-08-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
1112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Occasionally I'll take one for the PU team, but I have yet to find a great (or even a moderately good) site that hasn't been reviewed on TBP or PU.
What I do now when I discover a site that isn't on TBP or PU is send an email to Khan with the site's URL so it can be added to his project list.
|
07-31-09 08:48am
|
Reply
1113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto that except that well produced softcore videos can really get my motor going as well. Generally, most photos no longer get my interest except when they are of my A list babes and are taken by a true pro.
|
07-29-09 10:19pm
|
Reply
1114
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Now that's a term I can understand. Brazzer tits are, by and large, enhanced with aftermarket adjustments by Dr. Gene and are becoming a total turn-off.
Naturals are best, by far.
When I was a Score member a few years back when the quality was lousy and the DRM was in force, at least the models were mostly (not always) natural.
And as James says, there were some "thick" ones in there with very large naturals bouncing on their very large bellies, but that's just fine. The assortment was good back then but the price and the HD have me interested; very interested.
Great review James. Thanks.
|
07-26-09 08:35pm
|
Reply
1115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
PU first, then TBP if I need more info or if the scores are significantly different.
|
07-21-09 06:52pm
|
Reply
1116
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Boy is that true!
But better yet, I liked the articulate and fact loaded commentary. Much better than the "your site sucks" crap that is often posted.
|
07-13-09 08:32am
|
Reply
1117
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Reply
Got it. A more subtle form of overpromise. I have visited a few topless beaches in Europe and would have loved to been able to shoot some video without being conspicuous, so this kind of site is right up my alley. Great definition and great bods in the preview site.
This site is what I call a "once and done" site where a short (one month) membership should be timed so that I can drain as much as I can of the good stuff to my hard drive, then sit back and wait a year or so for another grab and run.
Thanks for the review. I was not aware sites like this existed, so they may get $25 of my porn budget shortly.
|
07-13-09 08:27am
|
Reply
1118
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Review
You said "updates are too small/rare." The preview site says at least 5 updates per week.
Is this another case of a site overpromising and under delivering?
|
07-12-09 11:16pm
|
Reply
1119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Make me feel like a real old fart but yes, I had a friend who could get his hands on some "smokers" as they were then called, with stars like Bettie Page and Candy Barr.
With the thousands of girls now doing porn there still isn't anyone that comes close to either one of those two for basic, unadulterated beauty.
And "soundless." They weren't soundless. The projectors were always rather noisy. But yes, there was no soundtrack.
|
07-11-09 10:15am
|
Reply
1120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If my memory is accurate the first site I joined was SexyBabes.tv many years ago. I'm still a member although my tastes have migrated to video from photos with the advent of HD and the ability to download scenes as long as 1 hour in a single bite.
Candidly I've thought about dropping the site but with the addition of Babelicious to their lineup, while I don't get nearly as much material as I do with, say, Twistys, what they have is still very high quality.
The other end of the spectrum is Danni.com which I joined in 03 or 04 and loved it. The negative was their DRM, which they said would not stop me from creating my own stash on DVD discs that would still be viewable after I dropped my membership(they lied). But as long as I stayed a member and was on line I could acquire the requisite license.
Then when Danny Ashe sold it, the customer service and content slipped badly and their business practices started getting a bit sleazy. I quit the site, then tried a test month in 2006 only to find that it had remained rather bad,,,and still with the lousy DRM.
Haven't been back since and doubt that I ever will go back.
|
07-09-09 08:17am
|
Reply
1121
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
The clean shaven aspect doesn't bother me that much but the absence of any heavier eroticism, such as finger insertions and/or labia play reduces the appeal of this site.
That said, perhaps it's me but it seems like the models are getting more busty, are doing a lot more leg spreading than before and are, on average, prettier than in past years.
And I wish they would do something to make their videos watchable. They are usually videos of photo shoot sessions which are not nearly as interesting as the stills.
|
07-08-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
1122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
Nope. If it's not illegal, it's just not right. I'll let people look at my stuff with me, but I won't make a copy.
|
07-08-09 09:19am
|
Reply
1123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I joined a Jana Jordan site (Jana Rocks) because she rocks my sox. It was not promoted as a non nude site but it turns out that it was and it is a total POS site.
But I'm into the nude female body so a site with tease before nudity is OK...but a site with no nudity might as well be a G rated tv show.
|
07-06-09 08:24am
|
Reply
1124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I am into the erotic female form and find nothing at all erotic about an underage girl or a model who appears to be an underage girl.
I pass on that stuff just as I pass on those BBW's who are just fat slobs.
|
07-06-09 08:17am
|
Reply
1125
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
Quick question.
Is there a comprehensive search function that one can use to find models with specific attributes, such as large breasts, small breasts, blond, large labias, outdoors, etc., etc.?
|
06-22-09 11:14am
|
