| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You are absolutely correct. This is the reason why I have been stepping on their balls and Khan is keeping a close eye on how all this works out.
|
03-10-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
427
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Comment
That is not true either. We tend to ignore or question the extreme low scoring reviews when reasoning is not given in reasonable amounts. No site is perfect and no two people are the same, so of course there will be differences. However, most of us can agree on roughly how good a site is. If I give a site an 85, there is likely going to be someone else who gives it an 83 or 87 based on something they liked or disliked that I am impartial to. We usually stay in the same area though, and everyone who is trusted gives valid reasons and explains why those reasons are important to them.
I checked out the link you provided. Image this, a T-girl getting nice compliments from other T-girls and T-girl wannabes. That is about as useful as asking a chain smoker what they feel about raising the taxes on cigarettes. Of course the opinions will be biased! I believe you will have come up with a better argument than that.
I enjoy many sites, but do not give them 100's and at times not even in the 90's. This may be because they are lacking elsewhere. It looks as if the site we are discussing updates only weekly. The site I gave a 100 to updates five times per day! Perfection does not keep us waiting.
Had you come on here and given 85-90, I do not think anyone would have thought much of it. But 100's right out of signing up just do not float well. Particularly when Khan has already told us that there have been issues with people creating multiple accounts to artificially boost the site.
|
03-10-09 09:12am
|
Reply
428
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
Where are these comments you say you posted, or are you talking about this reply? Just want to be sure because there are no other comments for this site posted.
There is obviously a real person behind the posts, but I do not believe that person has the general users best interests in mind. After all, all the recent reviews for this site have read just about the same. The seem as if they were written by the same person.
|
03-10-09 06:12am
|
Comment
429
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
|
03-10-09 01:03am
Replies (11)
|
Reply
430
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
Looks like we have another spoof here. This site is quickly hitting my Shit List! Something tells me that thee will be a few more before this all plays out.
|
03-10-09 12:54am
|
Reply
431
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Check the reply page. It seems we have yet another new member just raving about this site. KinkyKarl joined only a few hours ago and is continuing the advertising for them. Hell is profile does not even add up. He says he is 52, but it lists him as 49?
So by our count that is four account created to place this site up into the heavens! This makes me not trust the site either.
|
03-09-09 11:53pm
|
Review
432
|
Extreme Sophia
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very cute main performer, Sophia is the best looking main performer on the network
-Larger amount of higher quality videos than other main sites on network
-Several download options for the videos
-Access to a very large network
-Seems to be exclusive
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Site is simple and easy to get around
-Very wide variety of items end up inside Sophia
-Full scene options for all scenes |
| Cons: |
-A bit pricy at $30
-No longer updating as of 9-26-2008
-No zips for photos
-Video quality could still use work, even the newer ones, but I am more critical than some on this
-Must log in frequently, and must be done on the homepage
-File naming is uninformative
-Tattoos, not my thing
-Photos spread over many pages, harder to download |
| Bottom Line: |
This site, much like the rest of the main sites, has a lot of pros and cons. To enjoy this site you must enjoy seeing a girl shove many different items inside her and perform many other less than usual acts.
The site was updated for over two and a half years and during this time Sophia took on several looks. At first she was darker haired, then she had highlights, which I liked, and towards the end she ended up with several fairly large tattoos. I am not a tattoo fan so this is a disappointment for me. I even seen a video or two where she had nipple rings, but this did not seem to stick.
Sophia is a trim figured girl with fake breasts. I do not like the term fake in her case because they are no overly large or obtrusive. I would say they are a very small D cup or a full C. She seemed to have kept her hair about shoulder length through her near 3 year run.
The is a wide variety of things that end up inside Sophia. Anything from Barbie dolls to hand fulls to plastic eating utensils. The topic of the scenes vary a bit too. The are DPs, lesbian, spit swapping, anal dildo insertions and so on.
The style of the site is the same as Extreme Holly and Extreme Alex and the rest. The video quality is exactly the same and so are the pictures. The difference is that the videos did not use the lower qualities. So everything is very consistent.
Quicky Rundown
104 Scenes
104 Files
33.9 GB total video size
325 MB average file size
45 hours, 28 minutes run time
This site by it self is worth joining for some, but for the rest the bonus content removes any doubt that might be left. The quality and amount of bonus content make this a hard network of sites to turn down.
So why an 83 instead of a 93? The video quality needs to be improved, and the site needs to resume updating. Not updating is a sure way to never get into the 90's in my scoring. Something as simple as making zip files for the photo sets would add several points as well.
Overall this site is worth the $30 to join. I would not pay much more than that though. And if you want to join there is no sense in waiting around, it is not as if you will get a couple of extra updates if you wait until next month, expect for the bonus sites. |
|
03-09-09 11:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
433
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Yes. I believe I remember that one too. Seems something a bit fishy is going on here.
|
03-09-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
434
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Alex2222's Review
Um...This is the second extreme high score for this otherwise unheard of site this week. Makes me suspect of any one-review-wonder.
Alex. Please give us much more detail. This sounds more like an advertisement than a review.
|
03-09-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Each type of scene needs to have its setting. A great looking girl looks so much better when she is a nice setting.
Would it make sense for a bondage scene to be on the beach? Although that might be interesting, it just does not make sense nor does it appear to be bondage like.
We have all seen the amateur scenes with dogs barking in the background, trash on the floor, and terrible lighting. The same couple doing the same thing in a nice setting is so much more appealing. And at the same time a great looking woman just does not seem the same when she is featured in a trashy setting.
|
03-09-09 12:33am
|
Review
436
|
Extreme Holly
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No DRM
-Extreme content
-Huge network of sites
-A variety of content
-Holly is good looking
-Several video type options
-Site simple and can get from one set to next scene simply by pressing "next"
-Very nice (fake) breasts |
| Cons: |
-Price a bit high at $30 per month
-Holly is no longer updating as of 9-09-2007
-Photos are small 1000x750 and a little fuzzy
-No Zips for photo sets
-Must log in frequently
-Not all videos have "full" scene option
-Files not named well "004599_1000_001.wmv" is typical |
| Bottom Line: |
Holly is into doing fairly extreme things and looks great doing them. She has nice breasts, I know they are fake but honestly hers look much better that way. There is actually a video of her implant surgery day which is something that not everyone is willing to share.
On that note, some of her videos are of her with natural breasts, probably a small C. Obviously the newer stuff is of her with her new breasts, which I would say is a very full DD.
There is a large variety of topics covered. Anything from spit swapping, double penetration, and hard deep throating to dancing and sucking an old man's dick (lucky bastard!).
Unfortunately the site is no longer updating. They still have you covered though. The bonus content is absolutely huge. I have downloaded well over 100 GB of bonus content and am no where near having it all. There is a wide variety of bonus sites included, so there is something everyone.
The video quality could use some work. Obviously it is not likely to happen. The highest quality is 720x480 at 1.85 MBit/s. This is not bad, but it could be so much better. The older videos are 320x240 and at 757 KBit/s.
Quicky Rundown
197 Files
13.2 GB
33 hours, 15 minutes total running time
720x480 at 1.85 MBit and 320x240 at 757 KBit
147 scenes
A few of the scenes can be seen on Spit Swappers and a the other Extreme sites based on who else is featured in the scene. Like I said though, it is only a few.
The biggest disappointment is that they are not updating anymore. So this site by itself is only worth joining once. But, the bonus sites are still updating and with some very nice quality stuff. I made the mistake of ignoring the bonus content at first because many times on a network of sites the bonus stuff is total junk, do not make that mistake!
You also get access to Extreme Alex, Extreme Sophia, Spit Swappers, and a few other main sites. Many of the bonus sites are not listed here on Pu, I believe because I can not find a direct access to them. They seem to be bonus only.
This site is worth joining because of the extreme things Holly likes doing, the fact she is hot, and the huge amount of bonus content. I enjoyed many of her videos, and thought the breasts implant surgery interview style video was nice. The reason for only getting an 80 is because the site does not update, thus the video quality reflects this. |
|
03-08-09 10:44pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
No babe spotting would defeat the purpose for me!
It is a very broad and likely uneducated statement. I never have been to one and never will. I do not see the appeal in hanging around a bunch of naked people with no sexual innuendos at least.
I know for one of two things would happen. One I would have a hard on the whole time, thus embarrassment. Or I would be extremely limp and shriveled, thus embarrassment. I am sure people do not say much about it there, but I would still be very self conscious and not get a lot of enjoyment out of it. Perhaps this is all my ignorance showing through, but I do not intend on finding out personally.
So if you have been to a few and can testify that there are good looking people there than I will stand corrected at your word. I have seen many nudist videos and picture scattered over the internet and extremely rarely is there anyone that i would call attractive. That is the bases for my opinion, however weak of a base it may be. But you wont find me sitting naked by the lake with my buddies!
|
03-06-09 12:29am
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Nudity if for pictures of beuatiful women, the shower, sex, and jerking off. Otherwise, keep it to yourself. We all know that there are generally no good looking women at nudist camps anyway. Just if you want to see overweight middle aged people flopping around I guess it would be great for you.
|
03-05-09 08:26pm
|
Reply
439
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I could not have asked for better timing! I have a subscription somewhere else ending tonight and NA was my next place to go. Perfect! I knew there was a reason I hung around this place.
Thanks for the heads up and all the work.
|
03-04-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
440
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Interviews are great, but most of us do not download the videos for the interviews. I always say more content is better. I thought would be to make the interviews separate from the normal video. This way people who are not interested in them do not need to download them, and those who are interested can specifically download them. As I said, it is just a thought.
I personally have never been a picky person on here the girls come from. A good looking woman is a good looking woman!
|
03-04-09 12:35am
|
Reply
441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
I much prefer seeing the girl getting the guy off, after all that is what it is all about. I personally do not like jerking off at the end of sex, so seeing it is not appealing either. Cream Pie is not bad either.
|
03-03-09 08:36am
|
Reply
442
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
redfrog's Review
Just wanted to add that the video resolution described is only partially correct. The videos are 720, where as the the 1280 is the other dimension. Usually it is listed relative to vertical lines of resolution, or to be safe just include both. In this case it is 1280x720 which usually makes decent video.
|
03-02-09 11:44pm
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
This is a turn off for me. I am a younger guy and prefer to see women with younger men, at least in their twenties. Of course this view may changes as I get older. Hell, when I am an old fart I might get off on the idea of an old guy banging a fresh young womansimply because I wish it were me. Never know.
|
03-01-09 01:13am
|
Reply
444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I check here, my email, VideoBox, and whatever other site I happen to be joined to. I am assuming you are not talking about porn sites only correct? 20 porn sites a day would take some serious money that I wish I had!
|
02-27-09 01:25am
|
Reply
445
|
Czech Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marco2006's Comment
You rated this site as a 50, which of course means it is total utter garbage. When a site is "average" it usually calls for an average score. So if you had rated it between 60 and 75 it might mean something.
You really need to offer justification when you say a site is to be avoided or if a site is a must have. 4 words hardly informs people what the issues are. You need to elaborate on this.
|
02-25-09 05:01pm
|
Reply
446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have had a few. Usually it is simply because I believe I am getting full access only to find partial access and/or the content is much different than advertised. A fast was to burn money and increase my blood pressure.
Never rip off a man with a stiff cock, he might just smack you in the side of the face with it! Well that is what I wanted to do to them.
Fortunately it has been a while since I joined a one-minute-wonder. I have only run across one since I have been using PU, but in that case I now believe I was somehow redirected during the sign up because it seems no one else had issues.
There have been some where I was disappointed with the size. Usually I only join smaller sites if they have something specific I want. Often times the site that has exactly what you are looking for is only a handful of less than spectacular videos.
|
02-25-09 12:59am
|
Reply
447
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Reply
There is no need for hindsight, just go back and change what you feel needs to be changed.
|
02-24-09 11:16am
|
Reply
448
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Review
While I will agree it is a good site, it certainly is not the Holy Grail as you make it seem. Any why is concern about HIV a con for the site? I do not wish HIV on anyone, but it would hardly hurt me if the somehow it were transmitted between a few of the girls, and it certainly has nothing to do with the content of the site.
Basically what it comes down to is this review is advertisement for the site. Although I am not sure why? The site has decent reviews and scores here. I would not think they would need to resort to this sort of spamming. Perhaps this person receives some sort of referral bonus for new members, but if someone where to join through PU than PU would get that kick back?
Anyway, not a trustworthy review. The site worth joining, but a reader must be the judge of that based off of other reviews.
|
02-23-09 10:41pm
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Every now and then just for the fun of it. sometimes I want to see something a little different and will look to them for a couple free photos or video clips. They certainly can not replace actual sites for any sort of collection. But every now and then I gotta go see the strange video of three midgets gang banging a 75 year old woman. Well not that exactly, but just something to get a kick out of but I would not be willing to pay for.
|
02-23-09 04:29pm
|
Reply
450
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Brazzers have been using 1800 KBit. RK was a bit lower, at1500 KBit. Personally I always download the highest quality available. I always want the highest quality no matter the size. I am not beyond downloading 3 GB videos if that is what a site offers.
|
02-20-09 04:46pm
|
