| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
The physical quality of the video, resolution, bit rate and such. Do they look better than most places or are they not much different.
|
02-20-09 11:30am
|
Reply
452
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Well, I am not going to poop in your sand box too much. You do bring some very valid points. It really is a slight difference in opinion, but only on the scoring. The review and reasoning are solid as my dick was the first time I ever seen a porn. :)
I will have to check this site out by the way. I have never made it around to them yet.
Videobox is at a disadvantage when it comes to making it entertaining, they do not make the content. As for the model names, even i have noticed a few mix ups. If I notice a model name wrong there is a serious problem, I am lucky to remember my friends names!
Since I have your attention. How does the video quality compare at NA to videobox and brazzers. Videobox has better looking videos than Brazzers, but I would not want to go much lower than Brazzer's quality. I am hoping they have a higher quality than Brazzers and especially RK. I do not mind huge file sizes if it gets me good looking videos.
Might I suggest in you BL to but "My Take" paragraph and an "Average Joe" paragraph that is clearly defined. This way you can include both clearly. I kinda like that idea, I may just do that myself!
|
02-19-09 11:47pm
|
Reply
453
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
I just do not understand rating a site you prefer lower than another. Is there something fundamental that Brazzers and NA do better than Videobox? When I look at a score I see the score that the review gives the site based on what they feel it deserves, not what they people others believe it deserves. This is exactly why I am not telling you that one site is more deserving than another, because that is up to you to decide. The way your reply reads you are saying that you score sites not based what you like but rather what others like, a popular vote if you will. I certainly hope that is not the case.
You say that NA and Brazzers post content in a more appealing way, and this is a reason to show favor to them, I tend to agree. Perhaps we just have a difference in our logic. Not that either one is wrong, I am just trying to figure out yours.
What if someone is interested in finding particular models. Obviously you can not list every model on the site, but it would be worth noting if a site has usual models or unique models. You are not the only person interested in collecting this way. Exotics is the same way. But you are also correct in saying that some people have less concern over models, I am one of them to an extent.
What I am after is what, in your opinion, makes NA better than all other sites? Not what other people think.
|
02-19-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
454
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
As a rule we must give you some grief for posting a 100. So here it is.
The last thing you say is "On an overall scale? I prefer VideoBox." Now that is simply wrong right there. A site can not be viewed as perfect, by you, if you actually prefer another site. I also might add that you scored Videobox as a 95.
As I mentioned before, everyone is entitled a 100, in my opinion. The site someone chooses as a 100 does not actually need to be perfect, but it should be the one site that you would stay a member with if you could choose one and only one site. So now if you would choose this site over Videobox than assigning a 100 is fine, but you need to tell us what makes this site better for you. Again, the key question, is this site the best site out there for you? If you can not say yes then the site does not meet the requirements for perfection.
I believe I went into this somewhere else on this site, but my view of perfection for a site is one that is the absolute best. A perfect site is of course unattainable, so we are left with calling the best the current definition of perfection and the close running sites are near current perfection.
I guess I get a little anal about this, but you are certainly free to ignore me. I will just bug you forever then! :) Don't worry though, I am not going to yank my trust vote over it.
Oh yeah, reason number two. You passed me on point...grrrr...(shaking fist in the air) ... :)
|
02-19-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
455
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Everyone is entitled to their 100. But seriously, we do have to find a way to bust his balls about it! :)
|
02-19-09 06:12pm
|
Reply
456
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Of course they are not. A lot of girls do lesbian scenes because they do not want to have sex with a dude for various reasons. A lot of times it is because their boyfriend is not comfortable with another man doing his girlfriend, but has no problem with another woman doing her.
I am sure there are a few real lesbians, but somehow I doubt that a real lesbian would want to make a video for men to get off on.
|
02-19-09 06:09am
|
Review
457
|
Just Nude
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Full access trial, 3 days
Still updating
Zips for photo sets
Most photo sets have 3 size options
Pictures have Hi-Res option, up to 4000
Many great looking models
No download limit
No DRM
Watermark is small and out of way
Some girl-girl shoots, but could use more
Site very simple, you can not get lost
Videos look very nice, hires and high bit rate
Several video options as well
Use CCBill, I prefer them |
| Cons: |
File named only by gallery number
Trial a bit expensive at $10
Needs many more videos, only 18
First month is expensive if joining without using trial
The girl-girl shoots are dubbed under each models name
Videos are of photo shoots only |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are a fan of nude art or softcore photo shoots than this place is well worth a look. It is a lot like Met-Art, so if you enjoy their stuff than join this one and forget about the rest of this review.
The photos are of a very high quality and really bring out the beauty in the models. They scale nicely too, so do not worry about them looking worse as the size decreases to match your screen, you can even go larger if you like....in case you want to look into her eyes of course! :)
The site is still growing since the last review was posted. The now have 482 photo galleries and 18 videos. Now keep in mind that a the number of unique galleries is lower but still well over 400, when they have two or more models in the shoot they assign a new gallery for each one and do not mention this.
The videos look stunning. They do vary a bit in quality, but most are of two qualities. Some are 768x576 at 6 MBit and some are 1280x720 at 8 MBit. The videos are mostly outdoors. In parks, by water, near statues, and one is even one a large pile of tires by a small skating park! I knew I should have gone to the park that day! The duration of the videos is between 6 to 15 minutes with most of them being about 10 minutes.
Many of the photo shoots feature the model already nude when it starts. Some do start clothed, but many times when they do it is only partially clothed which can be erotic in itself. i wish more of the shoots would start clothed.
The number of photos in each shoot varies anywhere between 20 and 80. It seems like they cut out only what they feel is the best. I usually like having as many photos as was taken, but I can understand this would require a huge amount of space since many of the photos are over 6 MB a piece.
Speaking of size again.
Photos - 482 files - 34.8 GB
Videos - 18 files - 4.6 GB - 2 hr 50 min
So as you can see the site is about 40 GB which makes it easily downloadable with in a month, or the three day trial. But it certainly is large enough to warrant joining.
If you enjoy outdoor photography with great looking younger women showing the beauty of several aspects of nature that this site is for you. This site has made my "join again" list and would do the same for any picture fan. If you are only after videos than this may not be the place for you.
If you intend on joining use the trial. Even if you intend on staying for a month, use the trial. If you join straight up you pay $30 and get 30 days. If you use the trial first you pay $30 and get 33 days since the site recurs at $20 instead of the initial $30. Plus if you are not satisfied in the first 3 days you can just cancel then and pay only the first $10 for the trial. |
|
02-18-09 08:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
458
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Now this is a damn good review. Well done!
|
02-17-09 08:52pm
|
Reply
459
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I do not have a cut off line. As it is I blend the score, who made it, and what is said in the review.
Smaller sites in particular need a little leeway when it comes to this. A had score from a single user when the was pretty new does not mean the site still sucks a year later. If no one else has reviewed it and it has been a while I tend to overlook bad scores. That is so long as it looks good and is something I really want.
|
02-17-09 01:05am
|
Reply
460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Oh trust me, I know it. Actually I am trying to download all of VideoBox!
I leave my connection running 24/7. It is only a 3 Mbit, but I can pull a little over 30 GB in a day. I am hoping they can get me to a 5 MBit sometime soon, they almost can now but will not sell it until the full 5 is reached.
Exotics, I thought the same thing! I was not sure if I submitted this one in my sleep or not.
|
02-16-09 04:59pm
|
Reply
461
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have already paid for it, I might as well download it. Would you guys expect any different from me? :)
To be honest, there are times when I do not download the picture if they just are not worth it and the site makes it hard to get them.
|
02-15-09 12:32am
|
Reply
462
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I can not say that I ever gave this one much thought. I am not a cum shot fan, so it does not matter much to me. I will say that in most scenes eye protection would look pretty retarded though.
|
02-13-09 12:29am
|
Reply
463
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
That is terrible. And to think that I almost took them up on a similar Christmas offer.
As for chargebacks, I would not worry too much about it. It is a scare tactic to keep you from doing something that THEY are affraid of. Credit card companies keep an eye on how many charge backs a company receives over specific amount of time. At a point they will charge for them because the credit card has to deal with them. This is a way to encourage mechants to resolve issues on their own, which is usually better for everyone. When a company exceeds certain amounts of chargebacks they actually lose their ability to use that type of credit card. So doing a charge back is also a way of letting the large credit card companies know the mechant they are processing for it doing something wrong. And if chargebacks start coming from a handful of people the credit card companies do start looking into things.
So, by all means, do what you have to do. Hopefully at some point site owners will be fearful of getting a bad reputation on user review sites such as this one and become conserned with keep members happy and honorring deals offered.
Welcome to PU and we hope to see more from you, and hopefully it will be tales of good fortunes insted of bad.
|
02-12-09 08:57am
|
Reply
464
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In all reality I do not pay much attention to the rating on sites. Ratings here mean a lot more than the rating on the actual site. Once i am in the site I can decide for myself if I like the model or not, so that that point te opinions of other no longer matter. Besides, how much can you trust those rating anyway?
Usually when a site has comment boxes and such it is just people ranting about how they want to marry the woman, or that someone sucks. Reality Kings had a good bit of this.
|
02-11-09 01:13am
|
Reply
465
|
Please Bang My Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
6 videos per day? Seems a bit harsh!
|
02-09-09 06:07pm
|
Reply
466
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I tend to agree with most of you on this one. I will join a site that is not updating once and only once. Just because the site is stagnant does not mean it does not have junk material.
|
02-09-09 02:57pm
|
Reply
467
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Well, the 1.5 TB are the best buy per GB right now. Paying an extra $170 for an additional 500 GB to get a 2 TB drive simply is not worth it. In a few months I would be looking for them to be closer to $150.
|
02-08-09 01:10pm
|
Reply
468
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Gotcha. I never use their streaming videos. I download everything. With the connection I have here it is by far better to download when nicer videos are being viewed.
|
02-08-09 12:59am
|
Reply
469
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Hum....did they just cut off the ends or did they just "squeeze" it in and make the people look distorted? Either way I do not like it.
I hope this is an isolated thing. I would hate to see my 100 get lazy and become less valuable to me.
|
02-07-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
470
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Comment
I have noticed that some of their videos even though they should be in widescreen use full screen resolution but use the black bars at the top and bottom. They do have some of their stuff correct, but I do not know about everything.
|
02-07-09 10:06pm
|
Reply
471
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I love blondes. In porn and in real life. I am not disgusted by other hair colors by any means, but I do prefer blonde. However, I do not like "stupid blonde." Way too many blonde women in porn, especially younger bustier women, have to put on the stupid blonde act. I like women to be unintelligent in real life, so a sign of intelligence is nice in porn too.
|
02-05-09 08:50am
|
Comment
472
|
Extreme Holly
(0)
|
|
02-04-09 07:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
473
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I say the banana is the best of those. It is pretty hot when the girl eats the banana when she is done. Plus a banana has the potential of getting messy.
|
02-03-09 08:47am
|
Reply
474
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I do not actually hide it, but it is not siting out in the open either.
Go Pittsburgh!
|
02-01-09 02:06am
|
Reply
475
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Of course. I have never found a site that I could not use a download manager for manual downloading. When I say anti-download I mean that you can not queue up a few hours worth of downloads and leave. No resuming sucks though, because often times if your connection trips for a moment you get stuck restarting the download. :(
|
01-30-09 04:06pm
|
