| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
401
|
Extreme Girl Network
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Decent site size
-Access of many other sites on network and special bonus sites that are unrelated
-Loads of hardcore content
-Very hard action
-95% of videos have a "full" option
-No downlaod limits or DRM
-Site is very simply to navigate |
| Cons: |
-NO LONGER UPDATING as of 8-23-2007
-A bit pricy for just this site
-Videos need a lot of work in quality!
-Photos are just screen shots and NO ZIPs
-No search for different performers
-Watermark is larger than other sites on network
-Log in frequent, must be done from home page
-Files not names usefully
-No model search |
| Bottom Line: |
This site come with Extreme Alex, Sophia, Holly, Spit Swappers and several others. All of these sites are included in with a membership here. This site is a bit different than the other sites on the network.
The other sites focus on a single performer or a special topic such as spit swapping. This site does not feature a specific performer, thee are a good number of different women here. This site is all hardcore, very hardcore. Most scenes feature some sort of anal penetration and the majority of them feature double penetration.
The scenes usually start out with the woman clothed which is nice. I am not much a fan of scenes that skip this part. There is a very small plot to most of the scenes.
The video quality is much worse here, but I am not sure why. My only guess is that different people were making the content here as compared to the other sites. The videos at best look like low quality VHS and at worst is nearly unwatchable. Even the 2 MBit videos are nothing worth bragging about. For a 2007 site the videos are mostly subpar.
Quicky Rundown
106 Scenes
111 Files
40 Hours run time
24.8 GB of video
21-663 MB files evenly spread on size
2.01 MBit @ 640x480 and 877 KBit @320x240
Is this site worth joining?
In a word, NO. This site by itself is not worth joining at $30. The saving factor is the access to the other main sites and the many bonus sites. The site by itself would have gotten no more than a 62, and would have been lower if it did not have a good handful of content.
There are much better DP sites out there with watchable videos and actual photos. The only reason to join here is for access to the bonus sites and the other main site, which you can read my reviews individually. |
|
03-16-09 10:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
402
|
Extreme Alex
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Large bonus access
-Main performer is cute, girl next door look
-A variety of different content, not much is off limits here
-Get access to Extreme Sophia, and Holly which a seen in a few of the videos
-No download limit
-No DRM
-Navigation very simple
-Natural breasts
-90% of scenes have a "full" option |
| Cons: |
-Must log in often, on a different page
-Video quality needs work, but is not bad
-NO LONGER UPDATING as of 8-16-2007
-No zips for photos
-Photos are small and spread over many pages
-Tattoo on stomach, just a personal con |
| Bottom Line: |
Extreme Alex is very similar to the other Extreme sites on this network. The only real difference is the main performer, Alex. So lets focus on the differences.
Alex is smaller than Holly, and larger than Sophia. She does have a few extra pounds, but nothing to worry about. She does have a written tattoo on her stomach with is a turn off to me. Alex changes her hair color a few times, but nothing strange, just blond. She usually has blown hair with some blond in it. Alex has the smallest breasts of the three but she is the only on with naturals. They are likely a small 36 C. Alex also has a cuter face than Holly.
The action is fairly extreme. Obviously there is much worse out there, but for mainstream porn there is a few extras. There is a lot of anal sex and toying, a little squirting, several lesbian scenes, and even a scene were Alex is using a strap-on to make a girl named Mandy puke up her yogurt.
The video quality could use a bit of work even for being form 2007. I would like them to be closer to 3 MBit, but they do not look bad. They are a little fuzzy, but run smoothly.
Quicky Rundown
70 Scenes
78 Files
15-501 MB file size spread through the range
7.82 GB of video
14 Hours, 52 Minutes of run time
1.82 MBit @ 720x480 and 794 KBit @320x240
Should you join this site?
I would recommend this site because of the access to the other main sites and especially the access to the bonus sites. The bonus sites are not reviewed here at PU, but they are very nice. A good number for great scenes at 4 MBit and nice looking women. There is a wide variety of content on the bonus section.
As you seen in the Quicky Rundown, this site by it self is fairly small so make sure you like one of the other featured performers otherwise you may be a little disappointed in the size of Alex's site. Obviously if you want to join than do it, but only do it once. The main sites do not update so download them now and call it a day. The bonus sites do update.
So give it shot if you have the $30. There is enough content over this network to keep you happy for a while and Alex makes the find of videos you have to watch more than once. |
|
03-16-09 09:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
403
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Does not sound too promising. Guess I will have to put them on my avoid list for now. Thanks for the review.
|
03-16-09 04:40pm
|
Comment
404
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
03-13-09 10:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
405
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This explains the idea pretty well. It has been a year since I read the terms, and yes I did actually read them. I truly can see what you mean. It is kinda like me eating hamloaf, it is only good when it is free. It is not something I would pay for. Free things always seem better, but unfortunately there are not many free porn sites that are worth the page space they would take to even type in here.
I was not trying to be argumentative, I just had not though this issue through as well as you guys apparently have. As I frequently say, you guys have thought of everything!
Simple solution. Next time time one of us asks something like this, instead of explaining it in length just say "because I fuckin said so!" It is so much more dramatic and would act as a reminder to read the terms and rule every now and then. Speaking of which... Seriously though, thanks for the explanation. Your philosophy on this makes perfect sense.
|
03-13-09 08:31pm
|
Reply
406
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Even to a site that normal does charge? I understand that there are no reviews to things such as TGPs. I only mention this as a special circumstance. The idea was to have a trust worthy, usual member here have a chance to poke around this site and construct a review of the actual content without having to fork over the membership money.
I can understand as well not wanting people to have free access in exchange for writing reviews. I had not thought of this before, you guys think o everything! I can see it being very hard to write an objective review for someone after they gave free access. Plus I would want to know that people were not being paid off for writing less than truthful reviews to boost the site.
Although I think in this special case it may be appropriate, I can certainly live with your decision after figuring out for myself why you do not want them. You should have explained why exactly you do not allow this in your reply, but that is okay I figured it out, I think. If I am wrong about why please let me know!
|
03-13-09 02:53pm
|
Reply
407
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
That sounds like a tall order there! If yo do not eget an answer you could always try emailing the webmaster, they might be willing to tell you.
|
03-13-09 02:39pm
|
Reply
408
|
XXX Movie Online
(0)
|
Reply of
pornoman's Review
We all very fresh from jumping all over some other people giving 100's to a site with out giving justification. There is still blood in the water here and hungry PUs. So please do not feed us!
Give up a bunch of information about this one. It seems there are no reviews yet, so you get to set the bar on this site. Set it high. Answer all the questions that where asked and tell us even more than that. The review as written is meaningless. Take a few moments to look over a few reviews by several usually reviews and you will quickly see what I am talking about.
Welcome to PornUsers! I hope to hear more from you about this site and many more.
|
03-12-09 09:11pm
|
Reply
409
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
6000! Gee my job just keeps getting harder. One day I will final download their whole site. Maybe they will give an award for doing it. :)
|
03-12-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
410
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.
|
03-12-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
411
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.
The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.
Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.
As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.
|
03-12-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
412
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I was thinking about the same thing, but I do not think they deserve our money at this point.
|
03-12-09 02:07pm
|
Reply
413
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.
|
03-12-09 02:05pm
|
Reply
414
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Yup....going to have to do a lot better than that. Give us some actual information. You guys need to give up on this people, we are not buying into it.
|
03-12-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
415
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
This is yet another very subjective review to a site that has had a lot of attention because of these type of reviews. There is no fact in this, only personal opinion. It read the same as the other reviews that have been scrutinized and I again suspect it is the same person or someone from the same group being asked to write these and told what to say.
Everything in this review I could have wrote, and I have never subscribed to this site. If you read the first review written by JoeMushashi you can see that he complains about a lack of cum shots. And guess what, that is the only real con listed here. Image that, a site where a shemale wears boot and nylons, of course they do it is to make the performer appear more feminine.
The simple fact of the matter is that this review really did not tells us anything new and I must concur with Jeffrey with the conclusion that this is yet another ad. Seriously, we are not buying t and this is making the site look back, thus we will not buy a membership to the site and warn others against it.
|
03-12-09 10:29am
|
Reply
416
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Can say that I do. Just a good guess. Glad to see it is working now. I have this issue from time to time.
|
03-12-09 12:47am
|
Reply
417
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Uh oh...sounds like somebody is having a less than stellar day! Take a few breaths and try again, and let us know how it goes.
|
03-11-09 09:46pm
|
Reply
418
|
Amateur Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Denny's Review
Denny, we have no updates about what the videos and pictures are like. Please let us know how they are doing. TBP has not updated this since 2007.
|
03-11-09 09:43pm
|
Reply
419
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Exactly, you do not think Videobox should get a 100 (you never have reviewed by they way) but you can see why I score it so highly based on my review and the replies to the review. I gave it a 100 with many reason that are very important to me. Since everyone is different we all rate things a little different but overall we are fairly consistent. If you reviewed and score them you would likely give them a high score, but if you did not I would suspect that you would give a number of valid reasons and why those reasons are important to you.
I agree. Keeping an eye on things is all of our jobs, not just the staff. Of course the staff is needs to keep things right here because they are financially invested in this site's success. We are invested by time and the fact we like being here doing our part to contribute to the porn world. So of course we must react when someone comes along to pee in our porn pool. This is why the PU staff gave us the option to of assigning "trust" to people, and this is especially effect I believe because we can say we do not trust people as well as trust them. The "NO" trusts are very important. They make ill-agenda people stick out. And since the staff have gone through the work of making this place for us we should help them out by stepping on bad people's balls!
|
03-11-09 07:32pm
|
Reply
420
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Well damn it!
It does not look like T Shirts are fairing too well at this point. I am pisses off at you guys! :)
I do understand not wearing it in public. Imagine wearing one out on night and the next day at a job interview the lady asks if you where the jackass wearing it.
The would be great to wear around home of to a friends football party. Hell, might get a response from the college crowd, like me.
Perhaps this summer I will come up with a few designs and ask the staff if it would be okay to have them printed for myself. Hell if anyone elseis interested we could have several printed, it usually does not cost much to have a second or more printed. It is just the first one that is expensive because of set up. I guess we will just have to see.
|
03-11-09 07:18pm
|
Reply
421
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have been hoping for some shirts for a while now. I believe we discussed this in the forum a few weeks ago. Perhaps if enough people respond to the poll saying the want to buy some stuff the staff might look into it. He can only hope I guess.
|
03-11-09 12:06am
|
Reply
422
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Personally I like the content they produce. I just believe they need a to put some serious work to video quality. That is something that most people can agree on whether or not they enjoy the actually content itself.
|
03-10-09 11:01pm
|
Reply
423
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Review
I like the perspective this review gives. Some site do not change, which can be a good thing. If the keeps the same style than people can know what to expect if they had been there before or seen the videos elsewhere. This site is on my "join soon" list. I was a member a while back and am looking to update my collection.
Welcome to PornUsers!
|
03-10-09 08:29pm
|
Reply
424
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
There really is no need to insult users here. Insults tend to be a signal of impending defeat in discussion forums, as I am sure any of our several psychiatrists would concur. We try very hard to keep a decent, educated site. While I do not exactly like JoeMushashi's reply, you were definitely on the offensive with your first statement to him.
Yes "Kims Anal Heaven" does leave ample room for interpretation. Yes anyone could have deduced that the site would be about anal toying and such. But I also would believe there would be more than just large didlos. I would expect to see hardcore and likely a good number of cum shots. JoeMushashi's point was that he was disappointed with the site's content. He stated what he expected the site to be and why he expected that based on the trailer video.
What sets JoeMushashi apart from the many shill users that have come about due to this site is that he gave us his reason and his explanation for his reason. That is what we ask for, good or bad. He felt the trailer video was misleading and he warned fellow PUs about it.
So I would like to ask, are you affiliated with this site in some way, or are you just head over heels for it?
|
03-10-09 07:41pm
|
Reply
425
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I like that, it definitely has a nice ring to it. If I was not so used to my normal name I would do it.
When I was newbie I gave Videobox a 100 and people stepped on my balls about it. I had to justify that score and I believe I did through a long and at times a little heated discussion. So when a newbie comes along a posts extreme high scores I tend to jump at them a bit much the same way I was. I do not press as hard as I was about it, but I do like to see some genuine justification.
These reviews and comments about Kim's site read something like this "It is great because it is great" or "it is what it is because it is what it is." Neither of these really justify themselves but this really is the simplified summation of what they are doing.
I am hoping this people will see this as negative advertising and stop doing it. If I ran a site I would rather people not say much about it than say negative things about it. Perhaps they feel negative advertising is better than no advertising, at least people have heard of them. It is hard to say, but I do hope they let it go and try to get attention the honest way.
|
03-10-09 06:15pm
|
