| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Review
Welcome to PU HonestJoe. Good review there and I hope to see more coming in the future.
|
08-18-09 03:55pm
|
Comment
652
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
|
07-17-08 12:22am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
653
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the positive feedback. I wish more webmasters would take our reviews to heart (at least the non newbie reviews anyway) but I doubt that will happen here. My instincts tell me that this is now just a place holder site and that most of the marketing and money at NS is going into their parody productions. While it's disappointing from a consumer's perspective it perversely makes good business sense ... if you can't or don't want to compete with what's out there today just keep doing what you're doing until it doesn't pay any more.
|
07-17-13 11:39am
|
Review
654
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Access to 26 site network (no access to their parody porn site which they are best known for today)
+ Thousands of scenes available
+ Mostly exclusive content (some DDF and lesser known site scenes tossed in)
+ Decent price of $15 month through TBP
+ Almost no download failures
+ Network updates about 4 to 5x a week but only on a few sites
+ Lots of good looking, mostly American girls
+ Mostly good lighting and professional shooting
+ Videos have screen caps, all scenes have zip download option
+ Bills thru Epoch, no cross sales on signup and easy cancellation |
| Cons: |
- Lots of recycling of content between various sites and some recycling of older content. A lot of content can be found as updates on 2 - 3 different sites in the network.
- All but a couple of sites are dead or infrequently updated
- No real ability to search, no model directory, updates are rarely dated
- No HD vids, all are 640 x 480
- Download speeds vary from 800 KB/sec to about 50 KB/sec depending on time of day but was mostly around 100 to 200 KB/sec
- No stream options in screen but you can watch a stream via a media player but it's almost impossible to jump ahead or back except at lowest band width.
- Pics only come in at 1020 x 680 but there are zips
- Too much use of fish eye lenses, especially on pov shoots (vertigo here we come).
- Very repetitive in terms of scene layout
- Network feels lost, not really a pic or video network, just a compilation of stuff that hasn't changed in years. |
| Bottom Line: |
There was PU poll question this week asking about the first porn site you ever joined. While this wasn't the first for me, it was certainly a staple for me back in the late 90's and early 00's when 800x600 pics and postage stamp sized vids were standard issue. Unfortunately time has passed this site by and this is probably my last visit here. For uninitiated, this network is 90% hardcore with a few lez and solo shoots tossed in. Here's the overall skinny:
PICS: I primarily joined this time since I'm more of a pic guy. Although the pics going to back 2007 are 1020 by 680 I still get good resolution on my 24" monitor with them. The oldest content is 600x800 and is functionally useless. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics. The bad news is that they seem to be cutting back to only a few dozen so-so quality pics per scene in the last year. There is a fair amount of fish eye lens use on some sites which hurts after a while.
VIDS: Let's face facts, this is not a video site. Your only option is 640x480 .wmv downloads (or the same for ipad/psp). The psuedo stream function is marginal at best. Some of the vids even look sort of bad this level of resolution but everything going back to 2008 looks decent. Downloading is a chore given the slow speeds present for most of the day (it's currently taking me over an hour to DL two 450mb vids).
NAV: Navigation on the network was apparently developed during the internet stone age. Each site comes up in a new window. No search engine period. You can only look up models for each individual site. I frequently found myself digging through my download file to see if I had nabbed the same scene off of a different site on the network because of the recycling of content within the network. A number of sites stopped listing dates on updates to make it seem like they're not dead.
OVERALL: The only sites that continue to update regularly are Freshoutofhighschool, Newsensations, UnlimitedMILFs and Jizzbomb. The main emphasis on them (except the milf site) is younger porn stars. There is a fair amount of uniform and other outfit shoots which I like as a nice change of pace from the usual porn offerings today. The action is usually pretty good, the girls are pretty good looking and there is a lot of content provided you are willing to deal with what is now average at best quality. That's why I gave the network a score of 77.
However, this network just seems to be treading water until the owners can no longer make money offering what they have been doing for so long. I see no reason why a network that's been around for so long can't make the leap into the 21st century by offering HD vids (some of the nonexclusive DDF material can be had in HD on the DDF sites) and bigger pics (a few sets do offer 1500x1080 sizes here, apparently someone forgot to "dumb them down"). Like I noted above, this network just seems lost given the lack of high quality vids and the new found emphasis on limiting the number of pics per set. The lack of navigation and search adds to the sense that this place is just going through the motions in hopes of grinding out a buck or two. For those PU readers who hold on to a sense of nostalgia about the "good old days of porn", I offer up this network as an example that the good old days weren't always so good in comparison to what's out there today. |
|
07-16-13 02:29pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
655
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
|
04-16-08 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
656
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I hear ya. My only reason for bringing up the issue of posting a review or comment was the fact that TBP has no review of this site and Denner's comment (the only one posted) doesn't mention the price gouging. I thought others might want to be forewarned more clearly is all.
|
08-14-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
657
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler, I'd say go ahead and post a review on this one even though it's been a while since you were a member. I found this site looking at an outside review site and was tempted until I checked here. Several sites have given this one a high rating. For me, it means more when I see a review as opposed to just a comment. After relying on good ol' PU I think I'll pass on this one for now.
|
08-14-08 11:58am
|
Reply
658
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Denner has talked about is issue a few times in the forum (there's a new thread by him today on the topic). Basically, contact NS and see if they'll change their pricing or give you a partial refund or something.
|
03-14-09 01:53pm
|
Review
659
|
NS All Access
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hundreds of attractive porn star models in about 2800 sets (pics and vids each)
- Exclusive content
- Good TBP discount price of $15 month
- Access to 14 sites and some bonus material
- No DRM
- Newer vids come in at a decent size (640 x 480) with a stream rate over 1 mps |
| Cons: |
- Small pics (600 x 800 and oldest sets getting even smaller) with limited positions and most having less than 80 pics per set
- Older vids come in at 320 x 240 with a stream rate around 500 - 600 bps
- Navigation needs work
- Site gets repetitive
- Some sites have stopped updating |
| Bottom Line: |
I used to join this site about once a year and returned a few months ago after about 16 month abscence. What I found was that in terms of quality the network lags behind the pack.
The newer vids (over a 1000 of them) come in at the larger size but only in wmv and real formats but then the quality drops. The older vids are way too small and only come in scenes, not full movies.
For hardcore lovers, Newsensations, MrBiggz, POVfantasy and Jizzbomb are by far the best sites of the bunch. There is some set overlap between the sites but not much. The bonus material didn't really add anything to the network.
I like pictures and the photos only come in at 800 x 600 which is a shame given todays standards. The poses get repetitive and the hardcore content is limited to only a few different positions which tend to be the same from set to set. At 60 - 80 photos per set (the old stuff has even less) there just isn't enough.
The navigation needs work given that it doesn't list all the models in all the sites and after the posts move off the recent updates pagethere is no indication of when a set was posted -- if you've been a member before this is a real pain given the hundreds of models.
If you've never joined then the TBP discount probably makes it worth your while given the volume of material available. For me, I think I'm probably done coming back unless they seriously upgrade their quality. |
|
06-05-08 05:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
660
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ 750 hardcore scenes of attractive nubile aged porn featuring a good mix of Euro and American girls (what's not to like). Also a good mix of pornstars and relative unknowns. Mostly b/g content with some lesbian and 3 some. Limited anal / fetish content.
+ All scenes have pics with zips and at least 720 HD video (Half the scenes have 1080 sized vids).
+ Almost all exclusive content.
+ Numerous download options for vids and numerous playback options for streaming. The site also remembers your stream preferences.
+ Good D/L speeds for me; about 1.5 - 2 mb/sec.
+ Some interesting niche sites like Petiteballerinas and several milf + younger girl on boy sites.
+ Bills through CCBill.
+ Mostly professional production level porn with good lighting. |
| Cons: |
- Streaming playback was choppy for me at HD levels, had to resort 640x340 size for smooth playback.
- Only updates about once every 3 days.
- Limited model info.
- Tags and categories are bit too limited for a site this sized.
- There was a stretch of a few years where most of the models and scenes were basically teeenmegaworld / 3xgirls content (not exactly duplicates but the same models and style of shooting).
- Could use more dual camera work and some of the scenes do lack a bit of passion (just going through the motions). Limited story lines / plot if any.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup page and you can't chose your own password and username.
- Model names for the Euro girls, especially on older updates, is sketchy. File naming on downloads is also poor (no names, just numbers or scene names). |
| Bottom Line: |
In a nutshell, this is the hardcore version of nubiles.net. Pretty much all the content on nubiles will be found here minus the softcore / solo stuff. Thus, what you get is banging hot young bods in banging action. Exoticsforme did a good review recently so I'm not adding a lot here other than to mostly echo what he said. Here's the skinny:
PICS: All scenes have zip downloads available. About half the scenes have 2400x1600 sized pics while the newest half (late 2013 onward) go up 5760x3480. As with most sites, there is usually less going on in the pics here than with the vids. As usual, most pics are just HD video screen grabs but overall they look pretty good with limited pixelation. Most scenes also have screenshots to view. In browser viewing is at the 2400x1600 level.
VIDS: Starting in late 2013, you get 6 download options (1080 down to 480). The other half (2013 and earlier) at least have 720 vids. Good production qualities overall with good download speeds. In-browser playback a bit choppy at HD levels for me. Limited dialogue and plot lines in the vids. Most vids 20-30 minutes long. The 1080 sized vid files can get overly large (3-4 gigs).
NAV: In a word, "meh". The easiest way to download (short of DL manager) is to just go through all 50 pages of the nubiles-porn site. All updates are listed on there. As a short cut, note the scene number you left off at and hand type it in when you next log in to continue. The tags and categories are too general to be of much use. There is "public tags" section here which is new to me but is worthless are it's mostly douche bags saying "hot girl needs anal". The model directory seems complete but has almost zero info on the girls.
OVERALL: Despite my usual gripes about sites this ain't bad. I pretty much go what I expected at a decent level of quality without too much hassle.
Do note the following: Most of the updates come in two sites: PetiteHD and Nubiles-porn. The other sites update just once a month. DriverXXX no longer updates and was stupid anyway with poor quality (the driver / male has his face digitized out in the vids but not the photos, give me a break).
A lot of the Euro girls are shot by the same guys who bring you Teenmegaworld / 3xGirls so if you don't like their stuff be warned. I did come across a couple of scenes though that already occupy my hard drive.
Most of the scenes are farmed out so quality can sometimes be a bit iffy (Teacherfucksteens has really poor sound quality).
Most of the scenes are shot using a single camera and single mic which is usually static and can be a bit dull after a while. There is some POV style shooting in the scenes for those interested in that.
If you're wondering if you should join here or nubiles.net, it doesn't matter. You have access to all the sites through here and price is the same. If you got time, browse the nonhardcore babes too as there's a ton of them (multiple daily updates).
Overall, this is a good quality hardcore teen oriented site. The action can be a bit repetitive or uninspiring but no real complaints. Gotta like that in my book. |
|
07-06-16 07:35pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
661
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
aesop7's Review
I've been thinking about joining this site and was wondering how much hardcore content there is? Appreciated if you could let me know. Thanks for the review.
|
06-03-08 04:00pm
|
Review
662
|
Only 3X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Daily updates back to July '06
+ No DRM
+ Good sized pics (most 1600x1065 or larger) and all have zips
+ Many HD vids (1280 wmv) and rest come in up to 512 or 640 wmv
+ Some exclusive content and a good content mix (about 2/3 HC and the rest is lez and solo)
+ Decent $15 month discount through TBP |
| Cons: |
- Navigation and technical issues caused unnecessary pain and suffering
- Lots of nonexclusive photo sets and partial sets
- Quality can vary from OK to very good
- Not DL manager friendly
- Issues with having to keep logging in
- Incomplete model directory
- Large-ish opaque watermark in lower right cornor on all pics and some vids |
| Bottom Line: |
The bottom line here is that this site initially comes across as being in the same general family as 1byday or Pixandvideo but it's really more the red headed step child as it ain't getting, or giving, enough love and is stuck with the second tier material.
When you log in you can view the material by model directory, some general categories or the monthly calendar layout. The model directory is incomplete so it's easiest to view by the calendar. You don't know if a certain day is a pic or vid unless you hold your browser pointer over it (files ending in F = photo, V = vid and A = both although there are very few pics to see in these). There were also a few other technical glitches I came across but nothing too bad.
Click on a day and new window pops up (must turn off pop-up blocker). Then you select the vid size or photo. Sometimes you get another window, sometimes not. This makes it ill sutied to DL managers. Don't open any other windows or make browser changes because you'll be logged out. Don't leave the site unattended for more than 10 minutes or you get logged out. After a few hours you'll get logged out. Each time you have to circle back to where you left off.
Photos. Most of the photos are nonexclusive except for the photos that have matching vid sets (most sets don't have pics and vids, just one or the other). The nonexclusive stuff ranges from the older and more obscure stuff not many have seen to the stuff on every megasite. Some of the nonexclusive stuff gets pixeled at the 1600 level. The exclusive sets can be incomplete in comparison to the vids and are smaller (most come in at around 60 to 80 pics). There are some HD pic sets (3500x2300) but you'll be pressed to find more than 20 per set and they download seperately and copy the the regular resolution pics of the set so it's more of a novelty than an attraction.
Videos. The vids are pretty good except for the first few months were quality is average. Pretty much all the vids come in up to 512 or 640 wmv and the download speeds are OK. The quality on the vids is generally better than the pics and there are more vids than photo sets on this site. There are more HD vids with the newer material (2008).
The updates (daily) vary. Some months you get a bunch of pics, others a bunch of vids. When the photo and vid sets match, the "mate" set can be weeks or months apart.
The actors are all euro models except for some of the nonexclusive stuff. Most of the women are attractive but not many total hotties like the more premium sites. It claims to be brutally HC but there's really nothing too brutal about it but there is some anal and dp action.
Overall, the site isn't bad considering the price and the amount of content. If you can get over the technical issues it's not bad but the quality does vary, especially on pics. I wanted to give a higher score when I first joined but for now an 83 seems appropriate in my book. |
|
11-19-08 04:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
663
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
|
11-11-08 03:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
664
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Sounds like these people stole an idea from the amusement park people on the whole fast tracking thing. Haven't heard of this on a porn site before. On one hand, it seems like an interesting little perk. On the other, you know the update is coming anyway so why pay for "earlier" access other than the free fast tracks you get. I guess it sounds more like an innocent gimmick to me than a porn paradigm shifter.
|
08-03-09 10:42am
|
Reply
665
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
Hey Xbigvmanx. Just wanted to say welcome to PU. As a heads up, people (including myself, not trying to hide behind this one) are going to want to see more content in your reviews. What you have now is pretty thin. Once you qualify for the weekly drawing you'll also find out that more in depth reviews will earn you more raffle tickets. Hope to see more from ya.
|
10-30-08 08:29pm
|
Reply
666
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveF's Review
Good review on this site (a welcomed and significant improvement over the first few reviews you did). The only thing I would add is to include maximum picture sizes and vid sizes since these facts aren't always clear from the site info posted on TBP. Otherwise, keep the reviews coming. It's good to see someone new get involved here.
|
07-08-09 11:43am
|
Reply
667
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Thanks for the additional info. This site posts frequently on a tgp site I visit a lot so just looking to clarify a few things I didn't find in the reviews. Thanks.
|
05-02-08 11:53am
|
Reply
668
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Thanks for the good review here. I've thought about joining and was wondering about 2 things: 1. Is there any hardcore at all; and 2. Is their any toy play. Neither one is a deal killer for me but I'm just wondering.
|
05-02-08 12:07am
|
Reply
669
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Thanks for the review on this one. I was a member a few years ago and, being a picture person, was somewhat disappointed in the smallish picture sizes. From some of the free thumbnails I've seen it looks like the pics have gotten bigger so I was wondering what pixel size their stuff is coming in at now a days.
|
01-22-09 01:51pm
|
Reply
670
|
Oye Loca
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this one. I hate the misleading tours and previews on sites and encourage everyone to post them in their reviews or comments.
|
05-29-08 12:17pm
|
Reply
671
|
Pantyhose Addict
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Thanks for the update on this site. I've noticed it before but the reviews on it weren't very well done and they are over a year old now.
|
09-24-08 06:15pm
|
Reply
672
|
Pantyhose Line
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Comment
In response to your question about how to join scenes together, that came up in the forum some time ago. I don't know if it will help you but here's the link: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=194.
While they have some decent content my main beef with the site was that the content only had limited angles. By that I mean, for example, in the hardcore stuff you might only get a couple of positions in a scene. That sort of left me wanting.
It is a good site for those who like women and hosery but it needs help in my opinion before I'd rejoin.
|
02-24-09 10:05pm
|
Comment
673
|
Pantyhose Line
(0)
|
|
05-02-08 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
674
|
Pantyola
(0)
|
|
05-27-08 06:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
675
|
Parental Secrets
(0)
|
|
08-07-08 08:44pm
Replies (0)
|
